Citations

Abstract Background: The Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) is a method to predict outcome after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy that integrates Ki67, estrogen receptor (ER) analysis and pathological stage from the surgical specimen (Ellis, JNCI 100:1380, 2008). We sought to further develop the PEPI for use in clinical trials by: a) establishing an efficient SOP for Ki67 analysis, b) determining the effect of simplifying the score by removing the ER component (modified "mPEPI") and c) independent validation of mPEPI in the ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1031 neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor trial (Ellis, M, JCO 29:234, 2011). Methods: Ki-67 assay development focused on reproducing a 2.7% Ki-67 cut point (CP) required for PEPI. Ventana Image analysis (IA) to replace labor-intensive visual point counting (VPC) was assessed to increase scoring efficiency. Discordant scores led to a triage approach where cases with complex histological features that could not be resolved by IA were flagged for VPC. The Ki-67 scoring approach was preliminarily validated on T1/2 N0 cases from the P024 and POL trials (SABCS 2013, abstract P3-05-190). Models with and without ER suggested ER was dispensable. A locked SOP for mPEPI was subsequently applied to the Z1031A trial. The primary endpoint was time from the date of surgery to local, regional, or distant recurrence in the mPEPI-0 group (T1/2 N0, Ki67 <2.7%) versus the mPEPI>0 group. Results. mPEPI by IA was evaluated on 202 of 377 (53%) patients enrolled into Z1031A (6% of IA results were triaged to VPC). All patients have been followed a minimum of 2 years (median: 5 years; max: 7 years). Only 10 patients in the mPEPI-0 group (22.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, versus 78 in the mPEPI>0 group (49.4%). Time to breast cancer recurrence was decreased among those with mPEPI>0 status relative to those with mPEPI-0 status (log rank p=0.012). Only one disease event among 44 (2%) cases with mPEPI-0 was observed versus 26 of 158 cases with mPEPI>0 (16.5%) Conclusions. mPEPI-0 status can identify patients at low risk of relapse after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: therefore mPEPI-0 status has operational characteristics similar to pCR after chemotherapy for ER-negative disease. mPEPI is undergoing prospective validation in the Alliance ALTERNATE trial that will assess whether Fulvestrant increases the mPEPI-0 rate and also will prospectively determine whether patients with mPEPI-0 status can safely be managed without adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Citation Format: Souzan Sanati, Vera J Suman, Rodrigo Goncalves, Katherine DeSchryver, Cynthia X Ma, Jeremy Hoog, Erika Crouch, Michael Barnes, Gary Unzeitig, A Marilyn Leitch, Kelly K Hunt, Matthew J Ellis. Validation of the preoperative endocrine prognostic index in the ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1031 neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-13.

Abstract Background: CTCs are associated with clinical outcomes in metastatic breast cancer irrespective of ER/PR/HER2 status. Some data support the prognostic relevance of serial CTC enumeration relative to adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer. However, data from a large scale study focused on HER2 directed therapy for HER2+ disease have been lacking. We therefore sought to prospectively evaluate the effect of trastuzumab +/- lapatinib on CTCs and assess the prognostic/predictive value of CTC monitoring in HER2+ early stage breast cancer patients (pts). Methods: The Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation (ALTTO; NCT00490139) Trial is an international, randomized, open-label phase III study of two targeted agents for HER2+ breast cancer. From June 2007 to July 2011, 8381 pts were randomised from 946 sites in 44 countries to 1 of 4 arms with sequential or concurrent chemotherapy: (i) 52 wks of trastuzumab (T); (ii) 52 wks of oral lapatinib (L); (iii) 12 or 18 wks of T followed by a washout and then 34 or 38 wks of L; or (iv) 52 wks of L+T. 540 (6%) pts provided optional informed consent and up to 30 mL peripheral blood suitable for CTC analyses at baseline with additional collections at 13 or 19 wks, 52 wks, 18 mos, 24 mos, and recurrence. CTC analyses are being conducted in three laboratories (Mayo Clinic Rochester, n=431; Institut Jules Bordet and University of Munich, n=109). 2-3 x 10 mL CellSave™ samples are pooled and processed at each time point for CTC enumeration and HER2 expression using the immunomagnetic/immunofluorescence assay (CellSearch™). A round-robin concordance project was done between Mayo Clinic Rochester and Institut Jules Bordet before embarking on the primary correlative work. Results: At baseline, 20% pts had detectable (i.e., ≥1) EpCAM+/CK+/DAPI+/CD45- CTCs, and 16% pts had detectable EpCAM+/CK+/DAPI+/CD45-/HER2+ CTCs. Correlative analyses with clinical outcome are ongoing with plans for completion by Fall 2014. Conclusions: CTCs were detected in 20% of pts with HER2+ early stage breast cancer. This is similar to the frequency of detection in mixed early stage breast cancer populations relative to ER/PR and HER2 status. Concordance of enumeration and HER2 assessments between the two experienced laboratories, and correlation between disease free survival and CTC findings (from serial samples collected at baseline, during the course of HER2 directed therapy, and at set intervals of follow-up) will be reported. Citation Format: Minetta C Liu, Brigitte Rack, Amylou C Dueck, David W Hillman, Michael B Campion, Monica M Reinholz, Kevin C Halling, Christos Sotiriou, Françoise Rothé, Marion Maetens, Ghizlane Rouas, Wolfgang Janni, Antonio C Wolff, Lyndsay N Harris, Julie R Gralow, Kathleen I Pritchard, Susan Ellard, Nguyet A Le-Lindqwister, Frances Boyle, Evandro De Azambuja, Martine J Piccart-Gebhart, Michail Ignatiadis, Edith A Perez. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration and HER2 assessment as predictors of breast cancer outcomes in the ALTTO (BIG 2-06, Alliance N063D) Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-01.

Abstract Background NSABP B-36 compares 6 cycles of FEC-100 with 4 cycles of standard AC in pts with node-negative breast cancer. As reported separately, no significant differences between the two treatment arms were observed in the primary endpoint of disease-free survival or in the secondary endpoints of overall survival, recurrence-free, or distant recurrence-free intervals. Greater toxicity was reported in pts who received FEC compared to AC. We present here the results of the QOL and MH studies obtained prospectively in conjunction with the treatment study. We hypothesized that pts on FEC would experience greater treatment toxicity in the first 12 months of the study, and would have greater rates of amenorrhea at 18 months compared to pts on AC. Methods Among the 1,357 pts enrolled in the QOL study, 1,332 (675 AC, 657 FEC) submitted the baseline form and had QOL follow-up (fup) information. Pts completed: 1) the FACT-B instrument; 2) a symptom checklist; and 3) the SF-36 Vitality Scale, all at baseline, day 1 of cycle 4, and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after random assignment. FACT-B Trial Outcome Index (TOI), symptom severity, and vitality scores were compared between the two treatment arms using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis with adjustment for the baseline scores, type of surgery, and hormone receptor status, examining the first 12 months and the later time points separately. Menstrual status was collected at baseline for all enrolled pts, with subsequent assessments on day 1 of cycle 4, and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months for pts with menstrual bleeding within 12 months prior to random assignment and not having had a hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy (1, 096 pts). Post-chemotherapy amenorrhea was defined as the lack of menstrual periods during the 12 months preceding the 18-month fup evaluation. Data from 921 pts (475 AC, 446 FEC) were available for analysis. Logistic regression, adjusted for type of surgery and hormone receptor status, was used to test for association of amenorrhea status and treatment. Results Both TOI and vitality scores were worse for pts on FEC compared to those on AC at 6 months (p<0.01) with no significant difference at 12 months and beyond. No significant differences in symptom severity between the two treatment arms were observed. The rates of post-chemotherapy amenorrhea were significantly different between FEC and AC (66.8% vs. 58.7%, p=0.01) with positive hormone receptor status as an independent risk factor (p=0.03). Conclusions Women receiving FEC had diminished QOL at 6 months after random assignment, but no difference at 12 months or later. Premenopausal women receiving FEC experienced a higher rate of post-chemotherapy amenorrhea than women receiving AC. Support NCI grants U10-CA-12027, -37377, -69974, -69651 and -44066-26, and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, a subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc. Citation Format: Patricia A Ganz, John W Wilson, Hanna Bandos, André Robidoux, Alexander HG Paterson, Johnathan Polikoff, Luis Baez-Diaz, Adam M Brufsky, Louis Fehrenbacher, Aroop Mangalik, Patrick J Ward, Louise Provencher, John T Hamm, Philip J Stella, Robert L Carolla, Richard G Margolese, Henry R Shibata, Edith A Perez, Norman Wolmark. Impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL) and menstrual history (MH) in the NSABP B-36: A randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) to four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-01.

Abstract Background. Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) remain difficult challenges despite progress in multimodality treatment. The SWOG trial S0800 (clinicaltrial.gov NCT00856492) compared bevacizumab in combination with weekly nab-paclitaxel followed by dose-dense AC to nab-paclitaxel followed or preceded by AC as neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-negative IBC/LABC. The rationale was based on the proposed role of angiogenesis, potential role of improved flow and oxygenation in enhancing the delivery of chemotherapy agents, and the proapoptotic effect with certain chemotherapeutic agents, particularly taxanes. Methods. This was a randomized open-label Phase II trial with an accrual goal of 200 patients equally allocated to either bevacizumab (Arm 1) or no bevacizumab.Two patients were ineligible and five withdrew consent leaving 208 for analysis. The no bevacizumab group was further randomized to two sequences (Arm 2: nab-paclitaxel - AC+PEG-G versus Arm 3: AC+PEG-G- nab-paclitaxel) with 50 patients expected in each sequence. The primary endpoint of this study was pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as no evidence of invasive tumor at the primary site and axillary lymph nodes in the surgical specimen. The power for the primary comparison of bevacizumab (bev) versus no bevacizumab (no bev) ignoring sequence was 80% with a 1-sided α = 0.10. Randomization was stratified by hormone receptor status and type of disease (IBC or LABC). Results 215 patients were accrued May 2010 - September 2012. Most had LABC (88%) versus IBC (12%) and most tumors were hormone-receptor (HR) positive (67%). Fourteen (7%) patients had no definitive surgery (included as no pCR); 135 (65%) had residual disease (no pCR) and 59 (28%) had pCR. The bevacizumab pCR rate was higher (35/96; 38%) than that in the non-bevacizumab arms (24/112; 21%) (exact p=0.021; stratified p=0.015). In HR-positive disease there was slight improvement that was not statistically significant (bev 25% vs. non-bev 18%; p=0.41) while the difference was larger in HR-negative disease (bev 59% vs. non-bev 28%; p=0.014). In LABC the overall pCR rate was 29% with a higher rate in the bevacizumab patients (37% vs. 22%; p=0.035). For IBC there was improvement (30% vs. 14%), but not statistically significant (p=0.61) in a small sample. Overall, Grade 3 and 4 events were common in both (bev 67%; non-bev 65%), but did not differ by treatment. There were 21 deaths with 3-year overall survival (OS) of 87% and 83% for bevacizumab and non-bevacizumab, respectively (log-rank p=0.57). Conclusion Compared with combination anthracycline-taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the Bev-Nab-paclitaxel-AC regimen significantly improved pCR rate overall, primarily for triple negative (TNBC) patients. This neoadjuvant regimen could be a good choice for TNBC/IBC . The observed pCR rate in ER negative disease (59%) suggests that the addition of bevacizumab to a standard chemotherapy backbone may improve outcome in this subset, and justifies further testing of such an approach. Correlative science studies to further delineate the biology of TNBC and the effects of bevacizumab are ongoing. Citation Format: Zeina A Nahleh, William E Barlow, Daniel F Hayes, Anne F Schott, Julie R Gralow, Edith A Perez, William M Sikov, Sudhathi Chennuru, Hamid Mirshahidi, Sarah Vidito, Danika L Lew, Lajos Pusztai, Robert B Livingston, Gabriel N Hortobagyi. S0800: Nab-paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and pegfilgrastim with or without bevacizumab in treating women with inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer (NCI CDR0000636131) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-16.

Abstract Background: Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is the first long-acting topoisomerase 1-inhibitor providing sustained level of active metabolite that concentrate in the tumor for an entire chemotherapy cycle. In a Phase 2 study (Lancet Oncology 2013), EP demonstrated a 29% overall response rate in patients with metastatic breast cancer, leading to the Phase 3 global BEACON study in this population. Detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using immunomagnetic EpCAM-based methods have been conceptually accepted as a "liquid tumor biopsy". To circumvent the limited recovery of CTCs these methods provide for molecular profiling applications, we isolated CTCs based on an antibody-independent, continuous flow dielectrophoresis (DEP) technology (ApoStream®). We developed quantitative multiplex immunofluorescent assays for target-specific pharmacodynamics (PD) biomarkers for EP in CTCs isolated pre- and post-treatment. Here we present the distribution of the PD biomarkers in CTC samples collected from BEACON patients. Methods: Donation of blood samples for CTC analysis was voluntary. BEACON patients participating in the substudy had serial (pre-dose, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, End of Treatment) 7.5-mL whole blood samples drawn in EDTA tubes and shipped ambient to ApoCell (Houston, TX) within 96 hrs for processing. PBMCs were separated by Ficoll® gradient, and CTCs were isolated using ApoStream® technology. Isolated cells were deposited on three slides and stained for DAPI, CD45, and cytokeratin markers, as well as 2-3 of the seven PD markers, and analyzed by iCys® laser scanning cytometer equipped with image analysis software. CTC count, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of PD biomarkers, and % marker-positive cells were analyzed for their distribution. Results: 75% of the 852 BEACON patients participated in the CTC substudy, yielding 649 pre-treatment CTC samples. As of Mar14, 538 Cycle 2 Day 1, 281 Cycle 4 Day 1, and 394 End of Treatment samples were collected. 98% of pre-treatment blood samples were successfully processed. 97% had detectable CTCs, with a median of 504 CTCs (interquartile range: 128-1432). PD markers could be analyzed in 83-92% of samples after implementing a minimum requirement of 10 CTCs analyzed. Staining was positive for Top1, Top2, μH2Ax, Rad51, ABCG2, Ki67, and TUNEL in 82%, 71%, 14%, 30%, 20%, 56%, and 94% of samples, respectively. Percent of marker-positive cells varied from 0.2-69%, with 6- to 37-fold interquartile ranges. Median MFI in these cells varied between 25x103 and 100x103, with 1.2- to 1.6-fold interquartile ranges. Conclusions: CTC collection was successfully incorporated into the BEACON study, with 75% patient participation. CTC detection rate using ApoStream® was high, permitting evaluation of biomarkers at baseline and over time. EP target-specific PD biomarkers can be measured in CTCs isolated from patients participating in BEACON and will be assessed for their potential to predict clinical response. Final BEACON efficacy and safety results are expected in early 2015, which will allow further analysis of CTCs with patient outcome (response, PFS, OS) and change in CTCs at time of progression. Citation Format: Edith A Perez, Katie Caygill, Alison L Hannah, Javier Cortes, Ahmad Awada, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Christopher Twelves, Hope Rugo, Seock-Ah Im, Kenna Anderes, Darren W Davis, Ute Hoch. Etirinotecan pegol target-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers in circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic breast cancer in the phase 3 BEACON study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-03.

Abstract Background: Further stratification of the 70-gene MammaPrintTM signature into ‘high’ and ‘ultra-high’ risk groups may help predict chemo-sensitivity. In I-SPY 2, patients were classified as MammaPrint High1 (MP1) or MammaPrint (ultra) High2 (MP2), with MP2 defined as MP_score <-0.154. MP1/MP2 classification was added to HR and HER2 to define the cancer subtypes used in the I-SPY 2 adaptive randomization engine. Neratinib (N), one of the experimental agents evaluated in I-SPY 2, graduated in the HR-HER2+ signature. All patients received at least standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide; T->AC). HER2- patients were randomized to receive N+T- >AC vs. T->AC. For HER2+ patients, neratinib was administered in place of trastuzumab (N+T->AC vs. H+T->AC). Here, we assess the performance of MP1/MP2 class as a specific biomarker of neratinib response. Methods: 115 patients in the neratinib arm and 76 concurrently randomized controls had Agilent 44K microarrays and pCR data available for analysis. We assess association between MP1/MP2 and response in the neratinib and control arms alone using Fisher’s exact test, and relative performance between arms (biomarker x treatment interaction, likelihood ratio p < 0.05) using a logistic model. This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as a covariate, and in receptor subsets. Our study is exploratory with no claims for generalizability of the data. Statistical calculations are descriptive (e.g. p-values are measures of distance with no inferential content). Our analyses do not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers in the trial but outside this study. Results: There are 133 MP1 patients (neratinib: 74, Control: 59) and 58 MP2 patients (neratinib: 41, Control: 17), 84% (49) of which are Her2-. The distribution of pCR rates among MP1/MP2 dichotomized groups are summarized in Table 1. Neratinib (n=115)Control (n=76)MP1 (n=74)MP2 (n=41)MP1 (n=59)MP2 (n=17)HER2- (n=105)0 / 1715 / 337 / 395 / 16HER2+ (n=86)22 / 574 / 85 / 200 / 1 MP2, one of the 10 eligible signatures, did not meet the graduation threshold; and MP1/MP2 did not show a significant biomarker x treatment interaction (OR in neratinib relative to control arm = 1.25). The MP1/MP2 x treatment interaction remains non-significant after adjustment for HR and HER2 status (p=0.54). In HER2- patients receiving neratinib, 45% (15/33) of MP2 patients achieved a pCR, compared to 0% (0/17) of MP1 patients. In the HER2- controls, there is a 31% pCR rate in MP2 (5/16) vs. 18% in MP1 (7/39) patients (OR=2.14). This difference in performance between treatment arms appears significant (p=0.041). 90% of HER2+ patients are MP1, thus MP1/MP2 status x treatment interaction within the HER2+ subtype cannot be evaluated. Conclusion: Within the I-SPY 2 population as a whole, MP1/MP2 stratification does not appear to be a specific biomarker of response to neratinib relative to the control arm. The number of HER2- patients is small and precludes any definitive conclusion, but these data motivate further investigation of the biological mechanisms distinguishing MP1 from MP2 to better understand chemotherapy and/or neratanib responsiveness. Citation Format: Christina Yau, Denise M Wolf, Ashish Sanil, Jo Chien, Anne Wallace, Judy Boughey, Doug Yee, Debu Tripathy, Angela DeMichele, Rita Nanda, Steven Chiu, Claudine Isaacs, Kathy Albain, Hank Kaplan, Stacey Moulder, Rebecca Viscusi, Donald Northfelt, Kirsten Edmiston, Anthony Elias, Toncred Styblo, Barbara Haley, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Susan Flynn, Gillian L Hirst, Meredith Buxton, Nola Hylton, Melissa Paoloni, W Fraser Symmans, Laura Esserman, Don Berry, Minetta C Liu, John W Park, Laura van 't Veer. MammaPrint High1/High2 risk class as a biomarker of response to neratinib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-29.

Abstract Background: Further stratification of the 70-gene MammaPrintTM signature into ‘high’ and ‘ultra-high’ risk groups may help predict chemo-sensitivity. In I-SPY 2, patients were classified as MammaPrint High1 (MP1) or MammaPrint (ultra) High2 (MP2), with MP2 defined as MP_score <-0.154. MP1/MP2 classification was added to HR and Her2 to define the cancer subtypes used in the I-SPY 2 adaptive randomization engine. HER2- patients were randomized to receive standard chemotherapy or the oral PARP inhibitor veliparib in combination with carboplatin (V/C) and chemotherapy. V/C graduated in the triple-negative (TN) signature, where MP2 was not an eligible signature for graduation. Here, we assess the performance of MP1/MP2 class as a specific biomarker of response to V/C. Methods:115 HER2- patients (V/C: 71 and concurrent controls: 44) were considered in this analysis. We assess association between MP1/MP2 and response in the V/C and control arms alone using Fisher’s exact test, and relative performance between arms (biomarker x treatment interaction, likelihood ratio p < 0.05) using a logistic model. This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as a covariate. To assess MP1/MP2 in the context of the graduating signature, we added the MP2 patients to the graduating TN subset and evaluated the treatment effect in this ‘biomarker-positive’ group. Our study is exploratory with no claims for generalizability of the data. Statistical calculations are descriptive (e.g. p-values are measures of distance with no inferential content). This analysis does not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers in the trial but outside this study. Results: In the V/C arm vs. concurrent controls, there were 66 MP1 (V/C: 32, Control: 34) and 49 MP2 patients (V/C: 39, Control: 10), 78% of which are TN. The distribution of pCR rates among MP1/MP2 dichotomized groups are summarized in Table 1. V/C (n=71)Control (n=44)MP1 (n=32)MP2 (n=39)MP1 (n=34)MP2 (n=10)TN (n=59)3 / 819 / 303 / 132 / 8HR+HER2- (n=56)1 / 244 / 94 / 210 / 2 The OR between MP1/MP2 risk groups for predicting pCR is 9.71 in the V/C arm (p=6.63E-05), in comparison to an OR of 0.97 in the control arm (p=1). There is a significant biomarker x treatment interaction (p=0.023), which remains upon adjusting for HR status (p= 0.028). Based on the I-SPY 2 Bayesian model, a Phase III trial with 300 MP2 patients has a 95% predictive probability of success. When the MP2 patients are added to the graduating TN subset, the OR associated with V/C is 4.36, which is comparable to that of the TN signature (OR: 4.29), while increasing the prevalence of biomarker-positive patients by ∼10%. Conclusion: In our exploratory analysis, MP2 suggests higher sensitivity to V/C combination therapy relative to controls. This observation has prompted an investigation into the biological mechanisms distinguishing the MP1/MP2 subtype that may account for this specificity. Citation Format: Denise M Wolf, Christina Yau, Ashish Sanil, Jo Chien, Anne Wallace, Angela DeMichele, Hank Kaplan, Doug Yee, Claudine Isaacs, Kathy Albain, Rebecca Viscuzi, Judy Boughey, Stacey Moulder, Steven Chui, Qamar Khan, Toncred Styblo, Kirsten Edmiston, Donald Northfelt, Anthony Elias, Barbara Haley, Debu Tripathy, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Susan Flynn, Gillian Hirst, Meredith Buxton, Nola Hylton, Melissa Paoloni, Fraser Symmans, Laura Esserman, Don Berry, Hope Rugo, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Laura van 't Veer. MammaPrint High1/High2 risk class as a biomarker of response to veliparib/carboplatin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-25.

Abstract [Background] Patient advocates bring a unique, valuable perspective and presence to SPOREs. However, although patient advocates are recommended members of SPORE grants, guidelines are not given on the role of advocates or on measurement of the performance of advocates. [Methods] The Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer SPORE Patient Advocate Advisory Committee has developed a participation measurement tool. This tool will underpin and augment evaluations of the individual advocate contributions by the program PI and the SPORE project leaders. The Advocate Advisory Committee Chair will review the evaluations with the individual advocates. Annually, the advocate committee will review the performance of the group by the standard of the metrics. [Results] Advocates kept a log of their SPORE activities for four months then worked with a statistician to discern patterns of measurable, evaluable behaviors. The determined evaluable areas are training, scientific activity, meeting attendance, communication. Currently, those metrics are being tracked. Advocates developed the metrics together and report activities at the monthly advocate meetings. Currently, activities are simply tracked and categorized. No minimum standards are set. This will be the third step in the development of the metrics. [Conclusions] This approach is the first step in the development of meaningful evaluation of advocate SPORE activities. It quantifies the participation of advocates in the SPORE and provides the basis for developing a qualitative performance evaluation. The SPORE PI and the Committee Chair will use the evaluations to interpret the involvement of advocates in SPORE research and activities and to plan interventions to strengthen the advocate contributions to the SPORE. Citation Format: Cynthia Chauhan, Wayland Eppard, Lori Denison, Debra Gearhart, Lawanna Holmes, Ruth Kraft, Linda Miller, Mary A Sitta, Mary L Smith, James Ingle, Matthew Goetz. Measurements of advocate participation in and contributions to the Mayo Clinic breast cancer SPORE [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-04.

Abstract Background: We hypothesize that response to the pan-ERBB inhibitor, neratinib (N), may be predicted by pre-treatment HER2-EGFR signaling. In the I-SPY 2 TRIAL, N graduated in the HR-/HER2+ signature. All patients received at least standard chemotherapy. For HER2+ patients, N was administered in place of trastuzumab. We evaluated 18 HER family signaling proteins as biomarkers of N response using reverse phase protein microarray (RPMA) data from pre-treatment LCM purified tumor epithelium. Methods: 168 patients (N: 106, concurrent controls: 62) had RPMA and pCR data. 18 biomarkers relating to HER family signaling were evaluated: AKT S473, AKT T308, EGFR, EGFR Y1068, EGFR Y1148, EGFR Y1173, EGFR Y992, ERBB2, ERBB2 Y1248, ERBB3 total, ERBB3 Y1289, ERK1/2 T202/Y204, Heregulin, mTOR, mTOR S2448, PI3K p85 Y458/p55 Y199, PTEN S380, and SHC Y317. We assessed association between biomarker and response in the N and control arms alone (likelihood ratio test), and relative performance between arms (biomarker x treatment interaction) using a logistic model. Analysis was also performed adjusting for HR/HER2 status. In an exploratory analysis, we selected the marker with the greatest interaction (phosphorylated EGFR (Y1173)) to dichotomize patients optimally based on the data and assessed it in the context of the graduating signature by adding the EGFR Y1173-High patients to the HR-/HER2+ subtype and evaluating the treatment effect in this ‘biomarker-positive’ group. Our study is exploratory with no claims for generalizability of the data and does not account for multiplicities. Statistical calculations are descriptive (e.g. p-values are measures of distance with no inferential content). Results: 7 HER pathway markers (EGFR Y1068, EGFR Y1173, EGFR Y992, ERBB2 total, ERBB2 Y1248, ERBB3 Y1289, SHC Y317) are associated with response in the N but not the control arm. However, the difference in performance between arms did not reach significance by permutation testing. Adjusting for HR/HER2 status, EGFR Y1173 shows a significant biomarker x treatment interaction (p = 0.049). In an exploratory analysis, we dichotomized patients by their EGFR Y1173 levels and evaluated the distribution of pCR rates (Table 1). Neratinib (n=106)Control (n=62)EGFR Y1173 Low (n=31)EGFR Y1173 High (n=75)EGFR Y1173 Low (n=29)EGFR Y1173 High (n=33)HR-/HER2+ (n=28)0 / 412 / 181 / 11 / 5Not HR-/HER2+ (n=140)3 / 2724 / 575 / 285 / 28Table 1 OR between EGFR Y1173 groups in the N relative to control arm is 10.1. When EGFR Y1173 High patients are added to the graduating HR-/HER2+ subset, the OR associated with treatment is 3.2 and is comparable to that in the HR-/HER2+ signature (OR: 2.1), while increasing the prevalence of biomarker-positive patients by ∼50%. Evaluation of EGFR Y1173 under the I-SPY 2 Bayesian model is pending. Conclusion: Our sample size is too small to draw definitive conclusions. Our exploratory analysis reveals that HER family phosphoproteins associate with response to N, but only phosphorylated EGFR Y1173 appears to add value to the graduating signature. Given that this biomarker would expand the patient population that may benefit, it merits evaluation in other ongoing trials of neratinib. Citation Format: Julia D Wulfkuhle, Christina Yau, Denise M Wolf, Rosa I Gallagher, Ashish Sanil, Lamorna Brown-Swigart, Susan Flynn, Gillian Hirst, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Investigators, Meredith Buxton, Angela DeMichele, Nola Hylton, William F Symmans, Laura van't Veer, Douglas Yee, Melissa Paoloni, Laura Esserman, Donald Berry, Minetta C Liu, John W Park, Emanuel F Petricoin III. Evaluation of HER family protein signaling network as a predictive biomarker for pCR for breast cancer patients treated with neratinib in the I-SPY 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-15.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Flat epithelial atypia (FEA) is a recently described breast lesion that may coexist with cancer or atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). Currently, there is no consensus on whether to surgically excise FEA diagnosed by core needle biopsy. Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of pertinent studies to determine the frequency of upgrade to cancer or ADH at surgical excision of "pure" FEA (no other high risk lesion on core biopsy). METHODS: A retrospective search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases from 1/2003- 4/2014 to capture studies on core biopsy diagnosed FEA followed by surgical excision. Search terms were: FEA, flat epithelial atypia, DIN1A, columnar cell, breast diseases, core needle biopsy. Inclusion criteria were: 1) manuscript with original data on FEA diagnosed on core needle biopsy, 2) data included outcome of cancer at surgical excision, 3) English Language. RESULTS: Of 224 articles, 30 met inclusion criteria. StudyTotal Pure FEA cases%N excisedN upgraded to cancer% upgradedLim, 2006862.55120Kunju 20071485.712325Martel 20076338.124938Piubello, 20093360.62000Chivukula, 20093989.735514Senneta,20094187.83600Hayes, 200981008113Davashian, 20091210012217Tamasino, 20095444.424313Noske, 20104369.83027Lee, 20101546.77114Ingegnoli, 20101883.315320Noel, 20106232.32000Flegg, 2010NANA5240Sohn, 20113666.72428Lavoue, 20116010060813Rakha, 20112410024521Soloranzo,20113384.828414Verschuur-Maes, 20116934.824938Peres, 201212879.71021010Uzoaru, 201214565.69533Bianchi, 2012190100190189Biggar, 2012511005136Yamaguchi, 20121747.18113Polom, 20122010020210Khoumais, 201310490.4941011Villa, 201314285.212176Becker, 201330378.9239104Ceugnart, 20136382.55236Uzan, 2013351003500 Across 1420 patients with pure FEA in 30 studies, observed proportions with upgrade to cancer varied from 0-40% with a pooled estimate of 11% (95% CI: 8-15%) using a random effects model. Test for heterogeneity was statistically significant (p < 0.0001, I2 statistic=58%). After excluding 7 studies with <50% (or unreported %) of all FEA cases excised, heterogeneity decreased (p=0.07, I2=32%) and the pooled estimate of cancer upgrade was 9% (95% CI: 7-12%). For upgrade to ADH, 693 subjects with pure FEA were analyzed from 21 studies. The percent upgraded to ADH ranged from 0-60% with significant heterogeneity (p < 0.0001, I2 = 64%). Excluding 4 studies with <50% of FEA cases excised did not improve heterogeneity (p < 0.0001 and I2 = 66%). The random effects model pooled estimate of upgrade to ADH was 16% (95% CI: 11-23%) for the 21 studies and 17% (95% CI: 12-25%) for the subset of 17 studies. CONCLUSION: The pooled upgrade rate of FEA to cancer was 9-11% and upgrade to ADH was 16-17%. For patients with FEA on core needle biopsy, surgical excision should be strongly considered. Citation Format: Anatoliy V Rudin, Hoskin L Tanya, Ann M Farrell, Amy C Degnim. Flat epithelial atypia on core biopsy and upgrade to cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-06.