Citations

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor characterized by invasive growth, genetic heterogeneity and resistance to therapy. Alterations in the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) are frequently detected in GBM, including gene amplifications, mutations and exon deletions, exemplified by the expression of EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII). To target both wild-type and EGFRvIII, we generated the humanized antibody A10, which reacts with the 287-302 loop that is fully exposed on the extracellular domain of EGFRvIII and conditionally exposed on cells expressing gene-amplified EGFR. However, A10 showed little or no reactivity for cells expressing normal levels of wild type EGFR. We engrafted antibody fragments derived from A10 on to ARTEMIS® Cell Receptor Platform, which introduces two separate receptors into engineered T cells to provide activation and co-stimulatory signals. Specifically, the A10 antigen-binding fragment (Fab) was fused to the N-terminus of a γδTCR-signaling domains (A10-AbTCR) while the A10 single chain variable fragment (scFv) was fused to a costimulatory signaling receptor (A10-CSR). The resulting A10 ARTEMIS® T cells were cytotoxic for tumor cell lines displaying amplified or overexpressed EGFR and EGFRvIII. Further, glioblastoma PDXs were sensitive to A10 ARTEMIS® T cell killing. This prompted an in vivo evaluation in EGFR-driven cancers. GBM39 PDX tumors (expressing amplified EGFRvIII) were implanted into the brains of NSG mice. Mice received one or two infusions. Treatment with one infusion of A10 ARTEMIS® cells resulted in prolonged survival of tumor bearing mice with 40 % of mice were long-term survivors (74 days) compared to a median survival of 32 days (control) or 52 days (mock T-cells). For mice receiving two A10 ARTEMIS® T cell infusions, there was 100% survival of mice beyond 60 days, while all control and mock treated mice were dead by 28 days. Further, treatments of EGFR-amplified MDA-MB-468 tumors resulted in complete tumor regression with one treatment of A10 ARTEMIS® cells. Thus, this new format of A10 engineered T-cells appears to be a particularly promising for treating cancers with high levels of EGFR or EGFRvIII including GBM. Citation Format: Antonella Antignani, Danielle Burgenske, Guangyan Xiong, Hongbing Zhang, Cheng Liu, Jann Sarkaria, David FitzGerald. Engineered T-cells, targeting overexpressed EGFR and EGFRvIII, produce complete remissions in a PDX model of human glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2025 Oct 22-26; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2025;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B056.

Abstract Failure to repair radiation (RT)-induced DNA damage results in cell lethality, and combined treatment with DNA repair inhibitors can markedly enhance tumor control achieved with radiation. These inhibitors also can potentiate acute RT toxicities by suppressing DNA repair. Capitalizing on this normal tissue radiosensitizing effect, we determined effective radiosensitizing dosing regimens in mice for the ATM inhibitor WSD0628 and the DNAPK inhibitor WNC0901 in mice. Drugs were administered via oral gavage prior to each RT dose, and RT was delivered using an anterior/posterior 225 kVp beam. In an initial iteration of this model, various combinations of WSD0628 and RT were administered to cohorts of mice (n=5/group) and body weight was followed for 2 weeks. The resulting data were modeled to define the total dose of radiation estimated to cause 50% of mice to lose >20% body weight (D50). There was an inverse relationship between the WSD0628 and D50 doses: 0 mg/kg WSD0628/24.0 Gy (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.5–24.7); 0.25 mg/kg/19.2 Gy (95% CI 16.7–21.8); 1 mg/kg/13.7 Gy (95% CI 13.2–14.2); 2.5 mg/kg/11.0 Gy (95% CI 10.5–11.5); 5 mg/kg/11.3 Gy (95% CI 6.7–15.9) and 7.5 mg/kg/7.8 Gy (95% CI 7.8–7.9). Histological review of tongues from animals treated with 15 Gy RT (5Gy x 3) + 7.5 mg/kg WSD0628 demonstrated epithelial denudation and acute inflammation consistent with oral mucositis, while these features were not seen with the same dose as RT alone. Similar WSD0628 doses were evaluated in combination with 8 Gy supratentorial RT (via lateral beams) in orthotopic GBM43 PDX tumors. By treatment arm, the median time to a moribund state was: sham (29 days (d)), RT (39d), 1 mg/kg (42d), 2.5 mg/kg (49d), 5 mg/kg (65d), and 10 mg/kg (123d, overall p<0.0001). A second mucositis model was used for evaluation of WNC0901. Cohorts of 5 mice/group were treated with a set dose of RT (4Gy x 3) to the oral cavity alone and in combination with various doses of WNC0901, and the fraction of mice with >20% weight loss within 2 weeks was determined. The results of this study are as follows: placebo (0 of 5 mice with >20% weight loss); 15 mg/kg (3 of 5 mice); 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg (5 of 5 mice). Based on these data, we defined 25 mg/kg WNC0901 as the minimally effective dose and predicted that 50 mg/kg would provide robust radiosensitization. Consistent with this prediction, co-treatment of B16 melanoma flank tumor xenografts with RT (8Gy x 1) and WNC0901 (50 mg/kg) more than doubled the median tumor control duration (median 42 [range 24-45] days; time from implantation for tumor to exceed 1500 mm3) as compared to RT alone (24 [13-30] days) or sham treatment (17 [13-17] days; overall p<0.0001). This study describes how a radiation-induced oral mucositis model can be used to identify effective radiosensitizing regimens faster and with fewer resources than relying on tumor control studies alone. Citation Format: Danielle Burgenske, Darwin Garcia, Jiayan Le, Wenjuan Zhang, Sneha Rathi, Katrina K. Bakken, Lauren L. Ott, Zeng Hu, Brett L. Carlson, Ann Mladek, Jessica L. Abraham, Paul A. Decker, Matthew L . Kosel, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, William F. Elmquist, Wei Zhong, Jann N. Sarkaria. Radiation-induced oral mucositis to rapidly determine effective radiosensitizing dosing regimens for ATM and DNAPK inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2025 Oct 22-26; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2025;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B090.

Abstract Background: [212Pb]VMT-a-NET is an alpha therapy agent targeting somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2)-expressing tumors. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) generally express SSTR2 on their cell surface. Here, we report the results of a prospective, open-label, Phase I/IIa clinical trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of [212Pb]VMT-a-NET [NCT05636618]. Methods: The study design follows a Bayesian dose-finding algorithm. Main inclusion criteria include histologically proven well-differentiated unresectable or metastatic NETs, radiological evidence of progression on at least one prior line of systemic therapy, demonstration of lesional SSTR2 expression on an FDA-approved SSTR PET. Main exclusion criteria include: prior treatment with systemic PRRT-based therapies. In the dose finding phase, participants can receive up to four cycles of [212Pb]VMT-a-NET at the assigned dose level. Participants are followed for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observation up to 42 days after the first cycle. Efficacy is evaluated by investigators according to RECIST criteria v1.1. Here we report safety and preliminary efficacy data of participants enrolled in cohorts 1 and 2 at 92.5 MBq [2.5 mCi] and 185 MBq [5 mCi], respectively. Results: As of 30-Apr-2025 (data cut-off – DCO), a total of 42 participants were enrolled into the study. Nine of them were followed for DLT observation; thirty-three (33) additional participants were subsequently enrolled into cohort 2 to further evaluate safety and efficacy at the selected dose. For data analysis purposes, participants were divided into two different groups: a safety group and an efficacy group. The safety group included all participants enrolled by the DCO (n=42), while the efficacy group included only nine participants enrolled in cohort 1 (n=2) and cohort 2 (n=7) for DLT observation. Median follow up time for participants included in the safety group was 14 weeks (range:0,77); median follow up time for participants included in the efficacy group was 56 weeks (range: 6,77). In the safety group (n=42) we did not observe any DLTs, any grade 4 or 5 adverse events (AEs), any treatment-related discontinuations, any serious renal complications or myelosuppression, or any dysphagia. In the efficacy group (n=9) seven out of nine participants were with no progression as of the DCO, and four out of the seven participants enrolled in cohort 2 achieved a partial response (PR). Three PRs were confirmed, while one was pending confirmation at the time of DCO. Cohort 3, at a dose level of 222 MBq [6 mCi], has recently been opened for enrollment. Safety data for all treated participants and efficacy results for a mature subset will be presented at the congress. Conclusions: [212Pb]VMT-a-NET showed a favorable safety profile and promising clinical benefit for patients with advanced SSTR2-expressing NETs treated at the dose level of 185 MBq (5 mCi). The study is ongoing with cohort 3 currently open for enrollment. Citation Format: Vikas Prasad, Richard Wahl, Lilja Solnes, Savitha Balaraman, Gregory Sibley, Lowell Anthony, Brandon Mancini, Jason Starr, Vineeth Sukrithan, Chih-Yi Liao, Samuel Mehr, Lucia Baratto, Wenjing Yang, Alaa Hanna, Stephen Keefe, Markus Puhlmann, Thorvadur Halfdanarson. [212Pb]VMT-a-NET for somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2)-expressing tumors: safety and preliminary efficacy results in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2025 Oct 22-26; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2025;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr C095 .

Importance Many patients are diagnosed with benign breast lesions; however, evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for the management of benign breast disease (BBD) are limited. Observations The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) and the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) developed guidelines for the management of benign fibroepithelial lesions (FELs) using a modified Delphi consensus methodology and public comment. There was strong consensus that core biopsy–proven concordant fibroadenomas without atypia only require excision if they were symptomatic, patient preferred, attained a certain size, or demonstrated substantive growth over time on clinical examination. There was strong consensus that when removing a fibroadenoma, complete excision without transection of the mass is recommended and surgeons should consider aesthetics, sensation, and other factors when selecting incision placement. Patients with core biopsy–proven concordant fibroadenomas do not require imaging follow-up and may return to age-appropriate screening. Many benign phyllodes tumors (BPTs) present as an FEL on core biopsy, and these lesions along with any lesions with suspicion of or concern for phyllodes tumors (PTs) require surgical excisional biopsy with complete excision of the mass. Re-excision of a BPT is not required for patients with a positive margin for BPT, but a margin re-excision may be considered if the mass was transected or there is concern of residual disease after excisional biopsy. Patients with BPT who have undergone excision do not require follow-up imaging and may return to age-appropriate screening. Conclusions and Relevance Evidence-informed, consensus and expert opinion-based guidelines for the management of benign FELs of the breast were developed. These guidelines provide clarification on the controversial management of benign FELs of the breast. Any practicing clinicians who treat patients with benign FELs should integrate these guidelines into treatment of their patients.

Importance Contemporary guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with melanoma with predicted risk of SLN metastasis greater than 10% and consideration of SLNB when the risk is 5% to 10%. A gene expression profile (GEP)–based test that can accurately identify patients with a low risk of SLN metastasis would refine selection for SLNB. Objective To establish the predictive capability of the combined clinicopathological factors and GEP (CP-GEP) test to identify patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who can safely forgo SLNB and to investigate the prognostic value of CP-GEP regarding the outcome in patients with cutaneous melanoma after a negative SLNB (not reported herein). Design, Setting, and Participants This prognostic study was conducted from September 2021 to June 2024 at 9 academic medical centers with experienced melanoma surgeons. Included were patients with biopsy-proven invasive cutaneous melanoma with T1 to T3 tumors and clinically negative regional LNs. All patients were deemed candidates for SLNB using standard clinical criteria. GEP was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from the primary melanoma biopsy. Analyses were performed from December 2024 to August 2025. Intervention CP-GEP testing to determine risk of having a positive SLNB in patients with T1 to T3 cutaneous melanoma who were considered appropriate candidates for the procedure based on standard clinical parameters. Main Outcomes and Measures CP-GEP results were reported as low risk or high risk; the primary outcome measure was negative predictive value (NPV) in low-risk cases. Analyses included NPV assessment by tumor (T) subcategory, primary site, and age. Results A total of 1761 patients (median [IQR] age, 64 [53-72] years; 997 male [56.6%]) underwent SLNB (310 [17.6%] SLN positive) and had a successful CP-GEP test; GEP was successful in 97.7% of samples. A total of 651 patients (37.0%) were considered low risk by CP-GEP. Among low-risk cases, 46 (7.1%) were SLN positive, and NPV was 92.9% (95% CI, 90.7%-94.8%). High-risk cases had a 23.8% (264 of 1110) SLN-positive rate. The percentage of cases with low-risk CP-GEP declined with increasing T category (T1 = 346 of 507 [68.2%]; T2 = 295 of 897 [32.9%]; T3 = 10 of 357 [2.8%]). CP-GEP results were consistent in discriminating SLN-positive rates across primary sites, histologic subtypes, and mitotic count categories. In 2 large subsets, clinical stage IB (n = 1187) and patients 65 years and older (n = 832), 6.5% (95% CI, 4.6%-8.8%) of low-risk clinical stage IB cases and 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.7%) of all low-risk cases in patients 65 years and older were SLN positive vs 18.3% (95% CI, 15.3%-21.6%) and 20.3% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.2%) for high-risk cases, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this multicenter, prospective, blinded, prognostic study, the CP-GEP test reliably identified patients with melanoma with less than 10% SLN metastasis risk. SLN metastasis rates were approximately 3-fold greater for high-risk vs low-risk CP-GEP cases. In appropriately selected patients, the CP-GEP test may add value for shared patient-surgeon decision-making.

Abstract The Patient‐Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO‐CTCAE) was developed by the US National Cancer Institute to allow patients to directly report their side effects, enhancing the accuracy and patient‐centeredness of cancer clinical trial adverse event reporting. Clinician‐based reporting often misses the full range of patient symptoms, resulting in underreporting of side effects. The selection of adverse events for patient reporting must be defined in advance and consistently applied across all study arms. Investigators can use core symptom sets, including diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea, alongside tailored items specific to the treatments being studied. PRO‐CTCAE has demonstrated similar scores across electronic, paper‐based, and automated telephone administration methods. PRO‐CTCAE administration typically occurs before start of treatment and regularly throughout treatment, with the administration frequency tailored to the expected trajectory of side effects. Ensuring high survey completion rates is essential for PRO‐CTCAE success. Standard reporting can include tabular reporting of the proportion of patients with any (score ≥1) and high (score ≥3) levels of symptoms at the individual item level. A baseline‐adjustment approach should be applied to account for symptoms before start of treatment to isolate treatment‐emergent adverse events. The distribution of PRO‐CTCAE scores at each time point can be visualized using stacked bar charts. PRO‐CTCAE integration into cancer clinical trials is crucial for capturing a comprehensive range of treatment‐related symptomatic adverse events and improving the evaluation of therapy tolerability. Ongoing research continues to refine its implementation, supported by regulatory guidance.

ABSTRACT Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by opportunistic yeasts, namely those of the genus Candida , demonstrate strikingly high mortality rates and require early therapeutic intervention to optimize patient outcomes. Advancements in microbiological diagnosis of BSIs have introduced rapid molecular methods, including multiplex PCR panels, to detect common organisms directly from blood culture media. The BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) assay is one such method and detects seven of the most common yeast species responsible for fungemia, enabling timelier therapeutic optimization by clinicians. Here, we evaluated the clinical performance of BCID2 for yeast identification from positive blood cultures between 2021 and 2025 at a tertiary medical center, compared to the reference standard method, which couples subculturing and diagnostic mass spectrometry. A total of 252 individual yeast identification events were confirmed using the reference method during our study period, 33 (13%) of which represent organisms that lack BCID2 PCR-based targets and 219 (87%) represent organisms targeted by this assay. Of the 219 identifications compatible with the BCID2 panel targets, 209 (95%) were correctly identified. Discordance between BCID2 and the reference method commonly stemmed from the inability of BCID2 to target all yeasts encountered clinically in blood culture, as well as its reduced accuracy in cultures where >1 yeast is present. Overall, these data suggest that the BCID2 assay is a rapid and accurate method to identify the most common organisms causing yeast BSI from blood culture; however, subculture-based reference techniques are important complementary tools in the clinical microbiology laboratory. IMPORTANCE Invasive fungal diseases, including bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by yeasts, are increasing in prevalence alongside the growing global population of immunocompromised individuals. Prompt and targeted treatment is necessary for effective management of yeast BSI, and microbiological diagnostics play an important role in tailoring patient treatment. Rapid molecular assays that simultaneously detect multiple pathogens associated with a specific syndrome are attractive strategies to expedite pathogen identification. This includes the BIOFIRE FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) assay, which detects 33 organisms including 7 yeasts commonly associated with fungemia, directly from blood culture media. Its performance has been well established for the detection of bacteria and bacterial resistance markers from blood cultures. Here, we provide a yeast-specific snapshot into the microbiological performance of BCID2, highlighting its accuracy as well as limitations in detecting medically important yeasts compared to standard culture-based identification from a four-year specimen cohort collected in a tertiary care hospital.

ABSTRACT Disease Overview JAK2 unmutated erythrocytosis encompasses a heterogeneous spectrum of hereditary and acquired entities. Diagnosis The foremost step is excluding polycythemia vera (PV) with JAK2 mutation screening (exons 12–15). Apparent polycythemia such as physiological outliers or relative polycythemia secondary to volume contraction should be considered. A historical overview of hematocrit (Hct) and hemoglobin (Hgb) levels helps distinguish longstanding from acquired erythrocytosis. Serum erythropoietin (Epo) levels are variably informative. Hereditary Erythrocytosis Hereditary erythrocytosis should be considered in longstanding erythrocytosis with a positive family history; causes include EPOR mutations (subnormal Epo), high oxygen affinity hemoglobin variants, PIEZO1 mutations, 2,3‐bisphosphoglycerate deficiency, methemoglobinemia, and germline oxygen sensing pathway mutations ( HIF2A ‐ PHD2 ‐ VHL ). Acquired Erythrocytosis Acquired erythrocytosis results from central (cardiopulmonary disease) or peripheral (renal artery stenosis) hypoxia, Epo‐producing tumors (renal cell carcinoma) or drugs (testosterone, sodium glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2‐i), erythropoiesis stimulating agents). Idiopathic Erythrocytosis Idiopathic erythrocytosis is an ill‐defined terminology that presumes the existence of an increased Hgb/Hct level without an identifiable etiology. Management Cytoreductive therapy should be avoided. Phlebotomy should be considered for symptom control. Cardiovascular risk optimization and low‐dose aspirin are advised, while the role of HIF2A inhibitors remains unclear. Recent Advances EPO mutations which produce hyperactive, hepatic‐like Epo were identified. In cases with negative workup but high clinical suspicion, an expanded next generation sequencing panel for hereditary erythrocytosis is recommended. Among drugs, SGLT2‐i‐associated erythrocytosis is increasingly recognized. Future Directions Advances in molecular hematology are expected to improve the characterization of “idiopathic erythrocytosis”. Results from prospective studies are needed to elucidate the underlying pathology and guide management.