Citations

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives There is increasing use of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The role of additional adjuvant chemotherapy (AT) is not well‐defined. This study aims to determine the impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and lymph node (LN) involvement on overall survival (OS) in patients with resected PDAC and determine the impact of AT after NAT. Methods This is an observational cohort study of patients with PDAC who underwent NAT and surgical resection. A multivariable model was used to assess for differences in OS. An interaction term between LVI or LN involvement and AT use was utilized to test the benefit of additional AT. Results Seven thousand four hundred and fourteen patients were included; group A (LVI‐, LN‐) had 2787 patients, B (LVI + , LN‐) 652, C (LVI‐, LN + ) 1,712, and D (LVI + , LN + ) 2263. Median OS differed significantly between groups, A had the most favorable survival (34.1 months), followed by B (27.8 months), C (26.3 months), and D (21.2 months, p < 0.001). In patients with persistent LVI or LN involvement after NAT, additional AT was not associated with OS (group A, HR: 0.94, p = 0.4; B and C, HR: 1.0, p = 0.99; D, HR: 0.94, p = 0.32). Conclusions LVI and LN involvement were independently associated with worse OS. After NAT, the use of AT in patients with persistent LVI and LN involvement was not associated with improved OS.

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains highly lethal, but the contribution of nonbiological factors to long‐term survival is unclear. We evaluated demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, treatment, and care‐delivery factors associated with 3‐year survival and whether these associations persisted at 5 years. Methods National Cancer Database patients with stage I–III PDAC diagnosed from 2012 to 2022 were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for treatment pathway. Results Among 57,053 patients, 51,071 were eligible for a 3‐year analysis, and 12,205 (23.9%) survived. Compared with chemotherapy alone, surgery with chemotherapy (OR, 7.12; 95% CI, 6.64–7.63) and surgery alone (OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 3.49–4.23) had the strongest associations with survival. Younger age, lower comorbidity, Asian race, Spanish/Hispanic ethnicity, private insurance, lower grade, body or tail location, and lower nodal burden were independently associated with survival. Black race and treatment timing were not significant after adjustment. Findings were directionally consistent at 5 years. Conclusion Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors independently influence 3‐year survival in PDAC. These findings underscore the need to complement biologic and therapeutic advances with structural interventions, such as insurance expansion and improved access to high‐quality centers, to mitigate disparities and improve outcomes in this highly lethal cancer.

ABSTRACT Background Post‐pancreatectomy exocrine insufficiency is common after resection for pancreatic cancer and requires pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). We sought to determine the out‐of‐pocket cost of PERT and the association between PERT and survival. Methods The SEER‐linked Medicare database was queried for patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) from 2010 to 2019. Cumulative out‐of‐pocket costs were calculated and stratified by procedure and radiation. Results 11,854 Medicare beneficiaries with resected pancreatic cancer were identified, 4,653 (39%) required PERT and 7,201 (61%) did not. Median age was 73.0, 50.6% were female and 83.6% White. 25.9% underwent DP and 74.1% underwent PD; 7% received neoadjuvant radiation while 23.5% received adjuvant radiation. Logistic regression demonstrated that female sex (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16‐1.35, p < 0.001), neoadjuvant radiation (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.67‐2.24, p < 0.001), and PD (OR 2.45, 95% CI 2.23‐2.7, p < 0.001) were risk factors for requiring PERT. Patients without subsidies who underwent DP paid a cumulative $4,736 out‐of‐pocket for PERT after 5 years, those who underwent PD paid $5,601 out‐of‐pocket. Conclusions Nearly 40% of Medicare beneficiaries took PERT after resection for pancreatic cancer and paid thousands in out‐of‐pocket costs. While a conservative estimate, these findings highlight the importance of addressing this financial burden to patients.

Background: Whether robot-assisted cholecystectomy reduces bile duct injury compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains uncertain because prior studies have inadequately accounted for disease severity and have rarely classified injury severity using standardized criteria. This study compared perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic cholecystectomy across a large healthcare system while adjusting for operative complexity. Study Design: Adults undergoing robot-assisted or laparoscopic cholecystectomy within the Mayo Clinic Enterprise (2014–2025) were retrospectively evaluated. Propensity score weighting adjusted for demographics, surgeon case volume, learning curve, and disease severity using the Tokyo Guidelines and Parkland grading system in patients with acute cholecystitis. The primary outcome was bile duct injury; secondary outcomes included general and procedure-specific complications. Results: Among 23,513 patients (19,998 laparoscopic; 3,515 robotic), robot-assisted cholecystectomy was used more frequently for Parkland grade ≥3 disease. Overall, 227 bile duct injuries occurred (204 laparoscopic; 23 robotic), corresponding to absolute risks of 1.02% and 0.65%, respectively (absolute risk difference −0.37%, 95% CI −0.72% to −0.02%; number needed to treat, 273). Robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower odds of conversion to open surgery, 30-day readmission, and mortality, shorter hospital stay (β −0.56, 95% CI −0.66 to −0.45; P<0.001), and a 5-minute longer median operative time. In acute cholecystitis, robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower adjusted odds of bile duct injury (aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07–0.78; P=0.011). Conclusions: After adjustment for disease severity and surgeon-related factors, robot-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with lower odds of bile duct injury in acute cholecystitis and improved perioperative outcomes, including shorter hospitalization and lower conversion rates, despite greater use in more complex cases.

This economic evaluation assesses the costs, reimbursements, and estimated net operating margin of single- and 2-stage strategies for managing bile duct stone clearance to compare the financial outcomes of both strategies.

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives NCCN guidelines recommend right hemicolectomy (RHC) for appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (aNETs) > 2 cm and observation for < 1 cm. However, optimal surgical management of 1–2 cm tumors remains controversial. This study compared long‐term survival and recurrence between patients undergoing RHC versus appendectomy (APY) for 1–2 cm aNETs. Methods Patients with pathologically confirmed 1–2 cm aNETs treated at three Mayo Clinic sites (1972–2024) were included. Primary outcomes were recurrence and all‐cause mortality after resection. Associations with lymph node (LN) metastasis were assessed in patients with lymphadenectomy. Results Sixty‐five patients were identified: 29 (45%) underwent APY, 35 (54%) RHC, and one ileocecectomy. Median age at diagnosis was 39 years; 71% were female and 94% white. LN positivity was 15.2% for tumors with nodes examined. Tumor size > 1.5 cm, stage T3/T4, and lymphovascular invasion were not associated with nodal metastasis. No survival differences were observed between APY and RHC. LN positivity did not impact survival. No recurrences occurred during a median follow‐up of 6.25 years (IQR 2.44–12.63). Conclusions Among patients with 1–2 cm aNETs, RHC conferred no survival benefit over APY. Absence of recurrence and the limited prognostic value of nodal disease suggest APY alone may suffice for this population.

BACKGROUND: Subtotal cholecystectomy is increasingly recommended as a bailout strategy for the difficult gallbladder, yet its long-term durability and the risk profile of subsequent completion cholecystectomy remain incompletely defined. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing laparoscopic or open subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from 2012 to 2021 using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project state databases from New York and Florida. The primary endpoint was remnant cholecystitis, defined as a postoperative emergency, inpatient, or outpatient diagnosis of cholecystitis or need for subsequent cholecystectomy. Kaplan–Meier analysis estimated cumulative incidence. Secondary outcomes included completion cholecystectomy and bile duct injury requiring surgical repair. RESULTS: Among 2,682 patients (98.7% laparoscopic), the cumulative incidence of remnant cholecystitis was 13.3% during a median follow-up of 2 years (interquartile range [IQR] 0.7 to 4.1). The median time to developing remnant cholecystitis was 28 days (IQR 13 to 91), with 79.7% occurring within 6 months. Only 70 patients (2.6%) underwent completion cholecystectomy at a median of 103 days (IQR 43 to 202). Completion cholecystectomy was performed via open surgery in 47.1% of patients and was associated with a 7.1% bile duct injury rate and median length of stay of 3 days (IQR 1 to 7), compared with a 0.9% bile duct injury rate for subtotal cholecystectomy overall. CONCLUSIONS: Although remnant cholecystitis occurred in 13.3% of patients after subtotal cholecystectomy, few required completion cholecystectomy. When necessary, completion cholecystectomy was frequently open and associated with a substantially higher bile duct injury rate, supporting referral to experienced hepatobiliary centers for reoperation.

Abstract Background Robotic left pancreatectomy (RLP) is increasingly adopted worldwide. Current guidelines suggest a learning curve of 21 cases, yet its impact on major morbidity and oncological quality remains uncertain. Methods A retrospective multicentre international study was undertaken across 10 centres in the UK, Spain, Germany, the USA, and Australia (2014–2025). Consecutive patients undergoing RLP were categorised into competency (first 21 cases per centre) or proficiency phase (&gt;21). The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ IIIa), and secondary outcome was the R1-margin rate. Mixed-effects logistic regression and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analyses were performed. Results 521 patients underwent RLP, including 200 (38.4%) in the competency phase and 321 (61.6%) in the proficiency phase. Median age was 63 years (IQR 54–73), and 56.4% were female. Rates of major morbidity were similar between phases (14.5% versus 14.0%, P = 0.981), as were R1 margin rates (21.6% versus 19.7%, P = 0.092). Independent predictors of major morbidity included male sex (OR 1.76, P = 0.037), preoperative pancreatitis (OR 2.23, P = 0.031), and multivisceral resection (OR 2.29, P = 0.034). Among patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 110), prolonged operative time (OR 1.39 per hour, P = 0.004) and nodal positivity (OR 2.62, P = 0.047) predicted R1 resection, while learning phase was not associated with margin status. RA-CUSUM demonstrated no excess morbidity over time in any centre. Conclusions In this first multicentre international analysis, the learning phase of RLP did not increase the risk of major morbidity or compromise oncological quality. These findings support the safe global adoption of RLP with appropriate training and case selection.

Abstract Background Minimally invasive left-sided pancreatectomy (MIS-LP) is increasingly adopted for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs), yet its oncological safety compared with open surgery (O-LP) remains debated. Robust population-level evidence is required to guide practice. Methods Patients ≥65 years with grade 1–2 PNETs undergoing left pancreatectomy were identified from the SEER-Medicare database (2010–2019). Overall and cancer-specific survival outcomes were analysed using multilevel Cox regression after propensity-score matching (PSM). Landmark analysis from 6 months excluded early postoperative deaths. Results 772 patients were included: 257 (33%) MIS-LP and 515 (67%) O-LP. Median age was 71 years; 87% had grade 1 and 13% grade 2 tumours. Before matching, MIS-LP patients had lower comorbidity (median Charlson Index 2 versus 3, P = 0.011) and fewer with metastatic disease (2.0% versus 5.7%, P = 0.019). After PSM (MIS-LP n = 248; O-LP n = 441), 5-year overall survival was higher with MIS-LP (88.1% versus 84.5%, P = 0.03), while 5-year cancer-specific survival was similar (95.2% versus 93.5%, P = 0.11). O-LP was associated with increased risk of death (HR 1.75, 95% c.i. 1.05–2.91, P = 0.030), though not cancer-specific death (HR 1.97, 95% c.i. 0.86–4.54, P = 0.110). Notably, all 90-day mortalities (n = 15, 1.9%) occurred in the O-LP group. In landmark analysis beyond 6 months, surgical approach was no longer predictive of OS or CSS. Conclusions MIS-LP confers an early survival advantage, driven by reduced perioperative mortality, without compromising long-term oncological outcomes. As the largest population-based analysis in this setting, these findings support MIS-LP as the standard surgical approach for older patients with low- to intermediate-grade PNETs.

Importance Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens may be administered after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMNs), although the evidence supporting their use is limited. Objective To evaluate the survival benefit associated with contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after resection in A-IPMNs between 2017 and 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was an international, multicenter study with 69 participating centers across Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients undergoing resection for A-IPMNs were included. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Intervention Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, such as gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap); 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), and S-1. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival (months). Results Among 1321 patients (median [IQR] age 70 [63 to 76] years; 713 males [54.0%] and 608 females [46.0%]), 781 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while in 181 patients (13.7%) it was omitted due to poor patient fitness. Of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 568 patients (72.6%) received contemporary regimens, including GemCap (232 patients [29.7%]), FOLFIRINOX (176 patients [22.5%]), mFOLFIRINOX (71 patients [9.1%]), and S-1 (70 patients [9.0%]). The median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 64.2 (40.4 to 85.0) months, and the median overall survival was 73.8 months (95% CI, 66.4 to 81.9 months). After 90-day landmark analysis and exclusion of patients ineligible for chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 243:243 patients) was not associated with improved overall survival (median, 82.3 months; 95% CI, 78.2 months to not applicable [NA] vs not reached; 95% CI, 75.3 months to NA; P = .58). Contemporary regimens vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 309:309 patients) was not associated with longer survival, and a mean survival benefit greater than 4.2 months over 5 years was excluded (difference in restricted mean survival, 1.26 months; 95%, −1.72 to 4.24 months). Treatment outcomes did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or disease characteristic (eg, N stage or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in A-IPMNs, and a randomized clinical trial is indicated.