Citations

Clear

9 citation(s) found for "Bell, Diana".

Early Versus Late Recurrence in Olfactory Neuroblastoma: A Multi‐Institutional Analysis of Predictive Risk Factors
Harris, Alexandria , Tang, Anthony, Fung, Nicholas , Champagne, Pierre‐Olivier, Fernandez-Miranda, Juan, Gardner, Paul A. , Hwang, Peter H. , Kalyvas, Aristotelis, Patel, Zara M. , Patel, Zara M., Celda, María Peris, Pinheiro-Neto, Carlos D., Sanusi, Olabisi, Thorp, Brian D., Gompel, Jamie J. Van, Zenonos, Georgios, Zwagerman, Nathan T., Bell, Diana, Kuan, Edward C., Geltzeiler, Mathew, Hwang, Peter H , Patel, Zara , Snyderman, Carl H , Wang, Eric W , Choby, Garret , Tang, Anthony , Almeida, João Paulo , Champagne, Pierre‐Olivier , Kalyvas, Aristotelis , Pinheiro‐Neto, Carlos , Sanusi, Olabisi , Thorp, Brian D. , Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Zenonos, Georgios A. , Zwagerman, Nathan T. , Bell, Diana , Kuan, Edward C , Geltzeiler, Mathew , Choby, Garret

Mayo Clinic

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | July 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alr.70216 | PMID 42422976 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) exhibits variable recurrence patterns, with significant late recurrences occurring years after treatment. We investigated cutoff periods to define late recurrence and identified predictors that distinguish patients at risk of late recurrence from those considered cured. Methods From a multi‐institutional cohort of 219 ONB patients treated at nine centers, we analyzed 77 patients with documented recurrence. Using a 48‐month cutoff to define early (< 48 months) versus late (≥ 48 months) recurrence, we evaluated 35 clinical, anatomic, and treatment variables using Firth penalized logistic regression across three comparisons: (1) late versus early recurrence timing, (2) late recurrence versus no recurrence, and (3) early recurrence versus no recurrence. Results Thirty‐four of the 77 (44.2%) recurrences were classified as late. Among the 77 patients who recurred, smaller tumor volume (OR 0.243, p = 0.035) and lower novel Dulguerov staging (OR 0.802, p = 0.038) were associated with late, rather than early recurrence. When patients with late recurrence were compared to those who remained disease‐free, radiographic skull base bone involvement was the strongest independent predictor (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.14–8.64, p = 0.025), and this effect strengthened after adjusting for tumor volume (OR 3.80, p = 0.029). Pathologic dural invasion (OR 3.29, p = 0.013), Kadish stage (OR 2.02, p = 0.026), and T‐stage (OR 1.32, p = 0.040) were also significant. Conclusions A 48‐month cutoff effectively stratifies ONB recurrence risk. Skull base bone involvement independently predicts recurrence when compared to nonrecurrent cases and uniquely persists as a risk factor for late recurrence. These findings establish skull base bone involvement as a novel biomarker for risk‐stratified surveillance protocols.
NRG-HN006: Randomized phase II/III trial of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection for early-stage oral cavity cancer.
Lai, Stephen Yenzen, Attwood, Kristopher, Chang, Steven S., Khan, Saad A., Dunlap, Neal, Beadle, Beth M. , Yu, Jian Q. , Lowe, Val J., Truong, Minh Tam, Kovalchuk, Nataliya , Rong, Yi, Kappadath, S Cheenu, Bell, Diana, Liu, Cheng Z., Abazeed, Mohamed E. , Le, Quynh-Thu Xuan, Yom, Sue S., Le, Quynh‐Thu , Khan, Saad A. , Le, Quynh-Thu , Dunlap, Neal , Attwood, Kristopher M. , Subramaniam, Rathan M. , Lowe, Val J. , Truong, Minh Tam, Kappadath, Srinivas Cheenu , Bell, Diana, Yom, Sue S

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.tps6138 Get It

TPS6138 Background: Patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer (OCC; T1-2N0M0; AJCC 8th edition) have a 20-30% risk of occult nodal metastases despite clinical and radiographic evaluations. Standard-of-care treatment for most patients includes elective neck dissection (END), which requires surgical removal of the regional cervical lymph nodes, even though 70-80% of these necks are disease-free. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN Bx), a less invasive procedure, could assess the first echelon lymph nodes as an alternative to END, potentially reducing morbidity and costs. A pivotal clinical trial comparing SLN Bx to END (NCT#04333537) is underway to inform efforts to establish optimal disease management for early-stage OCC. Methods: To assess the efficacy of SLN Bx in this population, we activated an international, multi-institutional, prospective phase II/III trial in July 2020, randomizing patients to two surgical arms: SLN Bx and END. A node-negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging biomarker study with centralized read was required before randomization. OCC patients with a positive PET/CT remained in a registry to compare imaging findings with final neck pathology. Given the current evidence on morbidity for SLN Bx versus END, the phase II was designed to determine whether the change in patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related quality of life (QOL) from baseline to 6 months after surgery, using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), showed a signal of superiority of SLN Bx compared to END (minimum important difference ³ 7.5; one-sided a = 0.10; 90% power). As of December 2024, 261 patients had been randomized and 203 were analyzed for the “Go/No-Go” decision to move forward into phase III. The phase III portion is a non-inferiority (NI) trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint (NI margin hazard ratio 1.34 based on a 5% absolute difference in 2-year DFS; one-sided a = 0.05; 80% power, and two interim looks). The change in NDII from baseline to 6 months after surgery is a hierarchical co-primary endpoint for phase III. Phase III opened in October 2025 upon receiving a “Go” signal from phase II. Target accrual for phase III is 686 node-negative PET/CT patients, including those randomized in phase II (425 additional patients). In addition to sites requiring radiotherapy and imaging credentialing, quality assurance will include central pathology review of all negative SLN Bx cases and surgeon credentialing through an education course with SLN Bx and END case review by the surgical co-chairs. A surgical quality assurance working group will review all trial SLN Bx and END procedures. As of 01/12/26, 351 patients have been screened, and 273 of the planned 686 have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT#04333537 .
Outcomes for Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma (SNUC): An International Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
Liu, Jacklyn , Takahashi, Yoko , Rehman, Umar , Turri-Zanoni, Mario, Mattavelli, Davide, Counsell, Nicholas , Ferrari, Marco, Rampinelli, Vittorio , Vermi, William , Lombardi, Davide , Saade, Rami , Park, Ki Wan , Emanuel, Oscar , Schartinger, Volker Hans , Franchi, Alessandro , Facco, Carla, Sessa, Fausto, Battocchio, Simonetta , Eriksen, Patrick René Gerhard , Haddouchi, Mohamed El, Maragliano, Roberta , Lelkaitis, Giedrius , Saraswathula, Anirudh, KAUR, RAMAN PREET, Mydlarz, Wojciech K. , Ishii, Masaru, Dave, Manas, Fenton, Tim R. , Lim, Alison E. , Okhovat, Saleh , Elegio, Gyleen, Pouvreau, Pierre, Thariat, Juliette, Digue, L., Ferrand, François-Régis, Costes-Martineau, Valerie, Castain, Claire, Kermadec, H. De , O’Neill, James Paul, Lacy, Peter D., Vaz, Francis, O’Flynn, Paul, Howard, David J., Stimpson, Paul, Wang, S, Royle, Gary , Steele, Christopher, Jay, A., Carnell, Dawn , Forster, Martin D., Thomson, David, Buchwald, Christian von, Lllorente, Jose Luis, Hermsen, Mario A., Jurmeister, Philipp , Capper, David, Gallia, Gary L. , Js, Tay, Mohyeldin, Ahmed, Fernandez-Miranda, Juan, LE, Q, West, Robert B., Patel, Z M, Hwang, P H, Facchetti, Fabio , Nicolai, Piero, Ferrarotto, Renata, Phan, Jack, Bossi, P., Castelnuovo, P., Moya-Plana, Antoine, Verillaud, B., Garnis, Cathie , Thamboo, Andrew , Olawuni, Felicia O., Moore, E.J., Choby, Garret M., Lal, Devyani, Akhave, Neal S. , Bell, Diana , Su, Shirley Y., Lund, Valerie J., London, Nyall R. , HANNA, Ehab, Lechner, Matt, Hwang, Peter H. , Thariat, Juliette , Phan, Jack , Le, Quynh‐Thu , Patel, Zara M. , Franchi, Alessandro , Su, Shirley Y. , Lund, Valerie J. , Lechner, Matt , Castelnuovo, Paolo , Ferrari, Marco , Turri‐Zanoni, Mario , Mattavelli, Davide , Moya‐Plana, Antoine , Rehman, Umar , Turri-Zanoni, Mario , Mattavelli, Davide , Ferrari, Marco , Schartinger, Volker H , Maragliano, Roberta , Lelkaitis, Giedrius , Fenton, Tim R , Thariat, Juliette , Ferrand, Francois-Regis , Howard, David J , Carnell, Dawn , Forster, Martin D , von Buchwald, Christian , Hermsen, Mario , Tay, Joshua K , Le, Quynh-Thu , Patel, Zara , Hwang, Peter H , Facchetti, Fabio , Phan, Jack , Bossi, Paolo , Castelnuovo, Paolo , Moya-Plana, Antoine , Olawuni, Felicia, Su, Shirley Y , Lund, Valerie J , Lechner, Matt , Sessa, Fausto , Bendtsen, Simone K. , Jakobsen, Kathrine Kronberg , Saraswathula, Anirudh , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Ishii, Masaru, Dupin, Charles Louis , Digue, Laurence, Costes‐Martineau, Valérie , Castain, Claire , Hintze, Justin , O'Flynn, Paul E., Steele, Christopher D. , Woods, Robbie , Llorente Pendás, José Luis , Capper, David , Nayak, Jayakar V. , Nicolai, Piero , Vérillaud, Benjamin , Choby, Garret , Hanna, Ehab Y.

Mayo Clinic

Cancers | January 26, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 366

10.3390/cancers18030366 | PMID 41681839 Get It

Background: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is an extremely rare, high-grade, and aggressive tumor of the sinonasal tract. Due to the rarity of this malignancy, current treatment guidelines are based on small and often/mainly single-center retrospective datasets. In the absence of a universally accepted standard of care for SNUC, treatment approaches vary across countries and institutions, reflecting real-world clinical practice. The primary aim of this study was to describe real-world treatment and outcomes for patients with confirmed SNUC. Methods: This was an international, multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study that pooled patients into the largest SNUC dataset to date. Fifteen centers were enrolled to contribute data, including seven from Europe, four from the United States, three from the United Kingdom, and one from Canada. In the absence of a universally accepted standard of care for SNUC, treatment approaches varied across countries and institutions, reflecting real-world clinical practice. Patients included were those with histologically confirmed SNUC who were treated between 1997 and 2021. Results: This study yielded 485 patients treated for SNUC. The median age at diagnosis was 55.6 years (IQR: 44.5–67.6), and 63.7% were male. Most cases presented at advanced stages, with 70.8% as T4a or T4b. Overall survival (OS) outcomes were available for 412 patients, with a median follow-up of 26.0 months. The 5- and 10-year OS were 47.2% (95% CI: 40.8–53.3%) and 39.6% (95% CI: 32.5–46.6%), respectively. Advanced age, dichotomized T-stage (T4a/b vs. T1–3), M-stage, and orbital involvement were significant poor prognostic factors on univariable analysis (p’s < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, orbital involvement (HR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.42–5.27, p = 0.003) and distance metastasis stage (HR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.25–7.21, p = 0.014) were both independently associated with worse OS. Conclusions: This observational study presents the largest multi-center cohort analysis of SNUC to date, providing new insights into prognostic factors for a rare cancer treated at global centers of excellence. Orbital involvement and the presence of metastases are candidate independent risk factors associated with poorer OS.
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors
Adappa, Nithin D. , Beswick, Daniel M. , London, Nyall R. , Su, Shirley Y. , Wang, Marilene B. , Alexiev, Borislav A. , Antognoni, Paolo , Alonso‐Basanta, Michelle , Batra, Pete S., Bhayani, Mihir K. , Bell, Diana , Betz, Christian , Callejas, Claudio , Casiano, Roy R. , Chatzinakis, Vasileios , Chen, Simon , Chowdhury, Naweed I. , Citardi, Martin J. , Cohen, Marc A. , Dagan, Roi , Dalfino, Gianluca , Dassi, Camila , Almeida, John R. de , Tos, Angelo Paolo Dei , DelGaudio, John M. , Ebert, Charles S. , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Evans, James J., Fang, Christina H. , Farrell, Nyssa Fox , Ferrari, Marco , Fischbein, Nancy J. , Folbe, Adam J. , Fox, Meha G. , Lund, Valerie J. , Gallia, Gary L. , Gardner, Paul A. , Getz, Anne E., Govindaraj, Satish, Gray, Stacey T. , Gross, Bradley A. , Guo, Ruifeng , Ha, Patrick K. , Halderman, Ashleigh A. , Hanna, Ehab Y., Harvey, Richard J. , Hernandez, Stephen, Hopkins, Claire , Huang, Zhigang , Huang, Zhenxiao , Humphreys, Ian M. , Hwang, Peter H. , Iloreta, Alfred Marc, Ishii, Masaru , Jafari, Aria , Kennedy, David W. , Khan, Mohemmed, Kimple, Adam J. , Kingdom, Todd T. , Knisely, Anna, Kuo, Ying‐Ju , Lamarre, Eric , Lan, Ming‐Ying , Le, Hien , Lee, Nancy Y. , Lee, Jivianne K., Lee, Victor , Levine, Corinna G. , Lin, Jin‐Ching , Lin, Derrick T., Locke, Tran B. , Luong, Amber , Magliocca, Kelly R. , Matnjani, G., Meço, Cem , Michel, Loren S. , Na'ara, Shorook, Nicolai, Piero , Nuss, Daniel W. , Nyquist, Gurston , Oakley, Gretchen M. , Omura, Kazuhiro , Orlandi, Richard R. , Otori, Nobuyoshi , Papagiannopoulos, Peter , Patel, Zara M. , Pfister, David G. , Rabinowitz, Mindy, Sanusi, Olabisi , Sargi, Zoukaa , Schafhausen, Philippe, Schlosser, Rodney J. , Sedaghat, Ahmad R. , Senior, Brent A. , Shrivastava, Raj , Sindwani, Raj , Smith, Timothy L. , Smith, Kristine A. , Solares, C. Arturo , Stamm, Aldo Cassol , Stölzel, Katharina , Sumer, Baran D. , Tajudeen, Bobby A. , Thorp, Brian D. , Tsang, Raymond K. , VanKoevering, Kyle K. , Welch, Kevin C. , Wise, Sarah K. , Witterick, Ian , Won, Tae‐Bin , Wong, Stéphanie , Woodworth, Bradford A. , Wormald, Peter‐John , Zhou, Bing , Adappa, Nithin D. , Chapurin, Nikita , Ayoub, Noel , Bitner, Benjamin F. , Chang, Michael T. , Kuan, Edward C , Wang, Eric W , Beswick, Daniel , Wang, Marilene B , Alt, Jeremiah A , Bleier, Benjamin , Callejas, Claudio , Choby, Garret , Dalfino, Gianluca , Eloy, Jean Anderson , Fang, Christina H , Farrell, Nyssa F , Ferrari, Marco , Georgalas, Christos , Grayson, Jessica W , Harvey, Richard J , Holtzman, Adam L. , Hopkins, Claire , Humphreys, Ian M , Hwang, Peter H , Jafari, Aria , Kimple, Adam J , Lal, Devyani , Lan, Ming-Ying , Luong, Amber U , Meço, Cem , Omura, Kazuhiro , Orlandi, Richard , Patel, Zara , Sedaghat, Ahmad R , Senior, Brent A , Smith, Timothy L , Smith, Kristine , Snyderman, Carl H , Tong, Charles C L , van Zele, Thibaut , Won, Tae-Bin , Woodworth, Bradford A , Yao, William C , Yeh, Chien-Fu , Zhou, Bing , Schlosser, Rodney J , Bitner, Benjamin , Guo, Ruifeng , Chang, Michael T , Su, Shirley Y , Locke, Tran Bao , Adappa, Nithin D. , Abuzeid, Waleed M. , Alt, Jeremiah A. , Bernal‐Sprekelsen, Manuel , Blay, Jean‐Yves , Bleier, Benjamin S. , Bonilla‐Velez, Juliana , Carrau, Ricardo L. , Castelnuovo, Paolo , Chandra, Rakesh Kumar , Chiu, Alexander G. , Choby, Garret , Dallan, Iacopo , El‐Sayed, Ivan H. , Fokkens, Wytske Johanna , Geltzeiler, Mathew , Grayson, Jessica W. , Gross, Bradley , Grube, Jordon G. , Hanna, Ehab Y., Ivan, Michael E , Khan, Mohemmed N., Lal, Devyani , Lechner, Matt , Lobo, Brian C. , Markovic, Svetomir N. , McKean, Erin L. , Mendenhall, William M , Phan, Jack , Psaltis, Alkis J. , Ramanathan, Murugappan , Rimmer, Ryan , Rosen, Marc R , Sreenath, Satyan B , Šurda, Pavol , Thompson, Lester D.�R. , Turner, Justin H. , Turri‐Zanoni, Mario , Udager, Aaron M , Yao, William C.

Mayo Clinic

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | September 2, 2023 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 149-608

10.1002/alr.23262 | PMID 37658764 Get It

Abstract Background Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology‐based topics spanning the field. Methods In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence‐Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence‐Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus‐building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. Results The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology‐based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. Conclusion As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
NRG Oncology HN006: Randomized phase II/III trial of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection for early-stage oral cavity cancer.
Torres‐Saavedra, Pedro A. , Dunlap, Neal , Beadle, Beth M. , Chang, Steven S. , Yu, Jian Q. , Lowe, Val J. , Khan, Saad A. , Truong, Minh Tam, Bell, Diana , Kovalchuk, Nataliya , Abazeed, Mohamed E. , Le, Quynh‐Thu , Le, Quynh-Thu , Lai, Stephen Y. , Subramaniam, Rathan M. , C, Liu , Rong, Yi , Kappadath, Srinivas Cheenu , Harris, Jonathan

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS6093-TPS6093

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps6093 Get It

TPS6093 Background: Since patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer (OCC; T1-2N0M0; AJCC 8th ed) have a 20-30% rate of occult nodal metastases despite clinical and radiographic assessment, standard of care treatment includes elective neck dissection (END). Many patients have comprehensive surgical management of the regional cervical nodal basin even though the majority of those necks (70-80%) will not contain disease. Assessment of draining first echelon lymph nodes by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (Bx), a less invasive surgical procedure, may provide an alternative to END, while potentially reducing morbidity and cost. A decisive clinical trial comparing SLN Bx versus END can focus the HNC clinical and research community and resources on establishing the standard of care for management of the neck in early-stage OCC. Methods: In order to address the efficacy of SLN Bx in this population, we recently activated an international multi-institutional phase II/III prospective trial randomizing patients to two surgical arms: SLN Bx and END. PET/CT is an integral imaging biomarker in this trial. A node-negative PET/CT study with central read is required before randomization. Patients with a positive PET/CT central result will remain in a registry to compare imaging findings with final neck pathology. Given the current evidence available regarding morbidity for SLN Bx versus END, the phase II will determine if patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related QOL at 6 months after surgery using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) shows a signal of superiority of SLN Bx compared to END. A total of 228 randomized patients with negative PET/CT for potential evaluation of shoulder-related morbidity with difference in 6-month NDII scores (minimum important difference ³7.5; one-sided a = 0.10; 90% power) will serve as the “Go/No-Go” decision to move forward into phase III. The phase III portion is a non-inferiority (NI) trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint (NI margin hazard ratio 1.34 based on a 5% absolute difference in 2-year DFS; one-sided alpha 0.05; 80% power, and an interim look for efficacy at 67% of the events based on an O’Brien-Fleming boundary). The NDII at 6 months after surgery is a hierarchical co-primary endpoint for the phase III. Target accrual of phase III is 618 PET/CT negative patients, including those randomized in phase II (297 DFS events required for the final analysis). In addition to radiotherapy and imaging credentialing, quality assurance will include central pathology review of all negative SLN Bx cases and surgeon credentialing through an education course and SLN Bx and END case review by the surgical co-chairs. A surgical quality assurance working group will review all trial SLN Bx and END outcomes. As of 02/15/21, 7 patients have been screened and 6 of the planned 228 randomized patients in phase II have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04333537.
Establishing quality indicators for neck dissection: Correlating the number of lymph nodes with oncologic outcomes, NRG Oncology/RTOG 9501-0234.
Divi, Vasu , Cooper, Jay S., McHugh, Jonathan B. , Bell, Diana , Suntharalingam, Mohan, Raben, David, Kim, Harold E., Spencer, Sharon A., Laramore, George E. , Trotti, Andy, Foote, Robert L. , Schultz, Christopher J. , Zhang, Qiang , Harris, Jonathan , Harari, Paul M. , Sturgis, Erich M. , Cmelak, Anthony J. , Thorstad, Wade , Le, Quynh‐Thu , Holsinger, F. Christopher

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 7, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 6011-6011

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.6011 Get It

Establishing quality indicators for neck dissection: Correlating the number of lymph nodes with oncologic outcomes (NRG Oncology RTOG 9501 and RTOG 0234)
Divi, Vasu , Harari, Paul M. , Cooper, Jay S., McHugh, Jonathan B. , Bell, Diana , Cmelak, Anthony J. , Suntharalingam, Mohan, Raben, David, Kim, Harold , Spencer, Sharon A., Laramore, George E. , Trotti, Andy, Foote, Robert L. , Schultz, Christopher J. , Le, Quynh‐Thu , Harris, Jonathan , Sturgis, Erich M. , Thorstad, Wade , Zhang, Qiang , Holsinger, F. Christopher , Kim, Harold E , Le, Quynh-Thu

Mayo Clinic

Cancer | July 15, 2016 | Volume: 122 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 3464-3471

10.1002/cncr.30204 | PMID 27419843 Get It

BACKGROUNDProspective quality metrics for neck dissection have not been established for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lymph node counts from neck dissection, local‐regional recurrence, and overall survival.METHODSThe number of lymph nodes counted from neck dissection in patients treated in 2 NRG Oncology trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 9501 and RTOG 0234) was evaluated for its prognostic impact on overall survival with a multivariate Cox model adjusted for demographic, tumor, and lymph node data and stratified by the postoperative treatment group.RESULTSFive hundred seventy‐two patients were analyzed at a median follow‐up of 8 years. Ninety‐eight percent of the patients were pathologically N+. The median numbers of lymph nodes recorded on the left and right sides were 24 and 25, respectively. The identification of fewer than 18 nodes was associated with worse overall survival in comparison with 18 or more nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09‐1.74; P = .007). The difference appeared to be driven by local‐regional failure (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02‐2.08; P = .04) but not by distant metastases (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.77‐1.53; P = .65). When the analysis was limited to NRG Oncology RTOG 0234 patients, adding the p16 status to the model did not affect the HR for dissected nodes, and the effect of nodes did not differ with the p16 status.CONCLUSIONSThe removal and identification of 18 or more lymph nodes was associated with improved overall survival and lower rates of local‐regional failure, and this should be further evaluated as a measure of quality in neck dissections for mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2016;122:3464–71. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Role ofCRTC1/MAML2Translocation in the Prognosis and Clinical Outcomes of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma
Saade, Rami , Bell, Diana , García, Joaquín J. , Roberts, Dianna , Weber, Randal S. , Garcia, Joaquin

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | January 21, 2016 | Volume: 142 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 234

10.1001/jamaoto.2015.3270 | PMID 26796488 Get It

Prognostic value of p16 expression in Epstein‐Barr virus–positive nasopharyngeal carcinomas
Jiang, Wen , Chamberlain, Paul , Garden, Adam S. , Kim, Betty Y.S. , Ma, Dominic , Lo, Emily J., Bell, Diana , Gunn, G. Brandon , Fuller, Clifton D. , Rosenthal, David I. , Beadle, Beth M. , Frank, Steven J. , Morrison, William H. , Glisson, Bonnie S. , Phan, Jack , El‐Naggar, Adel K. , Sturgis, Erich M. , Jiang, Wen , Kim, Betty Y S , Phan, Jack , Fuller, Clifton David

Mayo Clinic

Head & Neck | November 11, 2015 | Volume: 38 | Issue: S1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hed.24258 | PMID 26560893 Get It

AbstractBackgroundOverexpression of p16 is associated with improved outcomes among patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. However, its role in the outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) remains unclear.MethodsEighty‐six patients with NPC treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2000 to 2014 were identified. Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) status were determined by in situ hybridization (ISH) and p16 by immunohistochemical staining.ResultsEBV positivity was associated with extended overall survival (OS; median, 95.0 vs 44.9 months; p < .004), progression‐free survival (PFS; median, 80.4 vs 28.1 months; p < .013), and locoregional control (median, 104.4 vs 65.5 months; p < .043). In patients with EBV‐positive tumors, p16 overexpression correlated with improved PFS (median, 106.3 vs 27.1 months; p < .02) and locoregional control (median, 93.6 vs 64.5 months; p < .02).ConclusionP16 overexpression is associated with improved PFS and locoregional control in patients with EBV‐positive NPC. P16 expression may complement EBV status in predicting treatment outcomes for patients with NPC. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1459–E1466, 2016