Tate, Matthew C.

Abstract Background: Glioblastoma recurrence is inevitable despite aggressive surgical resection of contrast enhancing (CE) tumor. Unlike the deep molecular characterization of CE glioblastoma, unresected infiltrating tumor, representing minimal residual disease (MRD) has not been well profiled. Increasingly, clinical trials are being conducted in the MRD setting for glioblastoma patients, necessitating understanding of unresected infiltrating tumor for targeted therapeutic development. Methods: Visium HD spatial transcriptomics was used to profile a cohort of newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve glioblastoma patients that underwent supramaximal resection, with both core and infiltrating in situ components. Spatial profiles generated expression signatures of infiltrative and CE tumor. For in silico prediction of therapeutics targeting the MRD, expression signatures of infiltrative and CE tumor were compared with drug perturbation signatures from the NIH L1000 database using the sRGES method to predict reversal of disease expression patterns. IC50 data from human cell lines were aggregated from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer or individual study data while blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetrance was predicted using the CNS-MPO approach. Findings: Infiltrative tumor expression profiles were enriched for genes corresponding to neural and oligodendrocyte progenitor like cells. In contrast CE glioblastoma displayed mesenchymal and astrocytic programs, suggesting spatial concentration of glioblastoma states within MRD and CE tumor. For CE glioblastoma, proteasome inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor agonists were predicted to have the highest antitumor activity. In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) were highly ranked for MRD while exhibiting low predicted efficacy in CE tumor. Synergy analysis of drug candidates provided multiple dual treatment options for both the CE and MRD contexts. Conclusions: Cumulatively, these data indicate that the resected tumor does not reflect the MRD state, providing clarity on why targeted therapeutics for glioblastoma have not been particularly successful. Spatial profiling of the MRD demonstrates vulnerability to unique drug targets, which if utilized in the correct setting could confer greater survival benefit. Citation Format: Harrshavasan Congivaram, Shashwat Tripathi, Mateo Gomez, Katy McCortney, Ching Man Wai, Ruochen Du, Thomas K. Sears, Jianzhong Zhang, Daniel J. Brat, Craig M. Horbinski, Mark W. Youngblood, Jared T. Ahrendsen, Adam M. Sonabend, Stephen T. Magill, Matthew C. Tate, Maciej S. Lesniak, Sean Sachdev, Timothy Sita, Priya Kumthekar, Karan Dixit, Robin Buerki, Ditte Primdahl, Mustafa Khasraw, John de Groot, David A. Reardon, Rimas V. Lukas, Roger Stupp, Amy B. Heimberger. In silico screening of therapeutics candidates targeting minimal residual disease in glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2496.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is highly aggressive with poor prognosis, especially in recurrent cases where treatments are limited. Intra-arterial (IA) Yttrium-90 (Y90) microsphere therapy, FDA-approved for hepatocellular carcinoma, offers the potential for targeted radiotherapy in recurrent GBM (rGBM). The FRONTIER trial evaluated the safety and feasibility of IA Y90-glass microsphere treatment for rGBM under an FDA Investigational Device Exemption. Materials and METHODS This prospective, single-arm, multi-center study included patients with rGBM in non-dominant, non-eloquent regions. The primary endpoint was 30-day incidence of treatment-related limiting toxicities (primarily ≥grade 3 non-hematologic, with exclusions). Secondary endpoints included adverse event (AE) rate, neurological changes, technical success (PET absorbed dose within ±20% of target), and efficacy. Treatment regions, defined via cerebral angiography-MRI fusion to cover the recurrent lesion, were targeted with 40±4Gy. Post-treatment evaluations included MRI, Y90-PET, and neurological assessments. RESULTS The procedure was well-tolerated by all twelve subjects and discharge occurred the following day with no decline in neurologic status. No limiting toxicities or device-related AEs were reported. Five patients experienced 8 procedure-related AEs (6 Grade 1, 2 Grade 3). Technical success was 100%, with post-treatment Y90-PET derived median absorbed dose of 41.5 Gy to the treatment region (median volume 80.3 cc). The median tumor absorbed dose was considerably higher at 124.2 Gy (median tumor volume 5.8 cc), indicating preferential tumor perfusion. At 2 months, 67% had stable disease, and 33% showed reduced T1-contrast enhancing volume within the treated area. Median progression-free survival was 3.1 (95% CI 0.92-NE) and overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.0-NE) from Y90 treatment. Exploratory analysis revealed a significant OS benefit for patients receiving a tumor absorbed dose above the median (11.9 vs 5.7 months, p=0.0073). CONCLUSION Results from this initial cohort suggest IA Y90-microsphere therapy is technically feasible and well-tolerated in rGBM. Further investigation is warranted.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common and debilitating symptom of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The epileptogenic zone, defined as cortex responsible for seizure generation, is located at the peritumoral region for most tumors, and lower-grade intrinsic brain tumors have the highest seizure incidence. Surgery is often the most effective treatment for the reduction in seizures in BTRE. However, surgical decisions have historically often been made exclusively for oncologic reasons, with less emphasis on seizure control. Surgical approaches for all tumor types are reviewed, highlighting relevant risk factors. Adjunctive tools during surgery, such as intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG), may help identify and remove surrounding brain areas which are epileptogenic. Minimally invasive surgery is also gaining traction, given its utility in treating seizures deep-seated tumors. This review explores epileptogenic brain tumors, surgery for BTRE, and emerging strategies to better achieve seizure control.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor that virtually always recurs with no established standard therapy at recurrence. Median survival after recurrence is 7-12 months. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Yttrium-90 (Y90) glass microspheres (TheraSphere™, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) is an FDA approved standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, and represents a novel strategy to treat regionally localized brain tumors. We are conducting a first-in-human clinical trial (under IDE) using Y90 microspheres modified to treat tumors in the brain. The goal of selectively delivering Y90 intra-arterially is to achieve higher tumoral absorbed doses while limiting non-target exposure. DESIGN: The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of Y90 microspheres treatment. Target enrollment is 12 patients at 5 participating medical centers. Key inclusion criteria include: 1st or 2nd recurrence of GBM , size 1-5cm, located in the non-dominant hemisphere in a non-eloquent region, accessible neurovascular anatomy for single intra-arterial treatment based on a diagnostic cerebral angiogram. After consent, patients will undergo screening angiography and imaging that be reviewed by the trial steering committee to determine treatment suitability. Treatment consists of Y90 microspheres administered intra-arterially to deliver 40Gy ± 10% to the treatment volume. Post-administration Y90 PET and MRI images allow assessment of dose distribution and acute safety. Following overnight admission, patients will be followed as outpatients weekly x 4, and then monthly up to month 6. Primary endpoints include treatment-related limiting toxicities, dose limiting toxicity defined as non-hematological toxicities ≥ grade 3, CNS toxicity ≥ grade 3 (eg. symptomatic ischemia or edema) related to non-target embolization, occurring through 30 days post procedure. Secondary endpoints include: treatment-related serious adverse events, change in post-treatment neurological function, technical success, objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, number: NCT05303467.