Citations

Abstract Background: Three prior Phase III trials (E2100, AVADO, and RIBBON-1) established the clinical benefit of adding bevacizumab (BV) to various chemotherapies (chemos) as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A previous Phase III study (AVF2119g) in patients with predominantly heavily pre-treated MBC, in which BV was added to capecitabine (Cape), resulted in a significant increase in objective response rate (ORR), but did not meet the primary endpoint for progression-free survival (PFS). The current study, RIBBON-2, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of BV to chemotherapies used as second-line treatment for MBC.Methods: Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to chemo+BV or chemo+placebo (PL). Key eligibility criteria included one prior cytotoxic treatment for MBC, ECOG performance status of 0 to 1, and HER2-negative or unknown status. Prior to randomization, investigators chose one of the following chemo agents: taxane (T; paclitaxel 90 mg/m2/wk for 3 of the 4 weeks; paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, docetaxel 75–100 mg/m2, all given q3wk), gemcitabine (G; 1250 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 q3wk), Cape (2000 mg/m2 Days 1–14 q3wk), or vinorelbine (V; 30 mg/m2/wk). BV or PL was administered at 10 mg/kg q2wk or 15 mg/kg q3wk, depending on the chemo regimen. The primary endpoint of the study was investigator-assessed PFS pooled across the chemo cohorts. Key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PFS within individual chemo cohorts, ORR, and safety.Results: 684 patients (T, 304; G, 160; Cape, 144; and V, 76) at 211 sites in 19 countries were randomized between February 2006 and June 2008. Overall, the two study arms were balanced for patient characteristics at baseline. The study met its primary endpoint of PFS pooled across chemo cohorts and also demonstrated a 10% increase in ORR when BV was added to chemo. At the interim analysis for OS, the median durations were 18 mo for chemo+BV and 16.4 mo for chemo+PL (see table).Across all chemo cohorts the incidence of BV-related AEs was consistent with data from previous studies. Hypertension was the only BV-related AE consistently increased in the chemo+BV arm across all chemo cohorts.Conclusions: The addition of BV to chemotherapies used for second-line treatment of MBC led to a significant improvement in PFS. The AE profile of BV in the overall study population and across the chemotherapy cohorts was consistent with that previously observed. Additional analyses, including PFS for the individual chemo cohorts, will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 42.

Abstract It has long been known that immune suppression is induced by the presence of a tumor, resulting in compromised T cell and dendritic cell (DC) functionality. What is not well understood is how soon the immune system recovers normal functionality following surgical removal of tumors and adjuvant therapy. This timing is of critical importance, as the effectiveness of therapeutic immune strategies relies on optimal presentation of antigens and activation of T cells. Blood from breast cancer patients was collected prior to surgery and at 3 and 6 months post adjuvant therapy. Patients were treated with surgery (breast conservation or mastectomy) and chemotherapy (CT) (n=22) or surgery without chemotherapy (n=38). Most patients had radiation therapy (RT). Blood from 22 healthy woman of similar age served as controls. T cell functionality (TCF) was determined following stimulation with plate-bound anti-CD3 (1 µg/ml) and anti-CD28 (0.5 µg/ml) and proliferation was measured by 3H-thymidine uptake. DC functionality (DCF) was determined by ability to present allo-antigens in a mixed lymphocyte reaction. Values for the normal samples determined the normal ranges (NR). Responses were grouped into 4 categories based on their status at 6 months: Group 1 - remained in NR; Group 2 - climbed into NR; Group 3 - remained below NR; Group 4 - fell below NR. Analysis of immunosuppression will be based on lymphocyte subsets, cytokine, COX-2, and PGE2 metabolite levels.T Cell Proliferation AllWith CTNo CT N=60N=22N=38Group 120%14%24%Group 223%23%24%Group 338%41%37%Group 418%23%16% DC Function AllWith CTNo CT N=58N=20N=38Group 143%35%47%Group 219%25%16%Group 317%15%18%Group 421%25%18% Forty-three percent of patients had normal levels (Groups 1 and 2) for TCF and 62% for DCF by 6 months post adjuvant therapy, suggesting that breast cancer patients are potentially amenable to vaccine therapy. 28% of patients had both TCF and DCF in NR; 50% had either TCF or DCF in NR; and 22% had neither in NR. The percentage of patients who had TCF in NR by adjuvant therapy was: 35% CT+RT (6/17); 33% CT (1/3); 52% (17/33) RT; and 20% (1/5) neither. The percentage of patients who had DCF in NR by adjuvant therapy was: 67% (10/15) CT+RT; 33% (1/3) CT; 67% (22/33) RT; and 40% (2/5) neither. Proper understanding of the effects of tumor, chemotherapy and radiation therapy on immune function, especially the effects on T cells and DCs, may enable us to identify the appropriate patients in whom to study immunotherapy approaches in women with early breast cancer and to examine strategies to counteract cancer-related defects in immune function. (supported by P50CA116201) Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4131.

Abstract Background: Treatment of aromatase refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is difficult and challenging. Estrogen receptor (ER) resistance causes enhanced expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).Several studies have shown that the ER interacts with the VEGF pathway and is an important mechanism of resistance. Therefore we embarked on a phase II study of fulvestrant, a complete ER suppressor and bevacizumab, a well studied VEGF monoclonal antibody in aromatase refractory MBC patients. Methods: A single stage phase II study with an interim analysis of fulvestrant and bevacizumab was conducted with these objectives: 6 month progression-free survival rate (PFS), tumor response, toxicity, and overall survival. Regimen: fulvestrant 250 mg day1 and 15 (cycle 1) then day 1 (cycle 2 and beyond) and bevacizumab 10mg/kg days 1 and 15 of each 4 weeks is a cycle. Results: At the time of interim analysis, 11/20 evaluable patients achieved 3-month progression-free survival status while remaining on treatment for at least 3 months, not meeting the protocol specified efficacy requirements and thus halting accrual. 36 patients were enrolled from September 2007-December 2008; 33 patients were evaluable. Number of prior metastatic chemotherapy regimens: 0 in 26 patients and 1 in 7 patients. 22 (67%) patients received prior hormonal therapy in the metastatic setting. 18 (55%) had measurable disease. A median of 6 cycles (range 1-19) were administered. 12/33 evaluable patients (95% CI:20-55%) achieved 6-month progression-free survival status while remaining on treatment for a least 6 months. Among 18 patients with measurable disease, 2 (11%) patients CI:1.4-35%) had a confirmed tumor reponse (both PR). Additionally, 2 patients had stable disease for greater than 6 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 22%. Median follow up was 8.5 months (range 1.7-17.5 months). Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% CI:5.4-10.1 months). The 6 -month overall survival rate was 84.8% (95% CI 73.5-98%). The median dose level administered was 250 mg for fulvestrant and 10 mg/kg for bevacizumab for cycles 1-19. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension 2 (6%), headache pain 2 (6%), and confusion 2 (6%). There was 1 grade 5 central nervous system hemorrhage. 13 (39%) patients experienced a grade 3 non-hematologic AE and 4 (12%) experience a grade 4+ non-hematologic AE. Conclusion: Fulvestrant/bevacizumab is safe and tolerable. Although this regimen did not meet its statistical endpoint, 22% of evaluable patients with aromatase refractory diesease achieved clinical benefit with minimal toxicity. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4096.

Abstract Background: Aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy effectively increases disease-free survival in postmenopausal women (PMW) with ER+ and/or PR+ breast cancer (BCa). However, the use of AIs results in nearly complete ablation of estrogen production which can lead to accelerated bone loss and increased fracture risk. The Z-FAST study evaluated the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in preventing AI associated bone loss in PMW with early breast cancer (EBC) who received adjuvant letrozole (LET).Material and Methods: 602 PMW with stage I-IIIa ER+ and/or PR+ BCa starting LET (2.5 mg qd x 5 yrs) were randomized (1:1) to upfront ZOL (4 mg IV q 6 mos) vs delayed ZOL. The delayed arm (D) received ZOL when either the post-baseline T-score decreased to <-2 or a clinical fracture occurred. All patients (pts) were treated with calcium and vitamin D. The primary endpoint, the percent change in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 mos, was previously reported (JCO; 25:829, 2007). The 5 year (5y) final study results are reported here.Discussion: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. 180 pts in upfront ZOL arm (U) and 175 pts in D completed full 5y study. Of pts with BMD data available, U (n=140) showed a mean increase of 6.2% in LS BMD while D (n=132) showed a mean decrease of 2.4%, resulting in an absolute difference of 8.6% (p<0.001). U (n=141) showed a mean increase of 2.6% in total hip (TH) BMD while D (n=132) showed a mean decrease of 4.1%, resulting in an absolute difference of 6.7% (p<0.001). When BMD data in D was excluded after pts started ZOL (censored analysis), the absolute difference in LS and TH BMD between the two arms was 11.3% and 8.7%, respectively. Among pts with baseline LS T-score between -1 and -2, 27.9% (19) U pts [8.6% (7) D pts] returned to normal T-score (T-score >-1), and no U pts as compared to 4.9%(4) D pts became severely osteopenic (T <-2). 17.7% (53) D pts met criteria that required initiation of ZOL. Although the study was not designed to detect a significant difference in the fracture rate between treatment arms, fractures occurred in 10.7% (29) U pts and 12.4% (33) D pts. Administration of ZOL q 6 mos for up to 5y was safe and well tolerated. No serious renal adverse events suspected related to ZOL and no confirmed osteonecrosis of the jaw cases (ONJ) were reported. Disease recurrence including death due to disease progression was reported in 7.0%, 95% C.I. (3.7%-10.3%) from K-M (16) pts in U, and 8.8%, 95% C.I. (5.2%-12.5%) (21) pts in D.Conclusion: The 5y follow-up of the Z-FAST trial show that the overall difference in the percentage change in BMD between U and D, at both LS and TH, progressively increased from baseline through 5y. These data demonstrate that ZOL 4mg IV q 6 mos is effective in preventing bone loss associated with adjuvant AI therapy in PMW with EBC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4083.

Abstract Background: The decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early stage breast cancer is based in part on the estimation of risk of tumor recurrence by physicians, which traditionally relies heavily on tumor size, nodal status and a set of biologic tumor characteristics such as hormone receptor and HER2 expression. The Oncotype DX® assay is a 21-gene expression profile aiming to improve risk stratification, recurrence prediction and optimize selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods: We selected 154 consecutive patients with early stage estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer and available Oncotype Dx® recurrence score (RS) for the study. Clinicopathologic data, including patient age, menopausal status, tumor size, histologic type, grade, mitotic activity, presence of lymphatic invasion (LVI), nodal status, hormone receptor and HER2 status on all patients were provided to four surgical oncologists, four medical oncologists and three pathologists, specializing in breast cancer diagnosis and management. Participants were asked to estimate the risk of recurrence of tumors based on available clinicopathologic data and to provide the three most important tumor features their risk estimates were based on. Risk estimates of participants were compared with RS results.Results: Based on the Oncotype Dx® results, 95 (61.7%), 45 (29.2%) and 14 (9.1%) tumors were of low (RS <18), intermediate (RS 18-30) and high (RS ≥31) risk, respectively. RS values showed a highly significant correlation with tumor grade, mitotic activity, LVI, hormone receptor and HER2 status, while no correlation with patient age, menopausal status, tumor size and histologic type was found. Participants' risk estimates agreed with those of the Oncotype Dx® assay in 54.2 ± 2.3 % (mean ± SEM, range 41.6 - 63.0%) of cases, while the risk of recurrence was over- and underestimated compared to RS results in 31.8 ± 3.1% (16.2 - 43.5%) and 14.1 ± 1.4% (7.1 - 22.7%), respectively. The rates of overestimation were significantly higher than those of underestimation (p = 0.0003). Although medical oncologists tended to overestimate the risk more frequently (38.1 ± 2.0%) compared to surgeons (28.7 ± 5.9%) and pathologists (27.5 ± 7.8%), the difference did not reach statistical significance. Estimation of the agreement of participants' risk assessment with RS results showed a mean kappa value of 0.2955 (range 0.1506 - 0.4123). No statistically significant difference in overall concurrence with RS results was found between surgeons, medical oncologists and pathologists. Participants ranked tumor stage/nodal status, hormone receptor status and tumor size to be the most important features when estimating recurrence risk.Conclusions: Based on traditional clinicopathologic features alone, surgeons, medical oncologists and pathologists tend to overestimate the risk of tumor recurrence as compared to Oncotype Dx® assay results. The RS may provide additional information regarding the intrinsic biological features of ER positive breast cancers and help tailoring treatment recommendations. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4061.

Abstract Background: Current guidelines recommend administration of chemotherapy for patients with breast carcinomas >1 cm in size, with consideration for patient age, comorbidities and tumor grade. However, it is unknown which patients actually benefit from therapy and overtreatment of a significant proportion of patients is a major concern. We investigated the impact of the Oncotype Dx® Recurrence Score (RS) on chemotherapy recommendations in early stage estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer patients.Methods: We selected 154 patients with early stage ER positive breast cancer and available RS for the study. Clinicopathologic data, including age, menopausal status, tumor size, type, grade, mitotic activity, presence of lymphatic invasion, nodal status, hormone receptor and HER2 status on all patients were provided to four surgical oncologists, four medical oncologists and three pathologists, specializing in breast cancer diagnosis and management. Assuming that all patients were in good general health and would receive endocrine therapy, participants were asked whether they would also advovate adjuvant chemotherapy based on clinicopathologic data with and without knowledge of the RS, and to provide the three salient clinicopathologic features on which their recommendations were based. Changes in recommendations of participants following inclusion of RS data were compared.Results: Based on RS results, 95 (61.7%), 45 (29.2%) and 14 (9.1%) tumors were of low (RS <18), intermediate (RS 18-30) and high (RS ≥31) risk, respectively. The results are summarized in Table 1. Assuming that the hypothesis previously put forward that patients with low to intermediate risk RS are not likely to benefit from chemotherapy, 82.3 ± 1.3% (75.5 - 89.0%) and 69.0 ± 6.9% (5.9 - 85.7%) of patients for whom chemotherapy was recommended by the participants would be "overtreated" without and with the use of RS results (p = 0.0322). No statistically significant difference was found among surgeons, medical oncologists and pathologists. Participants ranked patient age/menopausal status, hormone receptor status and tumor stage/nodal status to be the most important features when recommending chemotherapy.Conclusions: Although current recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage ER positive breast cancer patients are largely in line with published guidelines, inclusion of RS alters recommendations in about 25% of cases. While medical oncologists recommended chemotherapy more frequently compared to surgeons and pathologists, they were more likely to change recommendations in light of RS results.Table 1. Summary of results SurgeonsMedical oncologistsPathologistsp* Mean ± SEMRangeMean ± SEMRangeMean ± SEMRange Chemo without RS (%)29.2 ± 1.824.0 - 31.859.0 ± 5.046.8 - 70.846.8 ± 3.741.6 - 53.90.0156Chemo with RS (%)27.0 ± 5.611.0 - 36.438.6 ± 9.517.5 - 63.644.4 ± 5.833.8 - 53.90.1794No change (%)75.3 ± 7.054.5 - 85.766.7 ± 6.851.3 - 83.885.9 ± 6.478.6 - 98.70.3682Add chemo (%)11.2 ± 4.13.2 - 22.76.5 ± 1.93.2 - 11.75.8 ± 3.20.6 - 11.70.6882Avoid chemo (%)13.5 ± 3.94.5 - 22.726.8 ± 7.94.5 - 41.68.2 ± 4.50.6 - 16.20.2186*Kruskal-Wallis test Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4058.

Abstract Background: We have previously demonstrated that endoxifen is the most potent tamoxifen metabolite responsible for eliciting the anti-estrogenic effects of this drug in breast cancer cells expressing ERα (Wu, Hawse et al. Cancer Res 2009;69:1722). These studies support the clinical findings which demonstrate that women with genetically impaired CYP2D6 metabolism have significantly reduced endoxifen levels and a higher risk of breast cancer recurrence. More recently, data has emerged from several laboratories suggesting that expression of ERβ in breast tumors leads to increased benefits from tamoxifen therapy. However, the role of ERβ in mediating endoxifen action has yet to be explored.Methods: Using U2OS osteosarcoma cells, as well as Hs578T and MCF7 breast cancer cells, stably expressing ERβ, we examined the effects of endoxifen on ERβ protein levels by western blotting, ERβ transcriptional activity by real-time RT-PCR, and on ERβ inhibition of breast cancer cell growth through the use of proliferation assays.Results: We have discovered that endoxifen stabilizes ERβ protein, unlike its targeted degradation of ERα, and induces ERα/ERβ heterodimerization in a concentration dependent manner. We have also found that endoxifen is a more potent inhibitor of estrogen induced gene expression in MCF7 cells stably expressing ERβ. Concentrations of endoxifen that mimic patients with impaired CYP2D6 activity (20-40 nM) do not significantly alter E2-induced cell proliferation in MCF7 cells expressing only ERα. However, these concentrations of endoxifen significantly reduce the estrogen induced proliferation rate of MCF7 cells expressing ERβ.Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that endoxifen stabilizes ERβ protein, induces ER heterodimerization and more potently inhibits the actions of estrogen in breast cancer cells expressing ERβ. The presence of ERβ sensitizes cells to the anti-estrogenic effects of endoxifen and growth inhibition occurs at substantially lower endoxifen concentrations (20-40 nM) than in cells that express only ERα (100 nm). Our data suggest that tamoxifen therapy may be beneficial even in patients with reduced CYP2D6 metabolism when ERβ is expressed. These studies also suggest that the increased effectiveness of tamoxifen therapy in patients whose tumors express ERβ may be due to the effects of endoxifen. Finally, these findings underscore the need to further elucidate the role of ERβ in the biology and treatment of breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 405.

Abstract Resistance to hormonal therapy is a clinically unmet need in breast cancer. IGF signaling has been identified as a major mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy in breast cancer. As components of the IGF signaling pathway are expressed in most breast cancers, the development of IGF-1R monoclonal antibody (mAb) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are active areas of clinical investigations. A key distinction between the mAb and TKIs are their differences in their ability to inhibit the Insulin Receptor (InsR). While targeting the InsR with TKIs may have a theoretical liability of hyperglycemia, targeting only the IGF-1R may have the theoretical liability of incompletely blocking IGF signaling. As InsR isoform A expression, which can transduce IGF-II-mediated proliferation, is higher in breast cancers compared to normal breast tissue, we investigated whether IGF-1R or IGF-1R/InsR inhibition was sufficient for overcoming resistance to hormonal therapy. To determine the optimal combination strategies for clinical investigations, we tested the hypothesis that IGF signaling inhibition could overcome primary (or de novo/intrinsic) and secondary (or acquired/selected) resistance to hormonal therapy. For these studies, we used either hormone therapy-naïve or hormone therapy-resistant variants of the breast cancer model, MCF-7/AC-1, which has been engineered to stably express full-length human aromatase. We employed and compared a novel, potent dual kinase inhibitor of the IGF-1R and InsR, BMS-754807, which is currently in early clinical investigations, with the IGF-1R antibody mAb391. BMS-754807 has been shown to induce apoptosis more potently than mAb391 in Rh41 human rhabdomyosarcoma cells. In vitro, BMS-754807 demonstrated profound synergy in combination with tamoxifen and letrozole (median effect combination index <0.1). In vivo, BMS-754807 enhanced the anti-tumor activity of tamoxifen and letrozole in hormone-naïve tumors and induced regression of tumors resistant to tamoxifen or letrozole when combined with letrozole. This activity was not observed with mAb therapy, which resulted in greater up-regulation of InsR-A and erbB receptor expression and activation. This suggested a greater susceptibility to resistance pathways with mAb therapy. Dual IGF-1R/InsR blockade alone or in combination was tolerated by the animals and has no significant change in glucose homeostasis. Gene expression profiling experiments to compare the difference between the effects of tamoxifen in combination with BMS-754807 and with mAb revealed alternative pathway signaling is one of the potential mechanisms of resistance.In summary, combined hormonal therapy with BMS-754807 overcomes primary and secondary resistance to tamoxifen and letrozole and was well tolerated. IGF-1R blockade with a mAb alone is insufficient to overcome resistance and induces InsR over-expression. Thus, IGF signaling through either InsR or IGF-1R may be a major mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy. These data suggest that blockade of IGF-1 and IGF-II from activation of IGF-1R and InsR, with agents such as BMS-754807 have promise in extending the benefits of hormonal therapy in breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 402.

Abstract Background: An estimated 1.3 million women worldwide will be diagnosed this year with early stage breast cancer. The majority of women have estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer and are candidates for endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen remains the most commonly employed agent worldwide and substantially reduces recurrence and mortality. Tamoxifen is a pro-drug. CYP2D6 converts tamoxifen to endoxifen, which is primarily responsible for inhibition of estrogen-stimulated breast cancer growth in vitro. There have been conflicting reports regarding the relationship between CYP2D6 genotype/phenotype and tamoxifen clinical outcome. The ITPC was established to collect the worldwide experience relating to genetic variation in CYP2D6 and the outcomes of women with ER positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Establishment of the predictive value of CYP2D6 would enable the a priori identification of patients that could be spared ineffective therapy.Methods: Individual patient data including tumor characteristics, genotype, medication data, and recurrence information were requested from all published and non-published reports of clinical outcomes related to CYP2D6 and deposited at PharmGKB. CYP2D6 genotype was available for the following null (*3, 4, 5 and 6) and IM (*10, 17 and 41) alleles. CYP2D6 inhibiting medication data was requested for weak and potent CYP2D6 inhibitors. The primary analysis was to determine the association of CYP2D6 phenotype (combined genotype and medication) with breast cancer recurrence in tamoxifen treated early stage, ER positive invasive breast cancer.Results: At this time, the ITPC has received patient data on 3432 patients from the U.S., Sweden, UK, Germany, Belgium, and Japan. Median age at diagnosis was 62 years. CYP2D6 genotype was available in 3,392 (99%). The allele frequency for CYP2D6*4, the most common allele associated with the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype, was q=0.23. A total of 1152 recurrences representing first events (either local, regional, distant, or contralateral breast cancer) were recorded. At the time of abstract submission, patient and genotype data from an additional 1300 tamoxifen treated patients were pending submission.Conclusions: The ITPC represents the largest collection of individual patient data in regard to the potential importance of CYP2D6 phenotype in adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. The findings from this consortium are expected to substantially improve the global understanding of CYP2D6 and tamoxifen clinical outcome. Final results will be presented at the meeting Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 33.

Abstract Background: Despite the impressive results of the trastuzumab adjuvant therapy trials, 15% of patients (pts) with HER2 overexpressing or amplified breast cancer developed tumor relapse at 4 years. Lapatinib is a reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor against ErbB1 and ErbB2. The current study was developed to assess the cardiac safety and feasibility of adding lapatinib to paclitaxel and trastuzumab following doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as part of adjuvant therapy.Methods: A single-arm phase II study of doxorubicin (A, 60 mg/m2 day 1) and cyclophosphamide (C, 600 mg/m2 day 1) [q2w or q3w for 4 cycles]; followed by PTL: paclitaxel (P, 80 mg/m2 weekly), trastuzumab (T, 4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg weekly), and lapatinib (L, 1000 mg PO daily which was later amended to 750 mg) [total of 12 weeks of treatment]; followed by T (6 mg/kg day 1, every 3 weeks) and L (1000 mg PO daily) [total of 40 weeks of treatment] was conducted. The primary endpoint was severe symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF: New York Heart Association Class III or IV with a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of at least 10 percentage points to below 50% confirmed by cardiologist) with secondary endpoints of cardiac death and grade 3+ cardiac adverse events (AEs).Results: From April 2007 to October 2008, 109 evaluable pts were enrolled and initiated study treatment. Median age was 51 (range 28-72). Median follow-up is 10.2 months. No pts experienced CHF or cardiac death while on active treatment. One pt had CHF and 1 pt died due to myocardial infarction (MI) after they went off study treatment. The pt with CHF refused further treatment after completing 2 cycles of PTL and had CHF 1.8 months post PTL discontinuation with LVEF of 45% and dyspnea on exertion. The pt with MI went off study treatment due to non-cardiac AEs after completing 2 cycles of PTL and died 2.9 months post PTL discontinuation. Mean LVEF at baseline was 63.6% (N=109, SD=5.7); end of AC was 63.3% (N=104, SD=6.4); end of PTL was 59.9% (N=89, SD=8.3); and cycle 12 was 59.7% (N=66, SD=7.1). Grade 3+ non-hematologic AEs with incidence >5% include diarrhea (N=42, 39% & included both 1000mg & later amended 750mg dosing), fatigue (N=15, 14%), nausea (N=7, 6%), vomiting (N=7, 6%), acne (N=6, 6%), and hypokalemia (N=6, 6%). Pre-treatment cardiac marker data (troponin-T, troponin-I, brain natriuretic peptide, creatine kinase MB isoenzyme) will also be presented.Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that the inclusion of L does not add to the cardiac profile of T. Data from ALTTO and long-term follow data are needed to confirm the cardiac safety of this regimen. Cardiac marker data are being analyzed in the context of changes in LVEF. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and GlaxoSmthKline for this study. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3086.