Fipps, David C

Multi-listing (ML) increases the odds of transplantation compared with single-center listing. However, not all patients have equivalent access to ML. The recent allocation policy change prioritized distance from the donor hospital in an attempt to decrease geographic disparities. This study assessed access to liver transplant (LT) given ML practices before and after the acuity circles policy change. United Network for Organ Sharing data were queried for LTs between January 1, 2016, and November 1, 2024. Patients were grouped by listing at one versus multiple centers and by acuity circle era (ACE). Cohort characteristics and comparisons were described using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank tests. Multivariable logistic regressions and propensity score match (PSM) were performed to assess associations between ML and LT. The final cohort consisted of 105,030 patients; 4084 (3.9%) were multi-listed. Racial/ethnic minority groups, less educated, and publicly insured candidates were less often multi-listed. ML was positively associated with LT in all analyses (overall: OR=1.180, p <0.001; PSM: OR=1.164, p =0.001; pre-ACE: OR=1.127, p =0.015; post-ACE: OR=1.218, p <0.001). Education, race/ethnicity, and insurance type were also associated with LT across all analyses. ML patients were more often transplanted at their primary center with a significant increase in primary center LT post-ACE (53.4% vs. 63.4%, p <0.001). ML and LT had a positive correlation. There was a negative association between minority groups and ML as well as LT. Although acuity circles decreased geographic disparities, they did not change ML accessibility across candidates.

Hazardous health behaviors increasingly contribute to end-stage liver diseases. To address surges in alcohol-associated liver disease and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, clinicians in hepatology and liver transplantation must increasingly understand factors that influence eating and alcohol behaviors and consider ways to therapeutically influence patients’ health choices. Stigma is a prominent influence on patient behavior, but is overused as a sweeping explanatory factor as to why difficulties arise, behavior change does not occur, or when outcomes are suboptimal. With more awareness of behavioral influences, clinicians may wonder if, for all its adverse effects, stigma exerts some therapeutic effects on patients considering altering habits. While stigma is less likely to yield desired outcomes, other co-occurring systemic, social, and interpersonal influences can favorably affect health choices (ie, structural nudging, social norms and consequences, and motivational interviewing, respectively). In this article, we analyze these related yet distinct constructs in ways pertinent to liver disease and transplantation, indicating where they might be applied and further studied.

Living liver donation is a critical component for addressing organ shortage and improving outcomes for patients with end-stage liver disease. As the prevalence of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) increases worldwide, understanding and optimizing long-term donor health is paramount. The 2025 International Liver Transplantation Society and International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS-iLDLT) Consensus Conference convened experts in the field of liver transplantation to establish evidence-based guidelines focused on the long-term medical, psychological, and social considerations following living liver donation. The aim of this working group was to integrate current evidence and expert consensus on donor follow-up protocols, risk assessment, and management strategies to promote long-term donor health, quality of life, and living liver donor programs globally to safeguard the welfare of this unique population.

Hazardous alcohol use remains a major contributor to acute and chronic liver disease, while alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a leading indication for liver transplantation. In recent years, embedded, interprofessional ALD clinics have improved access to alcohol use disorder care within hepatology and liver transplantation, but more work is needed to meet this challenge. The literature is lacking regarding scaling procedures to provide services for increasingly large ill patient populations. This article begins to fill this gap by describing “expanded ALD care”: broad, innovative, longitudinal, interprofessional care delivery strategies surpassing standalone clinics. Drawing from analogous patient populations served by collaborative models in primary care and comprehensive eating disorder treatment, the expanded ALD care framework proposes practical strategies toward specific innovations: equipoise between biomedical and psychosocial care elements, increased clinician number and reach, long-term patient relationships, harm reduction and palliative care, outreach to external agencies and clinicians, and enhanced support for patients and families. The article also defines attributes of innovative healthcare systems that support expanded ALD care.

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) represents a group of conditions that show reversible multifocal narrowing or constriction of the cerebral arteries that supply blood to the brain. The initial manifestation of RCVS often includes a “thunderclap” headache that is sudden, severe, and often disabling. Stimulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and antipsychotics with serotonergic activity can alter the cerebral arterial tone, trigger vasoconstriction, and place patients at risk of a cerebrovascular accident. Thus, psychiatric medications are commonly discontinued on admission for RCVS, and psychiatry is often consulted for input on acute medication management and longitudinal treatment options. Currently, there is a dearth of literature on managing psychiatric medications in RCVS, resulting in variable practice patterns that place patients at risk of withdrawal, decompensation, and relapse. In this article, we provide a case example and aim to consolidate the limited data surrounding the management of psychiatric illness with comorbid RCVS in our discussion. There is a clear concern about worsening and even potentially lethal consequences due to serotonin or stimulant-induced vasospasm both during an acute episode and in long-term management of RCVS. We discuss the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms proposed for serotonergic-, noradrenergic-, and dopaminergic-induced cerebral vasospasm and how this correlates with the clinical management of patients on psychiatric medications. These data will then be organized to create a risks versus benefits outline to equip psychiatrists to make decisions about when to stop and when to restart psychiatric medications in the setting of RCVS.

AbstractThe rates of opioid use and opioid related deaths are escalating in the United States. Despite this, evidence-based treatments for Opioid Use Disorder are underutilized. There are three medications FDA approved for treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Naltrexone. This article reviews the history, criteria, and mechanisms associated with Opioid Use Disorder. Pertinent pharmacology considerations, treatment strategies, efficacy, safety, and challenges of Methadone, Buprenorphine, and Naltrexone are outlined. Lastly, a practical decision making algorithm is discussed to address pertinent psychiatric and medical comorbidities when prescribing pharmacology for Opioid Use Disorder.

Purpose of review This review highlights the salient data of the psychosocial concerns that influence outcomes of bariatric surgery and organ transplantation. Recent findings Bariatric surgery has emerged as an important intervention with data supporting substantial and sustained weight loss, enhanced quality of life, remission of obesity-related medical comorbidities, and improved long-term patient and graft survival in transplant patients. Depression, suicide, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol use, adherence, and psychopharmacology considerations can influence outcomes of both these surgeries. Summary Obesity is increasingly prevalent among patients pursuing transplantation surgery, and it is often a factor in why a patient needs a transplant. However, obesity can be a barrier to receiving a transplant, with many centers implementing BMI criteria for surgery. Furthermore, obesity and obesity-related comorbidities after transplant can cause poor outcomes. In this context, many transplant centers have created programs that incorporate interventions (such as bariatric surgery) that target obesity in transplant candidates. A presurgery psychosocial assessment is an integral (and required) part of the process towards receiving a bariatric surgery and/or a transplantation surgery. When conducting a dual (bariatric and transplantation surgery) psychosocial assessment, it is prudent to understand the overlap and differentiation of specific psychosocial components that influence outcomes in these procedures.

INTRODUCTION Our educational report discusses a unique card game that provides an engaging, and competitive strategy for teaching psychopharmacology in the medically ill. It engages the players and helps them learn how to justify medical decisions in the context of complicated medical comorbidity. METHODS We describe a problem-based learning approach where learners are presented with randomized diagnoses and complications and are then forced to make prescription decisions for treatment from a limited and randomized supply of medication cards. Each round is facilitated by the teacher, who engages the teams and/or individual players in discussions regarding the rationale and justification of the medication decisions. These treatment plans are scored according to the appropriateness of the medication choice and the process is repeated. DISCUSSION The game is flexible regarding players’ levels of education and has been played by medical students, psychiatry residents, and fellows throughout their years of training. Overall feedback has been positive from facilitators and trainees and the game has been a valuable source of engaging learners in the process of making complex medication decisions in the medically ill.

In this case report, a patient with schizophrenia experienced recurrent priapism while undergoing treatment of acute psychosis. This necessitated a review of the emergent treatment of priapism and discussion of the difficulties in treating priapism in a patient with acute psychosis. Therefore, this case report explores multiple possible etiologies of priapism within the realm of psychiatric care, reviews the proposed mechanisms of medication-induced priapism, and considers the psychopharmacological concepts that pertain to antipsychotic selection in the context of antipsychotic-induced priapism.