Citations

Abstract Background and Aims EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is an effective option to palliate symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). While the jejunum is conventionally targeted (EUS-GJ), targeting the duodenum (EUS-GD) may offer clinical advantages. Outcomes were compared for EUS-GJ and EUS-GD. Methods Adult patients who underwent EUS-GE for GOO between 2020 and 2024 were included and categorized as an EUS-GD if the stent entered the transverse or ascending duodenum or an EUS-GJ if the stent entered more distally. The primary outcome was clinical success (soft diet tolerance at 7 days). Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), stent misdeployment, and unplanned endoscopic reintervention. Baseline demographic variables and outcomes were compared with statistical significance at p < 0.05. Results Of the 139 included patients (median age 67 years (IQR 61–74); 41% female), 105 underwent EUS-GJ and 34 underwent EUS-GD. Clinical success was 98% for EUS-GJ and 94% for EUS-GD (p = 0.25). The misdeployment rate was 7% for EUS-GJ and 0% for EUS-GD (p = 0.19). The AE rate was 22% for EUS-GJ and 12% for EUS-GD (p = 0.23). There were no significant differences for stent obstruction (EUS-GJ 12% vs. EUS-GD 6%), bleeding (2% vs. 6%), perforation (4% vs. 0%), stent migration (1% vs. 0%), infection (3% vs. 0%), and unplanned reintervention (14% vs. 9%). Conclusion Both EUS-GJ and EUS-GD demonstrate high clinical success with no significant differences in adverse event rates. These data can support intraprocedural decision-making for endoscopists performing EUS-GE.

Background: Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are recommended for the endoscopic palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). Placement of SEMS during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been associated with an increased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate rates of PEP in patients who underwent SEMS placement for pancreatic versus non-pancreatic malignancy. Design: Retrospective Cohort Study. Methods: Patients who underwent SEMS placement for DMBO between June 2017 and May 2021 were identified retrospectively from a procedural billing database. PEP incidence was compared between pancreatic and non-pancreatic DMBO groups and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for PEP. Results: A total of 488 individuals were identified, with 395 (80.9%) cases of DMBO due to pancreatic and 93 (19.1%) due to non-pancreatic malignancy. Stent types included 124 (25.4%) fully covered (FCSEMS) and 364 (74.6%) uncovered metal stents (UCSEMS). The overall rate of PEP in the cohort was 6.3% with no significant difference between pancreatic and non-pancreatic etiologies (6.1% vs 7.5%, p = 0.606). When adjusted for age <50 years old, female sex, and pancreatic stent placement, a non-pancreatic malignancy was not associated with an increased risk of PEP (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.36–2.15). Conclusion: No statistically significant difference in PEP rates was seen after biliary sphincterotomy and SEMS placement for palliation of DMBO in patients with pancreatic versus non-pancreatic malignancies.

Background: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is recommended as part of multimodality sampling in the evaluation of biliary strictures, but can be false negative in 40%–50% cases. The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess predictors of false-negative FISH in patients with biliary strictures. Methods: Patients undergoing tissue sampling for biliary strictures from October 20 to February 22 were prospectively enrolled (NCT04572711). Procedural factors such as sampling techniques, order, and utilization of combination sampling were recorded. Results of an optimized pancreatobiliary FISH panel with locus-specific probes for 1q21, 7p12, 8q24, and 9p21 were reported per guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using BlueSky Statistics v.10.3.1, R package v8.81. Results: Of 327 patients, 93 (28.5%) were diagnosed with malignancy. A false-negative pancreatobiliary fluorescence in situ hybridization (PB-FISH) was reported in 40 (43.1%) patients. A history of primary sclerosing cholangitis was associated with lower odds of having a false-negative PB-FISH (aOR=0.38, 95% CI=0.16–0.82, p=0.02), whereas a hilar stricture was associated with a significantly higher false-negative PB-FISH in those with cholangiocarcinoma (aOR=3.2 [1.4–7.9], p=0.009). Dilation of biliary strictures prior to brushing was not associated with a lower rate of false-negative PB-FISH. Conclusions: In this prospective study, hilar strictures were more likely to have false-negative PB-FISH. Dilation of strictures did not affect PB-FISH performance. These results can help guide PB-FISH interpretation.

Abstract Clinicians struggle to accurately classify biliary strictures as benign or malignant. Current endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based sampling modalities including brush cytology and forceps biopsy have poor sensitivity for pathologic confirmation of malignancy. Cholangioscopy allows for direct visualization and sampling of biliary pathology; however, this technology is also associated with inaccurate classification of biliary disease. Previously, an artificial intelligence (AI) system that analyzes cholangioscopy footage was found to be more accurate in diagnosing biliary malignancy than ERCP sampling techniques. The aim of this study was to validate this AI system on a new series of examinations. Three academic centers collected all available unedited cholangioscopy recordings. The videos were processed by the cholangioscopy AI system. After analyzing videos, the AI system provided predictions as to whether malignancy was present. AI performance in classifying strictures was compared with the performance of brush cytology and forceps biopsy. 112 cholangioscopy examinations (containing 4 817 081 images) were generated from 99 patients. Of those examinations, 61 (54.5%) were for investigation of biliary strictures (31 [50.8%] benign, 30 [49.2%] malignant). For the correct classification of strictures, the AI system was 80.0% sensitive and 90.3% specific. It was also significantly more accurate for stricture classification (85.2%) than brush cytology (52.5%; P<0.001), forceps biopsy (68.2%; P=0.04), and the combination of brush cytology and forceps biopsy (66.7%; P=0.02). A previously developed cholangioscopy AI system was found to continually outperform standard ERCP sampling modalities for accurate identification of malignancy, without additional retraining, in a multicenter validation cohort.

Recent guidelines on biliary cannulation are lacking. This guideline is an initiative of the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) with the involvement of a panel of experts from Asia, Europe, and America. Relevant clinical questions on four areas (post‐endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] pancreatitis [PEP] prophylaxis, biliary cannulation techniques, sphincterotomy/papillary balloon dilation, and biliary cannulation in special circumstances) were developed and answered after systematic reviews of the literature and using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Successful biliary cannulation and sphincterotomy are cornerstones of ERCP and are indispensable for almost all therapeutic and advanced diagnostic procedures. However, adverse events, particularly PEP, may commonly occur and impair patients' outcomes. A high cannulation rate and a low rate of PEP are quality indicators for ERCP and should be the goal of all endoscopists. With this guideline we aimed to provide clinical practice advice applicable worldwide, regardless of resources and expertise availability. The main recommendations focus on specific aspects of ERCP, including pre‐, intra‐, and postprocedural measures to reduce the risk of PEP, the technique for an initial biliary cannulation attempt, options for cannulation in cases of difficult biliary access, alternatives to ERCP in case of failure (percutaneous‐ and endoscopic ultrasound‐guided), and biliary access in altered anatomy (periampullary diverticulum and postsurgical anatomy) and in the presence of duodenal stenosis.