Citations

Abstract Background: The use of anti-estrogen (AE) therapies (selective estrogen receptor modulators [SERMs], aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) in breast cancer (BC) patients was recently associated with risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (J Rheum 2015;42:55-9). We attempted to replicate and extend these results using electronic health record (EHR) enhanced cancer registry data that assessed specific AE therapies and also accounted for potential confounding by age, smoking status, and chemotherapy use. Methods: Using cancer registry and EHR data, we identified a cohort of BC patients who were newly diagnosed and treated at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 1998-2011 and had no previous diagnosis of RA. Smoking status at diagnosis, BC treatments and RA at diagnosis and during follow-up were identified using validated EHR-based algorithms. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from a multivariate Cox model were used to estimate the association of AE use with risk of RA, controlling for age, smoking status at BC diagnosis, and BC chemotherapy use. Results: The analytic cohort of 9,244 newly diagnosed BC patients treated and followed at Mayo Clinic had a median age at diagnosis of 59 years (range 18-97); 32% were smokers; and 29% were treated with chemotherapy. During a median follow-up of 49 months (range 1-191), 19 patients developed RA. Compared to BC patients not receiving any AE therapy, those receiving AI monotherapy, but not SERM monotherapy or both SERMs and AIs, were at significantly increased risk of developing RA (Table). AE Therapy# of RA Cases / # patientsHR* (95% CI)P-valueNo AE therapy6/4,0711.00 (reference)SERMs only5/2,5371.20 (0.36 - 3.95)0.77AIs only5/7126.37 (1.77 - 22.92)0.005SERMs then AIs3/1,8750.90AI then SERMs0/490.91 (0.21 - 3.86)*Adjusted for age, smoking status and use of chemotherapy Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the use of AIs for BC therapy, but not SERMs or SERMs followed by AIs, is associated with increased risk for development of RA, when controlling for smoking status and use of chemotherapy. While needing replication, these findings suggest a specific role for AIs in RA development and suggest pathways that could be targeted to prevent this potential treatment complication. Citation Format: Matthew K. Breitenstein, Ming-Fen Ho, Richard M. Weinshilboum, James R. Cerhan, Jyotishman Pathak, Tim Bongartz, Liewei Wang, James N. Ingle. Association of anti-estrogen therapy in breast cancer patients and subsequent risk of rheumatoid arthritis: An electronic health record study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-191. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-LB-191

Abstract Several studies have identified common genetic factors that influence susceptibility to lung cancer but no large studies have systematically studied familial lung cancers. The Genetic Epidemiology of Lung Cancer Consortium completed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using samples from 757 cases and 796 controls, all of European American ancestry, and frequency matched on age and sex. Genotyping was performed by the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR) using an Illumina Human OmniExpressExome-8v1 array. The most significantly associated SNPs were identified in the cases as a whole, and were also stratified by histology (adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) and family history (0-1 and 2-5 affected family members). Analysis of all cases and controls identified a large number of SNPs around the CFTR gene that are strongly associated with lung cancer risk. Upon imputation with European Ancestry 1000 genomes data, the most significant SNP in this region is rs43034 (p = 3.89E-07, OR = 0.657) in the promoter region. In addition, an exonic missense SNP, rs213950 (p = 6.32E-07, OR = 0.663), and an intronic SNP with a possible splicing effect, rs213935 (p = 5.20E-07, OR = 0.660) were also identified as possible protective alleles. Analysis by histological subtype identified several rare and exonic SNPs that were specific by histology. We highlight two SNPs, rs114719990 (p = 1.194E-04, OR = 336.8, SETD2, c.3229A>G, p.Thr1077Ala) and rs199710487 (p = 1.124E-04, OR = 366, NTN5, c.656G>A, p.Arg219Gln), that were identified as strongly associated SNPs in cases with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, and two SNPs, rs144465058 (p = 1.029E-04, OR = 484.6, ANK3, c.6555G>T, p.Gln2185His) and rs140216112 (p = 1.087E-04, OR = 476, GRIK4, c.1013C>G, p.Ala338Gly), that were identified as top SNPs in cases with histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. The SETD2 gene is thought to be a tumor suppressor gene and variants in this gene have previously been associated with leukemia and glioma (Zhu X et al. 2014, Fontebasso AM et al. 2013), and may now have implications in lung cancer, specifically adenocarcinoma development. In conclusion, we identified SNPs in the CFTR gene that may have a protective effect on lung cancer and several rare and exonic variants that were specific to histology subtype. SNPChrPositionGeneGenomic/ Nucleotide/ Amino acid changeOdds Ratiop-valueCFTR Protective Allelesrs430347117108449CFTRg.117108449T>C; 2.4kb upstream0.6573.89×10−7rs2139507117199533CFTRc.1408G>A; p.Val470Met0.6636.32×10−7rs2139357117178208CFTRc.869+1481A>G0.6605.20×10−7 Citation Format: Diana M. Toledo, Susan M. Pinney, Diptasri Mandal, Mariza de Andrade, Elena Kupert, Jennifer Franks, Colette Gaba, Claire L. Simpson, Ming You, Marshall W. Anderson, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson, Christopher I. Amos, Ann Schwartz. Genetic Epidemiology of Lung Cancer Consortium: genome-wide association study of familial lung cancer cases. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-189. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-LB-189

Abstract Background: Epidemiologic studies have suggested that metformin use is associated with cancer death reduction. The results for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are inconsistent. Retrospective studies of cancer survival may potentially have unintended biases; due to complexities of diabetes management, metformin use exposure is commonly categorized as simply “yes/no.” Nevertheless, in part based on epidemiologic studies, there are at least 20 open cancer clinical trials that include metformin in a treatment arm. We aimed to study metformin use and survival of patients with PDAC, addressing potential inherent biases. Methods: A retrospective cohort study for the years 2000-2011 was conducted using the patient database of the Mayo Clinic Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Pancreatic Cancer. 1,360 PDAC patients (59% male; mean age 67) with diabetes were studied; overall survival was the primary outcome. Initiation and duration of metformin use was carefully abstracted from medical records. Patients were categorized into 5 groups based on metformin initiation: (A) Never used, n = 908 (reference group); (B) Metformin started >1 year prior to PDAC diagnosis, n = 84; (C) Metformin started within 1 year prior to PDAC diagnosis, n = 212; (D) Metformin started <30 days post-PDAC diagnosis, n = 104; (E) Metformin started >30 days post PDAC diagnosis, n = 34. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) for survival differences between groups were computed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, sex, disease stage, body mass index, and diagnosis year group. Results: Median survival of patients in Groups B-E was 292 days compared to 308 for Group A; this was not significantly different. However, among 413 resectable patients, metformin users appeared to survive longer than non-users (782 vs. 612 days, p = 0.07). Survival in each group was 308, 245, 249, 243 and 818 days, respectively. Because Group E had already survived >30 days, a bias existed. With Group E excluded, there was no survival difference among the other 4 groups (p = 0.18). Compared to Group A, HR and 95% C.I. for metformin use were 1.08 (0.85-1.37), 0.99 (0.85-1.17), 1.04 (0.83-1.31) and 0.49 (0.33-0.74), for Group B-E, respectively. Conclusions: Our thorough analysis suggests that metformin use does not improve survival of patients with PDAC. The benefit of metformin was observed only in patients who started metformin post-PDAC diagnosis; however, there is an inherent survival bias in this group of patients. Studies of medication exposure and cancer survival warrant very careful and detailed data collection. Researchers should exercise caution when initiating clinical trials based on retrospective epidemiologic studies. Citation Format: Roongruedee Chaiteerakij, David B. Zhen, Patrick A. Burch, Kari G. Chaffee, William R. Bamlet, Ann L. Oberg, Lewis R. Roberts, Gloria M. Petersen. Metformin use does not increase survival of pancreatic cancer patients: A cautionary lesson. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-183. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-LB-183

Abstract Background: Breast tumors exhibit intratumor heterogeneity resulting in targeted therapy resistance and other challenges in disease management. To address the sources of heterogeneity, we performed a unique, in-depth analysis of clonal architecture in primary chemoradiation-naïve breast cancers. We combined DNA content-based flow cytometry and ploidy analysis with aCGH and whole exome next-generation sequencing (NGS) in multiple biopsies from the tumors and involved lymph nodes (LNs). Material and methods: We sorted nuclei from distinct populations of diploid, tetraploid, and aneuploid cells in surgical tumor samples from three chemoradiation-naïve patients. Each sorted tumor cell population was interrogated with aCGH and whole exome NGS. In Patient #1, we sorted and interrogated the genomes of tumor populations from 12 fresh frozen sections morphologically mapped from within a HER2+, ER+, PR- primary invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of histological grade 3 with LN involvement and 2-3 sections from 2 out of 5 LNs. In Patient #2, 11 morphologically mapped fresh frozen sections were analyzed from a grade 2, ER+, PR+, HER2+, BRCA2 mutant LN- IDC. In parallel, matching samples were processed for IHC assays. In Patient #3 biopsies from a grade 2 ER+, PR+ primary tumor were profiled. Results: The 18 primary and LN biopsies from Patient #1 fell into 6 distinct ploidy groups albeit with aberrant but homogenous aCGH profiles, characterized by SARC amplification and homozygous deletions in ROBO1 and ROBO2. In contrast a dominant ploidy was identified throughout 10 biopsies in Patient #2 but with heterogeneous aCGH profiles. Patient #3 had a clonal homozygous deletion in Numb in each of 4 tumor biopsies. Mutation profiles obtained through exome sequencing further confirmed that ploidy was the main driver in Patient #1 whereas copy number aberrations played the key role in Patient #2 with the BRCA2 mutation (R3129X). A dendrogram based on exome variant calls of the aneuploid populations in Patient #1 strongly correlated with ploidy group and further revealed the specific clonal population characterized by a 5N ploidy and homozygous mutations in TP53 and PIK3CA as the progenitor to the ploidies present in the distant LNs. Strikingly, patients #1 and #2 were HER2 wild type across their clonal populations, contradicting IHC staining in a single core biopsy. Conclusions:Rather than inferring the presence of distinct tumor cell populations, our flow-sorting based approach of first identifying clonal populations and then interrogating their genomes, provides an objective method of exploring the sources and clinical significance of tumor heterogeneity. Our approach of clonal analysis has broad implications in the study of tumor heterogeneity and the identification of drivers in breast and other solid tumors that can advance more effective treatment and clinical management of patients with this disease. Citation Format: MARIACARLA ANDREOZZI, Princy Francis, Elizabeth Lenkiewicz, Mia Champion, Brady Laughlin, Karen Anderson, Heather Cunliffe, Ann E. McCullough, Michael T. Barrett, Barbara Pockaj. Deep clonal profiling identifies distinct mechanisms of heterogeneity and evolution in breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-175. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-LB-175

Abstract Cell-cell contacts inhibit cell growth and proliferation in part by activating the Hippo pathway that drives the phosphorylation and nuclear exclusion of the transcriptional coactivators YAP and TAZ. Cell density and Hippo signaling have also been reported to block TGF-β responses, based on the ability of phospho-YAP/TAZ to sequester TGF-β-activated SMAD complexes in the cytoplasm. Herein, we provide evidence that epithelial cell polarization interferes with TGF-β signaling well upstream and independent of cytoplasmic YAP/TAZ. Rather, polarized basolateral presentation of TGF-β receptors I and II deprives apically delivered TGF-β of access to its receptors. Basolateral ligand delivery nonetheless remains entirely effective to induce TGF-β responses. These data demonstrate that cell type-specific inhibition of TGF-β signaling by cell density is restricted to polarized epithelial cells and reflects the polarized distribution of TGF-β receptors, which thus impacts SMAD activation irrespective of Hippo pathway activation. Citation Format: Flore Nallet-Staub, Xueqian Yin, Cristèle Gilbert, Véronique Marsaud, Saber Ben Mimoun, Delphine Javelaud, Edward B. Leof, Alain Mauviel. Cell density sensing alters TGF-beta signaling in a cell type-specific manner, independent from Hippo pathway activation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-028. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-LB-028

Abstract Background: The genomes of metastatic pancreatic cancers contain a myriad of intrachromosomal aberrations indicating a likely high prevalence of DNA repair deficiencies indicating sensitivity to DNA damaging agents such as the platinum’s. Because of this, the drug cisplatin was added to an albumin-bound paclitaxel + gemcitabine regimen, which has already been determined to improve survival over gemcitabine alone in a randomized phase III trial (NEJM 2013; 369:1691-1703). Objectives: To determine the efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine plus cisplatin for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer Methods: Eligibility criteria included Stage IV pancreatic cancer, no prior chemotherapy for systemic disease, KPS ≥ 70; life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks and measurable disease. The doses were albumin-bound paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 undiluted, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 in 500 ml of normal saline (NS), each infused over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle, along with 3 different dose levels of cisplatin (25, 37.5 or 50 mg/m2) in 500 ml of NS infused over 60 minutes, after the nab-paclitaxel infusion. Pre and post cisplatin hydration was given. Results: To date, 10 patients have been entered on study with all patients being evaluable, (baseline and at least one follow up CT scans completed). There have been 2 complete responses (20%), 6 partial responses (PR), (60%), 1 stable disease (10%), and 1 patient with progressive disease (10%), by RECIST 1.1 criteria. An exponential decrease in CA19-9 correlating with the t1/2 of the marker was noted. Response was seen rapidly with PR observed at the first staging evaluation at 9 weeks in 7 of 10 patients. The 8th patient achieved a PR at 18 weeks. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients: non-neutropenic sepsis/pneumonia (n = 1), and non-neutropenic bacteremia (n = 1) in the cisplatin 25 mg/m2 cohort; clostridium difficile colitis (n = 1) with cisplatin 37.5 mg/m2; and neutropenic fever/pneumonia (n = 1) with cisplatin 50mg/m2. Discussion: The study has completed phase Ib and will be expanded at the phase II dose of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 for a total of 25 patients. If this favorable response rate is confirmed, this 3 drug regimen could be further developed both for patients with advanced disease as well as in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Supported by grants from the Seena Magowitz Foundation and the SU2C Dream Team Citation Format: Gayle S. Jameson, Erkut Borazanci, Elizabeth Poplin, Michael T. Barrett, John Crowley, Adam Rosenthal, Amy Stoll-D'Astice, Karen L. Ansaldo, Steven Boone, Leticia Lebron, Ramesh K. Ramanathan, Ronald L. Korn, Daniel D. Von Hoff. High complete and partial response rate in a phase Ib pilot trial with cisplatin plus albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-003. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-LB-003

Abstract Background: SGI-110 (guadecitabine) is a novel HMA that prolongs in vivo exposure of the active moiety decitabine following subcutaneous (SC) administration. We previously reported guadecitabine clinical activity in previously untreated elderly AML with Overall Complete Response (CR+CRi+CRp) of 55% using a standard 5-day regimen (Yee et al, 2014). Here we report the first results of a more intensive 10-day regimen in the same patient population. Methods: Elderly AML patients (≥ 65y) with at least one of the following characteristics were enrolled: age ≥ 75y; poor Performance Status (PS) ≥ 2; significant comorbidities particularly cardiopulmonary dysfunction; poor risk cytogenetics; or secondary AML. Guadecitabine 60 mg/m2/d SC was administered for 10 days (Days 1-5; and 8-12) for the first 1-2 cycles followed by the 5-day regimen (Days 1-5) for subsequent cycles. Cycles were scheduled every 28 days. Primary endpoint was Overall Complete Response (Overall CR). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival, Safety including all-cause 30-day and 60-day early mortality, and global maximum DNA demethylation from baseline by LINE-1 assay. Results: Fifty two patients were treated with median age 77 (range 66-92) including 40 (77%) ≥75y; 34 (65%) male; 21 (40%) PS ≥ 2; 19 (36%) poor risk cytogenetics; and 13 (25%) secondary AML. The median bone marrow blasts percentage was 49% (range 16-98%). All patients had a minimum follow up of 3 months; 26 (50%) patients remain on treatment at the time of the analysis. Overall CR was observed in 24 patients (46%):14 CR (27%), 8 CRi (15%), and 2 CRp (4%). There was no significant difference between median DNA demethylation in responders (- 27%) and non-responders (-28%). Early all-cause 30-day and 60-day mortality occurred in 2 (4%) and 10 (19%) patients respectively. The most common Grade ≥3 Adverse Events considered by investigators to be drug-related were febrile neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (27%), neutropenia (21%), anemia (15%), bacteremia (10%), and pneumonia (6%). Conclusions: Administration of guadecitabine as a more intense 10-day regimen for the first 1-2 cycles was active with acceptable toxicity. However, and although it was not a randomized comparison, the 10-day regimen did not result in higher rate of Overall CR in previously untreated AML than what was previously reported for the 5-day regimen. A Phase III randomized clinical trial in previously untreated AML patients not considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy has been initiated with the 5-day regimen of guadecitabine. Reference: Yee K, Daver N, Kropf P, et al: European Hematology Association Meeting, June 12-15, 2104; Milan, Italy. Abstract S647. Citation Format: Gail Roboz, Hagop Kantarjian, Patricia Kropf, Ellen Richie, Nitin Jain, Elizabeth Griffiths, Nikola A. Podoltsev, Katherine Walsh, Casey O'Connell, Wendy Stock, David Rizzieri, Raoul Tibes, Todd Rosenblat, Woonbok Chung, Pietro Taverna, Xiang Yao Su, Sue Naim, Mohammad Azab, Jean-Pierre Issa. First results of a 10-day regimen of SGI-110 (guadecitabine), a second generation hypomethylating agent (HMA) in previously untreated elderly AML who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT321. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT321

Abstract Background: Traditional adjuvant therapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) consists of 60-66 Gy of radiation therapy (XRT) given in 2 Gy daily fractions along with high dose cisplatin if the patient has high risk factors. Despite the excellent cure rates for HPV+ OPSCC, one in three patients treated with conventional treatment will develop grade >3 long-term sequelae from therapy. There is intense interest in de-intensifying adjuvant therapy for this patient population in order to maximize quality of life while maintaining excellent historical rates of disease control. Methods: MC1273 is a phase II non-randomized trial open at Mayo Clinic Rochester testing a novel course of aggressive therapy de-escalation following surgery for HPV+ OPSCC. The primary endpoint is local/regional control at 2 years while secondary endpoints include toxicity and quality of life (QOL). The eligibility criteria include all patients with p16-positive OPSCC with less than a ten pack-year smoking history who have had a complete surgical resection. Exclusion criteria include positive surgical margins, prior history of malignancy, and history of connective tissue disorders. Patients are divided into two prospective cohorts depending upon risk factors found at surgery. Patients with intermediate risk disease (≥T3, ≥N2, lymphovascular invasion, or perineural invasion) are enrolled in MC1273A while patients with extracapsular extension (ECE) are enrolled in MC1273B. Patients on MC1273A receive 30 Gy of radiation delivered in 1.5 Gy twice-daily fractions over the course of two weeks along with weekly docetaxel (15 mg/m2) given on day 1 and day 8. Patients on MC1273B receive a similar treatment regimen but also have the nodal level with positive ECE concurrently boosted to 36 Gy in 1.8 Gy twice-daily fractions. In addition to standard of care follow-up, patients receive a swallowing assessment with speech therapy immediately before XRT, one month post-XRT, and one year post-XRT. Patients also have QOL assessment consisting of the XeQOLS, Eq-5D, FACT H&N (Vers 4) and Dermatology Life Quality Index assessed at pre-XRT and 3, 12, and 24 months post-XRT. Results: Each cohort of MC1273 is powered to detect a 10% local/regional failure rate with 85% confidence. Each cohort will accrue 35 evaluable patients and 5 additional patients to account for ineligibilities and violations (40 patients total per cohort.) MC1273A began accrual in September 2013. The first five patients were monitored for grade ≥4 acute toxicities before proceeding to open accrual. MC1273B began accrual in May 2014 and has also proceeded to open accrual. Accrual will also begin in Mayo Clinic Scottsdale in the first quarter of 2015. Conclusions: MC1273 is meeting its accrual targets and should finish accrual by 2016. We anticipate that preliminary results for toxicity will be available by 2017 and local/regional data will be available by 2018. Citation Format: Daniel J. Ma, Katharine A. Price, Eric J. Moore, Joaquin J. Garcia, Scott H. Okuno, Daniel L. Price, Jeff A. Sloan, Nathan R. Foster, Robert L. Foote. MC1273: Phase II evaluation of aggressive dose de-escalation for adjuvant chemoradiation in HPV associated oropharynx cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT227. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT227

Abstract Background: Copanlisib is a novel pan-Class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor with potent preclinical inhibitory activity against both PI3K-δ and PI3K-α isoforms. A phase II study of copanlisib in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent or aggressive lymphoma reported a promising overall response rate of up to 53% for patients in the indolent NHL group (Dreyling et al., ENA 2014). The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of copanlisib in patients with indolent B-cell NHL relapsed after or refractory to standard therapy. Methods: In this study, patients meeting the following criteria will be eligible for enrollment: histologically confirmed diagnosis of indolent B-cell NHL, with follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 1-2-3a, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL; splenic, nodal, or extra-nodal), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) with absolute lymphocyte count < 5 × 109/L at the time of diagnosis and at study entry, or lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM), and who have previously received ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy with rituximab and an alkylating agent and must be refractory to the last treatment with rituximab (refractory defined as not responding or progressing within 6 months of the last course of treatment). Patients will be randomized in 2:1 manner to receive 60 mg of copanlisib administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle or placebo administered on the same schedule. Patients will be treated until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Patients in the placebo arm will be allowed to cross-over to receive follow-up treatment with copanlisib, after confirmed disease progression. Dose reductions due to toxicities to 45 mg and 30 mg will be allowed. Radiologic tumor assessment will be performed every 12, 16 or 24 weeks for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The primary endpoint will be progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include overall objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), complete response rate (CRR), overall survival (OS), time to deterioration as well as time to improvement in disease-related symptoms. Exploratory objectives will include secondary PFS after first progression in placebo-treated patients who cross over to receive copanlisib and time to improvement and the time to deterioration in disease-related symptoms-physical (DRS-P) of at least 3 points as measured by the FLymSI-18 questionnaire. Approximately 189 patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized 2:1, with approximately 126 patients in the copanlisib monotherapy arm and approximately 63 patients in placebo arm. The study is planned to detect a 132% increase in median PFS in copanlisib versus placebo (i.e. to detect a hazard ratio of 0.43), using a stratified log-rank test. Citation Format: Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Igor Gorbatchevsky, Florian Hiemeyer, Lisa Cupit, Barrett H. Childs. CHRONOS-2: A randomized, double-blind phase III study of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase alpha/delta inhibitor copanlisib versus placebo in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT212. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT212

Abstract Background: Genomic assessment of cancer has been revolutionized by Next-Generation sequencing and is increasingly being applied to guide clinical prognostic and therapeutic decision-making. Initial clinical applications have been limited to gene panels and whole exome based strategies due to challenges with time to reporting of results, specimen quantity, analyte quality, and ethical-legal-social issues (ELSI). Methods: Excisional or core tumor biopsies or bone marrow biopsies were obtained from consenting participants. Nucleic acid was extracted from fresh or frozen samples followed by WGS/WES/RNASeq on the Illumina HiSeq2000 or HiSeq2500 and bioinformatics analysis. Therapeutic targets were then prioritized by a multi-disciplinary Genomic Tumor Board (GTB) and CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH and/or IHC. Treatment was delivered using on/off-label FDA approved drugs, available clinical trials and single patient INDs. Results: We consented 64 and enrolled 35 patients with advanced, treatment-refractory cancers. Median age was 59 (range 27-91) with 62% male. The majority had ECOG scores of 1 (94%). A median of 79 (range 28-8891) potentially functional somatic point mutations were identified in each case. One to two mutations/case were further identified as therapeutically targetable in 60% of the cases. The median time from tissue acquisition to CLIA validated results was 116 days (range 42-282) with CLIA validation of targets achieved in 21 of 22 patients. Genomic, target directed treatment was ultimately instituted in 13 patients utilizing: on/off label FDA approved drugs (n = 9), clinical trial (n = 3) and single patient IND (n = 1). Preliminary clinical efficacy was noted in 5 patients (2 PR, 3 SD). Integration of WES, long-insert WGS and RNA-Seq identified a case with an ERRFI1 mutant allele present in only 11% of the DNA reads while 82% of the RNA-Seq reads had the mutant transcript. The patient was treated with erlotinib and achieved a partial response by RECIST criteria. In another case, a fusion between FGFR2-MGEA5 was observed in WES and RNA-Seq data leading to prioritization as a drug target. Reasons for patients not receiving targeted therapy included: inability to access treatment (n = 1), death prior to intended treatment (n = 3), results returned after death (n = 3), no targets identified (n = 2) and decision to pursue alternate therapy (n = 5). Conclusions: Integrating whole genome analysis in a CLIA setting is not only feasible, but also valuable, in the prioritization and selection of potential targeted therapies for patients with advanced tumors. Continued barriers to broad application include the need for shorter time to reporting as well as broad availability of therapies through basket studies. Citation Format: Mitesh J. Borad, Jan Egan, Mia Champion, Katherine Hunt, Robert McWilliams, Ann McCullough, Jessica Aldrich, Sara Nasser, Winnie Liang, Michael Barrett, David Craig, Ramesh Ramanathan, John Carpten, A. Keith Stewart, Alan Bryce. Implementation of CLIA enabled integrated whole genome (WGS)/exome (WES)/transcriptome (RNAseq) next-gen sequencing to identify therapeutically relevant targets in advanced cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT112. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT112