Scheitler, Kristen M.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is the most commonly performed bedside emergent neurosurgical procedure. However, catheter misplacement occurs in approximately 25% of cases, potentially resulting in neurological injury or the need for repositioning, highlighting the need for safer and more accurate placement techniques. This review aims to (1) summarize technological innovations developed to enhance the accuracy and safety of bedside EVD placement, (2) evaluate their reported benefits and limitations, and (3) identify key barriers to their clinical implementation in critical care settings. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus combining terms related to EVD placement and assistive technologies. All the studies evaluated EVD placement using simulations, phantoms, cadavers, and patient procedures conducted at the bedside and in the operating room. RESULTS: We identified 3898 records, and 76 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 30 studies compared stereotactic systems, ultrasound guidance, frameless neuronavigation, and augmented or mixed reality technologies to the freehand technique. These studies consistently reported improved accuracy with advanced systems although complication rates and procedural times were variably reported. An additional 35 and 12 studies evaluated nonimmersive and immersive technologies, respectively, in noncomparative settings. Most of these demonstrated high first-pass success and mean tip deviations under 3 mm. Variability in the definitions of accuracy and procedural metrics limited data synthesis, but the overall findings suggest a promising trajectory for technology-assisted EVD placement. CONCLUSION: Assistive technologies for EVD placement show potential to improve accuracy and safety over the freehand technique. These early successes signal potential to improve bedside neurosurgical care. Realizing this promise will require future studies to standardize accuracy metrics, report time, and safety outcomes consistently and validate performance in real-world critical care settings.

OBJECTIVE Achieving submillimetric accuracy in stereotactic neurosurgery remains critical for safely targeting deep brain structures. Current workflows rely on intraoperative CT to register stereotactic frames to preoperative imaging, but this introduces additional radiation exposure, cost, and workflow complexity. Three-dimensional surface scanning (3DSS) potentially offers a fast radiation-free alternative capable of capturing detailed craniofacial anatomy and frame geometry. Therefore, the aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and navigational compatibility of integrating 3DSS into stereotactic workflows as a potential replacement for intraoperative CT. METHODS A human cadaveric head was imaged with both thin-slice CT and structured-light 3DSS after mounting stereotactic frame components. CT, 3DSS, and computer-aided design (CAD) models were registered using a multistep point cloud alignment pipeline involving the fast point feature histogram, the random sample consensus method, and the iterative closest point algorithm. Accuracy was assessed using surface deviation error, root mean square error (RMSE), and fiducial registration error within a commercial neuronavigation platform. RESULTS Fusion of the 3D facial scan with CT provided a mean surface deviation error of approximately 0.4 mm. Registration of the 3DSS-derived N-bar localizer to its CAD reference model produced a frame alignment RMSE of 1.3 mm. Within the navigation system, the 3DSS-based workflow achieved a mean fiducial registration error of 0.14 mm (range 0.02–0.20 mm), outperforming the conventional CT-based method (mean error 0.20 mm, range 0.09–0.40 mm). CONCLUSIONS The 3DSS-based method enabled precise submillimetric stereotactic registration without the need for intraoperative CT, reducing radiation exposure and operative complexity. This workflow is fully compatible with existing navigation systems and could serve as a practical radiation-free alternative in stereotactic neurosurgery. Future work will focus on automating frame detection, incorporating artificial intelligence–driven fusion methods, and validating this approach in live surgical settings.

Background: Invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation in psychiatry represents a burgeoning field that leverages advanced neuromodulation techniques to address substance use disorders (SUDs). Aims: This narrative review synthesizes findings from multiple reviews to evaluate the efficacy of neuromodulation in treating SUDs. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted between December 2024 and April 2025, focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examined various neuromodulation modalities, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). The selected reviews were analyzed to identify common themes, outcomes, and gaps in the current understanding of these treatments for SUDs. Results: 11 reviews met the final inclusion criteria; 5 focused on non-invasive neuromodulation (rTMS, tDCS) and 6 on invasive neuromodulation (DBS). Non-invasive neurostimulation was associated with modest improvements in craving and cognitive dysfunction in individuals with SUDs. Similarly, invasive neuromodulation (DBS), through high-frequency stimulation of the bilateral nucleus accumbens, appeared to reduce cravings and improve comorbid psychiatric symptoms in both preclinical and human studies. Importantly, small sample sizes, heterogeneity in targets and stimulation protocols, and short follow-up periods significantly limit the generalizability of current findings from both non-invasive and invasive neuromodulation studies. Conclusions: As novel and more effective therapies for the treatment of SUD are desperately needed, procedural interventional psychiatry holds promise. However, despite encouraging results, existing evidence is still preliminary, and larger, rigorously designed studies are warranted to further establish the safety and efficacy of neuromodulatory interventions for SUD treatment.

Abstract Introduction: Opioid use disorder constitutes a significant health crisis in the United States, contributing to high rates of opioid overdose-related deaths. A major driver of these fatalities is fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid with both sedative and analgesic properties. These properties that make fentanyl clinically effective also increase its addictive potential. Early in opioid addiction, abnormal increases in extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) reinforce excessive drug-seeking behaviors which can lead to fatal respiratory depression. Given this mechanism, we investigated whether high frequency stimulation (HFS), mimicking human deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) could block NAc dopamine increase following an acute lethal dose of fentanyl. We hypothesized that VTA DBS would mitigate these dopaminergic responses and prevent fentanyl-induced respiratory failure. Methods: Multiple cyclic square wave voltammetry (M-CSWV), was applied via a carbon fiber microelectrode in the NAc of urethane-anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats. Dopamine levels were recorded at baseline and following acute fentanyl (30 µg/kg, i.v.). HFS (130 Hz frequency, 200 µsec pulse width, and 0.2 mA amplitude) was administered to the VTA before and during fentanyl exposure. Results: Acute fentanyl administration resulted in a 178.2% increase in NAc dopamine levels from baseline, accompanied by a decline in respiratory rates to critically low levels (45 breaths per minute vs. 102 bpm), eventually resulting in 100% mortality. HFS of the VTA did not significantly alter baseline tonic dopamine levels or prevent fentanyl-induced dopamine increase in the NAc but was able to fully rescue fentanyl-induced respiratory failure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A typical workflow for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery consists of head frame placement, followed by stereotactic computed tomography (CT) or MRI before surgical implantation of the hardware. At some institutions, this workflow is prolonged when the imaging scanner is located far away from the operating room, thereby increasing workflow times by the addition of transport times. Recently, the intraoperative O-arm has been shown to provide accurate image fusion with preoperative CT or MR imaging, suggesting the possibility of obtaining an intraoperative localization scan and postoperative confirmation. In this article, we aim to evaluate the compatibility of the stereotactic frame system with the intraoperative O-arm system regarding lead accuracy and surgical flow. METHODS: A total of 17 patients undergoing DBS surgery for movement disorders were evaluated. One patient underwent both the stereotactic CT and O-arm localization, while 16 patients underwent only intraoperative O-arm localization. Following lead placement, intraoperative O-arm imaging was obtained to evaluate the accuracy of the lead placement. Accuracy was defined as the error measured as the distance from the center of the planned trajectory to the cannula. RESULTS: Less than 0.1 mm difference was found between the O-arm imaging technique and CT image localization of the NaviNetics stereotactic head frame in DBS surgery. Of the 16 patients who underwent the intraoperative O-arm imaging alone, the targets included bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus (16 leads), bilateral globus pallidus internus (4 leads), and subthalamic nucleus (12 leads). The mean ± SD radial error in the probe's eye view was 0.71 ± 0.33 mm for n = 32 leads. No tract hemorrhage was observed. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative O-arm imaging can be used safely and effectively for stereotactic registration and lead placement confirmation with the stereotactic system in both awake and asleep DBS surgery.

OBJECTIVE Conventional frame-based stereotactic systems have circumferential base frames, often necessitating deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery in two stages: intracranial electrode insertion followed by surgical re-preparation and pulse generator implantation. Some patients do not tolerate awake surgery, underscoring the need for a safe alternative for asleep DBS surgery. A frame-based stereotactic system with a skull-mounted "key" in lieu of a circumferential base frame received US FDA clearance. The authors describe the system’s application for single-stage, asleep DBS surgery in 8 patients at their institution and review its workflow and technical considerations. METHODS Eight patients underwent DBS lead insertion and IPG implantation in a single surgical preparation under general anesthesia using the system. Postoperative CT imaging confirmed lead placement. RESULTS Eight patients underwent implantation of 15 total leads targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (4 patients), globus pallidus internus (GPi; 3 patients), and subthalamic nucleus (STN; 1 patient). Intraoperative microelectrode recording was conducted for GPi and STN targets. Postoperative CT imaging revealed a mean ± SD radial error of 1.24 ± 0.45 mm (n = 15 leads), without surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS The stereotactic system facilitated safe and effective asleep, single-stage DBS surgery, maintaining traditional lead accuracy standards.