Citations

12122 Background: Aromatase Inhibitors (AI) have become the standard of care to reduce breast cancer recurrence in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients. AIs have been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of breast cancer recurrence by 47%. However, up to 52% of patients prematurely discontinue their use due to AI-associated musculoskeletal pain symptoms called Aromatase Inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal pain syndrome (AIMSS). No effective treatment exists to treat AIMSS. The present study examined the effectiveness of a multicomponent pain treatment program in reducing symptoms of AIMSS with the goal of improving adherence to AI medication. Methods: This trial enrolled breast cancer survivors with AIMSS in an intensive multicomponent pain treatment program. Pain, impact on functioning, fatigue, and mood were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression- Revised Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Symptom Impact Questionnaire Revised, and Fatigue Questionnaire at baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month intervals. Adherence to AI medication was obtained from patients’ self-reports. The treatment program consisted of a two-day structured intervention focused on Cognitive-Behavioral skills to address strategies to improve pain control, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and stress while educating patients on the efficacy of Aromatase Inhibitors in prolonging cancer-free survival. Results: A total of 73 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 63 years (range 31-79). Participants were primarily white, married, and highly educated. The measures showed elevated levels of pain, fatigue, and psychological distress at baseline with decrements in self-reported levels of functioning. Significant improvements across all measures were observed at the 3-month follow-up after participation in the multicomponent pain treatment program. Significant improvements in painrelated outcomes were observed at 3 months (WPI Δ −1.6; SS Δ −4.0; both p < 0.001), with sustained reductions in symptom severity through 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow-up. Self-report of AI medication adherence at one year showed that 77.9% of patients were still taking their prescribed medication. Conclusions: Patients with AIMSS experienced substantial emotional distress, pain, fatigue, and functional impairment at baseline. Following the intervention, significant improvements were observed across pain, physical functioning, fatigue, and psychological distress, with benefits sustained at one year. Importantly, the intervention was associated with high long-term adherence at one-year follow-up, highlighting its potential to improve both quality of life and treatment persistence.

These NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management discuss the identification and treatment of psychosocial problems in patients with cancer. They are intended to assist oncology teams to identify patients who require referral to psychosocial resources and to give oncology teams guidance on interventions for patients with significant distress. These guidelines also provide guidance for social workers, certified chaplains, and mental health professionals by describing treatments and interventions for various psychosocial problems as they relate to patients with cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding standards of care for distress management in patients with cancer and implementation of these standards, including application of evidence-based care delivery models, such as the collaborative care model.

Background: Unmet social needs may hinder health care providers’ ability to deliver suitable care. Telehealth has emerged as a mechanism to broaden care reach; however, limited studies have examined the relationships between telehealth services and social need outcomes. This study explores the impact of telehealth services, encompassing (1) telestroke, (2) telepsychiatry and addiction treatment, (3) teleconsultation and office visits,(4) tele-intensive care units, (5) telemonitoring postdischarge, (6) ongoing chronic care management, and (7) other remote monitoring, on social need performance outcomes. Methods: The 2022 American Hospital Association annual survey and the Area Health Resource Files, which include comprehensive hospital and community indicators, were utilized. A mixed-effects logistic regression was applied, analyzing 1,005 acute care general hospitals. Results: The results revealed that patients who received telemonitoring services after discharge were 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.88) times more likely to achieve better health outcomes compared with those who did not receive such services. These patients also experienced a significant decrease in the likelihood of requiring additional hospital or system services, with an odds ratio of 2.39 (95% CI: 1.32-4.00). Additionally, patients utilizing telepsychiatry and addiction treatment services had 1.66 times higher odds of reporting improved community health status (95% CI: 1.22-2.27). Lastly, patients who used teleconsultation and office visit services had 38% lower odds of experiencing poor community health status (95% CI: 0.40-0.95). Discussion: The findings highlight the potential of targeted telehealth services to positively impact health outcomes, reduce health care costs, and improve community health status.

This study aimed to explore contextual elements of the cancer experience that are consistently distressing and/or psychologically traumatic, as well as explore perceptions of Accelerated Resolution Therapy® (ART®) and its influence on the cancer experience. Using a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were completed by 12 participants following the completion of ART. Interview data were analyzed using content analysis to identify major themes and patterns. Four themes included: (a) Cancer as the straw that broke the camel’s back, (b) ART® is different from previous therapy, (c) Don’t need to always be looking in the rearview mirror, and (d) Importance of early psychological intervention. Participants perceived that ART® was different and potentially more effective than other types of therapy they had previously received. Results support the diagnosis of cancer and the cumulative effects of previous life events and cancer-related stressors as traumatic events.

Fibromyalgia (FM) affects 2% to 8% of the general population. FM patients often experience self-stigma and feel rejected by healthcare providers and families, resulting in isolation and distressing symptoms of pain, fatigue, and poor cognitive functioning, increasing the risk of depressive symptoms. Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is the most common comorbidity in FM patients (Any depression: 43%; MDD: 32%). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified a common genetic risk loci for major depression and fibromyalgia. Given that even minor symptoms of depression worsen the outcomes of FM patients, clinicians are challenged to identify and manage depression in these patients. However, due to overlapping symptoms, limited screening, and contamination bias, MDD often goes undiagnosed and presents a critical challenge. Unrecognized and untreated MDD in FM patients can exacerbate fatigue, sleep disturbances, and pain, reduce physical functioning, and increase the risk of developing comorbid conditions, such as substance abuse and cardiovascular disease. These comorbidities are associated with a lower treatment response rate, a higher dropout rate, and a greater risk of relapse. Clinicians may effectively identify and treat MDD in FM patients with appropriate pharmacologic agents combined with aerobic exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapies for core FM symptoms, thus significantly reducing symptom severity for both MDD and FM. Such a comprehensive approach will result in a much-improved quality of life. MedLine content was searched via PubMed to identify eligible articles between 1995 and 2023 using search terms fibromyalgia, major depressive disorder, and treatment of depression in fibromyalgia, and the most current information is presented. In this primer for clinicians caring for FM patients, we describe clinically relevant pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management approaches for treating MDD in FM patients.

These NCCN Guidelines for Distress Management discuss the identification and treatment of psychosocial problems in patients with cancer. All patients experience some level of distress associated with a cancer diagnosis and the effects of the disease and its treatment regardless of the stage of disease. Clinically significant levels of distress occur in a subset of patients, and identification and treatment of distress are of utmost importance. The NCCN Distress Management Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights describe updates to the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List, and to the treatment algorithms for patients with trauma- and stressor-related disorders.

Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with risk of persistent neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric complications, termed “long COVID”. It is unclear whether the neuropsychological manifestations of COVID-19 present as a uniform syndrome or as distinct neurophenotypes with differing risk factors and recovery outcomes. We examined post-acute neuropsychological profiles following SARS-CoV-2 infection in 205 patients recruited from inpatient and outpatient populations, using an unsupervised machine learning cluster analysis, with objective and subjective measures as input features. This resulted in three distinct post-COVID clusters. In the largest cluster (69%), cognitive functions were within normal limits, although mild subjective attention and memory complaints were reported. Vaccination was associated with membership in this “normal cognition” phenotype. Cognitive impairment was present in the remaining 31% of the sample but clustered into two differentially impaired groups. In 16% of participants, memory deficits, slowed processing speed, and fatigue were predominant. Risk factors for membership in the “memory-speed impaired” neurophenotype included anosmia and more severe COVID-19 infection. In the remaining 15% of participants, executive dysfunction was predominant. Risk factors for membership in this milder “dysexecutive” neurophenotype included disease-nonspecific factors such as neighborhood deprivation and obesity. Recovery outcomes at 6-month follow-up differed across neurophenotypes, with the normal cognition group showing improvement in verbal memory and psychomotor speed, the dysexecutive group showing improvement in cognitive flexibility, and the memory-speed impaired group showing no objective improvement and relatively worse functional outcomes compared to the other two clusters. These results indicate that there are multiple post-acute neurophenotypes of long COVID, with different etiological pathways and recovery outcomes. This information may inform phenotype-specific approaches to treatment.

Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with risk of persistent neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric complications, termed “long COVID”. It is unclear whether the neuropsychological manifestations of COVID-19 present as a uniform syndrome or as distinct neurophenotypes with differing risk factors and recovery trajectories. We examined post-acute outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in 205 patients recruited from inpatient and outpatient populations, using an unsupervised machine learning cluster analysis, with objective and subjective neuropsychological measures as input features. This resulted in three distinct post-COVID clusters. In the largest cluster (69%), cognitive functions were within normal limits (“normal cognition” neurophenotype), although mild subjective attention and memory complaints were reported. Cognitive impairment was present in the remaining 31% of the sample but clustered into two differentially impaired groups. In 16% of participants, memory deficits, slowed processed speed, and fatigue were predominant. Risk factors for membership in the “memory-speed impaired” neurophenotype included anosmia and more severe COVID-19 infection. In the remaining 15% of participants, executive dysfunction was predominant. Risk factors for membership in this milder “dysexecutive” neurophenotype included disease-nonspecific factors such as neighborhood deprivation and obesity. Recovery trajectories at 6-month follow-up differed across neurophenotypes, with the normal cognition group showing stability, the dysexecutive group showing improvement, and the memory-speed impaired group showing persistent processing speed deficits and fatigue, as well as worse functional outcomes. These results indicate that there are multiple post-acute neurophenotypes of long COVID, with different etiological pathways and recovery trajectories. This information may inform phenotype-specific approaches to treatment.

Background. The age of a liver transplant (LT) candidate is one of many variables used in the transplant selection process. Most research about the age at transplant has used prespecified age ranges or categories in assessing associations with transplant outcomes. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the age at transplant and survival. This study aimed to examine associations of age at transplant as a continuous variable, in conjunction with other patient and disease-related factors, with patient and graft survival after LT. Methods. We used the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data to identify LT recipients between January 2002 and June 2018. Cox regression models with a restricted cubic spline term for age examined associations with graft and patient survival after LT. We assessed the interactions of age with recipients’ sex, race/ethnicity, region, indication for transplant, body mass index, model for end-stage liver disease score, diabetes, functional status at transplant, and donor risk index. Results. Age at the time of LT showed a nonlinear association with both graft and patient survival. Each demographic, clinical, transplant-related, and donor-related factor influenced these relationships differently. Conclusions. Our results suggest that some older LT candidates may be better than some younger candidates and that clinicians should not exclusively use age to determine who receives LT.

Background: About 4 out of 10 fibromyalgia patients suffer from depression. The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) guidelines recommend using antidepressants to treat fibromyalgia. Objective: To determine predictors of improved outcomes following a multicomponent treatment program. Design: We designed this longitudinal treatment outcome study to evaluate the prevalence of depression symptoms in patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia at a tertiary care facility, and the impact of depression on functional outcomes after completing a multicomponent fibromyalgia treatment program. Setting: Tertiary care center. Patients: This study included 411 adult patients with fibromyalgia who completed a multicomponent treatment program for fibromyalgia. Expert physicians performed comprehensive evaluations following American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria to confirm fibromyalgia before referral to the program. Intervention: An intensive outpatient multicomponent treatment program consisting of 16 hours of cognitive behavioral strategies served as the intervention. Measurements: Functional status was assessed using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR). Depression was evaluated with the Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression (CES-D) measure. Measures were administered prior to participation in the program and approximately 5 months following completion of the program. Results: The cohort had a high prevalence of depressive symptoms (73.2% had depression at admission). Higher depression scores at baseline predicted poorer outcomes following multi-component treatment. Effectively treated depression resulted in improved functioning at follow-up. Limitations: Findings limited to tertiary care center cohort of fibromyalgia patients. Patients did not undergo a structured clinical diagnostic interview to diagnose depression. Conclusions: The current data links depression to poorer outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia. Depression is an important modifiable factor in the management of fibromyalgia. Guidelines should reflect the importance of assessing and effectively treating depression at the time of diagnosis of fibromyalgia, to improve functional outcomes. Registration: Specific registry and specific study registration number—Institutional Review Board—(IRB# 19-000495). Funding Source: No funding.