Citations

ABSTRACT Background Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative strategy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with contraindications to long‐term oral anticoagulation therapy. However, evidence comparing the long‐term outcomes of LAAO with those of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) remains limited. Methods A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases through April 2026. Co‐primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; composite of cardiac death, stroke, or systemic embolism) and net adverse clinical events (NACE; composite of MACCE and non‐procedure‐related bleeding). Secondary endpoints included individual components of co‐primary endpoints, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, all‐cause death, major or clinically significant bleeding (procedure + non‐procedure related), and stroke or systemic embolism. The random‐effects model was used to generate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. Results Four randomized controlled trials comprising 5890 AF patients and a median follow‐up of 3 years were included. There was no significant difference between LAAO and DOAC therapy in the risk of MACCE (RR 1.17; 95%CI 0.96–1.41; I 2 = 0%) or NACE (RR 0.89; 95%CI 0.65–1.24; I 2 = 85%). Both LAAO and DOAC therapy were similar in risk of cardiac death, stroke, systemic embolism, hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, all‐cause mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, and pericardial effusion. LAAO was associated with a lower risk of non‐procedure‐related bleeding (RR 0.60; 95%CI 0.47–0.76; I 2 = 59%). Conclusion LAAO demonstrated efficacy comparable to DOAC therapy in reducing the risk of MACCE, NACE, and ischemic events, while significantly reducing the risk of non‐procedure‐related bleeding. Our findings support a tailored approach to stroke prevention in AF, wherein LAAO serves as an effective alternative for patients with contraindications to DOAC therapy.

Background:Aortic valve replacement is the primary treatment for aortic valve disease and can be performed using either transcatheter (TAVR) or surgical (SAVR) approaches. The risk of aortic dissection (AD) with TAVR compared with SAVR remains unclear. We aimed to compare AD risk between TAVR and SAVR using a large, real-world cohort. Methods:We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the TriNetX research network. Patients with a diagnosis of aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, mixed aortic valve disease (AVD), or unspecified AVDwho underwent either TAVR or SAVR were included. A 1:1 propensity score-matching (PSM) based on baseline characteristics was performed to adjust for potential confounding. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results:Among 95,043 patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement, 20,237 matched pairs were analyzed after 1:1 PSM. Baseline characteristics were well balanced, with a mean age of 73.3 ± 9.3 years in the TAVR group and 73.2 ± 8.5 years in the SAVR group; 60.8% and 60.7% were male, respectively. TAVR was associated with significantly lower odds of composite AD than SAVR at all time points (1-year OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.44–0.82; 3-year OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.48–0.83; 5-year OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.51–0.85; p < 0.01 for all). Stratified analyses demonstrated lower odds of both Stanford type A and type B AD at all time points. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated a separation in composite AD-free survival between the two groups (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.51–0.86; p = 0.002).Conclusion:In this large, real-world cohort, despite a low event rate, TAVR was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of composite AD than SAVR.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) among participants with RA and aortic stenosis compared with those without RA, using real-world data from a large multicentre registry. Methods Using the TriNetX Research Network, participants with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR with (RA+) vs without (RA−) RA were identified. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs estimated 30-day all-cause mortality, permanent pacemaker implantation, ischaemic stroke, acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, major vascular complications, and major or life-threatening bleeding were evaluated. Five-year outcomes included all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction and all-cause hospitalization. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. Results A total of 1414 RA+ (4.3%) and 39 004 RA− participants were eligible. After matching, 1374 were included in each cohort. At 30 days, outcomes did not differ between RA+ and RA− groups; mortality was 2.0% vs 1.5% (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.73–2.29), with no significant differences in other endpoints. Over 5 years, mortality was 23.8% vs 20.5% (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.97–1.31), and stroke, myocardial infarction and hospitalization were similar; HRs were concordant with OR estimates. In sex-based analyses of RA patients, outcomes did not differ by sex. Conclusion In this large observational study, TAVR was not associated with excess short- or long-term risk in patients with RA. These findings support TAVR as a safe therapeutic option in RA patients with aortic stenosis.

Summary Frailty is independently associated with significantly higher 1‐year mortality and MACCE following MTEER. Frail patients also demonstrated increased risks of HF exacerbation, major bleeding, and readmission. Incorporating frailty assessment into pre‐procedural evaluation may improve risk stratification and guide personalized management strategies.

Mediastinal radiation potentiates aortic stenosis and complicates its treatment. We compared the short and midterm-outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with prior mediastinal radiation. Electronic databases were searched from inception through December 2024. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences (MDs) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Six observational studies were identified, including 2458 TAVR patients and 1873 SAVR patients. In the short-term, TAVR was associated with lower rate of mortality (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34–0.88), atrial fibrillation (RR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.15–0.65), acute kidney injury (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59–0.95), bleeding (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.33–0.42), and shorter length of hospital stay (MD: −4.30; 95% CI: −5.45 to −3.15). One-year mortality was comparable between the 2 groups (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.50–2.13). This meta-analysis of observational studies of patients with prior mediastinal radiation demonstrated that TAVR was associated with better short-term outcomes compared to SAVR. While 1-year mortality appeared similar between the 2 interventions, this finding should be interpreted with caution. However, randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

ABSTRACT Background Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding present a clinical challenge due to recurrent bleeding risk associated with anticoagulation for AF‐associated stroke prevention. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) offers an alternative stroke prevention strategy, but its impact on recurrent GI bleeding remains unknown. Methods This retrospective, multicenter cohort study used the TriNetX database to identify adults with AF on oral anticoagulation and a history of GI bleeding. Patients were stratified by treatment with or without LAAO. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. The primary outcome was recurrent GI bleeding. Cox regression analysis was used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Odds ratios (ORs) were used to evaluate effect sizes between groups. Kaplan–Meier curves were used for time‐to‐event analyses. Results After PSM, 9259 patients were compared in each group. Odds of recurrent GI bleeding were consistently lower in patients undergoing LAAO than without LAAO across all follow‐up intervals: at 3 months (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.78–0.91), 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.82–0.92). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significantly lower risk of recurrent GI bleeding with LAAO (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.76–0.84; p < 0.01). Conclusion In patients with AF and prior GI bleeding, LAAO was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent GI bleeding at short‐term and long‐term time intervals.

Abstract Aims Heart failure (HF) continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, placing a significant burden on healthcare systems. Differences in the outcomes of HF hospitalizations for adults in teaching vs. non-teaching hospitals in urban settings are uncertain. We evaluated outcomes of HF hospitalizations in patients hospitalized in urban teaching vs. non-teaching hospitals in the United States. Methods and results HF hospitalizations were abstracted from the 2016 through 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database and stratified into urban teaching vs. urban non-teaching hospital settings. Propensity-score matching was used to control for baseline differences between teaching and non-teaching hospital cohorts. Logistic regression and lognormal models were estimated to assess differences in inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), total costs, complications, and 30-day and 90-day all-cause readmissions. A total of 7 558 299 weighted HF hospitalizations were included in the analysis, of which 76.3% involved urban teaching hospitalizations. Compared to urban non-teaching, HF hospitalizations in urban teaching hospitals were associated with significantly higher odds of inpatient mortality (OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16–1.22), complications including cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, Intra-aortic balloon pump, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mechanical ventilation use as well as more extended hospital LOS, higher total costs, palliative care consultation and readmissions rates (all P &lt; 0.001). 30-day and 90-day all-cause readmission rates were also statistically higher in teaching hospitals, though the difference was clinically non-significant. Conclusion HF hospitalizations in urban teaching hospitals were associated with higher inpatient mortality, complication rates, resource utilization, and palliative care consult rates than urban non-teaching hospitals.

ABSTRACT Background Electrical storm (ES) is a life‐threatening manifestation of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia. While anti‐arrhythmic drugs (AADs) have historically been the first‐line treatment, the role of catheter ablation (CA) as an initial therapy in ES remains incompletely defined. This meta‐analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency CA compared to escalating medical therapy in patients with ES. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane databases was conducted for studies published from 2010 to 2025 that compared CA with medical therapy as first‐line treatment for ES. Outcomes of interest included ES recurrence, ventricular arrhythmia recurrence, in‐hospital mortality, procedural complications, and follow‐up survival. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random‐effects models. Results Six studies encompassing 963 patients (473 CA, 490 medical therapy) were included. The mean age was 67.8 years, and 87.7% were male. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 33%, and ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 77.5% of CA and 72.1% of MT patients. CA reduced the risk of ES recurrence by 71% compared to medical therapy (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.15–0.53; p < 0.001; I ² = 53%). Recurrence of any ventricular arrhythmia, in‐hospital mortality, and long‐term survival were also significantly improved with CA. Conclusion This meta‐analysis suggests that CA is associated with lower ES and VA recurrence and in‐hospital mortality and improved survival compared to medical therapy alone. These findings support consideration of catheter ablation as a first‐line strategy. Larger prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings and guide patient selection.

Background: Muscular dystrophies (MDs) may cause heart failure (HF), but outcomes specific to MD-related HF are not well characterized. Research Question: Do the outcomes of HF hospitalizations differ between patients with underlying MDs (MD-HF) vs. patients without MDs (non-MD-HF) in the United States? Methods: Discharge data from HF hospitalizations were abstracted from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2022) and stratified by the presence or absence of MD (MD-HF vs. non-MD-HF). Logistic regression and lognormal models were estimated to assess differences in inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), total costs, complications, and 30-day and 90-day all-cause readmissions. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to control baseline differences between the MD-HF and non-MD-HF cohorts. Odds ratios (OR) with associated 95% Confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were reported. Analyses were conducted via SAS v. 9.4, with statistical significance indicated by two-tailed p<.05. Results: 8,466,806 HF hospitalizations were included in the analysis, of which 3688 (0.04%) involved patients with MD. MD-HF hospitalizations involved younger patients (mean age 55.3 vs. 71.3 years, p<0.001) with higher rates of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared to non-MD-HF hospitalizations (48.1% vs. 34.9%, p<0.001). Compared to non-MD-HF hospitalizations (2.01%), MD-HF hospitalizations (5.82%) were associated with significantly higher odds of inpatient mortality (OR 3.01, 95% CI: 2.03, 4.45); higher complications rate (OR 2.11, 95% CI, 1.77, 2.52) including cardiogenic shock (OR 2.61, 95% CI, 1.90, 3.59), cardiac arrest (OR 2.27, 95% CI, 1.17, 4.41), use of mechanical ventilation (OR 2.23, 95% CI, 1.82, 2.73); higher palliative care consultation (OR 4.52, 95% CI, 3.21, 6.36); as well as more extended hospital LOS (OR 1.18, 95% CI, 1.09, 1.29), higher total costs (OR 1.32, 95% CI, 1.24, 1.41), and higher odds of discharge to rehab facility (OR 2.46, 95% CI, 1.99, 3.03) and home healthcare (OR 1.85, 95% CI, 1.55, 2.21) (all p<0.001). MD was not associated with a significant difference in 30-day (OR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.78, 1.12) and 90-day (OR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.82, 1.17) all-cause readmission rates. Conclusion: MD-HF hospitalizations were associated with higher inpatient mortality, complication rates, resource utilization, discharge to rehab facility and home healthcare, and no difference in readmission rates compared to non-MD-HF hospitalizations.