Citations

Clear

400 citation(s) found for "Peña, Alvaro".

Molecular and Structural Basis of Pan-Resistance to BTK Degraders and Inhibitors
Sievers, Quinlan , Lu, Hao , Cool, Allison , Gajewski, Stefan , Kong, Tim , Noviski, Mark , Whelan, Sarah , Wang, Yuhan , Navarrete, Lizbeth Mendoza, Mi, Xiaoli , Mukerji, Ratul , Ye, Jordan , Rios, Mateo Sanchez Garcia de los, Bousquet, Hugo , Tan, Y. , Brathaban, Nivetha , Narasappa, Nell , Lu, Ya‐Wen , Elechko, Jennifer, Phelps, Christopher B., Sekeres, Samantha, Bravo, Eduardo , Alencar, Alvaro J. , Islam, Prioty , Mato, Anthony R. , Noviski, Mark A , Wang, Yuhan , Mendoza Navarrete, Lizbeth , Ficici, Emel , Mukerji, Ratul , Iuliano, James N , Ye, Jordan , Sanchez Garcia De Los Rios, Mateo , Bousquet, Hugo , Tan, May , Brathaban, Nivetha , Narasappa, Nell , Lu, Ya-Wen , Elechko, Jennifer , Maron, Maxim I , Phelps, Christopher B , Rahman, Jahan , Notti, Ryan Q , Sekeres, Samantha , Lamkin, Erica N , Bravo, Eduardo , Alencar, Alvaro J , Ewalt, Mark D , Islam, Prioty , Mato, Anthony , Roeker, Lindsey , Bhatt, Shruti , Taylor, Justin , Thompson, Meghan C , Hansen, Gwenn M , Abdel-Wahab, Omar , Lamkin, Erica , Ewalt, Mark D. , Roeker, Lindsey E. , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Discovery | July 22, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1158/2159-8290.cd-26-0251 | PMID 42484277 Get It

Abstract Early-phase clinical trials of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) degraders have demonstrated efficacy in patients with BTK inhibitor-resistant chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). How clinical resistance to BTK degraders arises is unknown. Here we sequenced serial CLL samples from patients enrolled in the phase I trials of zelebrudomide and bexobrutideg and observed recurrent expansion of preexisting BTK A428D mutations at relapse. Unlike previously studied BTK inhibitor resistance mutations, BTK A428D conferred pan-resistance to BTK inhibitors and degraders. In the absence of BTK-directed therapies, however, cells bearing BTK A428D exhibited a competitive disadvantage. A crystal structure of BTK A428D revealed that the mutant aspartate clashes with the adenine ring of ATP and the adenine-mimetic moiety of BTK inhibitors and degraders. Combining BTK degraders with venetoclax mitigated the expansion of BTK A428D. These results provide the molecular basis for clinical resistance to BTK degraders and will inform the development of next-generation BTK degrader therapies.
A randomized phase II trial of folate receptor alpha peptide vaccine in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.
Knutson, Keith L., Hillman, DW, Cogen, Davitte , Moreno-Aspitia, Alvaro, Northfelt, Donald W. , Ernst, Brenda, Isakoff, Steven J. , Tolaney, Sara M., Calfa, Carmen, Nanda, Rita, Cole, John T., Fagbemi, Seth, Rowland, Kendrith M., Perez, EA, Chumsri, Saranya, Ruddy, Kathryn Jean, Knutson, Keith L. , Hillman, David W. , Moreno‐Aspitia, Alvaro , Ernst, Brenda , Tolaney, Sara M. , Calfa, Carmen, Nanda, Rita , Mortimer, Joanne , Fagbemi, Seth O., Perez, EA, Norton, Nadine , Chumsri, Saranya , Ruddy, Kathryn J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 536-536

10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.536 Get It

536 Background: Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is overexpressed in ~80% of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). We previously demonstrated that patients (pts) with breast cancer naturally mount immune responses to FRα. In prior Phase I and II studies, a GM-CSF-adjuvanted FRα peptide vaccine (FRPV) was safe and induced durable FRα-specific T-cell immunity in 83–90% of pts with breast and ovarian cancer. Methods: Eligible pts were women ≥18 years with TNBC (ER/PR ≤10%) with 1+ of the following: stage ≥T1c disease, node-positivity, or residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive FRPV or placebo (GM-CSF alone) every 28 days for cycles 2-7 and then every six months for 7 booster doses, with cycle 1 consisting of cyclophosphamide 50mg orally twice daily for days 1-7 and 15-21 (in both arms). Randomization was stratified by chemotherapy setting (adjuvant only vs neoadjuvant) and stage (I/II vs III). FRα expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The study was designed to detect (at 30 months after the last pt enrolled) a disease-free survival (DFS) difference of 14% assuming a 3.5-year DFS rate of 70% in the control group and with 78% power. Results: 280 pts were enrolled (median age 52). The majority had stage I or II tumors (n = 219, 78%). There were numerically more node-positive tumors in the vaccine arm, 78 (41%) vs 27 (32%), p = 0.15. Median follow-up was 3.5 years, and 33 (FRPV: 25, placebo: 8) DFS events were observed; 3.5-year DFS rate was 88% with FRPV and 90% with placebo (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.64–3.15; p = 0.39). Overall survival (OS) also did not differ by arm (HR 2.48, 95% CI 0.55–11.20; p = 0.22). Among node-positive pts (n = 105), DFS did not differ between arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.34–2.66; p = 0.92). However, a numerical DFS event rate improvement (14% for vaccine vs. 26% for placebo) was observed in 61 patients with stage III disease (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.16–1.68; p = 0.26). DFS did not differ by chemotherapy setting or by receipt of anthracycline, capecitabine, and/or an immune checkpoint inhibitor. FRPV was well tolerated, with predominantly grade 1–2 adverse events (AEs) and no vaccine-related grade ≥4 AEs. FRα expression was available from tumor in 230 pts, with 72% expressing > 0. Overall, DFS was not significantly associated with FRα expression (0 vs > 0; HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.21–1.44; p = 0.21), and no significant differences in DFS by FRα expression were observed between treatment arms. Conclusions: FRPV following oral cyclophosphamide was safe, with no vaccine-related high-grade AEs. While no significant improvement in DFS or OS was observed overall, a numeric trend toward improved DFS was observed in pts with stage III TNBC. This finding is hypothesis-generating and supports further evaluation of FRα-targeted vaccination in higher-risk TNBC. Immune correlative analyses are ongoing to better define vaccine immunogenicity and its relationship to clinical outcomes. Clinical trial information: W81XWH-15-1-0293.
Abstract 6715: Safety, tolerability, and early immune responses in the safety run-in of an HER2 multi-epitope vaccine combined with T-DM1 in residual HER2-positive breast cancer
Chumsri, Saranya , Giri, Sharmila, Ness, Andy J., Norton, Nadine , Cogen, Davitte , Necela, Brian M. , Northfelt, Donald W. , Advani, Pooja , Rao, R., Mareno-Aspitia, Alvaro, Ruddy, Kathryn J., Knutson, Keith L. , Norton, Nadine , Hillman, David W. , Nassar, Aziza , Ernst, Brenda , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Goetz, Matthew P. , Knutson, Keith L.

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Research | April 3, 2026 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 7_Supplement | Pages: 6715-6715

10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-6715 Get It

Abstract Background: Patients with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for HER2-positive breast cancer remain at high risk for recurrence even with standard adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). H2NVAC, a multi-epitope HER2 peptide vaccine, has previously demonstrated the ability to elicit robust and durable immune responses. Here, we assessed the safety and early immunogenicity of H2NVAC in combination with T-DM1 in this high-risk population. Methods: Patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer and residual invasive disease following NAC and HER2-directed therapy received standard adjuvant T-DM1 alongside six priming doses of H2NVAC administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) within 21 days of the first vaccination, with adverse events graded per CTCAE v5.0. Immunogenicity assessments included HER2-specific T-cell responses measured by IFNγ ELISpot and HER-specific serum antibodies measured by ELISA at baseline and 30 days after the sixth priming dose. Results: 20 patients were enrolled. H2NVAC plus T-DM1 was well tolerated with no DLTs observed. All treatment-emergent AEs were grade 1-2, with fatigue (grade 1 60%, grade 2 5%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (grade 1 35%, grade 2 10%), elevated alkaline phosphatase (grade 1 40%), nausea (grade 1 35%, grade 2 5%), arthralgia (grade 1 30%), and injection-site reactions (grade 1 50%) being most common. Robust vaccine-specific T-cell responses by ELISpot were observed in 94% of evaluable patients, who mounted HER2-specific T-cell responses at 30 days after the sixth priming dose, with a mean 197-fold increase over baseline. Further CYTOF analysis showed a significant decrease in exhausted T-cell phenotypes, with reduced LAG3 and TIM3 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. For antibody responses by ELISA, 26% of patients developed HER2 protein-specific antibody responses at this time point. There was no significant increase in antibodies to H2NVAC peptides or to unrelated tumor antigens (p53, IGFBP2, TERT, myoglobin) at 30 days after the sixth vaccine. Ongoing correlative analyses will assess the evolution of immune responses at later time points following completion of T-DM1 therapy. Conclusions: Concurrent administration of H2NVAC with T-DM1 was safe and did not increase toxicity beyond single-agent T-DM1. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that a cancer vaccine can be delivered concurrently with an antibody-drug conjugate without increasing adverse effects while still eliciting robust T-cell responses. Ongoing analyses will further define the kinetics and durability of vaccine-induced antibody and T-cell responses at later time points, as well as evaluate the efficacy of H2NVAC in reducing recurrence risk in the randomized phase 2 trial. Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Sharmila Giri, Andy J. Ness, David W. Hillman, Nadine Norton, Davitte Cogen, Brian M. Necela, Aziza Nassar, Donald W. Northfelt, Pooja Advani, Rohit Rao, Alvaro Mareno-Aspitia, Brenda Ernst, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Matthew P. Goetz, Keith L. Knutson. Safety, tolerability, and early immune responses in the safety run-in of an HER2 multi-epitope vaccine combined with T-DM1 in residual HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6715.
Multimorbidity in Atrial Fibrillation: Impact on Outcomes
Manemann, Sheila M., Alonso, Alvaro, Noseworthy, Peter A. , Siontis, Konstantinos C., Gersh, Bernard J., Roger, Veronique L., Ryu, Euijung , Killian, Jill M. , Weston, Susan A., Vaughan, Lisa E. , Gersh, Bernard J. , Alonso, Álvaro , Alonso, Alvaro , Siontis, Konstantinos C , Gersh, Bernard J , Roger, Veronique L , Chamberlain, Alanna M , Noseworthy, Peter A , Vaughan, Lisa , Siontis, Konstantinos C. , Roger, Véronique L. , Chamberlain, Alanna M.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the American Heart Association | February 24, 2026 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.124.040612 | PMID 41733064 Get It

Background Multimorbidity is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the impact of the number and type of comorbid conditions on outcomes remains uncertain. Methods This cohort study included patients with new‐onset AF from a Midwest region between 2013 and 2017. Eighteen chronic conditions at the time of AF were classified into groups: cardiometabolic, other somatic, and mental health. Cox regression determined associations between the number of each condition type with death, ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, and congestive heart failure, stratified by age. Results Among 16 509 patients with AF (mean age, 74 years; 43% women), the mean number of cardiometabolic, other somatic, and mental health conditions was 2.7, 1.4, and 0.5, respectively. The number and type of conditions had a varying impact on outcomes and differed by age. A higher number of cardiometabolic conditions were associated with increased risk of death within 90 days only in people aged ≥85 years (≥4 conditions versus 0: hazard ratio [HR], 1.74 [95% CI, 1.05–2.87]), whereas for death after 90 days, associations were strongest in the youngest age group (<65 years: HR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.35–2.46]; 65–74 years: HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.04–1.73]; 75–84 years: HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.09–1.60]; ≥85 years: HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.96–1.35]). Associations with outcomes were generally strongest in the youngest age group and attenuated with older age for higher number of other somatic conditions, whereas the pattern was less consistent for mental health conditions. Conclusions Along with cardiometabolic‐related conditions, other somatic and mental health conditions are important predictors of outcomes in AF, with effects differing by age, and should be considered when caring for these patients.
Management of Liver Cirrhosis in Percutaneous and Surgical Cardiac Interventions
Spadaccio, C., Mehta, Krishna, Pisani, Angelo , Osho, Asishana, Juarez‐Casso, Fernando, Alvaro, Domenico, Arif, Imran, Panza, Antonio, Vester, Russell S., Louis, Louis B., Sundt, Thoralf M., Crestanello, Juan, Alvaro, Domenico , Osho, Asishana A. , Spadaccio, Cristiano , Pisani, Angelo , Osho, Asishana , Juarez-Casso, Fernando, Alvaro, Domenico , Panza, Antonio , Louis, Louis B , Sundt, Thoralf , Crestanello, Juan A , Rose, David , Spadaccio, Cristiano , Nenna, Antonio , Juarez-Casso, Fernando M. , Arif, Imran, Vester, Russell Samuel , Sundt, Thoralf M. , Rose, David

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the American Heart Association | February 24, 2026 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.125.045147 | PMID 41732994 Get It

The systemic impairment that accompanies liver cirrhosis is known to carry a significant burden on death and postoperative complications in cardiovascular interventions. This review analyzes the impact of liver cirrhosis on short‐ and long‐term outcomes after cardiac surgery and percutaneous procedures, providing an evidence‐based guidance in the decision‐making process and perioperative management of these patients. Several parameters should be considered by the heart teams when assessing eligibility, indications for intervention, and perioperative management of these patients. Life expectancy, long‐term procedural outcomes, Child–Pugh or the Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score, presence of gastroesophageal varices and hepatic venous pressure gradient were extrapolated as the main determinants in decision making in patients with cirrhosis. Assessment and treatment of gastroesophageal varices is mandatory. Hepatic venous pressure gradient values >20 mm Hg preclude patients from a surgical approach. Considering the poor prognosis of advanced liver cirrhosis, futile treatments should be avoided. A multidimensional heart team approach involving surgical, cardiologic, anesthesiologic, hepatological, and medical considerations is recommended.
Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Symposium, Pediatric Society of Neuro-Oncology proceedings: Current status and future initiatives
Fangusaro, Jason, Warren, Katherine, Hargrave, Darren, Gampel, Bradley , Baxter, Patricia A, Perreault, Sébastien , Vézina, Gilbert , Mueller, Sabine, Kram, David E, Erker, Craig, Stuckert, Austin J. , Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi, Mahdi, Jasia , Leary, Sarah, Susan, N., Prados, Michael, Mankad, Kshitij, Salloum, Ralph , Reddy, A. O., Dhall, Girish, Lai, Holly, Rameh, Vanessa , Jaju, Alok , Laughlin, Suzanne , Green, Adam L. , Hwang, Eugene I., Silvera, V Michelle, Ho, Chang Y, Nabavizadeh, Ali, Kline, Cassie , Raju, Praveen, Shivaram, Avula, Kann, Benjamin H, Mirsky, Prof David M, Fangusaro, Jason , Warren, Katherine N, Hargrave, Darren R. , Robinson, Giles , Baxter, Patricia Ann , Mueller, Sabine , Takami, Hirokazu , Kram, David E. , Erker, Craig , Foreman, Nicholas K. , Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi , Leary, Sarah , Chi, Susan N , Prados, Michael D. , Tamrazi, Benita , Mankad, Kshitij , Gonçalves, Fabrício Guimarães , Hansford, Jordan R. , Reddy, Alyssa , Bhatia, Aashim , Bag, Asim Kumar , Wright, Jason N. , Bartels, Ute , Kilburn, Lindsay Baker , Robison, Nathan John , Mangum, Ross , Yeo, Kee Kiat , Lassaletta, Álvaro , Ho, Chang Yueh , Nabavizadeh, Ali , Margol, Ashley , Cohen, Kenneth J. , Avula, Shivaram , Kann, Benjamin H.

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology Pediatrics | February 18, 2026 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/neuped/wuag010 Get It

Abstract Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) is an international working group dedicated to developing standardized recommendations for response assessment in children with central nervous system tumors enrolled on clinical trials. This standardization facilitates easier and more reliable comparison of responses across trials. Since the first RAPNO publication in 2013, response guidelines have been issued for medulloblastoma (MB), low-grade glioma (LGG), high-grade glioma (HGG), diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, ependymoma, and craniopharyngioma. Many of these guidelines have already been incorporated into clinical trials to evaluate their effectiveness and accuracy. RAPNO has always been predicated on the idea that these consensus recommendations will require updates over time as they are applied in practice given technological advancements, evolving treatment approaches, and growing knowledge of disease pathology. A half-day RAPNO symposium sponsored by the Society of Neuro-Oncology was held in San Diego, California, United States, on May 15, 2025. This event coincided with the 8th Biennial Pediatric Society of Neuro-Oncology meeting. The main objectives were to identify ongoing RAPNO challenges, discuss potential updates, and plan future initiatives across 3 specific groups: (1) LGG/Craniopharyngioma, (2) HGG/diffuse midline glioma (DMG)/Ependymoma, and (3) MB and other seeding tumors. This manuscript reviews the symposium proceedings and highlights key topics and challenges discussed, as well as outlining future RAPNO initiatives.
Abstract PS1-10-22: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer prior to treatment with palbociclib and endocrine therapy: a retrospective analysis of the PROMISE study
O'Sullivan, C. C., Moyer, A. M., Nassar, A., Zahrieh, D. M., Suman, V., Tang, X., Thompson, K. J., Hentz, R. C., Harrington, J. J., Moreno-Aspitia, Alvaro, Northfelt, D. W., Haddad, T. C., Chumsri, S., Peethambaram, P. P., Ruddy, K. J., Giridhar, K. V., Leon-Ferre, R. A., Weinshilboum, R., Wang, L., Kalari, K. R., Goetz, M. P., O’Sullivan, Ciara C. , Zahrieh, David , Hentz, Roland, Northfelt, Donald W. , Chumsri, S., Peethambaram, Prema P. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Leon‐Ferre, Roberto A. , Kalari, KR, Goetz, Matthew P.

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Cancer Research | February 17, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PS1-10-22-PS1-10-22

10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-10-22 Get It

Abstract Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancer (BC) are prognostic and associated with therapy response; however, there are few data regarding distribution and significance of TIL values in ER+ HER2-negative (HER2-) MBC patients (pts) treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). CDK4/6 inhibition may promote antitumor immunity by production of type III interferons and tumor antigen presentation, and by inhibition of regulatory T cells (Goel, Nature 2017). Further, the addition of immune checkpoint therapy to palbociclib numerically prolonged PFS in the 2nd line (2L) setting (Mayer, JCO 2024). We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of TILs derived from fresh metastatic tumor biopsies in pts with ER+HER2- MBC prior to starting CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy (ET) in the first line (1L) and 2L setting. Methods: PROMISE (NCT0281902) is a multicenter, prospective study that enrolled women commencing the CDK4/6i palbociclib (Pb) with letrozole (1L) or fulvestrant (2L) for HR+HER2- MBC. The primary goal was to identify novel genomic variants and pathways associated with PFS. Here, we performed a secondary analysis to quantitate stromal TILs using protocol mandated pretreatment tumor biopsies and determine their association with PFS. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we reported median PFS (mPFS) and 3-year PFS percentage (%) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) by TILs [≥20% vs &lt;20%] separately within 1L and 2L. As sample TIL values were generally concentrated at zero (27/58 = 46.6%), coupled with wide spread of sample TIL values ≥20% [range: 20%- 80%], we applied a ≥20% threshold for PFS analysis (high vs low TIL group) as described by Luen, Salgado et al. Lancet Oncol 2017. Statistical significance was based on the Wilcoxon test of the null hypothesis that there was no difference in the PFS curves by TILs. PFS is reported at median follow-up of 21 months. Results: Pretreatment tumor biopsies from 58/68 (85.3 %) pts were evaluable (42 in 1L and 16 in 2L). Median [Q1, Q2] TIL values were higher in 1L (5% [0, 10]) vs 2L (0% [0, 15]). The most common biopsy sites were bone (44.8%), lymph node (17.2%), liver (17.2%) and breast (12%). Overall, TILs frequency (&gt;20%) by the 4 most common biopsy sites were bone (2/20, 10%), lymph node (4/7, 57%), liver (2/6, 33%), and breast (1/7, 14%). In 1L, although PFS was not significantly different (P = 0.237), mPFS (44 vs 34 months) and 3-year PFS 75.0%, [95% CI: 50.3%, 100%] vs 46.4% [95% CI: 31.0%, 69.5%]) were longer in pts with high versus low TILS, respectively. In 2L, the 3-year PFS was numerically similar comparing high and low TILs groups, (25.0%, [95% CI: 4.6%, 100%] vs 22.5% [95% CI: 6.7%, 76.1%]) with no significant difference in PFS (P = 0.761). Conclusions: In pts with ER+HER2- MBC treated with Pb and ET, PFS was numerically longer comparing high vs low TIL values in 1L but not 2L settings. Future studies evaluating TILs in larger datasets are needed to validate these findings. Genomic analysis (DNA/RNA) and its association with TIL levels is underway and will be presented at the meeting. Funding: The Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic; Mayo Clinic Breast Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE P50CA116201); Mayo Clinic Cancer Center (CA15083-40A2); TEMPUS (https://www.tempus.com/) and Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO (Career Development Award 2018, Dr. O’Sullivan) Citation Format: C. C. O'Sullivan, A. M. Moyer, A. Nassar, D. M. Zahrieh, V. Suman, X. Tang, K. J. Thompson, R. C. Hentz, J. J. Harrington, A. Moreno-Aspitia, D. W. Northfelt, T. C. Haddad, S. Chumsri, P. P. Peethambaram, K. J. Ruddy, K. V. Giridhar, R. A. Leon-Ferre, R. Weinshilboum, L. Wang, K. R. Kalari, M. P. Goetz. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer prior to treatment with palbociclib and endocrine therapy: a retrospective analysis of the PROMISE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-10-22.
Long-term cellular and humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in patients with solid malignancies undergoing chemotherapy
liu, Andrew, Necela, Brian, Li, Zhuo, Cogen, Davitte , Wieczorek, Mikolaj A. , Mummareddy, Ashita , Acampora, Marites, Reynolds, Gina, Advani, Pooja , Moreno-Aspitia, Alvaro, Virk, Abinash, Bharucha, A E, Marquez, Christopher P. , Patel, Tushar C., Knutson, KL, Chumsri, Saranya , Li, Zhuo , Reynolds, Gina A, Advani, Pooja P, Necela, Brian M. , Mummareddy, Ashita , Swift, Melanie D. , Virk, Abinash , Bharucha, Adil E. , Knutson, Keith L.

Mayo Clinic

Frontiers in Immunology | January 29, 2026 | Volume: 16 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3389/fimmu.2025.1690495 | PMID 41693712 Get It

Background While SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are highly effective in healthy individuals, the magnitude and durability of humoral and cellular responses in patients with solid malignancies receiving chemotherapy remain understudied. Previous reports suggest that patients with cancer may not mount adequate immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Additionally, most studies focused on humoral responses, while data regarding cellular immune responses are scarce. In this study, we evaluated humoral and cellular responses in patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy compared to healthy individuals up to one year after vaccinations. Methods Patients aged ≥18 who were willing to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were enrolled. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays were used to detect antibodies against nucleocapsid and spike proteins. Human IFN-γ Fluorospot assay was used to determine antigen−specific T-cell responses. Data were compared between groups using Mann−Whitney test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Results A total of 67 subjects (47 patients with cancer and 20 healthy individuals) were included. 1–3 months following the second vaccine doses, 96% of patients with cancer and 100% of healthy individuals demonstrated a positive humoral response. While the positivity rate was not significantly different, patients with cancer had significantly lower spike IgG antibodies than healthy individuals. However, this difference diminished at 6 months when patients with cancer had increased antibodies compared to decreased antibodies in the healthy cohort and no difference was noticed at 12-month. Patients with cancer developed a similar antigen-specific T-cell response as healthy individuals at 1–3 months, 6 months and 12 months. There were no significant differences when comparing patients aged ≤ 55 years vs. &gt;55 years, stages I-III vs. IV, single vs. multiple chemotherapy, and BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273 vaccines. There was a significant moderate correlation between neutralization and antibody levels at 12 months. However, despite patients with cancer having a significantly higher COVID risk score, there were no significant differences in COVID-19 infection and hospitalization between patients with cancer and healthy individuals. Conclusion Despite initial impaired antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, patients with solid malignancies receiving chemotherapy effectively generated long-term cellular and humoral responses by 6 and 12 months, leading to similar infection and hospitalization rates compared to healthy individuals.