Citations

Abstract Background: The role of fusion genes and associated fusion transcripts has long been recognized in hematopoietic malignancies. Until quite recently it has been difficult to detect such events on a genomic scale in solid tumors. Consequently, little is known about the potential role of fusion genes, transcripts, and proteins as driver mutations, biomarkers, or therapeutic targets in breast cancer. Methods: We have developed a novel analytical pipeline, Snowshoes-FTD, for detection of fusion transcripts in breast cancer cell lines and tumor samples (Asmann, et al. NAR 2011; May 27 ePub ahead of print). Preliminary analyses have been carried out with a panel of 8 each ER+, HER2+, and triple negative (TN) primary breast tumors, 8 primary human mammary epithelial cell (HMEC) lines from biopsy samples, plus 16 normal tissues from the Illumina Body Map dataset. Results: We have identified 120 redundant, tumor-specific fusion transcripts, expressed in two or more tumors and in no non-transformed samples. Sixteen of these represent intrachromosomal fusions and 104 arise from fusion of transcripts that map to two different chromosomes. Every breast tumor expressed one or more fusion transcripts. Twenty-nine fusion transcripts appeared to be tumor subtype specific. Among these, we have identified 2 HER2+, 10 ER+, and 17 triple negative specific redundant transcripts. In general, HER2+ tumors expressed fewer fusion transcripts (range 4 to 28/tumor) compared to TN (range11 to 44/tumor). Chromosomal distribution patterns were also markedly different among the tumor subtypes. For example, ER+ tumors expressed a preponderance of redundant fusion transcripts that involve chr1 and 2, whereas TN tumors had no fusion transcripts that map to either chromosome. Conversely, the predominant locus for TN fusion transcripts was chr19, which contains only one HER2+ fusion and no ER+ fusion transcripts. Conclusions: Primary breast tumors express many chimaeric transcripts, which we presume to arise primarily from genomic rearrangements. The majority of these transcripts are redundant, and a subset are tumor subtype specific. These transcripts may mark regions of chromosomal instability. HER2+ tumors, in general, appear to evidence less chromosomal instability, as inferred from fusion transcripts; although some HER2+ tumors appear to be quite unstable. TN tumors contain many more redundant fusion transcripts, implying increased genomic instability, particularly in chr19. We conclude that these fusion transcripts represent a class of heretofore unrecognized biomarkers that may be used for sub-classification of breast tumors. Some of these transcripts appear to encode proteins that may function as tumor-subtype-specific driver mutations and may have potential as therapeutic targets in breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-02.

Abstract Background Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are standard adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. We previously reported that racial/ethnic minority women receiving an AI in NCIC CTG MA.17 experienced fewer hot flashes, fatigue, and arthralgias than Caucasians (Moy B et al. Ann Oncol 2006;17:1637). Here we examined whether race affected clinical outcomes in the MA.27 AI trial comparing exemestane (E) with anastrozole (A). Methods: Fisher's exact test was used to compare observed side effects (0 vs grades 1–5) between minority and Caucasian women. Adverse events (AE), including menopausal symptoms, were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria of the National Cancer Institute (version 3.0). ITT univariate test of race effects on overall survival (OS) was determined with a stratified log-rank test, while multivariate testing was with stratified Cox regression. Results: Among 7312 for whom race was known, distribution was: Caucasian (n=6939; 95%); black (n=235; 3%); Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (n=93); 1%; American Indian (n=39; 1%); and mixed race (n=6). Among women treated with E, minorities reported a significantly lower incidence of hot flashes (45% vs. 56%; p=0.003) and fatigue (34% vs. 46%; p=0.001) compared to Caucasians. Similarly with A, minority women reported significantly fewer hot flashes (47% vs. 58%; p=0.002) and lower cholesterol (12% vs. 18%; p=0.01); however, they reported more headaches than Caucasians (16% vs. 10%; p=0.01). Caucasian women were more likely to discontinue therapy due to AE or side effects (32% vs. 24%). There was a significant OS interaction (p=0.02) between race and treatment with minority women on E having fewer deaths than those on A. Caucasian women had HR of E to A of 0.98 (95% CI 0.81−1.20), p=0.85, while minorities had HR of E to A of 0.72 (95% CI 0.33−1.58), p=0.41. Conclusions: Minority women tolerated AIs better and were also more compliant than Caucasians, supporting our previous findings. A significant interaction between race and type of AI therapy for OS was seen, favoring exemestane in minority women. Replication of these findings in larger cohorts is necessary. Since race/ethnicity may serve as a surrogate for genetic differences, our findings suggest pharmacogenomic differences which require further research. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-02.

Abstract Background Obesity, as defined by body mass index (BMI), has been associated with increased recurrence rate, shorter DFS and increased death rates due to breast cancer (BC). Most of the studies to date have examined the relationship of BMI and DFS in patients with hormone receptor positive disease. To our knowledge, BMI and its relationship with outcome in early stage HER2 positive breast cancer has not previously been examined. The N9831 is a large phase III trial testing the role of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting of high risk patients with early stage HER2+ BC. We hypothesized that the occurrence of overweight and obesity may correlate with outcome. Methods: This analysis presents BMI and its relation to tumor characteristics and DFS in patients (pts) enrolled in the N9831 clinical trial. Pts were categorized as normal weight, overweight or obese using the WHO BMI classification parameters of < 25%, 25–29% and ≥ 30% respectively. For patient characteristics, patients were grouped into non-obese (BMI< 30) and obese (≥ 30) cohorts. DFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between arms A (chemotherapy alone), B (chemotherapy plus sequential trastuzumab) and C (chemotherapy plus concurrent trastuzumab) were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model, stratified by BMI. Results: Analysis was completed on 3,017 eligible pts. Obese pts were more likely to be older and postmenopausal (p<0.0001 for both). There was no significant association between BMI and ER/PR status (p=0.07) or histologic tumor grade (p=0.33). Obese pts were found to have significantly larger tumors ≥ 2 cm (p=0.002) and more positive lymph nodes (p=0.02). There was no significant difference in DFS within each intrinsic arm (A, B and C) between the obese and non-obese pts at 3, 5 or 7 yrs of follow up. However, pts in the non-obese group had significantly improved DFS in arm B and C compared to arm A (p=0.001 and p<0.0001 respectively). Also obese pts in arm C had significantly improved DFS compared to obese pts in arm A (p=0.008). There was a trend of improved DFS in the obese group in arm B compared to arm A, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.09). Pts in the normal weight and overweight groups did significantly better in arm B (p=0.02 for both) and arm C (p=0.01 and p=0.002 respectively) compared to arm A. Conclusions: This analysis of data from the N9831 study confirms that obese pts with early stage HER2+ tumors have worse clinical outcome than pts with BMI < 30%. Adjuvant trastuzumab improved clinical outcome regardless of BMI. This study supports weight loss intervention for obese women with early stage HER2+ BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-02.

Abstract Purpose: To assess the role of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 (IGFBP-5) as a marker of relapse and survival in breast cancer tumors. Experimental Design: Targeted regulation of IGFBP-5 was identified in MCF-7 cells resistant (MCF-7R4) to the IGF-1R/InsR inhibitor, BMS-536924 and examined by comparative microarray analysis, western and ELISA. Protein expression of IGFBP-5 was measured by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 84 breast cancer patients to examine correlative associations with invasive tumor fraction and overall survival (OS). The expression ratio of IGFBP-5/IGFBP-4 (BPR) was determined in multiple breast tumor cohorts for univariate analysis. Results: IGFBP-5 was markedly upregulated and highly localized to the membrane in MCF-7R4 resistant cells. When compared to pathologically normal reduction mammoplasty tissue, IGFBP-5 expression levels were upregulated in both invasive and histologically normal adjacent breast cancer tissue. In an independent cohort of breast cancer patients, IGFBP-5 protein levels correlated directly with invasion and OS. In univariate and multivariate modeling, metastasis-free survival, recurrence free survival (RFS) and OS were significantly associated with high IGFBP-5 expression. Prognostic power of IGFBP-5 was further increased with the addition of IGFBP-4 and tumors were ranked based upon IGFBP-5/IGFBP-4 expression ratio (BPR). Multiple breast cancer cohorts confirm that BPR (high vs. low) was a strong predictor of RFS and OS. Conclusion: IGFBP-5 expression is a marker of poor outcome in breast cancer patients. An IGFBP-5/IGFBP-4 expression ratio may serve as a surrogate biomarker of IGF pathway activation and predict sensitivity to IGF-1R-targeted therapies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-11.

Abstract Invasive breast carcinoma in African American (AA) women differs significantly from their Caucasian (CA) counterparts in its incidence, morphology and outcome. These tumors are more likely to be high grade, hormone receptor negative, present at a younger age and at a higher stage. Evaluation and a better understanding of precursor lesions may help delineate the mechanisms underlying the development of breast cancer in these two groups. Atypical hyperplasia (AH) in the breast has been associated with an increased risk of developing cancer (relative risk∼4.0). Risk stratification of these women by identification of predictive biomarkers would be beneficial for optimal patient care. In our study we evaluated the expression of the following prognostic biomarkers: estrogen receptor (ER), Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme and Ki-67 in AH in a cohort of AA women with benign breast biopsies. AA women with benign breast biopsies from years 1997–2000 were retrieved from our departmental database. Clinical and follow up data was obtained from the SEER database. The hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) slides for these cases were reviewed by 2 pathologists, who were blinded to the outcome, and those with atypia were included in this study. Paraffin blocks were retrieved for immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis and standardized scoring methods applied. A total of 1608 AA women had benign breast biopsies during the study period. We performed IHC analysis on 37 (2.3%) who were diagnosed with atypia (25 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and 12 cases of atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH)). Increased COX-2 expression was seen in 19 of 28 (67.8%) cases with AH. Of these, 13 of 19 cases (68.4%) were of ADH and 6 of 9 cases (66.7%) were of ALH. Twenty of 25 cases had a high expression of ER overall. Of these, 15 of17 (88.2%) of the positive cases was in the ADH category and 3 of 7 (42.8%) was in the ALH group. Of 32 cases, only 3 cases showed a proliferation rate of > 2% (9.4%) with Ki-67 IHC stain. All of these cases belonged to the ADH (21) category. In summary, the majority of AH cases showed increased COX-2 expression, although no differences were observed between lobular and ductal lesions. In contrast, ADH lesions appeared to exhibit increased reactivity for ER compared to ALH. Similarly, although rare, more ADH cases showed an increased proliferation rate compared to ALH. From our data, COX-2 and ER might be of prognostic significance in AA patients with AH. Larger studies with follow up are needed to understand this disease further. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-07.

Abstract Background We evaluated the safety and efficacy of L+T in pts with 0–2 prior lines of chemotherapy (CT) for HER2+ MBC. In the context of this phase II trial, we evaluated metabolic response by FDG-PET and explored the relationship between metabolic response and clinical outcomes. Methods: Pts with measurable, HER2+ MBC were eligible. Cohort 1: No prior T, L, or CT +T for MBC, and >1 yr from adjuvant T, if received. Cohort 2: 1–2 prior lines of CT for MBC, including T, or relapse within 1 yr of adjuvant T. Pts received L 1,000 mg QD + T (2 mg/kg weekly or 6 mg/kg Q3W). Staging studies were done with CT or MRI at baseline (BL) and every 2 cycles (1 cycle=4 weeks [wks]). Objective response was assessed by local investigator according to RECIST 1.0. FDG-PET/CT was performed at BL, Wk 1, and Wk 8 per NCI guidelines. Central quality assurance, review, and analysis were performed on FDG-PET studies. Up to 5 target lesions were identified on BL FDG-PET images based on hypermetabolic uptake. Percent change in the summed maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of target lesions was calculated at Wk 1 or Wk 8, compared to BL. Metabolic response was assessed according to EORTC criteria for % change in SUVmax (progressive disease [PD]: ≥25% increase; partial response [PR]: ≥25% decrease; stable disease [SD]: <25% change). Metabolic response at Wk 1 was compared to Wk 8 as well as to clinical outcome, including objective response, clinical benefit, and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 87 pts were registered to the study. Of these, one pt did not begin protocol therapy and one pt did not have MBC on further testing, and are not included. 81/85 pts had FDG-PET data at Wk 1; 75/85 had data at Wk 8. Metabolic PR at Wk 1 was observed in 28/39 (72%) pts in Cohort 1 and 20/42 (48%) pts in Cohort 2. Metabolic PR at Wk 8 was observed in 27/34 (79%) pts in Cohort 1 and 18/41 (44%) pts in Cohort 2. Wk 1 and Wk 8 metabolic responses were similar. In cohort 1, 18/28 (64%) pts who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR had clinical benefit by RECIST. Of pts with Wk 1 metabolic SD, 2/9 (22%) had clinical benefit. In cohort 2, 9/20 (45%) pts who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR had clinical benefit; 5/22 (23%) who achieved Week 1 metabolic SD had clinical benefit. Exploratory analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) showed that pts in Cohort 1 who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR experienced a median PFS of 9.3 months ([mos]; 95% CI 5.6−22.3); for pts with metabolic SD, median PFS was 1.9 mos (95% CI 0.8−5.5). For pts in Cohort 2, Wk 1 metabolic PR was associated with median PFS of 5.6 mos (95% CI 3.7−7.8), whereas for pts with metabolic SD, median PFS was 3.7 mos (95% CI 1.8−5.5). Conclusions: L+T is associated with a high rate of early and sustained metabolic response by FDG-PET. Exploratory analyses suggest that metabolic PR may be associated with clinical benefit and longer PFS. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-07.

Abstract Background: T-DM1, an antibody-drug conjugate composed of trastuzumab, a stable linker, and the cytotoxic agent DM1, is in development for the treatment of HER2−positive cancers. Single-agent T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks (q3w) has demonstrated clinical activity in 2 phase II studies (TDM4258g and TDM4374g) in patients with pretreated HER2−positive MBC. The efficacy and safety of T-DM1 vs trastuzumab + docetaxel was investigated in patients with no prior MBC treatment in the randomized phase II study TDM4450g/BO21976. Here we report the PK of T-DM1 from that study and compare these data with those from studies that enrolled pretreated patients. Methods: In all 3 studies, PK parameters, including maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), terminal half-life (t½), steady-state volume of distribution (Vss), and clearance (CL) were estimated by noncompartmental analysis (NCA) for serum T-DM1, serum total trastuzumab (conjugated and unconjugated), and plasma DM1. The effects of baseline trastuzumab and HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) concentration on T-DM1 exposure were explored and the relationship between T-DM1 exposure and clinical response (objective response rate [ORR] and progression-free survival [PFS]) was modeled. Results: T-DM1 PK from evaluable patients enrolled in 3 studies are shown in Table 1. No significant correlations were observed between efficacy (as measured by ORR) and T-DM1 exposure (AUC, Cmax) after administration of T-DM1 to pretreated patients; efficacy-exposure analyses (ORR and PFS) for previously untreated patients will be presented. Patients with measurable concentrations of trastuzumab at baseline had a greater AUC during cycle 1; however, this did not impact ORR. Baseline circulating HER2 ECD concentrations also had no effect on ORR for pretreated patients. The impact of baseline trastuzumab and HER2 ECD concentrations on ORR and PFS in previously untreated patients will be presented. Conclusions: Single-agent T-DM1 has similar PK in patients who have received prior therapy for MBC and in those who have not. The PK of T-DM1 was not affected by prior trastuzumab treatment or by circulating HER2 ECD, and no significant correlations were observed between efficacy (ORR) and T-DM1 exposure (AUC, Cmax) or HER2 ECD for pretreated patients. The relationships between efficacy and T-DM1 exposure and HER2 ECD concentrations will be presented for patients without prior MBC treatment. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-13.

Abstract African American (AA) women have higher mortality rates from breast cancer (BrCa) and are diagnosed at younger ages than their Caucasian counterparts. Women who have had a benign breast biopsy are at increased risk of the disease, although less is known about the risk of BrCa associated with benign breast disease in AA women. We examined 1428 breast biopsies from AA women which occurred from 1997–2000 and assessed various pathologic markers including: apocrine metaplasia, ductal hyperplasia including atypia, evidence of cysts, duct ectasia, fibrosis, intra-ductal papilloma, sclerosing adenosis, columnar alteration, and involution (atrophy). These women were followed for later BrCa through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System, part of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program through 2008. Women who developed BrCa were compared to those in the cohort who did not, and to other AA women with BrCa in the SEER registry. AA women in our study were also compared to Caucasian women in the Mayo Clinic cohort. Differences in variables were assessed by chi-squared tests and 95% confidence intervals. Of the 1428 biopsies, 52 (3.6%) subsequent incident breast cancers were reported in SEER. The mean age at diagnosis was 59, and the mean time from biopsy to BrCa diagnosis was 6.1 years. Individuals with atypical ductal hyperplasia at biopsy (n=37, 2.6%) were more likely to develop breast cancer (n=7, 13.5%, p<0.01). No other pathologic variables were associated with increased risk. Women in our cohort with breast cancer did not differ from AA in the SEER database with respect to age at diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, or receptor positivity. Compared to the Caucasian women in the Mayo Clinic BBD cohort, AA women in our study were younger at biopsy (p<0.01), but had similar percentages of involution and atypia (p=0.50 and 0.15, respectively). Our preliminary findings among a relatively small group of AA women with prior benign breast biopsies and incident breast cancers suggest that results from the Mayo Cohort study are likely to apply to AA populations. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-16.

Abstract Background Tumors that are negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors and do not over express HER2 are referred as “triple negative” breast cancer (TNBC). These tumors are characterized by unique molecular profiles on gene expression arrays, aggressive behavior with a high recurrence rate, an increased risk of visceral metastases, poor prognosis and lack of targeted therapies. Brostallicin is a novel synthetic compound from the class of DNA minor groove binding (MGB) anti-cancer agents. It retains activity in cancer cells resistant to alkylating agents, topoisomerase I inhibitors and is fully active against DNA-mismatch repair deficient tumor cells. Cells expressing relatively high glutathione/glutathione S-transferase (GSH/GST) levels are more susceptible to brostallicin antitumor efficacy. Cisplatin administration increases expression of GST in tumor cells leading to an increased anti-tumor efficacy of brostallicin. Trial design: Single-stage phase II study — based on the effects of cisplatin on GSH/GST levels in preclinical models, the most reasonable sequence to explore was cisplatin on Day 1 followed by brostallicin on Day 2 repeated every 21 days. Eligibility criteria: Women or men ≥18 years of age with confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast with clinical evidence of measurable metastatic disease and triple negative subtype according to current ASCO CAP guidelines [ER/PR ≤1%; HER2 negative), who received 0–4 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting; with adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic functions; and no active CNS metastases. Aims: To study the efficacy of the novel drug, brostallicin, as well as to serve as proof of concept of its mechanism of action in TNBC. The primary endpoint is to evaluate clinical efficacy of the combination of brostallicin and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with metastatic TNBC, as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 months with 89% power (0.10 significance level) to detect an absolute difference of 20%. Secondary endpoints include ORR by RECIST, duration of response, 6-month PFS, overall survival (OS) and adverse event profile. Tertiary endpoints include assessment of 1) GSH levels prior to the administration of cisplatin and of brostallicin; and 2) the prevalence of BCRA-1 mutation by IHC in the primary or metastatic tumor. Statistical methods: The largest 3-month PFS proportion where the proposed treatment regimen would be considered ineffective in this population was estimated at 35% based on the median PFS of 60 days in patients with metastatic TNBC enrolled in the N0234 trial (erlotinib and gemcitabine as 1st/2nd line), and the smallest 3-month PFS success proportion that may warrant subsequent studies with the proposed regimen in this patient population was estimated at 55%. The interim analysis will be reported when the 20th eligible patient has been followed for 3 months. Present accrual and target accrual: 21 patients have been accrued at the time of abstract submission (June 2011). Target accrual is 42 evaluable patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-14.

Abstract Background NKTR-102 is a next-generation topoisomerase I inhibitor-polymer conjugate with a markedly reduced Cmax and a continuous exposure profile compared to irinotecan. A phase 2 trial of single-agent NKTR-102 compared a dose of 145 mg/m2 every 2w or every 3w in 3rd-line MBC (Awada et al, ASCO 2011). Overall the ORR was 29% (including 3% CR) with the prior ATC subset demonstrating an ORR of 31%. Dosing every 3w was better tolerated; in this arm, median PFS equaled 5.3m and median OS equaled 13.1m. Trial Design: NKTR-102 will be compared to TPC in an open-label, randomized, parallel, two arm multicenter Phase 3 pivotal study in pts with previously treated locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Key Entry Criteria: Adult females, with ECOG 0 or 1 with adequate liver, kidney and marrow function. All patients must have received prior therapy with an anthracycline (in neo/adjuvant or metastatic setting or both), a taxane (in neo/adjuvant or metastatic setting or both) and capecitabine (in neo/adjuvant or locally advanced/metastatic setting or both) unless not medically appropriate or explicitly contraindicated for the patient. All chemotherapy- and radiation-related toxicities must have resolved to ≤ Grade 1, except for stable sensory neuropathy ≤ Grade 2 and alopecia. Pts with brain metastases may be eligible, if stable for prior 4 weeks without steroids. Pts with Grade ≥ 2 pre-existing diarrhea or receiving chronic anti-diarrheal supportive care are not eligible. Statistical Methods: The primary efficacy endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include ORR by RECIST v1.1 and PFS. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to NKTR-102 given IV at 145 mg/m2 over 90-min every 21 days or TPC. Patients randomized to TPC will receive single agent chemotherapy, limited to choice of one of the following 5 agents: eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or a taxane. The investigator must decide which agent will be given to the patient prior to randomization. Pts will be stratified by geographical region and disease characteristics. Target Accrual: Approximately 840 patients (420 pts per treatment arm) will be randomized in order to obtain 615 deaths (alpha = 0.05; power 90% with one interim analysis scheduled when 50% of the deaths have occurred). PK sampling will be performed in a subset of pts and blood and/or tumor samples are planned for potential predictive markers of response and toxicity. Enrollment is expected to remain open until the end of 2013. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-07.