Citations

Showing 10 of 107969 citations.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease
Shah, Ishan K., Lim, Ju Yong , Erwin, Patricia J., Park, Soon J., Deo, Salil V. , Dunlay, Shannon M. , Dillon, John

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Cardiac Surgery | January 22, 2014 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 163-169

10.1111/jocs.12296 | PMID 24447133 Get It

Right Atrial Appendage Aneurysm: A Systematic Review
Aryal, Madan Raj , Hakim, Fayaz A., Ghimire, Sushil , Pandit, Anil , Bhandari, Yashoda, Acharya, Yam Prasad, Pradhan, Rajesh , Giri, Smith

Mayo Clinic

Echocardiography | January 22, 2014 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 534-539

10.1111/echo.12510 | PMID 24447323 Get It

BackgroundRight atrial appendage aneurysm (RAAA) is rare with fewer than 20 cases reported in the literature. We sought to systematically review the published cases of RAAA in terms of demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, complications, and outcome.MethodologyElectronic search for case reports, case series, and related articles published until July 2013 was carried out and clinical data were extracted and analyzed.ResultsSeventeen cases of RAAA were identified with equal sex distribution and commonly presenting in the third decades of life. Dyspnea and palpitation were the most common clinical presentations. Echocardiography was the most common diagnostic modality. The mean size of aneurysm was 8.83 ± 4.84 × 6.05 ± 2.99 cm. Most of the patients were treated medically with close follow‐up. The mean follow‐up period was 10 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmias and heart failure were the most common complications.ConclusionRight atrial appendage aneurysm although rare may be associated with significant morbidity. Surgical resection is indicated in symptomatic patients.
Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Limitations of Doppler Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Serial Stenoses”
Scantlebury, Dawn C. , Geske, Jeffrey B. , Nishimura, Rick A. , Geske, Jeffrey B

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging | January 22, 2014 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 212-212

10.1161/circimaging.113.001492 | PMID 24449554 Get It

Breast Cancer Occurring in the Chest Wall: Rare Presentation of Ectopic Milk Line Breast Cancer
Wysokinska, Ewa , Keeney, Gary L., Wysokinska, Ewa M

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 22, 2014 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 10 | Pages: e35-e36

10.1200/jco.2012.47.8958 | PMID 24449239 Get It

A Smart Setup for Craniospinal Irradiation
Peterson, Jennifer , Vallow, Laura A., Casale, Henry E., Tzou, Katherine S., Kim, Siyong

Mayo Clinic

Progress in Medical Physics | January 22, 2014 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 230

10.14316/pmp.2013.24.4.230 Get It

Invasive Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension
Borlaug, Barry A.

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Heart Failure | January 22, 2014 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 2-4

10.1161/circheartfailure.113.000983 | PMID 24449809 Get It

The practice of humanities in medicine at Mayo Clinic: Arts and humanities programmes in patient care and medical education
Rian, Johanna

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Applied Arts & Health | January 22, 2014 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 281-286

10.1386/jaah.4.3.281_1 Get It

Abstract ‘Humanities in Medicine’ programmes at major teaching hospitals and clinics offer a range of experiences for both patients and medical students. This report from the field discusses the history of the programme, the legacy of the institutional commitment to the interplay of arts and health and specifics of programmes designed for patient and student constituencies. References to existing studies locate the programmes in the context of the national field of activity.
Submandibular Gland Preservation during Concurrent Neck Dissection and Transoral Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Howard, Brittany E. , Hinni, Michael L., Nagel, Thomas H. , Cheng, Meng‐Ru, Hayden, Richard E. , Chang, Yu‐Hui

Mayo Clinic

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | January 21, 2014 | Volume: 150 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 587-593

10.1177/0194599813519041 | PMID 24449797 Get It

ObjectivesAnalyze the effect of ipsilateral submandibular gland preservation on patients undergoing concurrent neck dissection and transoral surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Evaluate for (1) intraoperative and postoperative communications between the oropharynx and neck and (2) oncologic outcomes.Study DesignRetrospective chart review of prospectively collected data.SettingTertiary academic referral center.Methods and SubjectsRetrospective chart review of patients undergoing transoral laser resection of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with simultaneous neck dissection(s) for primary, persistent, recurrent, and second primary disease between January 1999 and February 2013. Data analyzed for operative technique, pathologic diagnosis, postoperative course, complications, and oncologic outcomes.ResultsOverall 253 patients were identified. Of these, 96 patients underwent ipsilateral submandibular gland preservation and 157 underwent ipsilateral submandibular gland removal at the time of neck dissection. The prevalence of intraoperative communication between the neck and oropharynx was significantly lower in cases with submandibular gland preservation (2/96, 2.08%) compared to those with submandibular gland removal (22/157, 14.13%). No postoperative leaks occurred in the gland preservation group (0/96, 0%) compared to a leak prevalence of 8.92% (14/157) when the gland was removed (P =. 0041). There was no difference in local, regional, or distant disease recurrence between submandibular gland preservation and gland removal. Similarly, Kaplan‐Meier analysis showed no difference in disease free survival, disease specific survival, or overall survival.ConclusionsSubmandibular gland preservation during neck dissection in patients undergoing transoral surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma significantly reduces the risk of intraoperative and postoperative salivary leaks without compromising oncologic outcomes.
Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting FDA Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents, 2005-2012
Downing, Nicholas S., Aminawung, Jenerius A. , Shah, Nilay D. , Ross, Joseph S. , Krumholz, Harlan M. , Ross, Joseph S

Mayo Clinic

JAMA | January 21, 2014 | Volume: 311 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 368

10.1001/jama.2013.282034 | PMID 24449315 Get It

Rapid-Sequence Intubation
Stollings, Joanna L. , Diedrich, Daniel A. , Oyen, Lance J., Brown, Daniel R.

Mayo Clinic

Annals of Pharmacotherapy | January 21, 2014 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 62-76

10.1177/1060028013510488 | PMID 24259635 Get It

Objective: To summarize published data regarding the steps of rapid-sequence intubation (RSI); review premedications, induction agents, neuromuscular blockers (NMB), and studies supporting use or avoidance; and discuss the benefits and deficits of combinations of induction agents and NMBs used when drug shortages occur. Data Source: A search of Medline databases (1966–October 2013) was conducted. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Databases were searched using the terms rapid-sequence intubation, fentanyl, midazolam, atropine, lidocaine, phenylephrine, ketamine, propofol, etomidate thiopental, succinylcholine, vecuronium, atracurium, and rocuronium. Citations from publications were reviewed for additional references. Data Synthesis: Data were reviewed to support the use or avoidance of premedications, induction agents, and paralytics and combinations to consider when drug shortages occur. Conclusions: RSI is used to secure a definitive airway in often uncooperative, nonfasted, unstable, and/or critically ill patients. Choosing the appropriate premedication, induction drug, and paralytic will maximize the success of tracheal intubation and minimize complications.