Citations

Objective Vacuoles E1 enzyme X‐linked autoinflammatory somatic syndrome (VEXAS) is a recently identified rare genetic disorder associated with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. VEXAS presents with a combination of inflammatory and hematologic manifestations, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Methods Given the variability in disease presentation and the limited number of studies to date, no clinical documents currently exist to provide guidance to health care providers about the management of VEXAS. To address this gap, we formed an international multidisciplinary panel of VEXAS experts. Results Through formalized meetings and a voting process, the group developed consensus clinical guidance considerations for the management of VEXAS. These considerations offer practical advice on several key topics: (1) clinical features of VEXAS, (2) UBA1 screening methods, (3) the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) in patients with VEXAS, and (4) prognosis and management. The aim is to provide expert guidance on which patients to test, how to test for VEXAS, how to approach MDS in the context of VEXAS, and considerations for management. Conclusion This work marks the first formal international consensus guidance for VEXAS and is intended to be used as a resource for clinicians seeking to understand the disease and its management.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord involvement is infrequently reported in primary central nervous system vasculitis (PCNSV). This study describes the clinical findings, therapeutic responses, and outcomes of spinal cord involvement in a large cohort of patients with PCNSV. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 216 consecutive patients with PCNSV evaluated at the Mayo Clinic from 1983 to 2023. Spinal cord involvement was documented by histological examination or imaging. The clinical, laboratory, radiological, and pathological findings, along with management and outcomes, were compared between patients with and without spinal cord involvement. RESULTS: Of 216 patients, 10 (4.6%) had spinal cord involvement, with cerebral involvement in 9 cases. One patient (0.5%) had isolated spinal cord vasculitis. Histological evidence of vasculitis was found in all 10, with necrotizing vasculitis in 5 (50%). Magnetic resonance imaging showed thoracic abnormalities in 8 patients, cervical spine involvement in 2, conus medullaris involvement in 3, and cauda equina enhancement in 4. Compared with the 206 patients without spinal cord involvement, those with spinal cord vasculitis were more likely to present with paraparesis/tetraparesis ( P <0.001) and necrotizing vasculitis ( P =0.01) and less likely with hemiparesis ( P =0.006) and granulomatous vasculitis ( P =0.03). Patients with spinal cord involvement were more likely to have at least 1 relapse ( P <0.001) or more ( P <0.001). No differences between the 2 groups were observed regarding long-term remission, therapy response, and high disability scores (modified Rankin Scale score, 4–6) or death at last follow-up. Spinal cord involvement was associated with meningeal enhancement on brain imaging (odds ratio, 10.50) and the presence of lymphoma (odds ratio, 6.49), specifically Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed simultaneously with PCNSV. Spinal involvement was negatively associated with increasing age (odds ratio, 0.64) and cerebral infarction on imaging (odds ratio, 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord involvement defines a distinct subset of patients with PCNSV.

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a relapsing large vessel vasculitis with risk of serious ischemic manifestations, including vision loss and vascular damage in the form of large artery stenosis, aneurysms, and dissections. Approximately 50% of patients treated with glucocorticoid (GC) monotherapy and 30% of patients receiving adjunctive therapy with tocilizumab experience disease relapses, often during the first 2 years after diagnosis. Although most relapses in GCA do not involve life‐ or organ‐threatening presentations and can be controlled successfully, frequent relapses may lead to increased prescription of GC and consequent treatment‐related morbidity, in addition to risk of further vascular damage. Emerging data suggest that persistent disease activity may lead to increased vascular morbidity. Additionally, although tocilizumab decreases the frequency of relapses, more than 50% of patients relapse after discontinuation of therapy. Therefore, although interleukin‐6 blockade suppresses disease activity, it does not restore tolerance. In this article, we discuss the practical diagnosis and management of GCA relapses from an expert perspective. Current treatment options for GCA relapses, including those recommended by international guidelines, and novel potential therapies are reviewed.

The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System (PACNS), developed according to ESO standard operating procedures (SOP) and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, was elaborated to assist clinicians in the diagnostic and treatment pathway of patients with PACNS in their decision making. A working group involving vascular neurologists, neuroradiologists, rheumatologists, a neuropathologist and a methodologist identified 17 relevant clinical questions; these were addressed according to the patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) framework and systematic literature reviews were performed. Notably, each PICO was addressed with respect to large vessel (LV)-PACNS and small vessel (SV)-PACNS. Data to answer many questions were scarce or lacking and the quality of evidence was very low overall, so, for some PICOs, the recommendations reflect the ongoing uncertainty. When the absence of sufficient evidence precluded recommendations, Expert Consensus Statements were formulated. In some cases, this applied to interventions in the diagnosis and treatment of PACNS which are embedded widely in clinical practice, for example patterns of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) abnormalities. CSF analysis for hyperproteinorrachia and pleocytosis does not have evidence supporting their use as diagnostic tools. The working group recommended that caution is employed in the interpretation of non-invasive vascular imaging due to lack of validation and the different sensitivities in comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and histopathological analyses. Moreover, there is not a neuroimaging pattern specific for PACNS and neurovascular issues are largely underreported in PACNS patients. The group’s recommendations on induction and maintenance of treatment and for primary or secondary prevention of vascular events also reflect uncertainty due to lack of evidence. Being uncertain the role and practical usefulness of current diagnostic criteria and being not comparable the main treatment strategies, it is suggested to have a multidisciplinary team approach in an expert center during both work up and management of patients with suspected PACNS. Highlighting the limitations of the currently accepted diagnostic criteria, we hope to facilitate the design of multicenter, prospective clinical studies and trials. A standardization of neuroimaging techniques and reporting to improve the level of evidence underpinning interventions employed in the diagnosis and management of PACNS. We anticipate that this guideline, the first comprehensive European guideline on PACNS management using GRADE methodology, will assist clinicians to choose the most effective management strategy for PACNS.

ObjectiveThis study was undertaken to explore the gene expression profile of primary central nervous system vasculitis (PCNSV).MethodsBrain specimens of 4 patients with granulomatous vasculitis (GV), 5 with lymphocytic vasculitis (LV), 4 with amyloid β‐related angiitis (ABRA), and 4 normal controls were studied. RNA‐sequencing was performed using the Illumina Hiseq‐4,000 platform and the Illumina TruSeq Total‐RNA library. Student t test and false discovery rate tests were performed for each of the differentially expressed transcripts. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used for the pathway expression analysis. CIBERSORT was used to estimate the abundances of different immune cell subsets in the tissues based on gene expression data.ResultsTranscripts differentially expressed between PCNSV and normal brain indicated that endosomal, mitochondrial, and ribosome dysfunction, alterations in protein synthesis, and noncoding RNAs might be involved in PCNSV. Pathway analysis revealed the activation of dendritic cell maturation and antigen processing as well as neuroinflammation in PCNSV versus normal brain, whereas oxidative phosphorylation was inhibited. CIBERSORT estimation of immune cell subsets suggested that activated NK cells, M1 macrophages, memory B cells, and follicular helper T cells were likely to be more prevalent in PCNSV samples. Naïve CD4 T cells and monocytes were mainly estimated to be present in GV and ABRA. Plasma cell and γδ T‐cell signatures were mainly found in LV and normal brain. GV showed higher levels of genes associated with macrophage activities and T cells. ABRA showed higher levels of long noncoding RNAs and miR‐616. LV showed higher levels of genes encoding immunoglobulins.InterpretationRNA sequencing confirmed PCNSV heterogeneity. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:120–130