Citations

BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common and treatable cause of hypertension, yet data on the durability of medical treatment response beyond the first year are limited. Using the PA medical treatment outcomes framework, we evaluated long-term biochemical and clinical outcomes and factors associated with treatment response. METHODS: We conducted an international, multicenter, observational cohort study across 27 centers on 4 continents. Adults with PA treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and/or epithelial sodium channel blockers between 2016 and 2021 were included if follow-up data were available at ≥12 months. Biochemical and clinical responses were classified as complete, partial, or absent using PA medical treatment outcomes criteria. Ordinal logistic regression identified determinants of a favorable treatment response. RESULTS: The cohort included 1292 patients (47.5% women, mean age 52 years) with a median follow-up of 34 months (interquartile range, 21–51). At ≥12 months, 58.3% achieved a complete biochemical response, and 20.8% achieved a complete clinical response, with only 5% showing no response. Determinants of a favorable biochemical response included lower aldosterone and lateralization index, and higher renin and potassium levels at baseline. In those taking spironolactone, a higher daily dose was also associated with a favorable biochemical response. Determinants of a favorable clinical response included female sex, lower body mass index, shorter duration of hypertension, and absence of hypertension-mediated organ damage. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted medical therapy for PA can deliver sustained biochemical and clinical benefits. Early disease detection and adequate dose titration are highly actionable determinants of long-term treatment success.

Background Malpositioned orbital implants are an underappreciated source of significant postoperative morbidity, often necessitating revision surgery. Decision-making regarding practical frameworks to guide revision remains challenging and is not well standardized or characterized. Objective To analyze clinical presentations, radiographic failure patterns, multidisciplinary surgical strategies, and outcomes of patients undergoing revision surgery for malpositioned orbital implants. Methods A single-center retrospective consecutive case series was conducted of patients who underwent removal or replacement of malpositioned orbital implants. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, radiographic findings, surgical approaches, implant management strategies, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. Most cases were co-managed by plastic/reconstructive and oculoplastic surgeons. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings. Results Five of seven patients (71.4%) were female, with a median age of 60 years (range 29–78). Diplopia was the most common presenting symptom (5/7, 71.4%) along with pain or swelling (5/7, 71.4%) followed by globe malposition (3/7, 42.9%). CT demonstrated implant protrusion into orbital soft tissue in 4/7 patients (57.1%) and peri-implant inflammatory collections in 3/7 (42.9%). Out of our 7 revision cases, four patients (57.1%) underwent explantation alone, and three (42.9%) underwent secondary reconstruction with custom or semi-custom implants. At follow-up, diplopia improved or resolved in 4/5 affected patients (80%), and pain, swelling, and globe position improved in all symptomatic patients. Conclusion Malpositioned orbital implants demonstrate heterogeneous failure mechanisms that require individualized surgical management. A multidisciplinary approach can guide decision-making regarding implant removal versus revision of reconstruction, enabling safe revision surgery and favorable clinical outcomes. Additionally, virtual surgical planning and intraoperative navigation are enablers of safe and precise revision orbital surgery.

Background: Sexual dimorphism in the facial skeleton is fundamental to aesthetics and gender perception. This study employs AI-assisted three-dimensional (3D) imaging to analyze morphological differences between males and females in the upper, mid, and lower facial regions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 280 high-resolution craniofacial CT scans (147 females, 133 males) of adults aged 20 years and older. AI-assisted segmentation and modeling were performed using Materialise Mimics and 3-Matic software. The facial skeleton was divided into upper, mid, and lower regions for detailed morphometric evaluation. Statistical shape modeling (SSM) and heatmaps were used to visualize surface projection differences across age groups. Statistical comparisons were conducted to assess gender-based variation. Results: Significant sexual dimorphism was observed across all facial regions. In the upper face, males had greater interorbital width, frontotemporal brow width, inter-medial canthi distance, and more prominent frontal bossing. In the midface, males exhibited increased width, depth, and vertical height, with the most pronounced differences occurring in middle age. The lower face showed larger mandibular dimensions in males, including bigonial width, ramus height, and a sharper mental angle, while females had a more rounded chin and smoother mandibular contour. Heatmaps confirmed greater surface projection in male skeletons, particularly in the gonial and midfacial regions, with dimorphism decreasing with age. Conclusion: This represents the first large-sample CT study utilizing AI to comprehensively quantify facial skeletal dimorphism. Findings support the importance of gender-specific planning in facial reconstructive and aesthetic procedures.

OBJECTIVE Achieving submillimetric accuracy in stereotactic neurosurgery remains critical for safely targeting deep brain structures. Current workflows rely on intraoperative CT to register stereotactic frames to preoperative imaging, but this introduces additional radiation exposure, cost, and workflow complexity. Three-dimensional surface scanning (3DSS) potentially offers a fast radiation-free alternative capable of capturing detailed craniofacial anatomy and frame geometry. Therefore, the aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and navigational compatibility of integrating 3DSS into stereotactic workflows as a potential replacement for intraoperative CT. METHODS A human cadaveric head was imaged with both thin-slice CT and structured-light 3DSS after mounting stereotactic frame components. CT, 3DSS, and computer-aided design (CAD) models were registered using a multistep point cloud alignment pipeline involving the fast point feature histogram, the random sample consensus method, and the iterative closest point algorithm. Accuracy was assessed using surface deviation error, root mean square error (RMSE), and fiducial registration error within a commercial neuronavigation platform. RESULTS Fusion of the 3D facial scan with CT provided a mean surface deviation error of approximately 0.4 mm. Registration of the 3DSS-derived N-bar localizer to its CAD reference model produced a frame alignment RMSE of 1.3 mm. Within the navigation system, the 3DSS-based workflow achieved a mean fiducial registration error of 0.14 mm (range 0.02–0.20 mm), outperforming the conventional CT-based method (mean error 0.20 mm, range 0.09–0.40 mm). CONCLUSIONS The 3DSS-based method enabled precise submillimetric stereotactic registration without the need for intraoperative CT, reducing radiation exposure and operative complexity. This workflow is fully compatible with existing navigation systems and could serve as a practical radiation-free alternative in stereotactic neurosurgery. Future work will focus on automating frame detection, incorporating artificial intelligence–driven fusion methods, and validating this approach in live surgical settings.

Abstract Disclosure: I. Bancos: AstraZeneca. A. Ben-Shlomo: AstraZeneca. O. Hamidi: Recordati Rare Diseases, Neurocrine Biosciences, Corcept Therapeutics, Crinetics, Camurus, Xeris. A. Hamrahian: AstraZeneca. W. Huang: None. L.S. Kirschner: Corcept Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Crinetics, Sparrow Pharma, Spruce Biosciences. R. Sam: AstraZeneca. A.F. Turcu: AstraZeneca. A. Lihn: AstraZeneca. A. Mallappa: AstraZeneca. S. Perl: AstraZeneca. B. Tuyishimire: AstraZeneca. M.J. Brown: GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca. Introduction: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment for primary aldosteronism (PA) has limited efficacy in some patients. Highly selective, competitive aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs) offer an alternative therapeutic approach. SPARK (NCT04605549) was a Phase 2, open-label, multicenter trial of the ASI baxdrostat in patients with PA. Methods: Eligibility entailed: aged ≥18 years; diagnosis of PA; willingness to discontinue MRA up to 4 weeks before baxdrostat initiation; and systolic blood pressure (SBP) rise ≥20 mmHg or SBP ≥160 mmHg after discontinuation of MRA, or SBP ≥150 mmHg for patients with newly diagnosed PA who had not taken MRAs in the past 12 weeks. Patients entered a 12-week treatment period (Part 1) of once daily baxdrostat 2 mg, up-titrated to 4 mg or 8 mg at week (W) 4 or W8, respectively, if there was no significant risk of hypotension. Baxdrostat could be down-titrated to 2 mg or continued at 4 mg as needed. After W12, patients could continue baxdrostat up to W72 (Part 2) with doses at investigators’ discretion. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerability and change from baseline in mean seated SBP at W12. Results: Fifteen patients enrolled and completed Part 1; 14 patients continued to Part 2. Median (range) age was 54 (32, 75) years, 67% of patients were male, 47% were White, and median (range) body mass index was 32.0 (24.4, 41.4) kg/m2. At baseline, plasma renin activity (PRA) was <1 ng/mL/h in 12/15 (80%) patients, and 8/15 (53%) patients had hypokalemia (serum potassium <3.5 mmol/L). Mean (range) baseline SBP was 151.5 (130, 174) mmHg; diastolic BP (DBP) was 90.3 (74, 103) mmHg. At W12, mean (range) SBP change from baseline was –29.5 (–47, –12), –24.4 (–31, –17), and –23.9 (–47, –8) mmHg for patients on baxdrostat 2 mg (n=2), 4 mg (n=5), and 8 mg (n=7), respectively; DBP change was –8.0 (–14, –2), –10.4 (–20, 0), and –11.6 (–25, 7) mmHg, respectively. Overall, 11/15 (73%) patients achieved BP <140/90 mmHg and 6/15 (40%) achieved BP <130/80 mmHg at W12; reduced BP persisted in Part 2. No deaths were reported. Nine out of 15 (60%) patients had a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) during W4–W12 of Part 1 (all mild/moderate), including 1/15 (7%) patient with hyperkalemia; no serious TEAEs were reported. In Part 2, 14/14 (100%) patients had a TEAE (most mild/moderate), including 5/14 (36%) patients with hyperkalemia; one serious TEAE of hyperkalemia was reported. Mean (standard deviation, SD) serum potassium levels increased from 3.9 (0.6) mEq/L at baseline to 4.7 (0.5) mEq/L at W12. Mean (SD) 24-h urine aldosterone excretion at baseline and W12 were 30.3 (17.5) and 3.2 (2.7) µg/day, respectively. At W12, 7/15 (47%) patients had achieved unsuppressed PRA (≥1.0 ng/mL/h). Conclusions: Baxdrostat, an ASI, was well tolerated and led to reduced BP and unsuppressed renin in patients with PA. Inhibiting aldosterone synthase may be an alternative to MRAs for treating PA. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

With continued improvements in systemic cancer therapies, there has been an increase in the survivorship of patients with spinal metastases. However, many patients with spinal metastases are frail and may not be able to tolerate the morbidity of open surgery. For these patients, percutaneous ablation techniques offer a minimally invasive approach that can facilitate local tumor control and pain relief. Here we describe the currently employed modalities—radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation, and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT)—summarize the clinical support for their use, and overview the relative risks and benefits for each. All these technologies offer to help improve local tumor control and improve oncologic pain associated with vertebral metastases, and they have become a staple of multidisciplinary spine metastasis care at many centers. As clinical experience with these technologies continues to grow, their use will likely become more widely adopted, and so understanding of their indications, risks, and benefits will become increasingly important to the practicing spine oncologist.

Summary: Anatomy is a critical component of surgical training; however, traditional resources—such as Netter’s Surgical Anatomy , Gray’s Anatomy , and anatomy applications—often fall short in delivering surgically relevant, 3-dimensional (3D) perspectives of facial anatomy. Although cadaveric dissection remains a valuable teaching tool, its accessibility is limited by cost, ethical concerns, and the lack of structured curricula, making it less feasible for ongoing surgical education. To address these limitations, this article introduced a novel educational approach that integrates 3D photogrammetry and virtual reality technology into the surgical anatomy curriculum for craniofacial and aesthetic surgery. Six fresh cadaveric specimens were meticulously dissected by a plastic surgeon to illustrate the intricate layered anatomy of the face and neck. At each stage of the dissection, a photogrammetry technique was used to capture 360-degree images using 5 digital single-lens reflex cameras alongside a 3D handheld camera. This approach not only ensured high-quality imaging but also facilitated the creation of detailed, lifelike virtual 3D models, enhancing the understanding of facial and neck anatomy within a surgical context. Additionally, we present some technical refinements of the 3D volume renderings to capture precise anatomical details during our dissections. Preliminary results from the use of this technology in anatomy courses and workshops indicated trainee engagement, a clearer grasp of the spatial anatomical relationships, and greater confidence in applying this knowledge to hands-on surgical procedures.