Citations

Showing 10 of 107969 citations.

Endoscopic ultrasound-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of a gastric subepithelial tumor
Fujii, Larissa L., Gómez, Victoria , Song, Lujie, Levy, Michael J. , Levy, Michael J.

Mayo Clinic

Endoscopy | August 15, 2013 | Volume: 45 | Issue: S 02 | Pages: E225-E226

10.1055/s-0033-1344157 | PMID 23945921 Get It

Osteocapsular Arthroplasty of the Elbow
O’Driscoll, Shawn W. , Blonna, Davide

Mayo Clinic

JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques | August 14, 2013 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 3 | Pages: e15

10.2106/jbjs.st.m.00002 | PMID 30881746 Get It

Structural and functional insights into the juxtamembranous amino‐terminal tail and extracellular loop regions of class B GPCRs
Dong, Maoqing , Koole, Cassandra, Wootten, Denise , Sexton, Patrick M. , Miller, L J

Mayo Clinic

British Journal of Pharmacology | August 14, 2013 | Volume: 171 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1085-1101

10.1111/bph.12293 | PMID 23889342 Get It

Class B guanine nucleotide‐binding protein GPCRs share heptahelical topology and signalling via coupling with heterotrimeric G proteins typical of the entire superfamily of GPCRs. However, they also exhibit substantial structural differences from the more extensively studied class A GPCRs. Even their helical bundle region, most conserved across the superfamily, is predicted to differ from that of class A GPCRs. Much is now known about the conserved structure of the amino‐terminal domain of class B GPCRs, coming from isolated NMR and crystal structures, but the orientation of that domain relative to the helical bundle is unknown, and even less is understood about the conformations of the juxtamembranous amino‐terminal tail or of the extracellular loops linking the transmembrane segments. We now review what is known about the structure and function of these regions of class B GPCRs. This comes from indirect analysis of structure–function relationships elucidated by mutagenesis and/or ligand modification and from the more direct analysis of spatial approximation coming from photoaffinity labelling and cysteine trapping studies. Also reviewed are the limited studies of structure of some of these regions. No dominant theme was recognized for the structures or functional roles of distinct regions of these juxtamembranous portions of the class B GPCRs. Therefore, it is likely that a variety of molecular strategies can be engaged for docking of agonist ligands and for initiation of conformational changes in these receptors that would be expected to converge to a common molecular mechanism for activation of intracellular signalling cascades.Linked ArticlesThis article is part of a themed section on Molecular Pharmacology of GPCRs. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2014.171.issue‐5
The Decline Effect in Cardiovascular Medicine: Is the Effect of Cardiovascular Medicine and Stent on Cardiovascular Events Decline Over the Years?
Lee, Moo-Sik, Flammer, Andreas J. , Lerman, Amir

Mayo Clinic

Korean Circulation Journal | August 14, 2013 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 443

10.4070/kcj.2013.43.7.443 | PMID 23964290 Get It

FGFR1 Signaling Stimulates Proliferation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Inhibiting the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors p21Waf1 and p27Kip1
Dombrowski, Christian, Helledie, Torben, Grünert, Martin, Canning, Claire Ann, Jones, C. Michael , Hui, James Hoi Po , Nurcombe, Victor , Wijnen, André J. van , Cool, Simon M. , Ling, Ling , van Wijnen, Andre J

Mayo Clinic

Stem Cells | August 13, 2013 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2724-2736

10.1002/stem.1514 | PMID 23939995 Get It

Abstract Signaling through fibroblast growth factor receptor one (FGFR1) is a known inducer of proliferation in both embryonic and human adult mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and positively regulates maintenance of stem cell viability. Leveraging the mitogenic potential of FGF2/FGFR1 signaling in stem cells for therapeutic applications necessitates a mechanistic understanding of how this receptor stimulates cell cycle progression. Using small interfering RNA (siRNA) depletion, antibody-inhibition, and small molecule inhibition, we establish that FGFR1 activity is rate limiting for self-renewal of hMSCs. We show that FGFR1 promotes stem cell proliferation through multiple mechanisms that unite to antagonize cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors. FGFR1 not only stimulates c-Myc to suppress transcription of the CDK inhibitors p21Waf1 and p27Kip1, thus promoting cell cycle progression but also increases the activity of protein kinase B (AKT) and the level of S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (Skp2), resulting in the nuclear exclusion and reduction of p21Waf1. The in vivo importance of FGFR1 signaling for the control of proliferation in mesenchymal progenitor populations is underscored by defects in ventral mesoderm formation during development upon inhibition of its signaling. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that FGFR1 signaling mediates the continuation of MSC growth and establishes a receptor target for enhancing the expansion of mesenchymal progenitors while maintaining their multilineage potential. Stem Cells 2013;31:2724–2736
Reply to C.M. Booth et al
Goodwin, Pamela J. , Levine, M. , Cannistra, Stephen A., Ballman, Karla V. , Small, Eric J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 13, 2013 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 26 | Pages: 3300-3300

10.1200/jco.2013.51.8241 | PMID 23943837 Get It

Noninvasive Imaging of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Gene Therapy for Myocardial Ischemia
Chen, Ian Y. , Li, Zongjin , Rasooly, Julia , Paulmurugan, Ramasamy , Rosenberg, Jarrett , Rodriguez‐Porcel, Martin , Willmann, Jürgen K. , Wang, David S. , Contag, Christopher H. , Robbins, Robert C., Wu, Joseph C. , Gambhir, Sanjiv S. , Gheysens, Olivier S. , Wang, Qian , Wu, Joseph C

Mayo Clinic

Human Gene Therapy Methods | August 13, 2013 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 279-288

10.1089/hgtb.2013.028 | PMID 23937265 Get It

Tendon gradient mineralization for tendon to bone interface integration
Thoreson, Andrew R. , Chen, Qingshan , An, Kai‐Nan, Amadio, Peter C. , Zhao, Chunfeng , Qu, Jin, Qu, Jin , An, Kai‐Nan

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Orthopaedic Research | August 12, 2013 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1713-1719

10.1002/jor.22412 | PMID 23939935 Get It

AbstractTendon‐to‐bone integration is a great challenge for tendon or ligament reconstruction regardless of use of autograft or allograft tendons. We mineralized the tendon, thus transforming the tendon‐to‐bone into a “bone‐to‐bone” interface for healing. Sixty dog flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons were divided randomly into five groups: (1) normal FDP tendon, (2) CaP (non‐extraction and mineralization without fetuin), (3) CaPEXT (Extraction by Na2HPO4 and mineralization without fetuin), (4) CaPFetuin (non‐extraction and mineralization with fetuin), and (5) CaPEXTFetuin (extraction and mineralization with fetuin). The calcium and phosphate content significantly increased in tendons treated with combination of extraction and fetuin compared to the other treatments. Histology also revealed a dense mineral deposition throughout the tendon outer layers and penetrated into the tendon to a depth of 200 µm in a graded manner. Compressive moduli were significantly lower in the four mineralized groups compared with normal control group. No significant differences in maximum failure strength or stiffness were found in the suture pull‐out test among all groups. Mineralization of tendon alters the interface from tendon to bone into mineralized tendon to bone, which may facilitate tendon‐to‐bone junction healing following tendon or ligament reconstruction. © 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31:1713–1719, 2013
Comparison of Physical Activity Sensors and Heart Rate Monitoring for Real-Time Activity Detection in Type 1 Diabetes and Control Subjects
Manohar, Chinmay U., O’Keeffe, Derek T. , Hinshaw, Ling , Lingineni, Ravi K., McCrady-Spitzer, Shelly , Levine, James A. , Carter, Rickey E. , Basu, Ananda , Kudva, Yogish C. , Manohar, Chinmay, Carter, Rickey E

Mayo Clinic

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics | August 12, 2013 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 751-757

10.1089/dia.2013.0044 | PMID 23937615 Get It

Background: Currently, patients with type 1 diabetes decide on the amount of insulin to administer based on several factors, including current plasma glucose value, expected meal input, and physical activity (PA). One future therapeutic modality for patients with type 1 diabetes is the artificial endocrine pancreas (AEP). Incorporation of PA could enhance the efficacy of AEP significantly. We compared the main technologies used for PA quantitation. Subjects and Methods: Data were collected during inpatient studies involving healthy control subjects and type 1 diabetes. We report PA quantified from accelerometers (acceleration units [AU]) and heart rate (HR) monitors during a standardized activity protocol performed after a dinner meal at 7 p.m. from nine control subjects (four were males, 37.4±12.7 years old, body mass index of 24.8±3.8 kg/m 2 , and fasting plasma glucose of 4.71±0.63 mmol/L) and eight with type 1 diabetes (six were males, 45.2±13.4 years old, body mass index of 25.1±2.9 kg/m 2 , and fasting plasma glucose of 8.44±2.31 mmol/L). Results: The patient-to-patient variability was considerably less when examining AU compared with HR monitors. Furthermore, the exercise bouts and rest periods were more evident from the data streams when AUs were used to quantify activity. Unlike the AU, the HR measurements provided little insight for active and rest stages, and HR data required patient-specific standardizations to discern any meaningful pattern in the data. Conclusions: Our results indicated that AU provides a reliable signal in response to PA, including low-intensity activity. Correlation of this signal with continuous glucose monitoring data would be the next step before exploring inclusion as input for AEP control.
Progression to detrusor muscle invasion during urothelial carcinoma surveillance is associated with poor prognosis
Breau, Rodney H. , Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Farmer, Sara A., Thapa, Prabin , Cagiannos, Ilias , Morash, Christopher , Frank, Igor

Mayo Clinic

BJU International | August 12, 2013 | Volume: 113 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 900-906

10.1111/bju.12403 | PMID 24053569 Get It

Objective To evaluate survival in patients after radical cystectomy ( RC ) who presented with non‐muscle‐invasive urothelial carcinoma and progressed to muscle invasion during surveillance. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the association between clinical factors before RC and survival. Patients and Methods In all, 981 consecutive M ayo C linic RC patients without a history of radiation or systemic chemotherapy were reviewed. Of these, 190 had RC after they progressed from non‐muscle invasive disease to muscle invasion (progressed to ≥ pT2 ). These patients were compared to 310 patients who had RC before muscle invasion (≤ pT1 ), and 481 patients who had muscle invasion at initial presentation (presented with ≥ pT2 ). Survival estimates were generated using the K aplan– M eier method and compared using the log‐rank test, while adjusted analyses were performed using C ox proportional hazard regression models. Results Patients who progressed to muscle invasion on surveillance had a higher risk of death than patients who initially presented with muscle invasion (overall survival hazard ratio [ HR ] 1.3; 95% confidence interval [ CI ] 1.0, 1.5). The estimated 5‐year cancer‐specific survival was 85.4% for patients presenting with ≤ pT1 , 52.9% for patients who progressed to ≥ pT2 , and 62.4% for patients who presented with ≥ pT2 ( P < 0.001). The corresponding 5‐year overall survival rates were 70.0%, 42.1%, and 49.5% ( P < 0.001). Of the patients who initially presented with non‐muscle‐invasive disease, progression to muscle invasion was associated with increased risk of cancer‐specific death (adjusted HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.6, 3.5). Lack of information about patients who presented without muscle invasion and never received RC is the major limitation of this study. Conclusions Despite close surveillance, many patients who progress to muscle invasion will die from bladder cancer. Patients who progress to muscle invasion on surveillance seem to have particularly aggressive disease and may benefit from multimodal treatments.