Bohbot, Yohann

Abstract Objectives The progression of extra-mitral valve (MV) cardiac damage in patients with primary mitral regurgitation (MR) following surgical repair has not been described. We aimed to investigate the evolution of extra-MV cardiac damage after MV repair and to assess its prognostic significance. Methods Patients with severe primary MR undergoing surgical repair at 5 referral centres were included when echocardiographic follow-up assessment was available. Based on echocardiographic parameters at baseline and at a median follow-up of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-11) months after MV repair, patients were hierarchically classified as follows: stage 0: no cardiac damage; stage 1: left ventricular dilatation and/or dysfunction; stage 2: left atrial dilatation and/or atrial fibrillation; stage 3: pulmonary hypertension and/or significant tricuspid regurgitation. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Results A total of 764 patients (mean age 62 ± 13 years, 70% men) were included. Compared to baseline, 43% improved at least 1 stage, 49% remained unchanged, and 8% worsened at least 1 stage during follow-up after MV repair. At a median follow-up of 91 months after MV repair, 94 patients (12%) died. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for potential confounders, extra-MV cardiac damage staging at follow-up (HR per-1-stage-increase = 1.571; P = .009) and cardiac damage evolution (improved group, HR = 0.467; P = .034; worsened group, HR = 2.481, P = .037) were independently associated with all-cause mortality and had incremental prognostic value over preprocedural assessment. Conclusions Extra-MV cardiac damage improves significantly after MV repair, and its evolution is independently associated with all-cause mortality, suggesting the importance of comparative echocardiographic assessment following MV repair to improve risk stratification.

Abstract Valvular heart disease (VHD) is emerging as the next major epidemic in cardiovascular care, driven by the ageing population. The advent of less invasive alternatives to surgery—namely, transcatheter therapies—has revolutionized patient management, while simultaneously introducing new layers of complexity. Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant promise to transform the care of patients with VHD across all dimensions, including diagnosis, prognostication, disease progression, and therapeutic decision-making. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current evidence, and discuss the challenges, risks, and future directions associated with the integration of AI in the management of VHD.

ABSTRACT Aims The impact of treatment for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) across different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) to conservative (medical) management across LVEF categories. Methods and results Patients with severe isolated TR from the TRIGISTRY, a multicentre international registry, were categorized based on LVEF (preserved ejection fraction [pEF]: ≥50%, mildly reduced ejection fraction [mrEF]: 41–49%, and reduced ejection fraction [rEF]: ≤40%). We assessed the impact of treatment modality and procedural success (mild-to-moderate or lower residual TR) on 2-year survival within each LVEF category. Among 2384 patients, 1383 had pEF, 400 had mrEF, and 601 had rEF. Compared to conservative management, surgery (p < 0.0005) and TTVI (p < 0.0001) were associated with a survival benefit in patients with pEF. No significant survival advantage was observed in patients with mrEF (p = 0.28 for both), nor in those with rEF (p = 0.76 and p = 0.22, respectively). Similar results were obtained when surgical and transcatheter interventions were grouped (p < 0.0001, p = 0.17 and p = 0.29 in patients with pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Patients with residual TR after TTVI exhibited a trend toward worse survival compared to those managed conservatively across all LVEF categories (p = 0.47, p = 0.33 and p = 0.008 in pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Conclusions Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention, whether surgical or transcatheter-based, was associated with improved survival in patients with pEF but not in those with mrEF or rEF. Residual TR remained a significant prognostic factor across the entire LVEF spectrum. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection when considering TTVI in individuals with rEF.

Background The prevalence and impact of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) is unknown. We aimed to determine whether RVD assessed by echocardiography in routine clinical practice is independently associated with mortality in patients with DMR. Methods and Results We used data from the MIDA‐Q (Mitral Regurgitation International DAtabase‐Quantitative) registry, which included patients with isolated DMR due to mitral valve prolapse from January 2003 to January 2020 from 5 tertiary centers across North America, Europe, and the Middle East. A cohort of 2917 (mean age: 66 years, 70.8% male patients, follow‐up: 5.2 [3.3–8.3] years) consecutive patients with severe DMR was included and long‐term mortality was analyzed. RVD, identified in 426 (14.6%) patients, was associated with reduced 8‐year survival (55%±3% versus 77%±1%; P <0.001), overall and in all subgroups of patients, even after comprehensive adjustment including left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, DMR severity, pulmonary pressures, and surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.17–1.77]; P <0.001). This excess mortality was observed under medical management (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.20–2.05]; P =0.001) and after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.02–2.05]; P =0.039). Patients with RVD undergoing surgery within 3 months of diagnosis experienced a better 8‐year survival (73%±4% versus 43%±4%; P <0.001), even after adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.29–0.67]; P <0.001) despite an increase of 1‐month postoperative mortality (7.1% versus 0.5% for patients without RVD; P <0.001). Conclusions RVD is observed in 14.6% of severe DMR and exhibits a powerful and independent association with excess mortality partially attenuated by mitral surgery. Therefore, assessment of right ventricular systolic function should be included in routine DMR evaluation and in the clinical decision‐making process.

Abstract Aims In patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is associated with increased risk of heart failure and excess mortality. LV end‐systolic diameter (LVESD) is an established trigger for intervention, yet recommended LVESD thresholds apply poorly to patients with small body size. Whether LV normalization to body surface area (BSA) may be used as a trigger for DMR correction is unknown. We examined the link between LVESD index (LVESDi) and outcome in DMR to identify appropriate thresholds for excess mortality. Methods and results This study focuses on 2753 consecutive patients with DMR due to flail leaflets diagnosed in tertiary centres from Europe and the United States, with prospective echocardiographic measurement of LVESD and BSA and long‐term follow‐up. The primary endpoint was mortality after diagnosis under conservative management. Secondary endpoints were mortality under conservative and surgical management and postoperative mortality of patients who underwent surgery. The optimal LVESDi cut‐off for mortality prediction was 20 mm/m 2 . Irrespective of management type, 10‐year survival was lower with LVESDi ≥20 mm/m 2 than with LVESDi <20 mm/m 2 (both p < 0.001). After covariate adjustment, LVESDi ≥20 mm/m 2 was independently predictive of mortality under conservative management (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–1.75), and with conservative and surgical management (adjusted HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17–1.54). LVESDi remained associated with poorer postoperative outcome in patients who underwent intervention. LVESDi showed higher incremental predictive value over the baseline model compared to LVESD. The association between LVESDi ≥20 mm/m 2 and outcome was consistent in subgroups of patients with DMR. Conclusions In severe DMR due to flail leaflets, LVESDi is a marker of risk additive and incremental to LVESD. Its use in clinical practice should lead to earlier referral to mitral valve surgery and improved long‐term outcome.

Abstract Background and Aims Presentation, outcome, and management of females with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) are undefined. We analysed sex-specific baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics at referral for DMR due to flail leaflets and subsequent management and outcomes. Methods In the Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) international registry, females were compared with males regarding presentation at referral, management, and outcome (survival/heart failure), under medical treatment, post-operatively, and encompassing all follow-up. Results At referral, females (n = 650) vs. males (n = 1660) were older with more severe symptoms and higher MIDA score. Smaller cavity diameters belied higher cardiac dimension indexed to body surface area. Under conservative management, excess mortality vs. expected was observed in males [standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 1.45 (1.27–1.65), P &lt; .001] but was higher in females [SMR 2.00 (1.67–2.38), P &lt; .001]. Female sex was independently associated with mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.29 (1.04–1.61), P = .02], cardiovascular mortality [adjusted HR 1.58 (1.14–2.18), P = .007], and heart failure [adjusted HR 1.36 (1.02–1.81), P = .04] under medical management. Females vs. males were less offered surgical correction (72% vs. 80%, P &lt; .001); however, surgical outcome, adjusted for more severe presentation in females, was similar (P ≥ .09). Ultimately, overall outcome throughout follow-up was worse in females who displayed persistent excess mortality vs. expected [SMR 1.31 (1.16–1.47), P &lt; .001], whereas males enjoyed normal life expectancy restoration [SMR 0.92 (0.85–0.99), P = .036]. Conclusions Females with severe DMR were referred to tertiary centers at a more advanced stage, incurred higher mortality and morbidity under conservative management, and were offered surgery less and later after referral. Ultimately, these sex-related differences yielded persistent excess mortality despite surgery in females with DMR, while males enjoyed restoration of life expectancy, warranting imperative re-evaluation of sex-specific DMR management.

Abstract Background and aims Benefit of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) correction and timing of intervention are unclear. This study aimed to compare survival rates after surgical or transcatheter intervention to conservative management according to a TR clinical stage as assessed using the TRI-SCORE. Methods A total of 2,413 patients with severe isolated functional TR were enrolled in TRIGISTRY (1217 conservatively managed, 551 isolated tricuspid valve surgery, and 645 transcatheter valve repair). The primary endpoint was survival at 2 years. Results The TRI-SCORE was low (≤3) in 32%, intermediate (4–5) in 33%, and high (≥6) in 35%. A successful correction was achieved in 97% and 65% of patients in the surgical and transcatheter groups, respectively. Survival rates decreased with the TRI-SCORE in the three treatment groups (all P &lt; .0001). In the low TRI-SCORE category, survival rates were higher in the surgical and transcatheter groups than in the conservative management group (93%, 87%, and 79%, respectively, P = .0002). In the intermediate category, no significant difference between groups was observed overall (80%, 71%, and 71%, respectively, P = .13) but benefit of the intervention became significant when the analysis was restricted to patients with successful correction (80%, 81%, and 71%, respectively, P = .009). In the high TRI-SCORE category, survival was not different to conservative management in the surgical and successful repair group (61% and 68% vs 58%, P = .26 and P = .18 respectively). Conclusions Survival progressively decreased with the TRI-SCORE irrespective of treatment modality. Compared to conservative management, an early and successful surgical or transcatheter intervention improved 2-year survival in patients at low and, to a lower extent, intermediate TRI-SCORE, while no benefit was observed in the high TRI-SCORE category.

Background Although women represent half of the population burden of aortic stenosis (AS), little is known whether sex affects the presentation, management, and outcome of patients with AS. Methods and Results In a cohort of 2429 patients with severe AS (49.5% women) we aimed to evaluate 5‐year excess mortality and performance of aortic valve replacement (AVR) stratified by sex. At presentation, women were older ( P <0.001), with less comorbidities ( P =0.030) and more often symptomatic ( P =0.007) than men. Women had smaller aortic valve area ( P <0.001) than men but similar mean transaortic pressure gradient ( P =0.18). The 5‐year survival was lower compared with expected survival, especially for women (62±2% versus 71% for women and 69±1% versus 71% for men). Despite longer life expectancy in women than men, women had lower 5‐year survival than men (66±2% [expected‐75%] versus 68±2% [expected‐70%], P <0.001) after matching for age. Overall, 5‐year AVR incidence was 79±2% for men versus 70±2% for women ( P <0.001) with male sex being independently associated with more frequent early AVR performance (odds ratio, 1.49; 1.18–1.97). After age matching, women remained more often symptomatic ( P =0.004) but also displayed lower AVR use (64.4% versus 69.1%; P =0.018). Conclusions Women with severe AS are diagnosed at later ages and have more symptoms than men. Despite prevalent symptoms, AVR is less often performed in women and 5‐year excess mortality is noted in women versus men, even after age matching. These imbalances should be addressed to ensure that both sexes receive equivalent care for severe AS.

Abstract Background Increasing attention has been paid to differences between the sexes in recent studies, but only a few have focused on such differences in aortic stenosis (AS). Purpose We sought to evaluate the differences between genders in AS outcomes and management. Methods We included 2429 patients (51.5% men; 49.5% women) with severe AS. Median follow-up was 42.0 (21–78) months. Results Women were older (p&lt;0.001), more often symptomatic (p=0.007), and presented with smaller aortic valve area (p&lt;0.001), and greater ejection fraction (p&lt;0.001) than men. Despite that women have a longer life expectancy than men in the general population, estimated five-year survival of patients with severe AS was lower for women compared to men (62±2% versus 69±1% respectively, p&lt;0.001). The 5-year survival was lower compared to expected survival, especially for women (62±2% vs. 71% for women and 69±1% vs. 71% for men). The cumulative 5-years incidence of AVR was 79±2% for men, and only 70±2% for women (p&lt;0.001) and, being male was independently predictive of AVR (OR: 1.49 [1.18–1.97]; p=0.011). After propensity matching, when both genders were comparable in terms of characteristics and management (AVR), women, as expected due to their higher life expectancy than men, had better 5-year survival than men (69±2% vs. 62±2%; p=0.023). Conclusion Women with severe AS present at a more advance stage of the disease, at older ages with more symptoms, and incur higher mortality than men. This excess mortality is related to a combination of late diagnosis and a less frequent and later referral for AVR than in men. This justifies appropriate measures to improve the situation and to ensure that both sexes receive equivalent care. Figure 1. (A) Survival curves. (B) Surgery incidence. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None