Citations

Clear

4203 citation(s) found for "Yu, Chen".

Pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation in a brain-dead human recipient
Liu, Xiaoyou , Peng, Guilin, Shi, Jiang , Ju, Chunrong, He, Ping , Liu, Xiaoqing , Zhang, Zuopen, Chen, Chuanbao, Pan, Dengke, Yang, Zifeng , Guan, Wenda, 陈, 中华克劳斯, Liu, Menyang, Liang, Hengrui , Zhao, Yi , Huang, Weiqing , Rucker, A. Justin , Xu, Xin , He, Jianxing , Yang, Chao , Liu, Hui, Liu, Xiaoqing, Zhang, Zuopeng , Pan, Dengke , Yang, Zifeng , Guang, Wenda, Li, Hongtao , Chen, Zhonghua, Liang, Hengrui , Jeon, Kyeongman , Chen-Yoshikawa, Toyofumi Fengshi , Lal, Amos, Zhang, Kang , Zhang, Kang , Liu, Xiaoyou , Xu, Xin

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | November 10, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-5155123/v1 Get It

Abstract This study reports the first pig-to-human lung xenotransplantation using a six gene-edited pig lung. A left lung from a gene-edited Chinese Bama Xiang pig was transplanted into a 39-year-old brain-dead human recipient. The xenograft maintained viability and functionality for 216 hours without signs of hyperacute rejection. Postoperatively, severe edema resembling primary graft dysfunction (PGD) was observed, potentially due to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Antibody-mediated rejection appeared to contribute to xenograft damage on postoperative days 3 and 6, with partial recovery by day 9 under the current immunosuppressive regimen. This pioneering study suggests that genetically modified pig lungs could potentially be used for future clinical applications in xenotransplantation.
Magnetic Resonance Elastography Combined With PI‐RADS v2.1 for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
Chen, Jie , Chen, Yuntian , Deng, Liping , Tang, Hehan , Zhang, Zhen , Chen, Tingyu , Zeng, Hao , Yuan, Enyu , Yao, Jin , Song, Bin , Yao, Jin , Chen, Guoyong , Yuan, Yuan , Yin, Meng , Chen, Jun

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | November 8, 2024 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 2248-2257

10.1002/jmri.29653 | PMID 39513399 Get It

BackgroundMultiparametric MRI may cause overdiagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI‐RADS v2.1).ObjectivesTo investigate the diagnostic performance of stiffness as a standalone and complementary marker to PI‐RADS v2.1 for diagnosing csPCa.Study TypeProspective.SubjectsOne hundred forty‐seven participants with pathologically confirmed prostate lesions (≥1 cm), including 71 with csPCa.Field Strength/SequenceT1‐weighted fast spin‐echo, T2‐weighted fast spin‐echo, single‐shot echo‐planar diffusion‐weighted imaging, fast 3D gradient‐echo T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging, and 3D single‐shot spin‐echo based echo‐planar MR elastography at 3.0 T.AssessmentThe PI‐RADS v2.1 score was assessed by three radiologists independently. Lesion shear stiffness (SS) values at 60 Hz and 90 Hz were measured. A modified PI‐RADS integrating stiffness with PI‐RADS v2.1 was developed. Diagnostic performance for csPCa was compared between stiffness, PI‐RADS v2.1 and the modified PI‐RADS.Statistical TestSpearman's correlation, Fleiss κ and intraclass correlation, Pearson correlation, one‐way analysis of variance, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the Delong test. Significance level was P < 0.05.ResultsIn the peripheral zone, csPCa (N = 35) had significantly higher SS than non‐csPCa at 60 Hz (3.22 ± 0.66 kPa vs. 2.56 ± 0.56 kPa) and at 90 Hz (5.64 ± 1.30 kPa vs. 4.48 ± 0.84 kPa). PI‐RADS v2.1 showed 100% sensitivity, 58% specificity, and 0.79 AUC for detecting csPCa. SS achieved 97% sensitivity, 52% specificity, and 0.80 AUC at 60 Hz, while SS had 63% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and 0.78 AUC at 90 Hz. The modified PI‐RADS, combing SS at 60 Hz with PI‐RADS v2.1, resulted in a significantly increased AUC (0.86) compared to that of PI‐RADS v2.1, with a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 75%.Data ConclusionStiffness can help identifying csPCa in the peripheral zone. Combining stiffness with the PI‐RADS v2.1 improved the diagnostic accuracy and specificity for csPCa.Evidence Level1Technical EfficacyStage 2
Renal Effects of Combination Phosphodiesterase V Inhibition and Low-Dose B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Acute Heart Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Hubers, Scott , Benike, Sherry L., Johnson, Bradley K. , Scott, Christopher G. , Chen, Horng H. , Hubers, Scott A , McKie, Paul M , Scott, Christopher , Chen, Horng , McKie, Paul M.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Heart Failure | November 8, 2024 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circheartfailure.124.011761 | PMID 39513267 Get It

BACKGROUND: Cardiorenal dysfunction with impaired cyclic GMP (cGMP) response is common in patients presenting with acute heart failure (HF). Type V phosphodiesterase (PDEV) is known to be upregulated in HF and may explain the dysfunction of renal response. The aim of this study was to determine whether B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) alone or in combination with PDEV inhibition improves renal function and increases urinary sodium and cGMP excretion in acute HF. METHODS: This open-label study included 67 patients hospitalized with acute HF and renal dysfunction. Patients were randomized to standard care, low-dose intravenous BNP (0.005 µg/kg per minute), or combination BNP/PDEV inhibition with sildenafil (25 mg q12 hours) for 48 hours. The coprimary end points were the percent change in estimated glomerular filtration rate and blood urea nitrogen from baseline to 48 hours. RESULTS: Treatment with BNP and BNP/PDEV inhibitor significantly increased plasma cGMP at 24 hours (+25.6% [+9.8%, +84.7%] and +60.8% [+32.3%, +103.8%] for BNP and BNP/PDEV versus −13.5% [−29.1%, +14.2%] with standard care; P =0.001). However, there was no significant change in estimated glomerular filtration rate 0 (−10.8%, +12.7%) for standard care versus 0 (−15.3%, +11.8%) for the BNP group versus –8.8% (−14.3%, +8.3%) for the BNP/PDEV group ( P =0.60) or blood urea nitrogen −1.4% (−10.7%, +12.0%) for standard care versus –5.9% (−14.6%, +9.4%) for the BNP group versus +6.9% (−5.3%, +18.8%) for the BNP/PDEV group ( P =0.38) between groups. Hypotension was more common in the BNP/PDEV inhibitor group. CONCLUSIONS: BNP and combination BNP/PDEV inhibition increased plasma cGMP in patients with acute HF but did not improve renal function or urinary sodium/cGMP excretion. Our study does not support the use of intravenous low-dose BNP with or without PDEV inhibition to enhance renal function in patients admitted with acute HF. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00972569.
The Association Between Perioperative Red Blood Cell Transfusions and 1-Year Mortality After Major Cancer Surgery: An International Multicenter Observational Study
Ramirez, María F. , Chen, Lee‐lynn , Guzman, Luis Felipe Cuellar, Lobo, Francisco , Uribe‐Marquez, Santiago, Ruscic, Katarina J. , Chew, Sophia Tsong Huey , Lanigan, Megan , Investigators, On behalf of the ARCA-1, Cata, Juan P. , Guerra-Londoño, Juan Jose , Warner, Matthew A. , Huang, Jeffrey Jianhong , Investigators, On behalf of the ARCA-1

Mayo Clinic

Anesthesia & Analgesia | November 6, 2024 | Volume: 140 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 782-794

10.1213/ane.0000000000007236 | PMID 39504267 Get It

BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions in patients undergoing surgery for cancer are given to treat anemia or acute hemorrhage. Evidence indicates that pRBC transfusions are associated with poor perioperative and oncological outcomes. The ARCA-1 (Perioperative Care in the Cancer Patient-1) study was designed to test the association between perioperative pRBC transfusions and postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cancer surgery. The primary hypothesis of our study was that perioperative pRBC transfusions have a negative impact on postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality. METHODS: ARCA-1 was an international multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Participating centers enrolled a minimum of 30 consecutive adult patients with cancer who underwent surgery with curative intent. The primary end point was all-cause mortality 1 year after major cancer surgery. Secondary end points were rates of perioperative blood product use, 1-year cancer-specific mortality, overall survival, and 30-day morbidity and mortality. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to adjust for selection bias. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to estimate the effects of significant covariates on 1-year mortality, cancer-related mortality, and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 1079 patients were included in the study. The rate of perioperative pRBC transfusions was 21.1%. Preoperative comorbidities, including anemia, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III to IV, a history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), myocardial infarction, stroke, need for dialysis, history of blood transfusions, and metastatic disease were statistically significantly more frequent in transfused patients compared to nontransfused patients. The 1-year mortality rate was higher in transfused patients before (19.7% vs 6.5%; P < .0001) and after (17.4% vs 13.2%; P = .29) propensity score matching. 1-year mortality was 1.97 times higher in transfused than in no-transfused patients (odd ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–3.41). The odds of 1-year cancer mortality for patients who had perioperative pRBCs was 1.82 times higher (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.97–3.43) compared to those who did not receive perioperative pRBC transfusion. The effect of perioperative pRBC transfusion on overall survival was also significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.15–2.99). Transfused patients also had a higher rate of 30-day postoperative mortality before (3.5% vs 0.7%; P = .0009) and after propensity score matching (4.2% vs 1.8%; P = .34). CONCLUSIONS: This international, multicenter observational study showed that perioperative pRBC transfusion was associated with an increased mortality risk.
791 Immunological correlates of response to vismodegib and PD-1 blockade in an autochthonous model of basal cell nevus (Gorlin-Goltz) syndrome
Ager, Casey R. , Zhu, Yucui, Chen, Dana, Athar, Mohammed, Izar, Benjamin , Bickers, David R., Jugler, Collin , Chen, Dana, Kim, Arianna L.

Mayo Clinic

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts | November 5, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A896-A896

10.1136/jitc-2024-sitc2024.0791 Get It

653 Phase I/II clinical trial for radiation and dendritic cell combination immunotherapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma
Wu, Chen , Fonkoua, Lionel Aurelien Kankeu , Wang, Panwen , Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Atwell, Thomas D. , Bornschlegl, Svetlana, Martinez, Kodi, McCoy, Gabrielle, Regan, Kevin M., Shao, Zuoyi , Li, Ying , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Tran, Nguyen, Wang, Junwen , Zhang, Henan , Dietz, Allan B. , Dong, Haidong , Park, Sean S. , Yi, Lin , Roberts, Lewis R.

Mayo Clinic

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts | November 5, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A749-A750

10.1136/jitc-2024-sitc2024.0653 Get It

636 A phase 1 trial of CUE-102, a novel WT1-pHLA-IL2-Fc T cell engager in HLA-A*0201 positive patients with WT1-positive recurrent/metastatic cancers
Uboha, Nataliya V. , Chaves, Jorge, Chen, Christopher T. , Powderly, John D. , Zhaohui, Jin, Alistar, Angela , Gabrail, Nashat , Agensky, Laura, Goel, Apollina, Margossian, Steven, Levisetti, Matteo, Quayle, Steve, Kim, Dae Won , Alese, Olatunji B. , Saenger, Yvonne M. , Zheng, Lei , Fu, Siqing , Gong, Jun , Zhaohui, Jin, Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Selfridge, Jennifer Eva

Mayo Clinic

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts | November 5, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A730-A730

10.1136/jitc-2024-sitc2024.0636 Get It

3D‐Printed Polymeric Biomaterials for Health Applications
Zhu, Yuxiang , Guo, Shenghan , Ravichandran, Dharneedar , Ramanathan, Arunachalam , Sacco, Alaina F., Patil, Dhanush , Thummalapalli, Sri Vaishnavi , Pulido, Tiffany V., Lancaster, Jessica N. , Yi, Johnny , Cornella, Jeffrey L. , Wang, Linbing , Zhao, Yiping , Chambers, Lindsay B. , Theobald, Taylor G. , Yang, Sui , Liang, Liang, Song, Kenan , Patil, Dhanush , Thummalapalli, Sri Vaishnavi , Lancaster, Jessica N , Yi, Johnny , Chen, Xiangfan , Mei, Xuan , Zhang, Yu Shrike , Wang, Linbing , Wang, Xianqiao , Zhao, Yiping , Hassan, Mohammad K , Yang, Sui , Song, Kenan , Ravichandran, Dharneedar , Zhu, Yuxiang , Ramanathan, Arunachalam , Sobczak, M. Taylor , Sacco, Alaina F., Lott, David G. , Chen, Xiangfan , Mei, Xuan , Zhang, Yu Shrike , Liang, Liang

Mayo Clinic

Advanced Healthcare Materials | November 5, 2024 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/adhm.202402571 | PMID 39498750 Get It

Abstract 3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, holds immense potential for rapid prototyping and customized production of functional health‐related devices. With advancements in polymer chemistry and biomedical engineering, polymeric biomaterials have become integral to 3D‐printed biomedical applications. However, there still exists a bottleneck in the compatibility of polymeric biomaterials with different 3D printing methods, as well as intrinsic challenges such as limited printing resolution and rates. Therefore, this review aims to introduce the current state‐of‐the‐art in 3D‐printed functional polymeric health‐related devices. It begins with an overview of the landscape of 3D printing techniques, followed by an examination of commonly used polymeric biomaterials. Subsequently, examples of 3D‐printed biomedical devices are provided and classified into categories such as biosensors, bioactuators, soft robotics, energy storage systems, self‐powered devices, and data science in bioplotting. The emphasis is on exploring the current capabilities of 3D printing in manufacturing polymeric biomaterials into desired geometries that facilitate device functionality and studying the reasons for material choice. Finally, an outlook with challenges and possible improvements in the near future is presented, projecting the contribution of general 3D printing and polymeric biomaterials in the field of healthcare.
Non-canonical CDK6 activity promotes cilia disassembly by suppressing axoneme polyglutamylation
He, Kai , Sun, Xiaobo , Luc, San , Hao, Jielu , Zhang, Yingyi , Huang, Yan , Ji, Biyun , Ku, Pei-I , Subramanian, Radhika , Ling, Kun , Hu, Jinghua , Chen, Chuan , Luc, San , Robichaud, Jielu Hao , Zhang, Yingyi , Huang, Yan , Ji, Biyun , Ku, Pei-I , Subramanian, Radhika , Ling, Kun , Hu, Jinghua , He, Kai , Chen, Chuan

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cell Biology | November 2, 2024 | Volume: 224 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1083/jcb.202405170 | PMID 39636239 Get It

Tubulin polyglutamylation is a posttranslational modification that occurs primarily along the axoneme of cilia. Defective axoneme polyglutamylation impairs cilia function and has been correlated with ciliopathies, including Joubert Syndrome (JBTS). However, the precise mechanisms regulating proper axoneme polyglutamylation remain vague. Here, we show that cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6), but not its paralog CDK4, localizes to the cilia base and suppresses axoneme polyglutamylation by phosphorylating RAB11 family interacting protein 5 (FIP5) at site S641, a critical regulator of cilia import of glutamylases. S641 phosphorylation disrupts the ciliary recruitment of FIP5 and its association with RAB11, thereby reducing the ciliary import of glutamylases. Encouragingly, the FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitor Abemaciclib can effectively restore cilia function in JBTS cells with defective glutamylation. In summary, our study elucidates the regulatory mechanisms governing axoneme polyglutamylation and suggests that developing CDK6-specific inhibitors could be a promising therapeutic strategy to enhance cilia function in ciliopathy patients.