Citations

Introduction: Limited research explores dermoscopy use among physician associates (PAs), outside of one prior study examining dermoscopy in PA student education. This study sought to investigate dermoscopy use among practicing PAs and its impact on their overall diagnostic confidence, including in darker skin tones, when differentiating between benign and malignant skin lesions. Methods: An anonymous survey was developed in 2023 with input from experts in dermoscopy and survey creation to assess PA confidence in skin lesion evaluation as well as PA dermoscopy knowledge and use, perceptions, barriers to use, and prior education. The dermoscopy survey was included as an optional module in the 2024 American Academy of Physician Associates (AAPA) Salary Survey. Results: Of 3,174 invited PAs, 995 (31.4%) responded. Most had never used dermoscopy in practice (81%) but knew or recognized the term (71%). A majority (53%) believed PAs should be trained in dermoscopy during PA school, and 26% reported no interest in future dermoscopy use. Dermatology PAs reported more frequent dermoscopy use and generally greater confidence in evaluating skin lesions, both overall and in darker skin tones, than PAs in other specialties. PAs in surgical (OR=0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6) and medical (OR=0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5) subspecialties were less likely to use dermoscopy at least annually compared with PAs in primary care. PAs in rural areas were more likely to feel confident in differentiating skin lesions than those in urban areas (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7-5.0). Conclusion: Dermoscopy use is associated with higher overall skin lesion assessment confidence. Wider adoption, especially outside dermatology, requires training, increased advocacy, and expanded education.

Introduction: Procedural competence is essential to clinical practice, yet assessment of technical skills such as suturing remains highly variable and often relies on subjective evaluations. While tools with limited validity evidence exist in surgical specialties, their use in family medicine is limited. This study evaluated the interrater reliability of a suture assessment tool developed by Sundhagen et al when used by family medicine faculty to evaluate the simple interrupted suturing skills of family medicine residents. Methods: In this cross-sectional reliability study, 15 core faculty members from four family medicine residency programs were recruited to evaluate the simple interrupted suturing skills of 20 family medicine residents using a modified suture assessment tool developed by Sundhagen et al. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate interrater reliability. Light’s κ was calculated for each question. Results: A total of 15 evaluators assessed 20 videos of resident suturing performance. The Light’s κ estimates ranged from 0.11 to 0.50, indicating slight to moderate agreement. None of the items reached the threshold for substantial agreement (κ≥0.61). Conclusions: The modified Sundhagen suture assessment tool demonstrated fair to moderate reliability when used to evaluate family medicine residents. While the level of agreement limits the tool’s effectiveness for standardized summative assessment, the tool may still offer value as a structured framework for formative feedback. Future studies may improve reliability through refined rater training, behaviorally anchored scoring criteria, and the use of visual exemplars.

Introduction: Family medicine contributes less scholarship and receives much less grant money than other specialties. Understanding when and how this disparity begins is a key step in addressing the gap in family medicine scholarship. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Resident Matching Program’s (NRMP’s) Charting Outcomes in the Match (2016–2024) to compare family medicine applicants with applicants to other specialties (ie, internal medicine, pediatrics, and all specialties combined). We examined the mean number of research experiences and the number of presentations and publications applicants had completed prior to starting residency. Additionally, we analyzed NRMP surveys to evaluate the weight applicants placed on institutional research support when choosing a residency program and the weight program directors placed on applicants’ research experience. Results: Family medicine applicants consistently reported fewer research experiences and presentations/publications than applicants to internal medicine, pediatrics, and all specialties combined. Osteopathic applicants showed the lowest research participation across all specialties we compared. Among other specialties, family medicine applicants placed less importance on programs’ research support, and family medicine residency program directors were less likely to consider research involvement when selecting applicants. Conclusions: Our results suggest that family medicine’s underrepresentation in research begins during the residency application process or sooner. Increased involvement in family medicine research among medical students should be a key component of strategies for bridging the research gap.

Objectives Guidelines advise repeat screening within four months if Papanicolaou (Pap) results are unsatisfactory for evaluation. This utilizes healthcare system resources and may decrease patient satisfaction due to needing a second clinic appointment. We assessed unsatisfactory Pap test (UPT) rates and associations with clinician and patient characteristics to inform future interventions to decrease UPTs. Setting Multisite midwestern United States primary care practice. Methods Retrospective analysis of women aged 21–65 with a Pap between 7/1/2021 and 6/30/2023. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess for associations between UPTs and clinician gender, degree, residency status, and experience. Results Of 51,195 Paps completed, 2.3% were unsatisfactory. Female clinicians performed the most Pap tests (83.2%) with slightly less likelihood of UPTs compared with male clinicians ( p = 0.015). There was no significant difference comparing physicians to advanced practice providers in UPTs ( p = 0.18). Residency training level did not affect UPT rates ( p = 0.95). Clinician experience was associated with higher UPT rates in first and fourth quartiles (least and most Paps performed) compared to middle two quartiles ( p = 0.004). UPTs were more likely among women aged > 50 years old ( p < 0.001), married ( p < 0.001), and Asian ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Clinician characteristics played a small role in predicting UPTs but patient age may be the factor most amenable to intervention to lower UPTs. Transitioning to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in peri/post-menopausal women could decrease UPTs given Paps are performed on the clinician-collected cervical specimen only if HPV testing is positive.

Background: Syncope is a common presenting complaint in the outpatient setting and requires a thoughtful and meticulous approach to history-taking skills. This is crucial in discerning cardiac versus non-cardiac etiologies, underscoring the pivotal role of healthcare professionals in the diagnostic process. Case Report: This is a case of a 76-year-old male who presented to the primary care clinic following an episode of syncope with abrupt loss of consciousness. Given the presentation, there was a high suspicion of cardiac etiology, and further testing was pursued. An electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrated normal sinus rhythm with a pre-existing first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block. The Holter monitor was without sustained arrhythmias. A dobutamine stress echocardiogram was negative for myocardial ischemia, though a resting transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrated findings consistent with cardiac amyloidosis. Further evaluation with cardiology confirmed the diagnosis of transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis. He was initiated on appropriate treatment and underwent a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) given his presentation. The patient ultimately succumbed to his disease 5 years after his diagnosis. Conclusion: If the cardiac etiology of syncope is suspected, further cardiac structural evaluation is necessary. Cardiac amyloidosis, although rare, is a cause of cardiogenic syncope that should not be overlooked. It should be considered in the differential diagnosis in the appropriate clinical setting, highlighting the need for a broad and comprehensive approach to diagnosis.

Background: Proper diagnosis in primary care is crucial due to the large number of skin cancer diagnoses each year and its associated growing economic burden. Understanding how primary care providers can be best trained in dermoscopy is instrumental in helping primary care providers differentiate benign and malignant cutaneous lesions so that appropriate action can be taken (eg, biopsy/referral to dermatology or reassurance). Objective: To assess the success of concise dermoscopy training among primary care providers. Design: A cohort study was conducted in primary care at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in internal medicine and family medicine. Diagnostic accuracy was measured on standardized testing through image-based recognition and in clinical practice through observation of referral and biopsy patterns both before and after dermoscopy education, focused on the TADA plus method. Results: Forty-three primary care providers completed the image-based recognition tests, with significant improvement in mean score measured after dermoscopy training workshop (20%). Among the thirteen primary care providers who continued to use dermoscopy in clinical practice, a significant improvement (31%) in mean clinical diagnostic accuracy was observed comparing 1 year of practice data before versus after dermoscopy training. Conclusion: Improvement in diagnostic accuracy with utilization of the TADA plus method translates into clinical practice. Therefore, training primary care providers in dermoscopy may improve the dermatologic care patients receive in primary care, especially in rural or medically underserved areas where access to dermatology is limited.

Abstract Background The electronic health record (EHR) presents new opportunities for the timely identification of patients at high risk of critical illness and the implementation of preventive strategies. This study aims to externally validate an EHR‐based Elders Risk Assessment (ERA) score to identify older patients at high risk of future critical illness during a primary care visit. Methods This historical cohort study included patients aged ≥65 years who had primary care visits at Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, between July 2019 and December 2021. The ERA score at the time of the primary care visit was used to predict critical illness, defined as death or ICU admission within 1 year of the visit. Results A total of 12,885 patients were included in the analysis. The median age at the time of the primary care visit was 75 years, with 44.6% being male. 93.7% of participants were White, and 64.2% were married. The median (25th, 75th percentile) ERA score was 4 (0, 9). 11.3% of study participants were admitted to the ICU or died within 1 year of the visit. The ERA score predicted critical illness within 1 year of a primary care visit with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.83–0.85), which indicates good discrimination. An ERA score of 9 was identified as optimal for implementing and testing potential preventive strategies, with the odds ratio of having the primary outcome in patients with ERA score ≥9 being 11.33 (95%CI 9.98–12.87). Conclusions This simple EHR‐based risk assessment model can predict critical illness within 1 year of primary care visits in older patients. The findings of this study can serve as a basis for testing and implementation of preventive strategies to promote the well‐being of older adults at risk of critical illness and its consequences.

Objective: Given limited critical care resources and an aging population, early interventions to prevent critical illness are vital. In this work, we measured post-implementation outcomes after introducing a novel electronic scoring system (Elders Risk Assessment—ERA) and a risk-factor checklist, Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness (CERTAIN), to detect older patients at high risk of critical illness in a primary care setting. Methods: The study was conducted at a family medicine clinic in Kasson, MN. The ADAPT-ITT framework was used to modify the CERTAIN checklist for primary care during 2 co-design workshops involving interdisciplinary clinicians, held in April 2023. The ERA score and modified CERTAIN checklist were implemented between May and July 2023 and identify and assess all patients age ≥60 years at risk of critical illness during their primary care visits. Implementation outcomes were evaluated at the end of the study via an anonymous survey and EHR data extraction. Results: Fourteen clinicians participated in 2 co-design workshops. A total of 19 clinicians participated in a post-pilot survey. All survey items were rated on a 5-point Likert type scale. Mean acceptability of the ERA score and checklist was rated 3.35 (SD = 0.75) and 3.09 (SD = 0.64), respectively. Appropriateness had a mean rating of 3.38 (SD = 0.82) for the ERA score and 3.19 (SD = 0.59) for the checklist. Mean feasibility was rated 3.38(SD = 0.85) and 2.92 (SD = 0.76) for the ERA score and checklist, respectively. The adoption rate was 50% (19/38) among clinicians, but the reach was low at 17% (49/289) of eligible patients. Conclusions: This pilot study evaluated the implementation of an intervention that introduced the ERA score and CERTAIN checklist into a primary care practice. Results indicate moderate acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the ERA score, and similar ratings for the checklist, with slightly lower feasibility. While checklist adoption was moderate, reach was limited, indicating inconsistent use. Recommendations: We plan to use the open-ended resurvey responses to further modify the CERTAIN-FM checklist and implementation process. The ADAPT-ITT framework is a useful model for adapting the checklist to meet the primary care clinician needs.

Background: Accurate ECG interpretation is vital, but variations in skills exist among healthcare professionals. This study aims to identify factors contributing to ECG interpretation proficiency. Methods: Survey data and ECG test scores from participants in the EDUCATE Trial were analyzed. The dependent variable was the test score for interpreting 30 12-lead ECGs. Independent variables included non-modifiable factors (physician status, clinical experience, patient care impact) and modifiable factors (weekly interpretations, training hours, expert supervision frequency). Bivariate and multivariate analyses generated the Comprehensive Model (all factors) and Actionable Model (modifiable factors only). Results: Among 1206 participants, there were 72 (6.0%) primary care physicians, 146 (12.1%) cardiology fellows-in-training, 353 (29.3%) resident physicians, 182 (15.1%) medical students, 84 (7.0%) advanced practice providers, 120 (9.9%) nurses, and 249 (20.7%) allied health professionals. Physicians accounted for 571 (47.3%) of participants, while 453 (37.6%) were non-physicians. Bivariate analysis showed associations between test scores and multiple variables (Table 1) . In the Comprehensive Model, scores were independently associated with weekly interpretations (9.9 score increase; 95% CI 7.9-11.8; P<0.001), physician status (9.0 score increase; 95% CI 7.2-10.8; P<0.001), and training hours (5.7 score increase; 95% CI 3.7-7.6; P<0.001). In the Actionable Model, scores were independently associated with weekly interpretations (12.0 score increase; 95% CI, 10.0-14.0; P<0.001) and training hours (4.7 score increase; 95% CI 2.6-6.7; P<0.001). The Comprehensive and Actionable Models accounted for 18.7% and 12.3% of the variance in test scores, respectively. Conclusions: Being a physician is a non-modifiable predictor, while training and regular practice are modifiable predictors of ECG interpretation performance.