Citations

Hazardous alcohol use remains a major contributor to acute and chronic liver disease, while alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a leading indication for liver transplantation. In recent years, embedded, interprofessional ALD clinics have improved access to alcohol use disorder care within hepatology and liver transplantation, but more work is needed to meet this challenge. The literature is lacking regarding scaling procedures to provide services for increasingly large ill patient populations. This article begins to fill this gap by describing “expanded ALD care”: broad, innovative, longitudinal, interprofessional care delivery strategies surpassing standalone clinics. Drawing from analogous patient populations served by collaborative models in primary care and comprehensive eating disorder treatment, the expanded ALD care framework proposes practical strategies toward specific innovations: equipoise between biomedical and psychosocial care elements, increased clinician number and reach, long-term patient relationships, harm reduction and palliative care, outreach to external agencies and clinicians, and enhanced support for patients and families. The article also defines attributes of innovative healthcare systems that support expanded ALD care.

Abstract Background There is limited data on the clinical effectiveness of upadacitinib (UPA), an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 (JAKi), in patients with perianal Crohn's disease (pCD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of UPA in pCD. Methods This retrospective analysis utilized data on adults (>17 years) who initiated UPA at 45 mg/day for active pCD across 10 centers in the United States and Canada. Standardized data extraction and entry protocols were followed. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as a ≥3-point reduction in Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) between baseline and follow-up. Secondary outcomes included normalization of CRP (<5 mg/L) or hsCRP (<1 mg/L), clinical remission (PDAI ≤4), and rates of hospitalization, antibiotic use, corticosteroid initiation, and new pCD-related surgeries. Fistula healing on MRI pelvis fistula protocol was defined as an absence of T2-weighted hyperintensity and post-contrast enhancement on T1-weighted images. Predictive analyses used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate baseline factors influencing time to PDAI remission, including BMI, CRP, albumin, PDAI, pCD disease duration, Montreal location and prior biologic exposure (<2 vs 2+). Results A total of 81 patients were treated with UPA for pCD (median age 35 years and 54.3% male). Most had ileocolonic disease (65.4%), with 54% presenting with complex fistulas. Of these, 92.6% had prior anti-TNF exposure, and 91 (88.9%) had prior exposure to 2+ biologics (Table 1). During a median follow-up of 4 months, clinical response (PDAI) was achieved in 17.3%. Improvement was observed in pain and restriction of activities (27.2%), restriction of sexual activity (13.6%), reduction in number of fistulas (11.1%), degree of induration (11.1%), and discharge (35.8%). Median CRP reduction was 21.05% [IQR: 0.00–74.53], and 21.0% achieved a ≥50% reduction in CRP. MRI healing was limited to 17.7% (6/34). Proctitis decreased from 23.5% at baseline to 7.4% at follow-up. During follow-up, hospitalizations occurred in 9.9%, 14.8% required antibiotics, 8.6% underwent examination under anesthesia in 8.6%, seton placement in 6.2%, and abscess drainage in 6.2%. Patients with ileocolonic disease showed the highest remission (54%) and response (15%) rates, while MRI healing was limited across all Montreal locations (7.4%). Lower baseline CRP (p < 0.05) and PDAI scores (p < 0.01) predicted shorter time to remission. Number of prior biologic exposures (p =0.2) and Montreal location (p = 0.7) were not predictive of time to PDAI remission (Figure 1). Conclusion UPA in a real-world cohort is effective in the management of treatment-refractory pCD. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these observations.

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities exist in the prevalence and natural history of chronic liver disease, access to care, and clinical outcomes. Solutions to improve health equity range widely, from digital health tools to policy changes. The current review outlines the disparities along the chronic liver disease health care continuum from screening and diagnosis to the management of cirrhosis and considerations of pre-liver and post-liver transplantation. Using a health equity research and implementation science framework, we offer pragmatic strategies to address barriers to implementing high-quality equitable care for patients with chronic liver disease.

The liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and waitlisting process is subject to variations in care that can impede quality. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Practice Metrics Committee (PMC) developed quality measures and patient-reported experience measures along the continuum of pre-LT care to reduce care variation and guide patient-centered care. Following a systematic literature review, candidate pre-LT measures were grouped into 4 phases of care: referral, evaluation and waitlisting, waitlist management, and organ acceptance. A modified Delphi panel with content expertise in hepatology, transplant surgery, psychiatry, transplant infectious disease, palliative care, and social work selected the final set. Candidate patient-reported experience measures spanned domains of cognitive health, emotional health, social well-being, and understanding the LT process. Of the 71 candidate measures, 41 were selected: 9 for referral; 20 for evaluation and waitlisting; 7 for waitlist management; and 5 for organ acceptance. A total of 14 were related to structure, 17 were process measures, and 10 were outcome measures that focused on elements not typically measured in routine care. Among the patient-reported experience measures, candidates of LT rated items from understanding the LT process domain as the most important. The proposed pre-LT measures provide a framework for quality improvement and care standardization among candidates of LT. Select measures apply to various stakeholders such as referring practitioners in the community and LT centers. Clinically meaningful measures that are distinct from those used for regulatory transplant reporting may facilitate local quality improvement initiatives to improve access and quality of care.

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo determine how self-reported level of exposure to patients with novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) affected the perceived safety, training and well-being of residents and fellows.MethodsWe administered an anonymous, voluntary, web-based survey to a convenience sample of trainees worldwide. The survey was distributed by email and social media posts from April 20th to May 11th, 2020. Respondents were asked to estimate the number of patients with COVID-19 they cared for in March and April 2020 (0, 1–30, 31–60, >60). Survey questions addressed (1) safety and access to personal protective equipment (PPE), (2) training and professional development and (3) well-being and burnout.ResultsSurveys were completed by 1420 trainees (73% residents, 27% fellows), most commonly from the USA (n=670), China (n=150), Saudi Arabia (n=76) and Taiwan (n=75). Trainees who cared for a greater number of patients with COVID-19 were more likely to report limited access to PPE and COVID-19 testing and more likely to test positive for COVID-19. Compared with trainees who did not take care of patients with COVID-19 , those who took care of 1–30 patients (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.80, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.51), 31–60 patients (AOR 3.30, 95% CI 1.86 to 5.88) and >60 patients (AOR 4.03, 95% CI 2.12 to 7.63) were increasingly more likely to report burnout. Trainees were very concerned about the negative effects on training opportunities and professional development irrespective of the number of patients with COVID-19 they cared for.ConclusionExposure to patients with COVID-19 is significantly associated with higher burnout rates in physician trainees.

INTRODUCTION: Immunocompromised liver transplant (LT) recipients are at increased risk of de novo malignancy. Data regarding oral and oropharyngeal malignancy following liver transplantation is limited, and recommendations for oral cancer screening are lacking. The impact of these malignancies on patient survival in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database has not been assessed. We aim to evaluate the rates of oral and oropharyngeal malignancy among LT recipients in the US and estimate patient survival. METHODS: We examined the UNOS database and identified patients with oral and oropharyngeal malignancy who underwent LT between 1988 and 2016. Patients greater than 18 years of age were included. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were performed. RESULTS: In the UNOS database, survival data regarding 142,488 patients was available and the cause of death was identified in 14,533 LT recipients.83 patients had oral and oropharyngeal malignancy. 23 patients had cancer of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Mean age 55 years (SD ± 8), mean BMI 26 (SD ± 4), males were 74%, white 83%. 49 patients had tonsillar and oropharyngeal cancer. Mean age 54 years (SD ± 7), mean BMI 25 (SD ± 4), males were 86%, white 80%. 11 patients had oral and palate cancer. Mean age 56 years (SD ± 6), mean BMI 26 (SD ± 5), males were 55%, white 100%. Compared to all LT indications, those who developed oral and oropharyngeal malignancy were more likely to have alcoholic liver disease ( P < 0.001). The mean patient survival time in the study population ranged between 5 and 7.5 years. However, patient survival was significantly lower among patients who developed oral and oropharyngeal malignancy compared to other LT recipients (Log-rank test, P < 0.001) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: Analysis of the UNOS database showed that oral and oropharyngeal malignancy is more common among male recipients with a history of alcoholic liver disease. Better outcomes should be expected if such patients were diagnosed earlier, prolonging their life expectancy. Having a history of heavy alcohol use should raise awareness among dentists, gastroenterologists and transplant physicians regarding the increased risk of oral cancers after LT.

INTRODUCTION: Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of de novo malignancies, in some cases up to 15.6%. Data regarding pancreatic cancer following liver transplantation is limited. We aim to evaluate the incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma among liver transplant recipients in the United States. Describe survival in those patients and identify subgroup of patients at increased risk. METHODS: We examined the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database and identified patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent liver transplant between 1988 and 2016. Patients 18 years of age and older were included. Demographics, primary diagnosis and survival data were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and log-rank tests were performed. RESULTS: In the UNOS database, survival data regarding 142,488 patients was available and the cause of death was identified in 14,533 liver transplant recipients. A total of 140 patients developed pancreatic adenocarcinoma after liver transplantation. Most common indications for transplantations were Hepatitis C, alcohol cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (25 [17.9%], 24 [17.1%] and 9 [6.4%] respectively). Annual incidence was 16 pancreatic cancer cases per 100,000 transplant recipients. Compared to national annual incidence of 12.9 cancer cases per 100,000 patients, the relative risk was 1.23 (95% CI 0.59–2.56). Compared to other liver transplant recipients, those who developed pancreatic cancer were older and transplanted earlier in the time period evaluated ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.002 respectively). Gender, ethnicity, BMI, and primary diagnosis (i.e., transplant indication) were not significantly different among groups. Patient survival was significantly lower in patients who developed pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Log-rank test P < 0.001) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: Analysis of the UNOS database showed that pancreatic adenocarcinoma is increased among liver transplant recipients without reaching statistical significance. Primary indications for transplantation and demographics were similar among both groups. Our findings suggest that pancreatic adenocarcinoma is more likely associated to long-standing immunosuppression and non-traditional risk factors rather than alcohol consumption or obesity. Further studies describing the natural history of pancreatic cancer after solid organ transplantation are suggested.