Sturgis, Erich M.

Abstract Background: HPV16 (human papillomavirus) is a leading cause of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) in the US. Antibodies to HPV16 early antigens are detectable in serum samples up to two decades before diagnosis and are potential biomarkers for early detection. In this study, we have developed and compared three custom HPV16 serology platforms for detection of OPC: MSD (Meso Scale Discovery) electrochemiluminescent detection, RAPID ELISA, and a novel semi-quantitative lateral flow assay (LFA) using a custom android application. Methods: For the MSD platform, recombinant HPV 16 antigens (E1, E2, E6, E7) were synthesized in mammalian cells and printed on multiplexed arrays. In RAPID ELISA, GST-tagged antigens (E1, E2, E6, E7) were expressed using mammalian in vitro transcription and translation and bound IgG detected. For the LFA, His-tagged recombinant proteins (HPV16 CE2 184-365aa and HPV16 E7) were synthesized, printed, and antibodies detected with protein G conjugated nanoparticles. Archived serum samples drawn from newly-diagnosed OPC patients (n = 60), with matching saliva samples (n=54, MSD assay only) were obtained from Mayo Clinic. Unmatched controls (n = 46) were obtained from AT Still. For the lateral flow assay, colorimetric image analysis was done using a titration curve of known concentration of monoclonal antibody. We optimized the biomarker panel (E2, E6, and E7 for MSD and ELISA, and for LFA E2, and E7) by using multiparametric analysis and plotting the receiver operating curves to the test performance, and assays were compared using the Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results: At 98% specificity, the MSD HPV16 serologic assay achieved 88% sensitivity, similar to RAPID ELISA, and the LFA assay at 85% sensitivity. The signal intensities for saliva samples were weaker at 24% sensitivity. The Cohen’s kappa value ranged from 0.74 to 0.78 for the comparison between all three assays. There was only one sample among all the cases that was negative by all three serology tests. Conclusion: All three assays have strong concordance for the detection of HPV16 early antigen serology. All the tests can facilitate large scale HPV serology research. Citation Format: Akshansh Kaushik, David Routman, Tej Patel, Joshua Eger, Padhmavathy Yuvaraj, Kathleen R. Bartemes, Marisa D. Griesel, Danielle E. Hunter, Katie Van Abel, Anu Mathew, Mingyue Wang, Leonid Dzantiev, Martin Stengelin, Jacob N. Wohlstadter, Ann Spolarich, Kristina R. Dahlstrom, Jennifer Blain Christen, Erich Sturgis, Karen Anderson. HPV serology for rapid detection of HPV positive oropharyngeal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5099.

6006 Background: IMPT has unique biologic and physical properties compared with IMRT, limits radiation dose beyond the targeted tumor volumes, and is a novel de-intensification strategy for the management of head and neck tumors. This study was designed to compare the outcomes for patients with OPC after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with IMRT vs IMPT. Methods: This is a multi-center, randomized, phase III non-inferiority OPC trial Stage III/IV (AJCC 7th) squamous cell carcinoma stratified patients by human papillomavirus status, smoking status, and receipt of induction chemotherapy (IC). The primary endpoint was the rate of progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 3 years, where progression was defined as disease recurrence or death. Under the null hypothesis, H0: r ≥ 1.535 established the margin for non-inferiority of IMPT. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), treatment-related malnutrition, and gastrostomy-tube dependence. Analyses were conducted on intent-to-treat (ITT; n=440), per-protocol (PP; n=296), and as-treated (AT; n=397) populations. Results: Patients (n=440) were randomized to undergo IMRT(n=219) or IMPT (n=221) at 21 institutions. The median age was 61 years and HPV/p16 was positive in 95%. IC was the initial treatment in 13% of patients. All patients were treated with CRT to 70 Gy in 33 fx with bilateral neck treatment, and post-CRT surgical lymph node dissection occurred in 8%. The median follow-up was 3.14 years. In the ITT analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) for disease progression or death at 3 y was 0.87 (95%CI 0.56,1.35); p=0.006 and the corresponding HR for death (OS) was 0.63 (95%CI 0.36-1.10) suggesting a protective affect with IMPT. In PP analysis, the PFS HR was 0.85 (95%CI 0.52,1.38); p=0.009 and HR for death (OS) was 0.60 (95%CI 0.32-1.12). In the AT analysis, PFS HR was 0.88 (95%CI 0.56,1.37); p=0.007 and the corresponding HR for death (OS) was 0.70 (95%CI 0.40-1.22). For each analysis above, the null hypothesis was rejected and IMPT was non-inferior to IMRT. PP gastrostomy-tube dependence decreased with IMPT vs. IMRT from 42% to 28% (p=0.019), and more IMPT patients sustained their nutrition with end of treatment weight loss < 5% from baseline: 24% vs 14% (p=0.037). Conclusions: IMPT is non-inferior to IMRT and has emerged as a standard of care CRT approach for OPC that reduces malnutrition and gastrostomy-tube dependence. Clinical trial information: NCT01893307 .

BACKGROUNDProspective quality metrics for neck dissection have not been established for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lymph node counts from neck dissection, local‐regional recurrence, and overall survival.METHODSThe number of lymph nodes counted from neck dissection in patients treated in 2 NRG Oncology trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 9501 and RTOG 0234) was evaluated for its prognostic impact on overall survival with a multivariate Cox model adjusted for demographic, tumor, and lymph node data and stratified by the postoperative treatment group.RESULTSFive hundred seventy‐two patients were analyzed at a median follow‐up of 8 years. Ninety‐eight percent of the patients were pathologically N+. The median numbers of lymph nodes recorded on the left and right sides were 24 and 25, respectively. The identification of fewer than 18 nodes was associated with worse overall survival in comparison with 18 or more nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09‐1.74; P = .007). The difference appeared to be driven by local‐regional failure (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02‐2.08; P = .04) but not by distant metastases (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.77‐1.53; P = .65). When the analysis was limited to NRG Oncology RTOG 0234 patients, adding the p16 status to the model did not affect the HR for dissected nodes, and the effect of nodes did not differ with the p16 status.CONCLUSIONSThe removal and identification of 18 or more lymph nodes was associated with improved overall survival and lower rates of local‐regional failure, and this should be further evaluated as a measure of quality in neck dissections for mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2016;122:3464–71. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

AbstractBackgroundOverexpression of p16 is associated with improved outcomes among patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. However, its role in the outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) remains unclear.MethodsEighty‐six patients with NPC treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2000 to 2014 were identified. Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) status were determined by in situ hybridization (ISH) and p16 by immunohistochemical staining.ResultsEBV positivity was associated with extended overall survival (OS; median, 95.0 vs 44.9 months; p < .004), progression‐free survival (PFS; median, 80.4 vs 28.1 months; p < .013), and locoregional control (median, 104.4 vs 65.5 months; p < .043). In patients with EBV‐positive tumors, p16 overexpression correlated with improved PFS (median, 106.3 vs 27.1 months; p < .02) and locoregional control (median, 93.6 vs 64.5 months; p < .02).ConclusionP16 overexpression is associated with improved PFS and locoregional control in patients with EBV‐positive NPC. P16 expression may complement EBV status in predicting treatment outcomes for patients with NPC. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1459–E1466, 2016