Acampora, Marites

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in combination with chemotherapy is associated with improved outcomes in a subset of patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, biomarkers for predicting patient response, such as PD-L1 expression, have limited predictive efficiency. Voabil et al. has shown that ex vivo cytokine profiling of live tumor tissue resections treated with αPD-1 can predict patient response to ICI (Voabil et al., Nat Med. 2021). However, this method requires large amounts of tissue to address intra-specimen tumor heterogeneity, which is not feasible with standard of care (SOC) diagnostic core needle biopsies (CNBs) for breast cancer, where tissue is scarce. We show for the first time that ex vivo cytokine profiling is possible in live tumor fragments (LTFs) generated from CNBs in breast tissue. Methods: We present a cytokine profiling platform to assess response to ICI treatment in LTFs generated from CNBs. CNBs were collected from patients who were identified as potential candidates for SOC ICI (by treating physician) and enrolled in one of two prospective observational clinical trials (NCT05520099 and NCT06349642). CNBs were cut by an automated, proprietary cutting instrument to generate LTFs ofapproximately 300 µm in thickness. To address tissue heterogeneity and mitigate tissue scarcity in CNBs, we used a sequential treatment strategy in which control and ICI treatment were applied to LTFs in the same well, in a phased approach. This strategy provides a solution for the variability observed in cross-well comparisons. LTFs were encapsulated in hydrogel and treated with IgG control followed by αPD-1 (BioXCell). Cytokine production rates were measured longitudinally using multiplex assays assessing>45 cytokines, including 15 cytokines assayed by Voabil et al., and the fold changes of cytokine production rates in response to ICI over IgG control were calculated. Results: Using non-breast tumor tissue, we validated that our platform can measure changes in cytokine production in LTFs following sequential treatment, and that these measurements are comparable to those observed in a cross-well setting. In a small cohort of TNBC specimens, we show changes in cytokine production rates in response to ex vivo sequential control and ICI treatment. Ten cytokines, including IFN-γ and CXCL10, shown to be predictive of patient response to ICI in Voabil et al. were found upregulated in response to αPD-1 in TNBC specimens. Future determination of correlation with clinical response data (pathological complete response for early stage and RECIST 1.1 for metastatic patients) gathered from NCT05520099 and NCT06349642 will be used to validate platform responders and non-responders. To date, 11 patients with confirmed TNBC diagnoses have enrolled in these clinical studies. Conclusion: We report, for the first time to our knowledge, the ability to detect immune checkpoint inhibitor responses in live TNBC tissue obtained via CNBs. This proof-of-concept lays the groundwork for integrating functional tissue responses with clinical correlation data, with important implications for guiding current ICI therapies and advancing this platform for use in next-generation immuno-oncology treatments for TNBC. Citation Format: P. P. Advani, J. Harvey, J. Polley, M. Weidner, A. Arnold, D. Haley, R. Bollam, R. Rao, S. Chumsri, K. Hugghins, M. Acampora, C. Vivelo, H. Hernan, L. Hrycyniak, J. Zweng, H. Gierman, S. Bhattacharya, D. Mukhopadhyay. Ex vivo cytokine profiling of live triple negative breast cancer patient specimens from core needle biopsies illustrates proof of concept to assess tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-01-08.

Background While SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are highly effective in healthy individuals, the magnitude and durability of humoral and cellular responses in patients with solid malignancies receiving chemotherapy remain understudied. Previous reports suggest that patients with cancer may not mount adequate immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Additionally, most studies focused on humoral responses, while data regarding cellular immune responses are scarce. In this study, we evaluated humoral and cellular responses in patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy compared to healthy individuals up to one year after vaccinations. Methods Patients aged ≥18 who were willing to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were enrolled. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays were used to detect antibodies against nucleocapsid and spike proteins. Human IFN-γ Fluorospot assay was used to determine antigen−specific T-cell responses. Data were compared between groups using Mann−Whitney test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Results A total of 67 subjects (47 patients with cancer and 20 healthy individuals) were included. 1–3 months following the second vaccine doses, 96% of patients with cancer and 100% of healthy individuals demonstrated a positive humoral response. While the positivity rate was not significantly different, patients with cancer had significantly lower spike IgG antibodies than healthy individuals. However, this difference diminished at 6 months when patients with cancer had increased antibodies compared to decreased antibodies in the healthy cohort and no difference was noticed at 12-month. Patients with cancer developed a similar antigen-specific T-cell response as healthy individuals at 1–3 months, 6 months and 12 months. There were no significant differences when comparing patients aged ≤ 55 years vs. >55 years, stages I-III vs. IV, single vs. multiple chemotherapy, and BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273 vaccines. There was a significant moderate correlation between neutralization and antibody levels at 12 months. However, despite patients with cancer having a significantly higher COVID risk score, there were no significant differences in COVID-19 infection and hospitalization between patients with cancer and healthy individuals. Conclusion Despite initial impaired antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, patients with solid malignancies receiving chemotherapy effectively generated long-term cellular and humoral responses by 6 and 12 months, leading to similar infection and hospitalization rates compared to healthy individuals.

Abstract Background: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been demonstrated to have robust and durable humoral immune response in healthy individuals. However, their effectiveness in immunocompromised patients, particularly cancer patients, remains less known. Newer data suggests that cancer patients may not mount adequate protective immune response after vaccination. Methods: A retrospective study of patients ≥ 18 years old who had SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody (anti-S Ab) testing after 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines between 12-90 days at Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2021 and May 10, 2021 was performed. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) was used to measure the antibody response. Patients with prior COVID-19 infection and patients on immunosuppressive therapy for an indication other than cancer were excluded. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies (percentages) and continuous variables were reported as median with range. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare continuous variables between groups and Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. All tests were two-sided with p value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The analysis was done using R program version 3.6.2. Results: Among 201 patients, 79 had breast cancer, 91 had a hematologic malignancy, 6 had other solid malignancies, and 25 had no history of cancer. All breast cancer patients on endocrine therapy or trastuzumab ± pertuzumab without chemotherapy (n=35) had anti-S Ab titer ≥ 500 U/mL. Patients on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) appeared to have low level of anti-S Ab with 28.6% (n=4/14) had anti-S Ab titer ≤ 500 U/mL. Patients on chemotherapy also had low levels of anti-S Ab with 47% (n=14/30) having anti-S Ab titers ≤ 500 U/mL. When combining breast cancer patients on endocrine therapy alone or anti-HER2 therapy with patients without history of cancer as an immunocompetent group, there was significantly greater proportion of immunocompetent patients (97%) who had anti-S Ab titer ≥ 500 U/mL compared with only 8% of patients with hematologic malignancy and 55% of patients with solid malignancy on chemotherapy or CDK4/6i (p < 0.001). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, and vaccine type, patients with solid malignancies and treatment-related cytopenia, including chemotherapy and CDK4/6i, (OR 35.51 [95%CI 8.38-255.25, p < 0.001]) were more likely than immunocompetent patients to have a suboptimal anti-S Ab results ≤ 500 U/mL.Conclusion: A significant number of breast cancer patients on chemotherapies and CDK4/6i had poor humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. While CDK4/6i is not commonly considered as immunosuppressive therapy, breast cancer patients on CDK4/6i appeared to have suboptimal response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Our study also highlights the significance of assessing antibody response after COVID-19 vaccines in these vulnerable patients. Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Pooja P. Advani, Tanmayi S Pai, Zhou Li, Marites Acampora, Gina A Reynolds, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Christopher P Marquez, Keith L. Knutson. Antibody responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-23-01.