Tabassum, Shehroze

Managing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging due to its complex arrhythmic substrate, and pulmonary vein isolation through catheter ablation remains the primary treatment. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with persistent AF to provide evidence-based insights for clinical decision-making. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CBA and RFA in persistent AF were included. Data on efficacy, safety, and procedural outcomes were pooled in the form of odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the random effects model in the Review Manager (RevMan) software. Four RCTs comprising 899 patients were included in our analysis. There were no significant differences between CBA and RFA in terms of AF recurrence, atrial tachycardia/flutter recurrence, or any arrhythmia recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 18 months after ablation. Procedure time was significantly shorter with CBA (MD: −44.85 minutes, 95% CI: −56.46 to −32.24, P < 0.01), while fluoroscopy time was comparable between the 2 groups (MD: 4.31 minutes, 95% CI: −1.79 to 10.40, P = 0.17). Safety outcomes, including overall complications, phrenic nerve palsy, access-site complications, and pericardial effusion, showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. CBA and RFA show similar rates of atrial arrhythmia recurrence and periprocedural complications in the treatment of persistent AF, while CBA offers the advantage of a shorter procedure time.

Obesity affects approximately 72 million Americans and is a significant contributor to ischemic heart disease (IHD). Given the scarcity of data, this observational study examines trends and disparities in IHD-related mortality among obese individuals in the United States from 2003 to 2019 using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research data. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were calculated for IHD as the underlying cause of death and obesity as a contributing cause of death, revealing an increase in IHD-related mortality among obese adults. AAMR rose from 2.1 in 2003 to 3.9 in 2019, with higher rates in men, non-Hispanic Black individuals, the elderly, and those in nonmetropolitan and Midwest regions. These findings underscore significant sex, racial, and regional disparities in mortality, suggesting a need for targeted health policies and resource allocation, improving overall cardiovascular health outcomes.

Background: Non-ischemic cardiomyopathies can be primary (p-NICM) which involves mainly the heart muscle or caused by systemic disease with heart muscle involvement as it is seen in systemic infiltrative diseases (i-NICM). There is limited data on the safety and in-hospital outcomes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in i-NICM. Methods: We identified patients who underwent VT ablation between 2018-2021 using the National Inpatient Sample Database. i-NICM include amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, or sarcoidosis. In-hospital complications include mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute heart failure (AHF), bleeding, vasopressor use, blood transfusion and cardiac tamponade. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results : There were 7,420 VT ablations, 7,235 had P-NICM and 185 had i-NICM. A multivariable analysis did not reveal any difference in mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.32-1.98; p=0.62), AHF aOR: 0.88 (0.41-1.81; p=0.69, AKI aOR:1.17 (0.83-1.65); p=0.36, blood transfusion aOR: 0.63 (0.25-1.59); p=0.33, vasopressor aOR: 0.86( 0.51-1.49); p=0.61 or pericardial effusion/ tamponade aOR: 1.16 (0.67-2.1); p=0.58 Figure Conclusion: Patients with i-NICM had similar in-hospital complications compared to P-NICM further supporting the safety of VT ablation in managing recurrent VT in patients with i-NICM.

Background: The highly arrhythmogenic nature of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) leads to high morbidity and mortality, the rates of which may be higher in COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of CS patients admitted to hospitals with COVID-19. Methods: The study utilised the 2020–2021 National Inpatient Sample database, examining primary COVID-19 cases in adults aged older than or equal to 18 years. Those with CS were identified using ICD-10 code “D86.85” and compared with and without propensity matching (1:10) to those without CS for baseline characteristics and primary outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI), use of mechanical ventilation, cardiac arrest and mortality. Results: In total, 2 543 912 COVID-19 cases were identified. Before propensity matching, CS patients were more likely to be younger (58.0 vs. 64.0 years, P<0.01), male (64.0% vs. 52.6%, P=0.011), of Black ethnicity (60.0% vs. 15.9%, P<0.01), exhibit higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores (3.00 vs. 1.00, P<0.01) and had a higher incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (aOR 2.649, 95% CI 1.366–5.134, P=0.004). After propensity matching (CS, N=95; non-CS, N=875), those with CS were at a statistically significant reduced risk of AKI (aOR 0.484, P=0.01); however, the outcomes of death, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, length of stay (LOS) and healthcare costs did not reach significance. Conclusion: In a propensity-matched cohort admitted with COVID-19, CS patients had a reduced risk of AKI, but comparable LOS, rates of cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilator use, and mortality. Future research is warranted to develop evidence-based guidelines for managing COVID-19 in patients with CS.

Background: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is an inflammatory biomarker that is used to predict mortality, readmission, early discharge, and LOS, thus, serves as a useful tool for ED physicians. Our study aims to analyze the efficacy of suPAR in predicting these prognostic markers in ED. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search on 6 databases from the inception to 30th November 2022, to select the following eligibility criteria; a) observation or triage trial studies investigating the role of suPAR levels in predicting: 30 day and 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission, early discharge (within 24hr), and LOS in patients coming to AMU. Results: A total of 13 studies were included, with a population size of 35,178, of which 52.9% were female with a mean age of 62.93 years. Increased risk of 30-day mortality (RR = 10.52; 95% CI = 4.82–22.95; I2 = 38%; P < .00001), and risk of 90-day mortality (RR = 5.76; 95% CI = 3.35–9.91; I2 = 36%; P < .00001) was observed in high suPAR patients. However, a slightly increased risk was observed for 30-day readmission (RR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.16–1.94; I2 = 54%; P = .002). More people were discharged within 24hr in the low suPAR level group compared to high suPAR group (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.40–0.53; I2 = 41%; P < .00001). LOS was thrice as long in high suPAR level patients than in patients with low suPAR (WMD = 3.20; 95% CI = 1.84–4.56; I2 = 99%; P < .00001). Conclusion: suPAR is proven to be a significant marker in predicting 30-day and 90-day mortality in ED patients.