Famuyide, Abimbola O.

Background Effective leadership is critical to the success of complex multidisciplinary healthcare organisations. As the organisation emerged from the global pandemic, Mayo Clinic recognised a need to transform its traditional, linear care model into a dynamic, platform-based approach to support its strategy. This required a new leadership model that could support and equip leaders with the skills needed to drive patient-centred healthcare transformation from within. Objective To develop and validate a new leadership competency framework capable of supporting future-ready leadership. Methods A multiphase, evidence-based approach was employed: (1) a visionary interview, goal setting and literature review; (2) focus groups with 23 leaders from across the organisation; (3) iterative competency framework development; and (4) a validation study involving a stratified sample of 129 physician leaders who rated competencies on importance and differentiation, and a qualitative verification by key stakeholders. Results Five core competencies with 23 behaviours were identified. The validation analysis established all behaviours as important for differentiating leadership performance. Stakeholder review confirmed the competencies were actionable and applicable across leadership roles at all levels. Conclusion The Leads Self, Leads Others, Inspires Others, Forward Thinking and Engages Others (abbreviated LLIFE) competency model positions a healthcare organisation to advance leadership excellence in a rapidly evolving healthcare environment that requires comprehensive transformation. It aligns with strategic goals, embeds values-based behaviours and supports continuous development, establishing a model that other healthcare institutions may learn from and adapt.

IntroductionWe calculate the financial margins for delivery of routine antenatal care as reimbursed by Medicaid. Prenatal care cost varies with overhead, health care provider type, and number of office visits. Antenatal care is only one component of the global maternity bundle, which also includes intrapartum and postpartum care.MethodsTime for provision of low‐risk antenatal care was determined prospectively from a study of 133 low‐risk pregnant patients. Health care provider time cost was estimated using mean wages for obstetricians and midwives. Margins were estimated by subtracting cost of provider services and overhead for the antenatal component of maternity care from total Medicaid reimbursement for the pregnancy global package (CPT 59400) using 2015 dollars. The maternity bundle elements of routine prenatal laboratory tests, ultrasounds, intrapartum care, and postpartum care were not included in our analysis of cost components.ResultsPatients received an average of 215 minutes of direct provider time per pregnancy. At the 50th percentile for physician payment and assuming overhead is 53.4% of revenue, practice margins varied by state from −$1067 to +$675, with a median of −$357. Median margins for midwifery care were +$15, with a range of −$579 to +$885. Margins were negative if overhead costs exceeded 33% of revenue for physician care and 55% of revenue for midwifery care.DiscussionIn many states, Medicaid reimbursement for the global maternity package is less than the actual cost of antenatal care alone. Improving reimbursement or decreasing costs is necessary to make maternity care more cost‐effective.

Abstract BackgroundTraditional prenatal care includes up to 13 in person office visits, and the cost of this care is not well-described. Alternative models are being explored to better meet the needs of patients and providers. OB Nest is a telemedicine-enhanced program with a reduced frequency of in-person prenatal visits. The cost implications of connected care services added to prenatal care packages are unclear.MethodsUsing data from the OB Nest randomized, controlled trial we analyzed the provider and staff time associated with prenatal care in the traditional and OB Nest models. Fewer visits were required for OB Nest, but given the compensatory increase in connected care activity and supplies, the actual cost difference is not known.Nursing and provider staff time was prospectively recorded for all patients enrolled in the OB Nest clinical trial. Published 2015 national wages for healthcare workers were used to calculate the actual labor cost of providing either traditional or OB Nest prenatal care in 2015 US dollars. Overhead expenses and opportunity costs were not considered.ResultsTotal provider cost was decreased caring for the OB Nest participants, but nursing cost was increased. OB Nest care required an average of 160.8 (+/- 45.0) minutes provider time and 87.8 (+/- 25.1) minutes nursing time, compared to 215.0 (+/- 71.6) and 99.6 (+/- 29.7) minutes for traditional prenatal care (P<0.01). This translated into decreased provider cost and increased nursing cost (P<0.01). Supply costs increased, travel costs declined, and overhead costs declined in the OB Nest model. ConclusionsIn this trial, labor cost for OB Nest prenatal care was 34% higher than for traditional prenatal care. The increased cost is largely attributable to additional nursing connected care time, and in some practice settings may be offset by decreased overhead costs and increased provider billing opportunities. Future efforts will be focused on development of digital solutions for some routine nursing tasks to decrease the overall cost of the model. Trial Registrations: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02082275

This month we focus on current research in hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disorders. Dr. Famuyide discusses four recent publications, which are concluded with a “bottom-line” that is the take-home message. A complete reference for each can be found on Box 1 on this page along with direct links to abstracts.

AbstractEndocrine regulation of uterine biology is critical for embryo receptivity and human reproduction. Uterine endometrium depends on extrinsic sex steroid input and hence likely has mechanisms that enable adaptation to hormonal variation. Emerging evidence suggests that sex steroid bioavailability in the endometrium is determined by adjusting their metabolic rate and fate via regulation of cytochrome (CYP) p450 enzymes. The CYP enzymes are targeted by ubiquitously expressed Sp/Krüppel-like (Sp/KLF) transcription factors. Specifically, KLF11 is highly expressed in reproductive tissues, regulates an array of endocrine/metabolic pathways via epigenetic histone-based mechanisms and, when aberrantly expressed, is associated with diabetes and reproductive tract diseases, such as leiomyoma and endometriosis. Using KLF11 as a model to investigate epigenetic regulation of endometrial first-pass metabolism, we evaluated the expression of a comprehensive array of metabolic enzymes in Ishikawa cells. KLF11 repressed most endometrial CYP enzymes. To characterize KLF11-recruited epigenetic regulatory mechanisms, we focused on the estrogen-metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4. KLF11 expression declined in secretory phase endometrial epithelium associated with increased CYP3A4 expression. Additionally, KLF11 bound to CYP3A4 promoter GC elements and thereby repressed promoter, message, protein as well as enzymatic function. This repression was epigenetically mediated, because KLF11 colocalized with and recruited the corepressor SIN3A/histone deacetylase resulting in selective deacetylation of the CYP3A4 promoter. Repression was reversed by a mutation in KLF11 that abrogated cofactor recruitment and binding. This repression was also pharmacologically reversible with an histone deacetylase inhibitor. Pharmacological alteration of endometrial metabolism could have long-term translational implications on human reproduction and uterine disease.