Citations

Background : Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Optimal treatment decisions are challenging, and existing treatment allocation frameworks may not fully reflect the evolving therapeutic landscape or contemporary clinical practices in North America. Methods : Using a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 20 North American experts in hepatology, medical oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology developed a consensus-based treatment framework for HCC, termed the BEACON-HCC system. The framework was informed by current evidence and expert opinion through iterative discussion and voting. In a pilot study using 29 real-world patient cases, we assessed concordance between external expert recommendations and BEACON-HCC recommendations and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 2025 treatment recommendations. Results : The BEACON-HCC treatment allocation framework diverges from prior frameworks by incorporating nuanced clinical features such as degree of intrahepatic tumor burden and vascular invasion, and adverse tumor prognostic markers, to align treatment allocation with tumor biology and therapeutic potential. Key innovations include the incorporation of emerging modalities such as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and systemic-locoregional combination therapies. In the pilot exercise, expert treatment decisions showed 96.6% concordance with BEACON-HCC recommendations and 72.4% concordance with BCLC recommendations. Conclusions : BEACON-HCC is a consensus-based framework for treatment allocation that incorporates the expanding range of therapeutic options available to patients in the North American HCC population. Expert treatment decisions showed a high concordance with the BEACON-HCC system; further validation using empiric clinical data is planned through the HCC-Live Consortium.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is highly aggressive with poor prognosis, especially in recurrent cases where treatments are limited. Intra-arterial (IA) Yttrium-90 (Y90) microsphere therapy, FDA-approved for hepatocellular carcinoma, offers the potential for targeted radiotherapy in recurrent GBM (rGBM). The FRONTIER trial evaluated the safety and feasibility of IA Y90-glass microsphere treatment for rGBM under an FDA Investigational Device Exemption. Materials and METHODS This prospective, single-arm, multi-center study included patients with rGBM in non-dominant, non-eloquent regions. The primary endpoint was 30-day incidence of treatment-related limiting toxicities (primarily ≥grade 3 non-hematologic, with exclusions). Secondary endpoints included adverse event (AE) rate, neurological changes, technical success (PET absorbed dose within ±20% of target), and efficacy. Treatment regions, defined via cerebral angiography-MRI fusion to cover the recurrent lesion, were targeted with 40±4Gy. Post-treatment evaluations included MRI, Y90-PET, and neurological assessments. RESULTS The procedure was well-tolerated by all twelve subjects and discharge occurred the following day with no decline in neurologic status. No limiting toxicities or device-related AEs were reported. Five patients experienced 8 procedure-related AEs (6 Grade 1, 2 Grade 3). Technical success was 100%, with post-treatment Y90-PET derived median absorbed dose of 41.5 Gy to the treatment region (median volume 80.3 cc). The median tumor absorbed dose was considerably higher at 124.2 Gy (median tumor volume 5.8 cc), indicating preferential tumor perfusion. At 2 months, 67% had stable disease, and 33% showed reduced T1-contrast enhancing volume within the treated area. Median progression-free survival was 3.1 (95% CI 0.92-NE) and overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.0-NE) from Y90 treatment. Exploratory analysis revealed a significant OS benefit for patients receiving a tumor absorbed dose above the median (11.9 vs 5.7 months, p=0.0073). CONCLUSION Results from this initial cohort suggest IA Y90-microsphere therapy is technically feasible and well-tolerated in rGBM. Further investigation is warranted.

Objective: Review the current literature for available treatments for acute cholecystitis (AC) in nonsurgical candidates and provide guidelines for the management of these patients. Background: Cholecystectomy is the gold-standard treatment modality for AC. A considerable number of patients who are not eligible for surgery are managed by percutaneous and endoscopic techniques. There is recent data regarding endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage and emerging percutaneous approaches to address cholelithiasis and remove drains. Methods: An expert panel of surgeons, gastroenterologists, and interventional radiologists reviewed the current literature and provided recommendations for AC management in nonsurgical candidates. Recommendations were based on relevant evidence, with quality and strength assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Percutaneous cholecystostomy is advised for patients ineligible for lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) or with reversible conditions, aiming to bridge to cholecystectomy. The optimal timing of cholecystectomy after percutaneous cholecystostomy remains unclear. In cases where surgery is not feasible, potential definitive treatments such as percutaneous cholecystolithotripsy/lithectomy and cholecystoduodenal stenting should be considered. For calculous AC, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with LAMS is recommended as a therapy for never-surgical candidates if they are eligible for monitored anesthesia care or general anesthesia and there is institutional expertise and minimal intervening ascites. Conclusions: The management of AC in nonsurgical candidates remains a challenge, with institutional protocols varying based on physician preferences and expertise. The proposed protocol integrates percutaneous and endoscopic approaches and emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary collaboration. Further research is required to evaluate these evolving management techniques, as the current literature is limited.

Abstract BACKGROUND Yttrium-90 (Y90) microsphere treatment is an FDA-approved endovascular radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma; however, extra-hepatic experience is limited. The FRONTIER trial (NCT05303467) is a first-in-human study conducted under an IDE from the FDA evaluating the safety and feasibility of intra-arterial Y90 endovascular radiotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). METHODS The primary endpoint is the incidence of treatment-related limiting toxicities through 30 days, in 12 patients with rGBM. Eight subjects (50% male) with non-dominant hemisphere rGBM have been enrolled to date, with 6 patients reported herein. The treatment region, encompassing the recurrent lesion, excluding eloquent regions, and defined using cerebral angiography-MRI fusion, was selectively targeted with 40±4Gy. Immediate post-treatment imaging included MRI to evaluate acute treatment-related effects and Y90-PET to evaluate the absorbed dose distribution. Neurological assessments were performed pre- and post-treatment. Analysis of post-contrast T1w enhancing tissue volume (T1wvol) inside and outside the treated region was performed longitudinally. RESULTS All patients tolerated the procedure well and were discharged the following day. No decrease in neurological function and no limiting toxicities were reported through 30 days. Post-treatment MRI revealed no device-related acute ischemia or hemorrhage. Mean absorbed dose to the treatment region was 42.1±2.4Gy, within 3% of the targeted value, suggesting technical feasibility. Mean tumor absorbed dose within the treatment region was 65.1±22.6Gy most likely due to increased tumor perfusion in the treatment region. A reduction in T1wvol at 2m was observed in 4/6 patients, with the remaining 2 patients showing increased T1wvol. Disease progression by T1wvol occurred more rapidly outside the treatment region than within. All patients received subsequent therapy, with 2 patients receiving surgery 82 and 120 days post Y90 treatment. CONCLUSION Interim results in this first-in-human feasibility study demonstrated technical feasibility and no limiting toxicities through 30 days. Enrollment is ongoing. These data warrant additional investigation.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor that virtually always recurs with no established standard therapy at recurrence. Median survival after recurrence is 7-12 months. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Yttrium-90 (Y90) glass microspheres (TheraSphere™, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) is an FDA approved standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, and represents a novel strategy to treat regionally localized brain tumors. We are conducting a first-in-human clinical trial (under IDE) using Y90 microspheres modified to treat tumors in the brain. The goal of selectively delivering Y90 intra-arterially is to achieve higher tumoral absorbed doses while limiting non-target exposure. DESIGN: The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of Y90 microspheres treatment. Target enrollment is 12 patients at 5 participating medical centers. Key inclusion criteria include: 1st or 2nd recurrence of GBM , size 1-5cm, located in the non-dominant hemisphere in a non-eloquent region, accessible neurovascular anatomy for single intra-arterial treatment based on a diagnostic cerebral angiogram. After consent, patients will undergo screening angiography and imaging that be reviewed by the trial steering committee to determine treatment suitability. Treatment consists of Y90 microspheres administered intra-arterially to deliver 40Gy ± 10% to the treatment volume. Post-administration Y90 PET and MRI images allow assessment of dose distribution and acute safety. Following overnight admission, patients will be followed as outpatients weekly x 4, and then monthly up to month 6. Primary endpoints include treatment-related limiting toxicities, dose limiting toxicity defined as non-hematological toxicities ≥ grade 3, CNS toxicity ≥ grade 3 (eg. symptomatic ischemia or edema) related to non-target embolization, occurring through 30 days post procedure. Secondary endpoints include: treatment-related serious adverse events, change in post-treatment neurological function, technical success, objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, number: NCT05303467.

Abstract The burden of HCC is substantial. To address gaps in HCC care, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Practice Metrics Committee (PMC) aimed to develop a standard set of process‐based measures and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) along the HCC care continuum. We identified candidate process and outcomes measures for HCC care based on structured literature review. A 13‐member panel with content expertise across the HCC care continuum evaluated candidate measures on importance and performance gap using a modified Delphi approach (two rounds of rating) to define the final set of measures. Candidate PROs based on a structured scoping review were ranked by 74 patients with HCC across 7 diverse institutions. Out of 135 measures, 29 measures made the final set. These covered surveillance (6 measures), diagnosis (6 measures), staging (2 measures), treatment (10 measures), and outcomes (5 measures). Examples included the use of ultrasound (± alpha‐fetoprotein [AFP]) every 6 months, need for surveillance in high‐risk populations, diagnostic testing for patients with a new AFP elevation, multidisciplinary liver tumor board (MLTB) review of Liver Imaging‐Reporting and Data System 4 lesions, standard evaluation at diagnosis, treatment recommendations based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging, MLTB discussion of treatment options, appropriate referral for evaluation of liver transplantation candidacy, and role of palliative therapy. PROs include those related to pain, anxiety, fear of treatment, and uncertainty about the best individual treatment and the future. The AASLD PMC has developed a set of explicit quality measures in HCC care to help bridge the gap between guideline recommendations and measurable processes and outcomes. Measurement and subsequent implementation of these metrics could be a central step in the improvement of patient care and outcomes in this high‐risk population.

Background: Patients with cholangiocarcinoma often have indwelling biliary stents or catheters which are prone to obstructions and/or infections; studies show that 20–40% present with fever and/or jaundice requiring urgent treatment in the outpatient setting for which there are no uniform guidelines. The goal was to develop an expert panel consensus on this topic using the modified RAND/UCLA Delphi process to rate treatment appropriateness. Methods: Thirteen expert physicians from relevant specialties, geography, and practice settings were recruited for the panel. Patient scenarios were developed and panelists rated the therapies before and after a face-to-face discussion. The appropriateness of various therapies was rated on a scale from 1–9 and classified as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain. Scenarios with greater than 2 (>2) ratings of 1–3 (inappropriate) and greater than 2 (>2) ratings of 7–9 (appropriate) were considered to have disagreement and were not assigned an appropriateness rating. Results: Panelists were from all US regions and the UK (8%) and had practiced for a mean 16.5 years (4–33 years). Panelists rated 480 scenarios before the meeting and re-rated 288 of the clinical scenarios after the meeting. The panelists agreed that ongoing treatment with chemotherapy did not influence decision-making and, therefore, 192 scenarios were excluded from the final list. Disagreement decreased from 37.5% before to 10.4% after the meeting. Consensus on stent/tube manipulation and inpatient antibiotic therapy was obtained and summarized in patients as “appropriate” or “maybe appropriate” based on a patient’s bilirubin level at presentation. Conclusions: The Delphi process produced consensus guidelines to fill an unmet need in the urgent management of ascending cholangitis in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

AbstractThis article is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The guidelines panel consisted of medical oncologists, pathologists, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The panel reviewed a series of questions regarding the medical management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as questions regarding surveillance after resection. The available literature was reviewed for each of the question and panel members voted on controversial topics, and the recommendations were included in a document circulated to all panel members for a final approval.

Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has emerged as a major cause of cancer deaths globally. The landscape of systemic therapy has recently changed, with six additional systemic agents either approved or awaiting approval for advanced stage HCC. While these agents have the potential to improve outcomes, a survival increase of 2–5 months remains poor and falls short of what has been achieved in many other solid tumor types. The roles of genomics, underlying cirrhosis, and optimal use of treatment strategies that include radiation, liver transplantation, and surgery remain unanswered. Here, we discuss new treatment opportunities, controversies, and future directions in managing HCC.