Citations

Importance Clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine aim to deliver high-quality evidence with greater efficiency, including smaller sample sizes and shorter timelines. The selection of sensitive and reliable end points is central to this goal. Right ventricular (RV) structure and function play a critical role in many cardiovascular conditions; however, RV-specific parameters remain underused and inconsistently applied in interventional clinical trials. In this article, the current and emerging role of RV-focused imaging and hemodynamic parameters as end points in clinical trials are explored and a comprehensive framework for their development, validation, and broader implementation is proposed. Observations Across multiple disease domains, RV-focused parameters derived from echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and right-sided heart catheterization demonstrate potential value in assessing the therapeutic effects of new medicines or devices across a wide range of conditions including heart failure, cardiomyopathies, valve diseases, pulmonary hypertension, and congenital heart conditions. However, their use is inconsistent, and feasibility challenges are common, particularly in multicenter clinical trial settings. Key limitations include variability in imaging acquisition, incomplete data capture, lack of standardized protocols, and insufficient validation linking short-term RV changes to long-term clinical outcomes. Emerging tools such as artificial intelligence may improve reproducibility and efficiency, while collaborative, multidisciplinary efforts are essential for advancing end-point development. Conclusions and Relevance RV-specific end points hold substantial promise for enhancing the sensitivity and mechanistic insight of clinical trials but remain inadequately integrated into current practice. Optimal end-point selection requires balancing clinical relevance, analytical validity, and operational feasibility, with consideration of disease-specific pathophysiology and trial design. Standardization of acquisition, validation of clinically meaningful changes, and centralized data analysis are important next steps. Broader adoption of robust RV metrics supported by technological innovation and cross-sector collaboration has the potential to improve trial efficiency, accelerate therapeutic development, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Importance Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) demonstrated superior outcomes over medical therapy in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in the Edwards EVOQUE Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Pivotal Clinical Investigation of Safety and Clinical Efficacy Using a Novel Device II (TRISCEND II) randomized clinical trial, and received regulatory approval in the US in 2024. Contemporary real-world data on its effectiveness and safety remain limited. Objective To evaluate 30-day clinical, echocardiographic, and health status outcomes of TTVR in real-world use. Design, Setting, and Population Retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients who underwent TTVR in the US from February 2024 through March 2025 in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. Patients had symptomatic, severe TR despite optimal medical therapy and TTVR was deemed appropriate by a heart team. Statistical analysis was conducted from September 2025 to February 2026. Exposure Device-enabled TTVR. Main Outcomes and Measures Thirty-day event rates (all-cause death, stroke, bleeding, new cardiac implantable electronic device [CIED] implantation, heart failure hospitalizations), TR reduction, and changes in health status (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary [KCCQ-OS] score) are reported. Subgroup analyses examined the impact of baseline CIED status on outcomes. Results Among 1034 attempted procedures at 82 centers (mean [SD] age, 77.1 [10.6] years; 69.1% female; 73.2% NYHA functional class III/IV), a valve was successfully implanted in 1017 patients (98.4%). Mild or less TR was achieved in 98.4% of patients post procedure and in 97.7% at 30 days. At 30 days, all-cause mortality was 3.1%; stroke, 0.2%; bleeding, 7.9%; new CIED, 15.9% in CIED-naive patients; and heart failure hospitalization, 3.1%. There were significant improvements in NYHA functional class (class I/II, 82.7%; P < .001) and mean KCCQ-OS score (22.4 points; P < .001) from baseline to 30 days. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality ( P = .47), heart failure hospitalization ( P > .99), and functional outcomes ( P = .55) when patients were stratified by baseline CIED status. Conclusions and Relevance Early US real-world experience with TTVR confirms safety and effectiveness in patients with severe TR. Thirty-day outcomes are consistent with the TRISCEND II pivotal trial, demonstrating acceptable safety, near-complete TR elimination, and significant health status improvements in an older, comorbid population. Rates of new CIED implantation and bleeding were lower than randomized clinical trial experience.

Abstract Aims The pathophysiology of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is not well understood. Methods and results We investigated dynamic changes in TR severity during exercise in patients with HFpEF and associated relationships with haemodynamics, cardiopulmonary reserve, and prognosis using invasive haemodynamic exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography and expired gas analysis. Among 169 patients with HFpEF (91 no TR, 44 mild TR, 34 ≥ moderate TR), older age and atrial fibrillation were more common in patients with greater TR severity. Right heart remodelling and dysfunction were more frequently observed with greater TR severity, particularly in the right atrium, along with stepwise increases in right atrial (RA) pressure and interventricular septal flattening, and decreases in cardiac output (CO). During exercise, TR severity frequently worsened, and over half of the patients with moderate TR at rest displayed severe TR during exercise, accompanied by profound RA dilatation, reduced RA reservoir strain, increased septal flattening, and more severely impaired CO reserve. Abnormalities in tricuspid annular motion and ventricular interaction were amplified by exercise with greater TR, but exercise pulmonary vascular pressures did not differ across groups. Patients with ≥ moderate TR during exercise displayed higher event rates (hazard ratio 2.85, 95% confidence interval 1.18–6.85), but patients with mild TR had similar prognosis as those without TR in adjusted models. Conclusions Tricuspid regurgitation in HFpEF is related to advanced RA myopathy and often worsens during exercise leading to dynamic right-sided heart failure, exaggerated ventricular interaction, impaired CO reserve, and increased risk for adverse outcomes. These data emphasize the clinical importance of exercise evaluation and call for further study of novel treatments in those with significant resting and provocable TR.

ABSTRACT Aims The impact of treatment for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) across different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) to conservative (medical) management across LVEF categories. Methods and results Patients with severe isolated TR from the TRIGISTRY, a multicentre international registry, were categorized based on LVEF (preserved ejection fraction [pEF]: ≥50%, mildly reduced ejection fraction [mrEF]: 41–49%, and reduced ejection fraction [rEF]: ≤40%). We assessed the impact of treatment modality and procedural success (mild-to-moderate or lower residual TR) on 2-year survival within each LVEF category. Among 2384 patients, 1383 had pEF, 400 had mrEF, and 601 had rEF. Compared to conservative management, surgery (p < 0.0005) and TTVI (p < 0.0001) were associated with a survival benefit in patients with pEF. No significant survival advantage was observed in patients with mrEF (p = 0.28 for both), nor in those with rEF (p = 0.76 and p = 0.22, respectively). Similar results were obtained when surgical and transcatheter interventions were grouped (p < 0.0001, p = 0.17 and p = 0.29 in patients with pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Patients with residual TR after TTVI exhibited a trend toward worse survival compared to those managed conservatively across all LVEF categories (p = 0.47, p = 0.33 and p = 0.008 in pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Conclusions Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention, whether surgical or transcatheter-based, was associated with improved survival in patients with pEF but not in those with mrEF or rEF. Residual TR remained a significant prognostic factor across the entire LVEF spectrum. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection when considering TTVI in individuals with rEF.

Abstract Background and Aims The TRISCEND II trial demonstrated superior clinical benefits for patients with ≥severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) treated with the EVOQUE transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) system plus medical therapy vs medical therapy alone. This work reports 1-year and 18-month outcomes in patients stratified by baseline TR severity. Methods The multicentre, prospective TRISCEND II trial enrolled 400 patients with symptomatic, ≥severe TR, and randomized 2:1 to TTVR (n = 267) or control (n = 133). In a post hoc analysis, patients were stratified into severe TR (n = 172) and massive/torrential TR (n = 220) cohorts. Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes were reported at 1 year, with Kaplan–Meier estimates for all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization assessed at 18 months. Study oversight included an independent echocardiographic core laboratory, clinical events committee, and data safety monitoring board. Results One year after TTVR, TR was ≤mild in 95.2% of severe TR and 95.3% of massive/torrential TR patients. The primary safety and effectiveness endpoint (win ratio) favoured TTVR over control regardless of baseline TR severity: severe {1.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11, 2.43]} and massive/torrential [2.20 (1.55, 3.14)]. At 18 months, TTVR patients had similar mortality to controls [rate difference: severe 0.2% (−11.6, 11.9), massive/torrential −5.8% (−17.6, 6.0)], whereas HF hospitalization rates favoured TTVR in the massive/torrential cohort [vs control, severe 9.8% (−3.0, 22.7), massive/torrential -15.2% (−28.9, −1.5)]. Conclusions Patients with ≥severe TR benefit from TTVR, experiencing improvements in TR severity, functional capacity, and quality of life regardless of baseline TR severity, with a signal for greater benefit in patients with more advanced disease.

Abstract Background and Aims Classification and risk stratification in aortic (AR), mitral (MR), and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) remains a significant clinical challenge. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system to assess valvular regurgitation and stratify MR-progression risk. Methods Using transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) at two sites (internal development/test, external test), the DELINEATE-Regurgitation system was developed to classify AR, MR, and TR severity using colour Doppler videos. Methods of summating video-level classifications into study-level predictions were tested, comparing single-view with multiview approaches integrating predictions across multiple videos. Model agreement with cardiologists was assessed by weighted kappa. A separate AI system (DELINEATE-MR-Progression) analysing colour Doppler videos was developed to predict which patients with mild, mild–moderate, and moderate MR were most likely to progress to moderate–severe or severe MR with analysis by Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results A total of 71 660 TTEs with 1 203 980 colour Doppler videos were included. The weighted kappa in internal/external test sets for regurgitation classification was 0.81/0.76 for AR, 0.76/0.72 for MR, and 0.73/0.64 for TR using a multiview approach taking all colour Doppler videos in a study, demonstrating substantial agreement with cardiologist interpretation with superiority of multiview over single view approaches. In the progression analysis, the AI score stratified MR-progression risk even when controlled for clinical factors known to be associated with MR progression [internal test set hazard ratio 4.1 (95% confidence interval 2.5–6.6)]. Conclusions An AI system can accurately classify AR, MR, and TR and predict MR progression beyond currently known risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement offers a less-invasive alternative for high-risk patients with bioprosthetic valve failure. Limited experience exists in intermediate-risk patients. We aim to evaluate 1-year outcomes of the PARTNER 3 mitral valve-in-valve study. METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter study enrolled symptomatic patients with a failing mitral bioprosthesis demonstrating greater than or equal to moderate stenosis and regurgitation and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score ≥3% and <8%. A balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (SAPIEN 3, Edwards Lifesciences) was used via a transeptal approach. The primary end point was the composite of all-cause mortality and stroke at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients from 12 sites underwent mitral valve-in-valve from 2018 to 2021. The mean age was 70.1±9.7 years, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 4.1%±1.6%, and 54% were female. There were no primary end point events (mortality or stroke) through 1 year, and no left-ventricular outflow tract obstruction, endocarditis, or mitral valve reintervention was reported. Six patients (12%) required rehospitalization, including heart failure (n=2), minor procedural side effects (n=2), and valve thrombosis (n=2; both resolved with anticoagulation). An additional valve thrombosis was associated with no significant clinical sequelae. From baseline to 1 year, all subjects with available data had none/trace or mild (grade 1+) mitral regurgitation and the New York Heart Association class improved in 87.2% (41/47) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve-in-valve with a balloon-expandable valve via transseptal approach in intermediate-risk patients was associated with improved symptoms and quality of life, adequate transcatheter valve performance, and no mortality or stroke at 1-year follow-up. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03193801.

Background: Left ventricular (LV) mass regression after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is a favorable effect of LV unloading, but its relationship to improved clinical outcomes is unclear. We examined the effect on clinical outcomes after transcatheter AVR (TAVR) of: 1) amount of LV mass index (LVMi) regression; and 2) persistent severe LV hypertrophy (LVH). Methods: Of 2115 patients with symptomatic AS at high surgical risk receiving TAVR in the PARTNER randomized trial or continued access registry, 462 (55% women) who had severe LVH (LVMi ≥149 g/m 2 men, ≥122 g/m 2 women, by ASE criteria) at baseline (BL) and LVMi measured 6 mo post-TAVR were included in our analysis. The effect of LVMi regression was evaluated by comparing outcomes in patients with greater vs. lesser decrease (dichotomized by median % change) in LVMi between BL and 6 mo, and in those without vs. with persistent severe LVH 6 mo post-TAVR. Cox PH models evaluated rates of all-cause mortality (6-12 mo), rehospitalizations (through 1 yr), and the composite of these two outcomes. Results: LVMi decreased from 173±32 (BL) to 121±25 g/m 2 (6 mo) (p<0.001) in those with greater LVMi regression, and from 164±30 (BL) to 158±34 g/m 2 (6 mo) (p<0.001) in those with lesser LVMi regression. Patients with greater vs. lesser LVMi regression had similar baseline clinical characteristics, a lower rate of rehospitalization (10.5% vs. 19.9%, p=0.006) and lower rate of the composite endpoint of death or rehospitalization (13.2% vs. 21.4%, p=0.02), but a similar rate of death (4.9% vs. 4.8%, p=0.86). Persistent severe LVH at 6 mo post-TAVR was present in 54% (58% of whom were women). Patients without vs. with persistent severe LVH had similar baseline clinical characteristics, a lower rate of rehospitalization (11.9% vs. 18.1%, p=0.053) and lower rate of the composite endpoint of death or rehospitalization (13.3% vs. 20.7%, p=0.03), but a similar rate of death (3.9% vs. 5.7%, p=0.42). Similar results were obtained when including patients with moderate or severe LVH. Conclusions: In high-risk patients with severe AS and severe LVH undergoing TAVR, greater LV mass regression and resolution of initially severe LVH at 6 months are associated with a lower rate of death or repeat hospitalization.

Innovations in cardiac imaging have fundamentally advanced the understanding and treatment of cardiovascular disease. These advances in noninvasive cardiac imaging have also expanded the role of the cardiac imager and dramatically increased the demand for imagers who are cross-trained in multiple modalities. However, we hypothesize that there is significant variation in the availability of cardiac imaging expertise and a disparity in the adoption of advanced imaging technologies across the United States. To evaluate this, we have brought together the leaders of cardiovascular imaging societies, imaging trainees, as well as collaborated with national imaging accreditation commissions and imaging certification boards to assess the state of cardiac imaging and the diversity of the imaging workforce in the United States. Aggregate data confirm the presence of critical gaps, such as limited access to imaging and imaging expertise in rural communities, as well as disparities in the imaging workforce, notably among women and underrepresented minorities. Based on these results, we have proposed solutions to promote and maintain a robust and diverse community of cardiac imagers and improve equity and accessibility for cardiac imaging technologies.