Citations

Importance Cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is associated with reduced cognition. It is uncertain whether revascularization might be an effective treatment for cognitive impairment in these patients. Objective To test whether any cognitive benefit from revascularization of high-grade, asymptomatic ICA stenosis varies based on the degree of baseline cerebral hemodynamic impairment. Design, Setting, and Participants This substudy was conducted within a multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial. Adults (aged 35-86 years) without dementia with eighth-grade education or higher and unilateral asymptomatic ICA stenosis greater than or equal to 70% were enrolled from January 2018 to July 2024 at 61 sites in North America (last follow-up in July 2025). Of 607 participants screened from 2485 in CREST-2, 392 were enrolled. Magnetic resonance or computed tomographic perfusion imaging tested for baseline hemodynamic impairment defined by delayed time-to-peak (TTP) arrival of intravenous contrast in the hemisphere ipsilateral minus contralateral to the stenotic artery. Intervention Carotid revascularization (endarterectomy or stenting) plus intensive medical management (IMM) vs IMM alone. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the difference in composite cognitive z score over 1 year based on 5 cognitive tests. The primary analysis tested for an interaction between treatment group (revascularization vs IMM alone) and degree of baseline hemodynamic impairment among those with reduced baseline cognition (cognitive z score ≤−1.0 SD). Results Of 392 participants enrolled (mean age, 71 years; 125 [32%] females), 61 were excluded for missing baseline imaging and 40 for missing cognitive examinations or other covariates, leaving 291 with complete data. Fifty-one had reduced cognition at baseline (25 in the revascularization group and 26 in the IMM alone group). TTP ranged from no interhemispheric TTP delay to a more-than-2-second delay. Mean (SD) cognitive z scores were −1.36 (0.51) at baseline and −1.17 (0.47) at 1 year in the revascularization group and −1.34 (0.83) at baseline and −1.01 (0.97) at 1 year in the IMM alone group. The primary analysis showed no difference in cognition by treatment group over 1 year, adjusting for treatment group × hemodynamic status interaction and other covariates (adjusted difference in cognitive z score, −0.15 SD [95% CI, −0.54 to 0.24]). The interaction was not significant (β estimate = 0.018 [95% CI, −0.025 to 0.061]; P = .40). Conclusions and Relevance In this substudy of a randomized clinical trial, there was no differential effect of revascularization vs IMM alone on cognition over 1 year by cerebral hemodynamic status among those with baseline reduced cognition, suggesting that revascularization does not improve cognitive dysfunction by restoring flow to the brain in chronic asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03121209

Background Studies suggest that hypoperfusion from heart failure (HF) may contribute to cognitive decline. However, the relationship between the HF subtypes and cognition remains poorly described in real‐world populations. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional study of patients aged ≥18 years seen at the Mayo Clinic in 2022 who underwent echocardiogram and cognitive assessment within 1 year. HF was classified per the 2022 American Heart Association as no HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF), HF with mildly reduced EF, and HF with reduced EF. Cognitive impairment was categorized using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score as normal (≥26), mild (18–25), and moderate to severe (<18). Linear regression assessed EF–Montreal Cognitive Assessment correlation and logistic regression the association between HF subtypes and cognitive dysfunction, adjusting for age, sex, race, and vascular risk factors. Results A total of 1592 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age, 75.7±13.8 years; 48.5% women). Lower EF was associated with worse cognitive performance (postadjustment β=0.033, P =0.013). Patients with HF with reduced EF and patients with HF with preserved EF had significantly lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores than those without HF (17.6±6.2 and 18.9±5.8 versus 19.9±6.0, P <0.001). The prevalence of moderate to severe cognitive impairment was highest in HF with reduced EF (43.3%), followed by HF with preserved EF (34.4%), no heart failure (28.6%), and HF with mildly reduced EF (23.4%) (adjusted trend P =0.032). Conclusions HF, independent of ejection fraction alone, is associated with cognitive impairment. Further studies should confirm these findings and evaluate the impact of interventions targeting EF and HF subtypes on cognitive outcomes.

Background Effective leadership is critical to the success of complex multidisciplinary healthcare organisations. As the organisation emerged from the global pandemic, Mayo Clinic recognised a need to transform its traditional, linear care model into a dynamic, platform-based approach to support its strategy. This required a new leadership model that could support and equip leaders with the skills needed to drive patient-centred healthcare transformation from within. Objective To develop and validate a new leadership competency framework capable of supporting future-ready leadership. Methods A multiphase, evidence-based approach was employed: (1) a visionary interview, goal setting and literature review; (2) focus groups with 23 leaders from across the organisation; (3) iterative competency framework development; and (4) a validation study involving a stratified sample of 129 physician leaders who rated competencies on importance and differentiation, and a qualitative verification by key stakeholders. Results Five core competencies with 23 behaviours were identified. The validation analysis established all behaviours as important for differentiating leadership performance. Stakeholder review confirmed the competencies were actionable and applicable across leadership roles at all levels. Conclusion The Leads Self, Leads Others, Inspires Others, Forward Thinking and Engages Others (abbreviated LLIFE) competency model positions a healthcare organisation to advance leadership excellence in a rapidly evolving healthcare environment that requires comprehensive transformation. It aligns with strategic goals, embeds values-based behaviours and supports continuous development, establishing a model that other healthcare institutions may learn from and adapt.