Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE (68Ga-Dotatate) PET is a promising imaging modality for post-operative meningioma delineation and outcome assessments following stereotactic radiosurgery. However, its utility for response assessment following other meningioma therapies, including somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) targeting [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (177Lu-Dotatate) therapy is insufficiently understood. Here we report the 68Ga-Dotatate PET results, prospectively obtained in patients with treatment-refractory meningioma who enrolled in a phase 2, open-label clinical trial (NCT03971461) evaluating the radiopharmaceutical 177Lu-Dotatate. METHODS Patients underwent 68Ga-Dotatate PET during screening and 24±2 weeks following treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate at 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) every 8 weeks for 4 doses. Up to 5 meningioma lesions per patient were assessed by gadolinium-enhanced T1 MRI and 68Ga-Dotatate PET using lesional Krenning score and lesional to superior sagittal sinus (SSS) maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ratio (SUVR (lesion/SSS)). RESULTS Eight patients with 16 lesions were assessed. By RANO criteria, the best radiographic response was stable disease (SD) in 7 patients (14 lesions) and partial response (PR) in 1 patient (2 lesions). Krenning score was assessed in 14 lesions (Krenning 4/3/2/1 in 3/4/5/2 lesions). Following 177Lu-Dotatate, Krenning score was reduced by ≥1 point in 9 and remained stable in 5 lesions. SUVR (lesion/SSS) was evaluated in 16 lesions. Compared to baseline, SUVR (lesion/SSS) at 6 months was partially reduced (PR, ≥50%) in 2 lesions, minimally reduced (MR, <50% and ≥25%) in 3 lesions, and stable (SD, <25% reduction and <25% increase) in 11 lesions. CONCLUSIONS 68Ga-Dotatate PET is a promising imaging biomarker in patients with advanced meningioma. Treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate led to substantial reduction in SUVR (lesion/SSS) in a subset of patients. In contrast to other reports, 68Ga-Dotatate assessments were generally concordant with post-gad T1 based MRI assessments per RANO. Updated results in an expanded group of patients will be presented.

Abstract The prognosis for patients afflicted with GBM has remained dismal in spite of decades of investigations, which speaks to the need to identify targets that drive essential functions in GBM, using well-tolerated, brain permeant inhibitors. Here we report our studies of MT-125, a small molecule inhibitor of non-muscle myosin IIA and IIB. MT-125 has high brain penetrance and an excellent safety profile; blocks GBM invasion and cytokinesis; and prolongs survival in murine GBM models. By impairing mitochondrial fission, MT-125 increases redox stress and induces DNA damage and ferroptosis; and these effects explain why this drug synergizes with radiotherapy in prolonging survival in murine GBM models. MT-125 also induces oncogene addiction to receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling through a mechanism that is also driven by redox stress, and it also synergizes with FDA-approved RTK and MAP Kinase pathway inhibitors in vitro. Furthermore, MT-125 also synergizes with an FDA approved, RTK inhibitor in vivo, with the combination producing long-term, tumor free survival in an aggressive, preclinical murine model of GBM. MT-125’s long-term administration is well-tolerated at doses well above what is predicted to be therapeutic in multiple mammalian species. These data provide a powerful rationale for the clinical development of NMII targeting therapeutics to treat cancer and demonstrates that MT-125 has strong clinical potential for the treatment of GBM.

Abstract Despite intensive research over the past two decades, all glioblastoma (GBM) Phase 3 drug trials have been negative. The utility of the preclinical studies used to inform development for 10 Phase 3 trials was evaluated by four criteria: 1) drug distribution to the brain, 2) tumor location (flank vs. intracranial), 3) GBM xenograft source (patient-derived (PD) vs. cell line-derived (CD)), and 4) magnitude of survival extension. For the trials evaluated, no preclinical brain:plasma (B/P) data were reported for enzastaurin, cilengitide, nimotuzumab, Depatux-M, or bevacizumab, although IgG typically has a B/P ≈1%. B/P for imatinib was 1-3% and the other four drugs ranged from 25% to 51%. Except for enzastaurin, all drugs were studied in orthotopic tumor survival studies. The best response for each drug compared to relevant control (relative increase in median survival) was 22% (nimotuzumab), 31% (marizomib), 36% (sunitinib CD) / 5% (sunitinib PD), 63% (bevacizumab/temozolomide), 140% (imatinib), 157% (Depatux-M), 220% (veliparib/temozolomide), 300% (cediranib); median survival was not reached for cilengitide. However, only veliparib and sunitinib were studied in orthotopic PD models, and a single CD model (U87 or D54) was used exclusively for four drugs (enzastaurin, nimotuzumab, sunitinib, marizomib). In summary, 6 of 10 drugs had unknown or very poor brain distribution, 8 of 10 drugs were tested exclusively in CD models, which have questionable translational value, and 3 of 10 drugs had nominal activity (<50% survival prolongation) in preclinical survival studies. The stunning lack of clinical progress in GBM is deeply discouraging, but is consistent with underwhelming preclinical testing and the contextual interpretation of those results. Acknowledging multifaceted reasons for failed clinical trials, a more rigorous and critical approach should be used in preclinical studies, coupled with follow-up surgical window of opportunity studies, to identify and promote only the most promising therapies into advanced clinical testing.

Abstract Pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients (Ped/AYA; 0–39 years) with meningiomas are underrepresented in neuro-oncology research, despite meningiomas being the second most common primary brain tumor in this age group. While DNA methylation-based models have advanced classification and prognostication in adults, their utility in younger populations remains uncertain. To address this gap, we aimed to evaluate the performance of current DNA methylation-based classification and recurrence prediction models in Ped/AYA patients with meningiomas and identify age-associated molecular differences. As part of this study, we analyzed 1,568 meningioma samples with DNA methylation and clinical data, including subsets with whole-exome and RNA sequencing. Patients were grouped into Ped/AYA (≤39 years, n = 213) and adult (>39 years, n = 1,355) cohorts. We assessed classifier performance, performed subgroup-specific model retraining, and compared molecular profiles across age groups. Our results showed that molecular classification differed significantly between age groups, with Ped/AYA tumors less frequently belonging to the most aggressive Proliferative Molecular Group. The DNA methylation-based recurrence model performed well in adults (AUC = 0.83) but poorly in the Ped/AYA cohort (AUC = 0.57). However, retraining the model on only younger patients improved performance (AUC = 0.75). In addition, Ped/AYA tumors exhibited significantly fewer chromosomal alterations, including lower frequencies of 1p, 6q, and 14q loss (p<0.05). Taken together, these findings indicate that predominantly adult-trained methylation models underperform in younger meningioma patients due to both biological divergence and exclusion from training datasets. Our findings underscore the need for age-specific molecular tools to improve prognostication and support personalized care across the lifespan in neuro-oncology.

Abstract MGMT is primarily inactivated via promoter methylation, but MGMT homozygous deletion (hmzdel) has been rarely reported as an alternative inactivating mechanism. Although functionally similar to a methylated MGMT promoter, MGMT hmzdel is associated with an unmethylated MGMT promoter test result reflecting the MGMT promoter status of the non-neoplastic cells invariably present in any tumor specimen. Thus, patients whose tumors have MGMT hmzdel (and unmethylated MGMT promoter) would be inaccurately predicted to lack benefit from alkylating chemotherapy based on MGMT promoter methylation testing alone. To evaluate the impact of this clinical scenario, we estimated the frequency and distribution of MGMT hmzdel in routine clinical testing of CNS tumors. Among 12,424 CNS tumors (3,044 with provided diagnosis of glioblastoma) tested using Oncoscan chromosomal microarray (2015-2025), 10 tumors (0.08%) had MGMT hmzdel: 8 with entire gene hmzdel and 2 with partial gene hmzdel favored to be inactivating (RNA-sequencing underway to exclude possibility of activating rearrangements). All tumors were supratentorial and non-midline. Median age at diagnosis was 58.5 years (range, 34-81), with 3:2 male:female. Of the 10 cases, 9 (of 3,044; 0.3%) had integrated diagnosis of glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype; the remaining case was a recurrent astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4. All 10 cases had loss of chromosome 10q and a highly unmethylated MGMT promoter by droplet digital PCR testing of downstream CpG sites 75-80/84-87, with median fraction abundance of 0.19% (range, 0-0.85). In summary, MGMT hmzdel only occurred in high-grade adult-type diffuse astrocytic gliomas, and is a rare potential pitfall for MGMT promoter methylation testing leading to inaccurate patient stratification. It is critical that laboratories performing routine CNS tumor copy number testing include MGMT in the curated list of reportable genes, and that clinicians be aware of this rare clinical scenario to accurately stratify patients despite misleading MGMT promoter test results.

Abstract BACKGROUND Tovorafenib is a type II rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF) kinase inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2024 for relapsing or chemotherapy-refractory pediatric low-grade gliomas with mutations or alterations in the gene BRAF. There is potential for the use of this drug outside the pediatric population. We present a single institution case series of adults with CNS tumors with mutations or alterations in BRAF treated (off-label) with tovorafenib. METHODS Chart review. RESULTS 8 adult (age >18) patients were treated with tovorafenib at our institution between March 2024 and June 2025. Age range was 21-66 years old (median age 42). The population included 5 males and 3 females. Indications for treatment were pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 2), high grade astrocytoma with piloid features (HGAP) (n = 2), Erdheim-Chester disease (n = 2), pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (n = 1), and otherwise unclassified low-grade glioma (n = 1). All patients had mutations or alterations in BRAF including KIAA1549 fusion (n = 4), V600E mutation (n = 3), or GAB2 fusion (n = 1). Radiographic response to therapy was seen in 5/8 patients with 3 cases of radiographic stability (though one patient later progressed) and 2 cases of decrease in tumor size (in a pilocytic astrocytoma and in an HGAP). Both cases of decreased tumor size after treatment were in tumors with KIAA1549 fusions. Adverse effects of tovorafenib included fatigue (n=2), headache, myalgias, diplopia, cytopenias, and transaminitis (n=1). 3/8 patients had to pause or stop treatment due to adverse effects (intolerable headache, cytopenias, and transaminitis respectively). CONCLUSION Tovorafenib is a promising new treatment for CNS tumors with BRAF mutations or alterations. Our single institution case series suggests the efficacy of this drug for multiple tumor types in adults. Certain tumor subtypes such as KIAA1549 fusions may be more likely to benefit from this treatment.

Abstract BACKGROUND Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a treatment for radiation necrosis. Doses ranging from 2.5 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg have been utilized however the optimal dosing remains inadequately studied. METHODS Retrospective review of adult patients with central nervous system tumors or brain metastasis treated with bevacizumab from 6/29/2021 to 7/31/2024. Patients were divided into those who received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg every 21 days and those who received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 21 days. The primary outcome was radiographic response as assessed by a blinded neuro-oncologist. Secondary outcomes included clinical response as documented in clinical notes, major adverse events including hemorrhage and thromboembolic events and re-dosing for recurrence of radiation necrosis beyond the 4 initially planned doses. RESULTS 104 patients were included (median age 59.3 years, 55% male); 53 patients in the 7.5 mg/kg group and 51 patients in the 10 mg/kg group. In the 7.5 mg/kg group, 1 patient had a complete response (CR), 16 patients had a partial response (PR), 32 patients had stable disease (SD), 3 patients had progression of disease, and 1 patient did not have repeat imaging. Of the 51 patients in the 10 mg/kg group, 3 patients had a CR, 10 patients had a PR, 27 patients had SD, 5 patients had progression of disease, and 6 patients did not have repeat imaging. There was no statistically significant difference in radiographic response between the two dosing groups (p = 0.42). Clinical response rates were higher in the 7.5 mg/kg group (65.2% vs 37.8%, p = 0.013). Major adverse events and need for re-dosing for radiation necrosis recurrence were comparable. CONCLUSION Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg was equally as efficacious as 10 mg/kg in terms of radiographic response and may offer a better clinical response for patients with radiation necrosis.

Abstract BACKGROUND Cognitive symptoms are common among cancer patients treated with intracranial radiation but inadequately assessed and suboptimally treated, owing in part to the time-consuming and resource-intensive nature of formal neuropsychological testing. Through remote administration of brief cognitive assessments and symptom-directed interventions, decentralization uniquely addresses this problem. METHODS In this single-site phase 2 fully decentralized clinical trial (NCT06377696), patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) for primary or metastatic brain tumors undergo cognitive evaluations with the application, Mayo Test Drive, and the Short Test of Mental Status (STMS; via telehealth or in person), at baseline and every three months for one year. Participants are provided wearable devices for health promotion. Half the participants are randomized to metformin to evaluate this agent’s efficacy in treating RT-related cognitive symptoms. Target enrollment is 100 participants. RESULTS Seventy-three patients (median age 45.5, 46% female) with brain tumors who received RT were enrolled May 2024 to May 2025. In this unplanned interim analysis, we evaluated the impact of decentralization on study participation. Thirty-six participants (49%) reported a primary residence greater than 150 miles from our institution. Seven patients were consented remotely, the remainder in person. Of 380 study-related visits (201 STMS, 179 treatment toxicity checks) 216 (57%) were completed by telehealth. Thirty-two of 336 (9.5%) study-related lab draws were completed at locations outside our institution. Wearable device data was continuously collected, with median 3022 steps tracked per patient per day on study. 190/250 (76%) quality-of-life surveys sent digitally were completed to date. CONCLUSION Decentralization implemented as part of this clinical trial enabled participation despite significant distance from our institution and facilitated study-related assessments through digital solutions, eliminating the need for travel. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a fully decentralized supportive care trial in neuro-oncology, which can increase participation and accelerate evaluation of novel therapeutics.

Abstract BACKGROUND Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, has become a mainstay in the management of malignant gliomas. Multiple bevacizumab biosimilars have been approved since initial FDA approval of the reference agent and have seen widespread use due to reduced cost. However, real-world data evaluating comparability between reference and biosimilar agents have remained limited. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated with reference bevacizumab (Avastin) versus those receiving bevacizumab-bvzr, a widely used biosimilar agent (Zirabev) for the management of malignant glioma at our institution between 2019 and 2022. RESULTS A total of 161 patients were included in our final analysis; 97 received reference drug (Avastin) while 64 received the biosimilar agent (Zirabev). Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups were similar. We performed survival analysis with post-progression survival (PPS) to ensure against lead-time bias. PPS was similar between the Avastin (median PPS 496 days) and Zirabev (median PPS 513 days) groups on univariate analysis (p=0.7654). Similarly, on multivariate Cox regression, there were no differences in PPS when comparing Avastin and Zirabev (HR 1.0673, p=0.6986). MGMT promoter methylation (HR 0.5709, p=0.0238), age at cancer diagnosis (HR 1.0356, p=0.0009), total dose of bevacizumab received (HR 0.9975, p=0.0087) and treatment with anticoagulation (HR 1.8086, p=0.0372) were significantly associated with PPS. Rates of therapy-related adverse effects were also similar between those receiving the reference drug and biosimilar agent (OR 0.9043, p=0.7824). However, concomitant treatment with antiplatelet therapy (OR 3.1447, p=0.0150) or anticoagulant therapy (OR 4.9069, p=0.0010) were significantly associated with increased risk for adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS Bevacizumab-bvzr demonstrated similar clinical efficacy and safety profile compared to reference bevacizumab in our institutional cohort. Concomitant treatment with antiplatelet therapy (OR 3.1447, p=0.0150) or anticoagulation (OR 4.9069, p=0.0010) were significantly associated with increased risk for adverse effects.

Abstract IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic gliomas with lower-grade histological features alongside specific genomic alterations (e.g., TERT promoter mutation, EGFR amplification, gain Chr7/loss Chr10) are presently diagnosed as glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM) under WHO 2021 criteria. Previous analyses categorized these into “early/evolving” or “surgically undersampled” GBMs. However, it remains unclear whether these tumors share identical clinical and prognostic features with histologic GBM. Data from IDH-wt molecular GBMs across six institutions were aggregated. Astrocytic IDH-wt tumors of any grade that lacked necrosis or microvascular proliferation on initial histopathology yet exhibited molecular alterations consistent with WHO 2021 GBM diagnosis, were included. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to categorize patients into risk groups based on overall survival (OS). Among the 264 patients included, the median age was 60 years (IQR: 51-67), with 162 (61%) being male. Additionally, 210 (80%) were diagnosed since 2016, and 216 (82%) received chemoradiation plus adjuvant temozolomide (GBM-SOC). The median follow-up period was 3.9 years (95% CI: 3.4, 4.6). Identified univariate risk factors for worse survival included older age, biopsy-only status, EGFR amplification, absence of initial adjuvant treatment, low post-operative KPS, and tumor histologic grade of 3. RPA divided patients into four distinct survival groups (p<0.0001). The “best” risk group comprised lower grade (<=2) tumors (n=58, median OS (mOS): 40 months (95% CI: 33, NA)). The “second best” group included Grade 3 patients receiving GBM-SOC without steroids during initial RT (n=139, mOS: 25 months (95% CI: 22, 28)). The “second worst” group encompassed Grade 3 patients who were on steroids during initial RT while receiving GBM-SOC (n=38, mOS: 15 months (95% CI: 13, 20)). The “worst” group contained Grade 3 tumors that had not undergone SOC (n=29, mOS: 9 months (95% CI: 4, 26)). These data show that histologic features and treatment are strong indicators of patient outcomes.