Citations

Abstract Background & Aims Stricturing Crohn’s disease (CD) is a significant problem, and no selective anti-fibrotic therapies are available. Anti-inflammatory approaches are the mainstay of medical treatment. However, data on the efficacy of ustekinumab (USTE) in ileal stricturing CD are lacking. Our aim was to assess its efficacy in this setting. Methods We performed an international multicenter observational cohort study evaluating adult CD patients who received USTE within 6 months of imaging-confirmed symptomatic stricturing small bowel disease. Outcomes were rates of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD), surgery, intervention (defined as the composite need for EBD or surgery), recurrent obstructive symptoms, and USTE persistence. Results Fifty-seven patients were included (51% female, median age 43 years). Median follow-up was 17 months. Intervention rates were 35%, 45%, and 69% of patients, at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. USTE persistence was 78%, 76%, and 52% at 12, 24, and 48 months. Estimated obstructive symptoms rates were 31% and 49% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. EBD within 6 months prior to starting USTE was associated with an increased risk of intervention. Increased bowel wall thickness on imaging, prior biologic use, and obstructive symptom duration were associated with USTE discontinuation. Occurrence of obstructive symptoms during treatment was associated with prior biologic use, EBD within 6 months of starting USTE, and a lower BMI. Conclusions USTE appears to be an appropriate medical option in biologic-experienced CD patients with ileal strictures. Further prospective data are needed to better define outcomes and predictors of response in this setting.

Abstract Background and Aims The long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD) were evaluated in the U-ENDURE Long-Term Extension (LTE) study. Here we report the results after 2 years of total maintenance treatment. Methods U-ENDURE is an ongoing 240-week LTE study conducted at 243 sites across 43 countries (first patient enrolled in LTE 21 March 2019). Patients who completed the 52-week maintenance study continued their previously assigned treatment, once-daily upadacitinib 15 mg or upadacitinib 30 mg. Efficacy was analyzed at week 48 of the LTE; safety was analyzed in the cumulative study population (combined 52 week maintenance and 48 week LTE) and the LTE study population only (cutoff date: 19 December 2023). Results From LTE week 0 to week 48, as-observed efficacy rates for clinical remission (per stool frequency/abdominal pain score, upadacitinib 15 mg: 78.3% to 82.9%; upadacitinib 30 mg: 84.7% to 76.6%; per CD Activity Index, upadacitinib 15 mg: 81.3% to 83.1%; upadacitinib 30 mg: 86.1% to 86.8%), endoscopic response (upadacitinib 15 mg: 59.6% to 67.1%; upadacitinib 30 mg: 71.2% to 69.6%), inflammatory biomarkers, and quality-of-life outcomes remained stable. The safety profile of the cumulative maintenance population observed through LTE week 48 was consistent with previous trials in the upadacitinib CD program. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates for the cumulative maintenance population were 283.1 and 273.4 events/100 patient-years for upadacitinib 15 mg and upadacitinib 30 mg, respectively. Event rates of serious treatment-­emergent adverse events were 16.0 events/100 patient-years for upadacitinib 15 mg and 14.6 events/100 patient-years for upadacitinib 30 mg. The most common adverse events of special interest (≥ 5.0 events/100 patient-years) were hepatic disorder, lymphopenia, creatine phosphokinase elevation, herpes zoster, and anemia. There was 1 treatment-emergent adverse event of suicide leading to death. Conclusion Sustained clinical, endoscopic, quality-of-life, and biomarker outcomes were observed in patients who were initial responders to upadacitinib and completed 2 years of maintenance therapy, with no new safety signals identified. Clinical trial identifier U-ENDURE; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03345823.

Abstract Introduction Limited data exist on the natural history and treatment persistence in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients on 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in the era of biologic agents and small molecules. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the US Collaborative Network in patients with UC who were initiated on 5-ASA between 2015 and 2019. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year incidence rates of advanced therapy use and colectomy were calculated. Predictors of advanced therapy use and colectomy within 5 years were analyzed and expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Results Among 15 177 patients in the UC 5-ASA cohort (mean age 47.2 ± 19.1 years old, 49.2% female and 70.3% White), the 1-, 3- and 5-year incidence of advanced therapy use was 5.37%, 11.56% and 15.8%, respectively. After PSM, age < 40 years old (aOR 1.93, 95% CI, 1.73-2.15), male sex (aOR 1.13, 1.02-1.25), obesity (aOR 1.18, 95% CI, 1.05-1.31), pancolitis (aOR 1.18, 95% CI, 1.03-1.36), steroid use (aOR 1.79, 95% CI, 1.53-2.09), and CRP ≥ 12 mg/L (aOR 1.39, 95% CI, 1.05-1.83) prior to 5-ASA initiation were associated with advanced therapy use within 5 years. The 1-, 3- and 5-year incidence of colectomy was 0.74%, 1.28%, and 1.64% respectively. After PSM, male sex (aOR 1.36, 95% 1.06-1.74), obesity (aOR 1.32, 95% CI, 1.02-1.69), primary sclerosing cholangitis (aOR 2.37, 95% CI, 1.11-5.06), pancolitis (aOR 1.90, 95% CI, 1.29-2.78), and steroid use (aOR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.35-2.84) were associated with colectomy within 5 years. Conclusion Our study provides updated estimates of advanced therapy utilization and colectomy as well as predictors of disease progression in patients with UC on 5-ASA in the biologic era.

Abstract Background and Aims Over 10% of patients with Crohn’s disease require permanent ileostomy. We aimed to summarize the existing data on diagnosis, definitions of recurrence, and management of Crohn’s disease patients with permanent ileostomy. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to February 6, 2024. Randomized controlled trials, cohort and cross-sectional studies, and case series of more than 5 patients reporting on postoperative recurrence or the need for surgery in patients with Crohn’s disease and permanent ileostomy were included. Search results were independently screened, and full text of all titles meeting eligibility criteria was obtained. Outcomes of interest included diagnostic techniques, recurrence definitions, and management approaches. We estimated pooled rates (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) of recurrence. Results Thirty cohort studies including 2055 Crohn’s patients with permanent ileostomy were included (53% female, median age at the time of ileostomy creation 32 years, the most common reason for ileostomy was refractory disease). The postoperative recurrence rate was 27% (95% CI, 21.3–33.3, 26 studies, 451/1805 patients). Modalities for diagnosis of Crohn’s disease recurrence were symptoms (15 studies), endoscopy (4 studies), histology from endoscopic biopsies (2 studies), imaging (5 studies), and surgery (22 studies). The reported definitions of recurrence for each modality were heterogeneous. Conclusions There is a lack of standardized monitoring tools and criteria for diagnosing recurrence in patients with Crohn’s disease and permanent ileostomy. The results of this systematic review will form the basis of a global expert recommendation exercise focused on developing management standards and trial endpoints for this condition.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and prior biologic failure may have reduced or delayed efficacy with subsequent advanced therapies. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod during the True North (TN) study and its open-label extension (OLE) in biologic-exposed patients with UC. METHODS: TN was a randomized, placebo-controlled 52-week trial (10-week induction, 42-week maintenance period). Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Clinical outcomes were assessed at TN week (W) 10 and W52 and OLE W46 and W94. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated through induction and in the OLE until W94. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: This analysis included 376 biologic-exposed patients. In the placebo-controlled cohort, more ozanimod-treated patients achieved clinical response than placebo at W10 regardless of the number or type of prior biologics; patients who used 1 vs ≥2 prior biologics achieved higher efficacy rates. Efficacy rates were higher at W52 than W10 and were similar across subgroups regardless of the number or type of prior biologics. Significantly greater proportions of ozanimod vs placebo patients achieved symptomatic response by W5 ( P = 0.0173) and symptomatic remission by W10 ( P = 0.0207). Among biologic-exposed TN W10 ozanimod nonresponders who entered the OLE, 61% achieved symptomatic response with an extra 10 weeks of ozanimod treatment. Ozanimod efficacy was durable for ∼3 years of continuous treatment in biologic-exposed W52 clinical responders who entered the OLE. No new safety signals were observed. DISCUSSION: Ozanimod was effective and safe in biologic-exposed patients with UC, but these patients may require more time to respond to treatment. Clinical trial registry website and trial numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.

Abstract Introduction There is limited real-world evidence comparing the effectiveness of ozanimod to vedolizumab as first-line advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional US database in adults with UC who were initiated on ozanimod compared to vedolizumab between January 1, 2021 and 22 June, 2024. The primary outcome was to compare the risk of a composite outcome of corticosteroid use, colectomy, or change to another advanced therapy between the 2 cohorts within 12 months. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for demographics, comorbid conditions, disease extent, laboratory parameters, and previous corticosteroid use. The risk was expressed as an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% CIs. Results We identified 222 patients in the ozanimod cohort (mean age 41.2 ± 15.7, 46.3% male sex, 68% White, and 22.5% ulcerative proctitis), and 4145 patients in the vedolizumab cohort (mean age 47.4 ± 18.3, 45.2% male sex, 69.7% White, and 17.2% ulcerative proctitis). After PSM, there was no significant difference in the risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.63-1.36) and corticosteroid use (aOR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.53-1.18) between the 2 cohorts within 12 months. There was a higher risk of change in therapy in the ozanimod cohort (aOR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.09-3.49) compared to the vedolizumab cohort. Colectomy rates were low in both cohorts (<0.04%). Conclusions Our real-world study showed that ozanimod use is associated with similar corticosteroid use but higher odds of a change in therapy compared to vedolizumab when used as first-line therapy in patients with UC. Further prospective studies are needed to understand long-term outcomes.

Abstract Background Since 2009, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialists have utilized “IBD LIVE,” a weekly live video conference with a global audience, to discuss the multidisciplinary management of their most challenging cases. While most cases presented were confirmed IBD, a substantial number were diseases that mimic IBD. We have categorized all IBD LIVE cases and identified “IBD-mimics” with consequent clinical management implications. Methods Cases have been recorded/archived since May 2018; we reviewed all 371 cases from May 2018–February 2023. IBD-mimics were analyzed/categorized according to their diagnostic and therapeutic workup. Results Confirmed IBD cases made up 82.5% (306/371; 193 Crohn’s disease, 107 ulcerative colitis, and 6 IBD-unclassified). Sixty-five (17.5%) cases were found to be mimics, most commonly medication-induced (n = 8) or vasculitis (n = 7). The evaluations that ultimately resulted in correct diagnosis included additional endoscopic biopsies (n = 13, 21%), surgical exploration/pathology (n = 10, 16.5%), biopsies from outside the GI tract (n = 10, 16.5%), genetic/laboratory testing (n = 8, 13%), extensive review of patient history (n = 8, 13%), imaging (n = 5, 8%), balloon enteroscopy (n = 5, 8%), and capsule endoscopy (n = 2, 3%). Twenty-five patients (25/65, 38%) were treated with biologics for presumed IBD, 5 of whom subsequently experienced adverse events requiring discontinuation of the biologic. Many patients were prescribed steroids, azathioprine, mercaptopurine, or methotrexate, and 3 were trialed on tofacitinib. Conclusions The diverse presentation of IBD and IBD-mimics necessitates periodic consideration of the differential diagnosis, and reassessment of treatment in presumed IBD patients without appropriate clinical response. The substantial differences and often conflicting treatment approaches to IBD versus IBD-mimics directly impact the quality and cost of patient care.