Citations

BACKGROUNDCross‐sectional data on inpatient glucose control in a large sample of US hospitals are now available, but little is known about changes in glycemic control over time in these institutions.OBJECTIVETo evaluate trends in glycemic control in US hospitals over 2 years.DESIGNRetrospective analysis.METHODSPoint‐of‐care blood glucose (POC‐BG) test results at 126 hospitals during January to December 2007 and January to December 2009 were extracted using the Remote Automated Laboratory System‐Plus (Medical Automation Systems, Charlottesville, VA), and patient‐day‐weighted mean glucose levels were compared.SETTING/PATIENTSHospitalized patients.RESULTSA total of 12,541,929 POC‐BG measurements from 1,010,705 patients were analyzed for 2007, and 10,659,418 POC‐BG measurements from 656,206 patients were analyzed for 2009. Patient‐day‐weighted mean POC‐BG in 2009 decreased by 5 mg/dL in the non‐intensive care unit (non‐ICU) data compared with that in 2007 (154 mg/dL vs 159 mg/dL, respectively; P < 0.001). However, POC‐BG values were clinically unchanged in intensive care unit (ICU) data from 2009 vs 2007 (167 mg/dL vs 166 mg/dL; P < 0.001). From 2007 to 2009, the proportion of patient‐day‐weighted mean POC‐BGs that were >180 mg/dL declined from 28% to 25% in non‐ICU patients (P < 0.001), but not in ICU. Decreases in patient‐day‐weighted mean POC‐BG values in non‐ICU patients were significant regardless of hospital size, type, and geographic region (all P < 0.001), but similar decreases were not found in ICU data.CONCLUSIONSIn this first analysis of glucose changes in US hospitals, improvements over 2 years occurred in non‐ICU patients. Ongoing analysis will determine whether this trend continues. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:121–125. © 2012 Society of Hospital Medicine

Background— Congestion is a primary driver of symptoms in patients with acute heart failure, and relief of congestion is a critical goal of therapy. Monitoring of response to therapy through the assessment of daily weights and net fluid loss is the current standard of care, yet the relationship between commonly used markers of decongestion and both patient reported symptom relief and clinical outcomes are unknown. Methods and Results— We performed a retrospective analysis of the randomized clinical trial, Diuretic Optimization Strategy Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (DOSE-AHF), enrolling patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure. We assessed the relationship among 3 markers of decongestion at 72 hours—weight loss, net fluid loss, and percent reduction in serum N terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level—and relief of symptoms as defined by the dyspnea visual analog scale area under the curve. We also determined the relationship between each marker of decongestion and 60-day clinical outcomes defined as time to death, first rehospitalization or emergency department visit. Mean age was 66 years, mean ejection fraction was 35%, and 27% had ejection fraction ≥50%. Of the 3 measures of decongestion assessed, only percent reduction in NT-proBNP was significantly associated with symptom relief ( r =0.13; P =0.04). There was no correlation between either weight loss or net fluid loss and symptom relief, ( r =0.04; P =0.54 and r =0.07; P =0.27, respectively). Favorable changes in each of the 3 markers of decongestion were associated with improvement in time to death, rehospitalization, or emergency department visit at 60 days (weight: hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.85–0.97 per 4 lbs; weight lost; fluid hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.90–0.99 per 1000 mL fluid loss; NT-proBNP hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–0.99 per 10% reduction). These associations were unchanged after multivariable adjustment with the exception that percent reduction in NT-proBNP was no longer a significant predictor (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.93–1.02). The rates of death, HF hospitalization, or emergency department visit at 60 days for patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 markers of decongestion (above the median) were 67%, 64%, 46%, and 38%, respectively (log rank P value=0.05). Figure. Relationship between number of markers of decongestion above median* and time to 60-day risk of emergency department (ED) visit, rehospitalization, or death. *Median net fluid loss, 3.8 L; median net weight loss, 6.5 lbs; median percent reduction in N terminal B-type natriuretic peptide 24.3%. Conclusions— Weight loss, fluid loss, and NT-proBNP reduction at 72 hours are poorly correlated with dyspnea relief. However, favorable improvements in each of the 3 markers were associated with improved clinical outcomes at 60 days. These data suggest the need for ongoing research to understand the relationships among symptom relief, congestion, and outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00577135.

Background— Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) decreases mortality rates but is underutilized. Current median time from hospital discharge to enrollment is 35 days. We hypothesized that an appointment within 10 days would improve attendance at CR orientation. Methods and Results— At hospital discharge, 148 patients with a nonsurgical qualifying diagnosis for CR were randomized to receive a CR orientation appointment either within 10 days (early) or at 35 days (standard). The primary end point was attendance at CR orientation. Secondary outcome measures were attendance at ≥1 exercise session, the total number of exercise sessions attended, completion of CR, and change in exercise training workload while in CR. Average age was 60±12 years; 56% of participants were male and 49% were black, with balanced baseline characteristics between groups. Median time (95% confidence interval) to orientation was 8.5 (7–13) versus 42 (35 to NA [not applicable]) days for the early and standard appointment groups, respectively ( P <0.001). Attendance rates at the orientation session were 77% (57/74) versus 59% (44/74) in the early and standard appointment groups, respectively, which demonstrates a significant 18% absolute and 56% relative improvement (relative risk, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–2.37; P =0.022). The number needed to treat was 5.7. There was no difference ( P >0.05) in any of the secondary outcome measures, but statistical power for these end points was low. Safety analysis demonstrated no difference between groups in CR-related adverse events. Conclusions— Early appointments for CR significantly improve attendance at orientation. This simple technique could potentially increase initial CR participation nationwide. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01596036.

We designed an experiment to examine the effect of bile acid sequestration with Colesevelam on fasting and postprandial glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes. To do so, we tested the hypothesis that Colesevelam increases the disposition index (DI), and this increase is associated with increased glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) concentrations. Thirty-eight subjects on metformin monotherapy were studied using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. Subjects were studied before and after 12 weeks of Colesevelam or placebo using a labeled triple-tracer mixed meal to measure the rate of meal appearance (Meal Ra), endogenous glucose production (EGP), and glucose disappearance (Rd). Insulin sensitivity and β-cell responsivity indices were estimated using the oral minimal model and then used to calculate DI. Therapy with Colesevelam was associated with a decrease in fasting (7.0 ± 0.2 vs. 6.6 ± 0.2 mmol/L; P = 0.004) and postprandial glucose concentrations (3,145 ± 138 vs. 2,896 ± 127 mmol/6 h; P = 0.01) in the absence of a change in insulin concentrations. Minimal model–derived indices of insulin secretion and action were unchanged. Postprandial GLP-1 concentrations were not altered by Colesevelam. Although EGP and Rd were unchanged, integrated Meal Ra was decreased by Colesevelam (5,191 ± 204 vs. 5,817 ± 204 μmol/kg/6 h; P = 0.04), suggesting increased splanchnic sequestration of meal-derived glucose.

Abstract Purpose: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating disease. Recent studies suggest that the stem cell properties of GBM contribute to the development of therapy resistance. Experimental Design: The expression of Survivin and Ran was evaluated by immunohistochemistry with GBM tissues, and quantitative reverse transcriptase (qRT)-PCR and immunocytochemistry with patient-derived GBM sphere cultures. With a computational structure-based drug design, 11 small-molecule compounds were designed, synthesized, and evaluated as inhibitor candidates for the molecular interaction of Survivin protein. The molecular mechanism of the lead compound, LLP-3, was determined by Western blot, ELISA, in situ proximity ligation assay, and immunocytochemistry. The effects of LLP-3 treatment on GSCs were evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. Quantitative immunohistochemistry was carried out to compare Survivin expression in tissues from 44 newly diagnosed and 31 recurrent post-chemoradiation GBM patients. Lastly, the sensitivities of temozolomide-resistant GBM spheres to LLP-3 were evaluated in vitro. Results: Survivin and Ran were strongly expressed in GBM tissues, particularly in the perivasculature, and also in patient-derived GSC cultures. LLP-3 treatment disrupted the Survivin–Ran protein complex in cancer cells and abolished the growth of patient-derived GBM spheres in vitro and in vivo. This inhibition was dependent on caspase activity and associated with p53 status of cells. Immunohistochemistry showed that Survivin expression is significantly increased in recurrent GBM compared with newly diagnosed tumors, and temozolomide-resistant GBM spheres exhibited high sensitivities to LLP-3 treatment. Conclusions: Disruption of the Survivin–Ran complex by LLP-3 abolishes survival and growth of GSCs both in vitro and in vivo, indicating an attractive novel therapeutic approach for GBM. Clin Cancer Res; 19(3); 631–42. ©2012 AACR.

BackgroundOctogenarians (>80 years) have been underrepresented in clinical trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).ObjectiveTo determine the benefit of CRT with or without a defibrillator in older elderly patients.MethodsWe retrospectively studied consecutive patients who received CRT at our institution from 2002 through 2008. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and echocardiographic parameters were assessed before and after CRT. Thirty‐day complications after device implant were collected. Survival data were obtained from the national death and location database. Data were compared between those 80 years and younger and those older than 80 years.ResultsOf 728 patients identified, 90 (12.4%) were older than 80 years. After CRT, older and younger patients had similar improvements in NHYA class (P = 0.41), ejection fraction (P = 0.48), and mitral valve regurgitation (MR) severity (P = 0.42). In the older patients, defibrillator implantation was associated with comparable improvement in NYHA class, ejection fraction, and MR grade severity (P > 0.05), as in those without a defibrillator. Overall survival was worse in octogenarians than in the younger patients by Kaplan‐Meier estimates (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed similar survival between the younger and older subjects (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.83–1.84; P = 0.31). The observed complication rate in all study subjects was 12.2%, with no difference between the two age groups.ConclusionOctogenarian patients who received CRT with or without a defibrillator for advanced heart failure had similar clinical benefits as younger patients. CRT should not be withheld from octogenarians meeting current selection guidelines.