Hamadi, Hanadi

Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a critical window for both pharmacological therapies and non-pharmacological interventions to delay cognitive decline. Objective To evaluate whether combining pharmacotherapy with multicomponent behavioral interventions enhances outcomes relative to behavioral interventions alone. Methods The sample included people with MCI (pwMCI) of any etiology who completed the HABIT Healthy Action to Benefit Independence & Thinking ® program. Baseline pharmacotherapy (acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and/or glutamate regulators) use was dichotomized (yes/no). Multivariate linear mixed-effects models examined changes from baseline in care partner-reported everyday functional skills, quality of life, self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, and HABIT compliance at post-intervention, 6 months, and 12 months, adjusting for baseline cognitive impairment severity and relevant demographic covariates. Results Among 1074 pwMCI, 413 (38.5%) were receiving pharmacotherapy at baseline. Pharmacotherapy use was more prevalent among White than non-White participants (39.4% versus 23.3%, p = 0.01). At baseline, pharmacotherapy users had more severe cognitive impairment and lower utilization of rehabilitation strategies (all p < 0.05). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements across all outcomes at post-intervention. During follow-up (mean score change compared to baseline), pharmacotherapy users showed greater increases in HABIT compliance at 6 months (3.2 versus 2.0) and 12 months (2.1 versus 1.4). In contrast, by 12 months, pharmacotherapy users experienced greater worsening of everyday functional skills related to memory (−2.1 versus −1.3) and executive function (−5.8 versus-3.7). Conclusions pwMCI undergoing pharmacotherapy entered the HABIT program with more advanced cognitive impairment. The pharmacotherapy was not associated with greater intervention-related benefit or attenuation of long-term cognitive decline.

Transitions from inpatient rehabilitation to home critically affect patient recovery and caregiver well-being. Social determinants of health (SDoH) shape these outcomes yet remain underexamined in rehabilitation settings. The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of SDoH on patient and caregiver experiences during the first 30 days following discharge from a multi-site inpatient rehabilitation facility in the southeastern United States and explore patterns of patient satisfaction and caregiver burden that can influence care transitions. A prospective cross-sectional descriptive study surveyed 61 patients and 50 caregivers using validated instruments assessing SDoH, communication, discharge preparedness, and caregiver burden. Social isolation, affecting 18% of patients and 10% of caregivers, was the most prevalent challenge. Additional challenges include health literacy and transportation barriers. Caregivers experienced substantial burden: 60% decline in social activities, 50% decreased energy, and 40.9% negative physical health effects. However, 58.1% reported strengthened patient relationships. This study identifies the importance of care continuity and SDoHs after inpatient rehabilitation. Interdisciplinary interventions focused on these key challenges are essential for improving outcomes.

Purpose To assess if hospitals with high physician employment differ in risk-standardized mortality and readmission rates. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional evaluation of data from the 2021 Hospital Readmission Reduction program, Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, American Hospital Association and Area Health Resource Files was utilized. A binary variable was created to identify hospitals with ≤ 50% or &gt;50% employed physicians. Dependent variables included 30-day mortality and readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia (PN), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) hospitalizations. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare hospitals. The final matched cohort compared 200 hospitals in each group ( ≤ 50% physicians and &gt; 50% physicians). Findings After matching, hospitals with &gt; 50% physician employment were associated with improved mortality scores for AMI (−0.36, 95% CI: −0.58, −0.14), COPD (−0.38, 95% CI: −0.63, −0.14), and PN (−0.71, 95% CI: −1.15, −0.27). No significant differences were noted for CHF mortality or readmission rates. Originality/value There has been a growth in hospitals employing physician in the United States. This work demonstrates that hospitals with higher physician employment levels are associated with lower mortality scores. This likely reflects a broader organizational phenotype characterized by alignment, scale and clinical integration rather than physician employment as an isolated strategy. Further research should examine organizational features to better disentangle the structure and combination of organizational characteristics underlying these associations.

Objective: Patients with chronic pancreatitis commonly experience abdominal pain, anxiety, depression, reduced mobility, and difficulty performing daily activities or maintaining employment. These factors contribute to diminished quality-of-life and high healthcare utilization. This study aims to explore the relationship between specific quality-of-life domains among patients with chronic pancreatitis. Methods: A 55-item online survey was administered to patients with the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis at 3 Mayo Clinic sites from December 26, 2023, to December 26, 2024. The survey included validated questions assessing demographic, clinical, and quality-of-life metrics using EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument—a standardized assessment tool that evaluates 5 key health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Results: Of the 298 patients with chronic pancreatitis who completed the survey, employed patients had decreased odds of reporting problems with mobility (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45, P < .05), self-care (OR = 0.26, P < .01), usual activities (OR = 0.47, P < .05), and anxiety/depression (OR = 0.41, P < .05). Similarly, older patients had decreased odds of reporting problems with self-care (OR = 0.91, P < .01), usual activities (OR = 0.96, P < .01), pain/discomfort (OR = 0.96, P < .01) and anxiety/depression (OR = 0.92, P < .01). However, Medicare patients had greater odds of reporting problems with self-care (OR = 5.54, P < .01) and pain/discomfort (OR = 2.58, P < .05). Conclusions: Chronic pancreatitis impacts multiple dimensions of quality-of-life beyond pain. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level tool enables comprehensive assessment of physical and mental health. Our findings highlight key associations between patient characteristics and quality-of-life domains, supporting the need for individualized, deficit-targeted interventions. These results also suggest a potential role for vocational rehabilitation in promoting functional recovery and enhancing overall well-being in individuals with chronic pancreatitis.

Nonmedical stimulant use (NMSU) among adolescents poses significant public health concerns. Using cross-sectional design, this study examined risk and protective factors for NMSU among 20,576 Florida high school students using the 2020 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey, with 925 students reporting NMSU. Guided by Hawkins and Catalano’s Social Development Model, we employed multivariate logistic regression analyses to estimate adjusted odds ratios while controlling for demographics. Students engaged in extracurricular activities were 50% less likely to report NMSU. Higher academic performance was associated with lower NMSU likelihood. Students with friends who used stimulants nonmedically were significantly more likely to engage in NMSU (AOR, 7.60; 95% CI: 6.35, 9.10), as were those living with relatives who used substances (AOR, 3.54; 95% CI: 2.94, 4.26). Findings highlight the importance of extracurricular involvement and positive social networks in mitigating NMSU. Interventions addressing family, peers, and extracurricular involvement are crucial for prevention and evidence-based policies.

Background: Addressing social determinants of health in patient care helps hospitals better understand the non-medical factors influencing patients’ health outcomes. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between hospital characteristics, county determinants, and the systematic recording of health-related social needs among general and surgical acute care hospitals in the United States. It focused on the hospital’s routine collection of data on patients’ health-related social needs, such as transportation, housing, and food insecurity. Design: A cross-sectional retrospective study design was utilized. Methods: All hospitals that completed the American Hospital Association Annual survey (n = 2254) were included in the study. A series of multinomial logistic analyses were conducted. Results: The relative risk of hospitals routinely collecting health-related social needs data is 67% lower in for-profit hospitals and 90% higher in not-for-profit hospitals compared to government hospitals. Hospitals that are part of a system are 1.5 times more likely to routinely collect data on social needs. In addition, counties with higher household income have a statistically significant higher relative risk of hospitals collecting data on social needs, though the magnitude of the difference is small. The relative risk of hospitals collecting social needs data, but not routinely, is 2 times higher in teaching hospitals and 3 times higher among system hospitals. Conclusion: Our research strongly indicates that understanding and addressing these inherent hospital-related factors are essential for effectively integrating social determinants of health into routine healthcare data collection practices. Establishing more robust guidelines and standardization in these practices may enhance hospitals’ ability to document and utilize health-related social needs information, ultimately driving improved patient outcomes and supporting more equitable care.

Background: Unmet social needs may hinder health care providers’ ability to deliver suitable care. Telehealth has emerged as a mechanism to broaden care reach; however, limited studies have examined the relationships between telehealth services and social need outcomes. This study explores the impact of telehealth services, encompassing (1) telestroke, (2) telepsychiatry and addiction treatment, (3) teleconsultation and office visits,(4) tele-intensive care units, (5) telemonitoring postdischarge, (6) ongoing chronic care management, and (7) other remote monitoring, on social need performance outcomes. Methods: The 2022 American Hospital Association annual survey and the Area Health Resource Files, which include comprehensive hospital and community indicators, were utilized. A mixed-effects logistic regression was applied, analyzing 1,005 acute care general hospitals. Results: The results revealed that patients who received telemonitoring services after discharge were 1.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-2.88) times more likely to achieve better health outcomes compared with those who did not receive such services. These patients also experienced a significant decrease in the likelihood of requiring additional hospital or system services, with an odds ratio of 2.39 (95% CI: 1.32-4.00). Additionally, patients utilizing telepsychiatry and addiction treatment services had 1.66 times higher odds of reporting improved community health status (95% CI: 1.22-2.27). Lastly, patients who used teleconsultation and office visit services had 38% lower odds of experiencing poor community health status (95% CI: 0.40-0.95). Discussion: The findings highlight the potential of targeted telehealth services to positively impact health outcomes, reduce health care costs, and improve community health status.

SUMMARY Goal While studies have examined quality and health outcomes related to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’s) Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) Program, a significant gap exists in the literature regarding the relationship between pay-for-performance initiatives and hospital financial performance in the program’s Efficiency and Cost Reduction domain. This study examined the association between hospitals’ cost inefficiency and participation in the HVBP Program by estimating the probability and magnitude of improvement or achievement in the program’s Efficiency and Cost Reduction domain. Methods The 2014–2019 Efficiency and Cost Reduction domain data were obtained from CMS and merged with the American Hospital Association’s Annual Survey Database. We conducted a zero-inflated negative binomial regression to account for the excessive number of zeros in the data. Principal Findings The negative binomial component of the model assessed the magnitude of the impact on the Efficiency and Cost Reduction improvement from each covariate, while the zero-inflated component assessed the odds of being in the “certain-zero” group, meaning no chance to improve or achieve. Hospital ownership, location, size, safety-net status, percentage of Medicare patients, and the number of registered nurses per bed were statistically significant. Additionally, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index and teaching status significantly influenced efficiency performance. Practical Applications Changes in hospital performance in this domain exist and have evolved. Hospitals might be at a disadvantage with this performance measure because of their inherent organizational structure. The HVBP Program may not provide clear enough direction or actionable incentive to address the needs of stakeholders influenced primarily by measures of Medicare spending per beneficiary. This study’s findings hold practical value for policymakers, healthcare administrators, and researchers. Policymakers can use this information to tailor future pay-for-performance programs and effectively allocate resources. Healthcare administrators can identify areas for improvement and benchmark their performance against similar institutions. Researchers can explore the program’s long-term sustainability and investigate cost drivers within different hospital groups. By understanding the link between hospital characteristics and cost reduction, all stakeholders can contribute to a more efficient healthcare system.