Citations

Background The optimal imaging guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex coronary lesions remains a matter of debate. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OCT-guided PCI to angiography-guided PCI were included. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, with risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated for dichotomous outcomes using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Results Eleven RCTs involving 6432 participants were included. OCT-guided PCI showed no statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality compared to angiography-guided PCI (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.51–1.01, P = 0.06, I 2 = 0%). However, OCT-guided PCI was associated with a significant reduction in cardiac death (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30–0.90, P = 0.02, I 2 = 0%), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.89, P = 0.003, I 2 = 0%), stent thrombosis (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.87, P = 0.01, I 2 = 0%), and major edge dissection (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34–0.65, P < 0.00001, I 2 = 0%). Upon stratification of studies on the basis of follow-up duration, similar results were noted. Conclusion OCT-guided PCI demonstrated significant benefits in reducing cardiac death, MACE, and procedural complications compared to angiography-guided PCI. These findings support the integration of OCT in complex PCI, although further studies are warranted to assess its impact on long-term mortality.

Sudden cardiac arrest (CA) is a leading cause of death in the United States, with coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recognized as an independent risk factor. National trends in mortality among individuals with both conditions remain unclear. Using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (multiple cause-of-death data, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of deaths with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for COPD (J41–J44) and CA (I46). Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were calculated and stratified by race, sex, age group, census region, urbanization level, and place of death. Temporal trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression, reporting annual percent change (APC), and average annual percent change. From 1999 to 2023, a total of 853,773 deaths were recorded, with AAMRs declining from 35.48 to 22.77. The decline was steepest from 1999 to 2006 (APC: –2.77), followed by a more gradual reduction through 2021 (APC: –0.84), and a marked acceleration between 2021 and 2023 (APC: –5.52). Males consistently had higher AAMRs than females (35.41 vs 23.32). Racial disparities persisted, with non-Hispanic (NH) White (29.5) and NH Black individuals (28.16) experiencing the highest rates, followed by NH American Indians (26.17), Hispanics (22.2), and NH Asian/Pacific Islanders (17.82). Mortality was also highest in nonmetropolitan areas (31.37) and the Western region (39.68). Notably, home deaths increased following the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Overall, CA-related mortality in individuals with COPD has declined over the past 25 years, with sharper reductions observed in the post-coronavirus disease period. Despite these improvements, persistent and widening disparities underscore the need for targeted interventions in high-risk populations.

ABSTRACT Objective Hypertension is a key risk factor for aortic dissection (AD). AD, if left untreated, carries significant mortality rates. Our aim is to analyse trends in mortality due to AD in adults with primary hypertension in the United States (US). Methods We used the CDC WONDER database to extract mortality data for patients with primary hypertension who died due to AD. Age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and crude mortality rates (CMRs) were extracted per 100 000 persons. Annual percentage changes (APCs) and average APCs (AAPCs) in AAMRs and CMRs were calculated using Joinpoint regression. Results From 1999 to 2020, a total of 13 128 deaths due to AD were reported in patients with primary hypertension in the US. Males displayed a higher overall AAMR (0.3) than females (0.2) throughout the study period. Slight regional variations were observed, with the West showing the highest overall AAMR (0.4), followed by the Midwest (0.3), and the Northeast and South (0.2). In urban areas, AAMRs were higher than in rural areas until 2008. From 2009 to 2020, AAMRs remained stable in urban areas (0.3) but increased in rural areas from 2010 to 2020 (4.7). The highest state‐level AAMRs were observed in Hawaii, Oregon, and Oklahoma. Conclusion Significant differences were observed in AAPCs compared to AD‐related mortality trends in the general population. Mortality trends revealed an initial decline followed by a gradual rise. Clinicians should focus on high‐risk groups and raise awareness about the disease in these populations.

Background: Transradial artery access (TRA) is the favored approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary angiography (CAG). However, transulnar artery access (TUA) has emerged as an alternative, particularly when TRA is not feasible. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of TUA versus TRA in patients undergoing PCI and CAG. Methods: From inception to August 2025, a systematic search of electronic databases was conducted. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. Results: Nine RCTs involving 6089 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in procedural success between TUA and TRA (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.82–1.06, P = 0.28, I 2 = 99%). Similarly, puncture success rates were comparable (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–1.00, P = 0.06, I 2 = 83%). Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences in puncture attempts or hematoma incidence, but TRA was associated with a shorter procedure time (MD: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.27–1.50, P = 0.005). Conclusion: TUA provides a viable alternative to TRA, with similar success rates and complication profiles. However, TRA remains superior in terms of procedure time. Further large-scale RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings and refine clinical guidelines.

Despite advances in percutaneous coronary procedures, in-stent restenosis remains a significant challenge. Although sirolimus- and paclitaxel-coated balloons are promising alternatives, their comparative safety and efficacy remain uncertain. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched using relevant keywords from inception until August 2025. A total of 11 studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational cohort studies) were included, comprising 3633 participants overall. The primary outcomes assessed were target lesion revascularization and target lesion failure. Meanwhile, the Secondary outcomes included stent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, survival, binary restenosis, and angiographic endpoints (acute gain, diameter stenosis, in-segment late lumen loss, in-lesion late lumen loss, and in-segment minimal lumen diameter). Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed using I ² and X ² statistics ( I ²>50% = significant heterogeneity). Interstudy heterogeneity was low for most outcomes, including all primary clinical endpoints, with moderate heterogeneity observed only for select angiographic measures (notably in-segment late lumen loss and diameter stenosis). Statistical analysis was conducted using R software and RStudio (version 4.4.2), with a P value of < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. This meta-analysis examined studies that compared paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) versus standard balloon [sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB)] angioplasty. Regarding primary outcomes, there were no notable variations in target lesion failure [risk ratio (RR), 1.08, 95% CI, 0.90–1.29, P = 0.36] or target lesion revascularization (RR, 1.16, 95% CI, 0.98–1.37, P = 0.08). With all aggregated estimates being nonsignificant, secondary outcomes such as stent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, and survival were similar between groups. Angiographic endpoints revealed no discernible variations in late lumen loss (in-lesion and in-segment), acute gain, or diameter stenosis. Nonetheless, the SCB group’s minimal lumen diameter was significantly smaller than that of the PCB group (MD, −0.08 mm, 95% CI, −0.14 to −0.01, P = 0.02). In treating coronary in-stent restenosis, SCB and PCBs show similar overall safety and effectiveness; lesion-specific angiographic variations indicate that customized selection may improve patient outcomes.

Introduction: Resistant and uncontrolled hypertension pose persistent clinical and public health challenges. Renal denervation, a catheter-based procedure targeting renal sympathetic nerves, has emerged as a promising approach to lower blood pressure by reducing sympathetic overactivity. Hypothesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sham-controlled trials investigated whether renal denervation results in sustained blood pressure reduction across short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science through March 2025. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251015937). Randomized, sham-controlled trials of renal denervation in resistant/uncontrolled hypertension were included. Primary outcomes were ambulatory blood pressure (daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour); secondary outcomes included office and home blood pressure measurements. Follow-up durations were categorized into three groups: less than 6 months, 6–12 months, and greater than 12 months. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2. Results: Twenty trials (25 reports) with 2,167 RDN patients and 1,744 sham controls were included. Most trials had a low risk of bias. RDN significantly reduced 24-hour SBP (–3.29 mmHg, 95% CI: –5.91 to –0.67) and DBP (–1.42 mmHg, 95% CI: –2.29 to –0.55), despite high heterogeneity (I2 > 90%). Daytime DBP showed a significant reduction (–2.90 mmHg, 95% CI: –4.39 to –1.41), while other BP measures were less consistent. Home SBP was significantly reduced (–5.04 mmHg, 95% CI: –8.50 to –1.58). At 6–12 months, 24-hour SBP reduction persisted (–3.36 mmHg, 95% CI: –5.71 to –1.01), but DBP effects were nonsignificant. Long-term follow-up revealed nonsignificant changes in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusions: Renal denervation modestly lowers BP in the short term (<6 months). Mid-term SBP reduction persists, but diastolic and long-term effects are inconsistent. These findings highlight the need for refined patient selection, optimized techniques, and longer follow-up trials.

Managing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging due to its complex arrhythmic substrate, and pulmonary vein isolation through catheter ablation remains the primary treatment. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with persistent AF to provide evidence-based insights for clinical decision-making. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CBA and RFA in persistent AF were included. Data on efficacy, safety, and procedural outcomes were pooled in the form of odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the random effects model in the Review Manager (RevMan) software. Four RCTs comprising 899 patients were included in our analysis. There were no significant differences between CBA and RFA in terms of AF recurrence, atrial tachycardia/flutter recurrence, or any arrhythmia recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 18 months after ablation. Procedure time was significantly shorter with CBA (MD: −44.85 minutes, 95% CI: −56.46 to −32.24, P < 0.01), while fluoroscopy time was comparable between the 2 groups (MD: 4.31 minutes, 95% CI: −1.79 to 10.40, P = 0.17). Safety outcomes, including overall complications, phrenic nerve palsy, access-site complications, and pericardial effusion, showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. CBA and RFA show similar rates of atrial arrhythmia recurrence and periprocedural complications in the treatment of persistent AF, while CBA offers the advantage of a shorter procedure time.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes but faces challenges such as unsuccessful lead placement and suboptimal responses. The Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) system, a novel leadless left ventricular (LV) pacing technology, uses ultrasonic energy to deliver electrical stimulation directly to the LV endocardium, potentially improving the response rates. A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple databases from inception until August 2024. The outcomes of interest included the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional score, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and QRS duration. Statistical analysis involved pooling the mean differences (MDs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study using the inverse-variance random-effects model in RevMan version 5.4.1 software. Seven studies, including 468 patients with heart failure treated with the WiSE-CRT system, were included. The pooled analysis showed significant improvements in NYHA functional score (MD: −0.44; 95% CI: −0.67 to −0.21; P = 0.0002; I 2 = 77%), LVEF (MD: 5.71; 95% CI: 4.54 to 6.87; P < 0.001), LVEDV (MD: −24.49; 95% CI: −33.24 to −15.73; P < 0.001), and LVESV (MD: −24.47; 95% CI: −32.80 to −16.14; P < 0.001). The QRS duration also decreased significantly (MD: −38.62; 95% CI: −46.76 to −30.49; P < 0.001; I 2 = 60%). The WiSE-CRT system significantly improved NYHA functional score, LVEF, QRS duration, LVEDV, and LVESV in patients with heart failure. This leadless pacing technology offers a promising alternative for ineligible candidates or for those who do not respond to conventional CRT.