Citations

Abstract Background: We report the first case of instillation of alteplase, a tissue plasminogen activator, to dissolve occlusive upper urinary tract blood clot. Case Presentation: A 67-year-old Caucasian man with a solitary kidney became dialysis dependent because of upper urinary tract clot obstruction after ureteral stent placement for obstructing ureterolithiasis. After failure of more conservative measures, 10 mg of alteplase was instilled through nephrostomy tube daily for 2 consecutive days 30 minutes before manual irrigation with physiologic saline. After alteplase instillation, the occlusive blood clot dissolved with rapid improvement in urinary output and creatinine. Conclusions: Alteplase instillation through nephrostomy tube is a viable option to dissolve obstructing upper urinary tract blood clots.

Abstract Purpose: Currently, no genomic signature exists to distinguish men most likely to progress on adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Here we develop and validate a gene expression signature to predict response to postoperative ADT. Experimental Design: A training set consisting of 284 radical prostatectomy patients was established after 1:1 propensity score matching metastasis between adjuvant-ADT (a-ADT)-treated and no ADT–treated groups. An ADT Response Signature (ADT-RS) was identified from neuroendocrine and AR signaling–related genes. Two independent cohorts were used to form three separate data sets for validation (set I, n = 232; set II, n = 435; set III, n = 612). The primary endpoint of the analysis was postoperative metastasis. Results: Increases in ADT-RS score were associated with a reduction in risk of metastasis only in a-ADT patients. On multivariable analysis, ADT-RS by ADT treatment interaction term remained associated with metastasis in both validation sets (set I: HR = 0.18, Pinteraction = 0.009; set II: HR = 0.25, Pinteraction = 0.019). In a matched validation set III, patients with Low ADT-RS scores had similar 10-year metastasis rates in the a-ADT and no-ADT groups (30.1% vs. 31.0%, P = 0.989). Among High ADT-RS patients, 10-year metastasis rates were significantly lower for a-ADT versus no-ADT patients (9.4% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.021). The marginal ADT-RS by ADT interaction remained significant in the matched dataset (Pinteraction = 0.035). Conclusions: Patients with High ADT-RS benefited from a-ADT. In combination with prognostic risk factors, use of ADT-RS may thus allow for identification of ADT-responsive tumors that may benefit most from early androgen blockade after radical prostatectomy. We discovered a gene signature that when present in primary prostate tumors may be useful to predict patients who may respond to early ADT after surgery. Clin Cancer Res; 24(16); 3908–16. ©2018 AACR.

Objective To investigate the long‐term utility of adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy ( RP ) for prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion ( SVI ; pT 3b), as the published data are conflicting. Patients and Methods Patients with SVI during RP and pelvic lymph node dissection at two major referral centres from 1986 to 2014 were included. Kaplan–Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regressions were used to determine if adjuvant radiotherapy ( aRT ) and adjuvant hormonal therapy ( aHT ) were predictors of biochemical recurrence ( BCR ), cancer‐specific mortality ( CSM ) and overall mortality ( OM ). Subset analyses were performed for pN 0 patients and pN + patients. Results Overall, 3 279 patients with prostate cancer and SVI were included with a median follow‐up of 148 months. Considering the whole SVI population, 1 387 (42%) received no adjuvant therapy, 1 179 (36%) received aHT , 461 (14.1%) received aRT , while 252 (7.7%) received both aHT and aRT . The 10‐year BCR , CSM , and OM rates were 64%, 14%, and 27%, respectively. In the overall population, aRT and aHT were predictors of BCR , CSM and OM (all P < 0.04). When only pT 3bN0 patients were considered, aHT was a significant multivariate predictor of BCR [hazard ratio ( HR ) 0.50, P < 0.001), CSM ( HR 0.62, P = 0.01) and OM ( HR 0.75, P = 0.004). Conversely, aRT was not associated with survival outcomes (all P > 0.05). When only the subgroup pT 3bN+ was considered, the use of aRT was related to an improvement in CSM ( HR 0.65, P = 0.03) and OM (HR 0.78, P = 0.03). Conclusions aHT + aRT seems to be effective in pT 3b patients. However, when stratified according to the presence of nodal metastases, aHT remains effective only in the node‐negative subgroup, while aRT remains effective only in the node‐positive subgroup. Further data including prospective trials are warranted to study the utility of adjuvant therapies in this setting.