Citations

Abstract Introduction: CD56+ lymphocytes (a defining marker of natural killer cells) have a predominantly cytotoxic phenotype and a hypothetical role in breast tumor immunosurveillance. Here we investigate whether CD56+ staining density varies in nonmalignant breast lobules according to confirmed breast cancer risk factors- age, and histologic features of fibrocystic change and lobular involution. Methods: Archived breast tissue samples were obtained from 94 women with benign breast disease (BBD). The sample set was selected as a nested case-control study (47 cases, 47 controls) from within a large BBD cohort; cases were those who developed breast cancer subsequent to their benign breast biopsy; controls were matched to cases on age at biopsy, year of biopsy, and length of breast cancer free follow-up at least as long as the time-to-cancer in the matched case. Up to 10 representative lobules in each sample were characterized by H&E for fibrocystic changes and the degree of epithelial proliferation (normal, nonproliferative, proliferative, atypia) and for degree of lobular involution (none, partial, complete). Consecutive sections were immunostained for CD56 and hematoxylin. Using digital image analysis, CD56 staining was quantified on a per lobule basis by pixel ratio (PR) (positive stain:total lobule). Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed effects regression on the rank transformed density to account for correlations among multiple lobules from the same patient in assessing the association of density with lobule characteristics and using conditional logistic regression for association with case-control status. Results: Among 94 women (median age 52, range 35-73), 876 lobules were evaluated: 431 in BBD cases and 445 in BBD controls. Overall, 391 lobules (45%) were normal and the remaining 485 (55%) demonstrated fibrocystic changes. Among fibrocystic lobules, 247 (51%) had nonproliferative changes, 218 (45%) had epithelial proliferation, and 20 (4%) had atypical hyperplasia. Among normal lobules, 61 (16%) had no involution, 139 (36%) had partial involution, and 191 (49%) had complete involution. The vast majority of lobules (861/876, 98%) demonstrated presence of CD56+ cells, while only 15 of 876 lobules in 11 patients had zero CD56+ cells [7 cases (15%) versus 4 controls (8.5%) OR 1.75, p = 0.37]. The median CD56+ PR was 0.55% overall. Fibrocystic lobules as a group showed significantly lower median CD56+ PR compared to normal lobules (0.37% vs 0.85%, p < 0.0001). Among subcategories of fibrocystic lobules, the median CD56+ PR was lower in proliferative lobules (0.29%) compared to non-proliferative (0.42%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.55). Older women (age > 55) showed the highest CD56+ PR (median of 0.92%), as compared to 0.38% in women 45-55 (p=0.02), and 0.52% in women age <45 (p = 0.26). Among normal lobules, median CD56+ PR was similar between lobules with no involution (0.55%) and partial involution (0.52%) but was considerably higher among lobules with complete involution (1.3%, p = 0.09 and p = 0.05, respectively). In a multivariable model, CD56+ PR differences between fibrocystic and normal lobules remained significant (p = 0.0002) and also remained significant between age groups of > 55 and 45-55 (p = 0.02), while involution was non-significant. Median CD56+ PR was lower in cases (0.43%) compared to controls (0.72%), but this was not statistically significant (p=0.19) in our sample of 47 case-control pairs. Conclusions: Breast lobules with fibrocystic changes show less CD56+ cells, raising a question of possible immune suppression induced by early epithelial abnormalities. These findings encourage further investigation to improve understanding of the immune microenvironment in premalignant breast tissues. Citation Format: Rushin D. Brahmbhatt, Daniel Kerekes, Tanya L. Hoskin, Alvaro Pena, Daniel W. Visscher, Melody L. Stallings-Mann, Derek C. Radisky, Linda M. Murphy, Vernon Shane Pankratz, Keith L. Knutson, Marlene Frost, Amy C. Degnim. CD56+ immune cell infiltration is decreased in benign breast lobules with fibrocystic changes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2014 Sep 27-Oct 1; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2015;8(10 Suppl): Abstract nr B34.

Abstract Introduction: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), which is highly expressed in benign breast epithelium, is postulated to function as a tumor suppressor of breast cancer. Atypias of the breast increase the lifetime risk of breast cancer four-fold. However, little is known about ERβ expression in association with atypias or whether ERβ plays a role in mitigating breast cancer risk in high-risk individuals. We therefore undertook this study to examine the relationship of ERβ expression in atypias and adjacent normal lobules with the risk of subsequent breast cancer. Methods: We studied women in a well-characterized benign breast disease cohort with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) diagnosed from 1967 to 1991. Nuclear and cytoplasmic ERβ expression was assessed via immunohistochemistry in both the atypical hyperplasia epithelium (atypia) and background normal lobules for percent (scores 0-4 for <1%, 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, >75%, respectively) and intensity (scores 0-3 for negative, weak, intermediate, strong, respectively) using a highly specific ERβ monoclonal antibody (PPG5/10). For nuclear staining, an ERβ sum score (percent + intensity, range 0-7) was created and grouped as low (0-2), moderate (3-5) or high (6-7). Competing risks regression was used to assess the association of ERβ expression with future breast cancer risk while also accounting for the competing risk of death from other causes. Results: 171 women, median age 56, were studied (79 ADH and 92 ALH). Median follow-up was 15 years overall, and 36 women developed breast cancer at a median of 13 years after their atypia biopsy. ERβ expression was lower in the atypia versus normal lobules whether evaluated by nuclear percent stained, nuclear intensity or cytoplasmic intensity (all p < 0.001). For nuclear staining specifically, ERβ expression in the atypia was low in 44 (26%), moderate in 117 (68%) and high in only 10 (6%) based on the sum score. In contrast, ERβ was higher in the normal lobules with a majority showing high expression (n = 96, 56%), moderate expression in 74 (43%) and low expression in only 1 (0.6%). Lower ERβ nuclear expression in the atypia was associated with increased breast cancer risk, whether evaluated by percent staining, intensity or sum score; the same was true for ERβ nuclear expression in the background normal lobules. Low ERβ expression in the atypia (sum score 0-2) was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of subsequent breast cancer compared to atypia with moderate-high expression (sum score 3-7), HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.02-3.8, p = 0.04. Lower ERβ expression in the normal lobules was also associated with an increased risk of future breast cancer: HR = 2.5 (95% CI: 1.3-5.1, p = 0.009) for low-moderate versus high expression. Conclusions: Increased ERβ expression in normal and atypical lobules was associated with a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer in our high-risk patient cohort. These data suggest that in women with atypical hyperplasia, ERβ expression is protective against the future development of breast cancer. ERβ may serve as a useful biomarker to further stratify breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease. Citation Format: Tina J. Hieken, Jodi M. Carter, John R. Hawse, IV, Tanya L. Hoskin, Marlene Frost, Lynn C. Hartmann, Derek C. Radisky, Daniel W. Visscher, Vernon S. Pankratz, Amy C. Degnim. ERβ expression and breast cancer risk prediction for women with atypias. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2014 Sep 27-Oct 1; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2015;8(10 Suppl): Abstract nr A03.

Abstract PARP inhibition can enhance the efficacy of temozolomide and prolong survival in orthotopic glioblastoma (GBM) xenografts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib with temozolomide and to correlate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies with efficacy in patient-derived GBM xenograft models. The combination of rucaparib with temozolomide was highly effective in vitro in short-term explant cultures derived from GBM12, and, similarly, the combination of rucaparib and temozolomide (dosed for 5 days every 28 days for 3 cycles) significantly prolonged the time to tumor regrowth by 40% in heterotopic xenografts. In contrast, the addition of rucaparib had no impact on the efficacy of temozolomide in GBM12 or GBM39 orthotopic models. Using Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) II cells stably expressing murine BCRP1 or human MDR1, cell accumulation studies demonstrated that rucaparib is transported by both transporters. Consistent with the influence of these efflux pumps on central nervous system drug distribution, Mdr1a/b−/−Bcrp1−/− knockout mice had a significantly higher brain to plasma ratio for rucaparib (1.61 ± 0.25) than wild-type mice (0.11 ± 0.08). A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation after a single dose confirmed limited accumulation of rucaparib in the brain is associated with substantial residual PARP enzymatic activity. Similarly, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric imaging demonstrated significantly enhanced accumulation of drug in flank tumor compared with normal brain or orthotopic tumors. Collectively, these results suggest that limited drug delivery into brain tumors may significantly limit the efficacy of rucaparib combined with temozolomide in GBM. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(12); 2735–43. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Background: PI3K/Akt activation is downstream of the B cell receptor (BCR) signaling cascade and is critical to mediate the interactions between CLL B-cell and bone marrow stroma which support leukemic survival. MK-2206 is a potent oral allosteric Akt inhibitor and we have demonstrated in vitro synergism with bendamustine (B) to induce CLL apoptosis. MK-2206 selectively abolishes BCR-stimulated cytokines CCL3, CCL4, CCL2, and IL-2Ra and significantly inhibits the BCR signaling pathway (Ding, BJH, 2013). We sought to assess the safety, maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and efficacy of MK-2206 in combination with B-rituximab (BR) in relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL patients in a phase I/II trial (NCCTG N1087 Alliance). Methods: Previously treated symptomatic CLL/SLL patients with up to 3 prior lines of therapy and ECOG performance status of 0-2 were eligible. Patients with 17p deletion or prior treatment with B were excluded. A standard phase I design was used to determine the MTD of MK-2206 in combination with BR (B 70mg/m2 for 2 days per cycle; R cycle 1: 375 mg/m2, cycle 2-6: 500 mg/m2). Phase II employed the MTD to evaluate safety and efficacy of the combination. Response was evaluated 2 months after the last cycle of therapy per IWCLL 2008 criteria. Results: 13 patients with a median age of 68 years (range 44-75) and 1.2 prior lines of therapy were treated. CLL FISH showed: del(11q) in 4 (31%), trisomy 12 in 2 (15%), del(13q) in 3 (23%), del(6q) (8%), del(17cen) (8%) and normal results in 2 (15%). IGHV was unmutated in 10 (91%) and mutated in 1 patient (9%) and was missing in 2 cases. ZAP-70 was positive in 8 (73%) and negative in 3 patients (27%). CD38 was positive in 8 (62%) and negative in 5 patients (38%). 70% of patients had received prior chemoimmunotherapy. At 90 mg of MK-2206, 1/6 patients experienced a DLT of grade 3 febrile neutropenia and hemolysis. 2/6 patients on the 135 mg dose experienced a DLT. One patient had grade 3 febrile neutropenia and one patient had a grade 3 acneiform rash. MTD was determined to be MK-2206 90 mg. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (46%) including febrile neutropenia (23%), diarrhea (15%) and thrombocytopenia (15%). The most common all-grade toxicities were neutropenia (69%), thrombocytopenia (62%), anemia (54%), nausea (54%), diarrhea (39%), rash (38%), and hyperglycemia (31%). 10 patients were treated at 90 mg and 3 patients were treated at the 135 mg dose. The ORR was 92% (n=12). Responses were: 3 CR (23%), 2 CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) (15%), 1 clinical CR (CCR) (8%) without marrow confirmation, 1 nodular partial remission (nPR) (8%), 5 PR (38%), and 1 progressive disease (8%). Median follow-up was 20 months (6-31 months). Median PFS in the CR/CRi group was not reached (NR) with 100% of patients progression free versus 12 months (95% CI 2 months-NR) if CR/CRi was not achieved (p=0.027). Median overall survival was NR in either the CR/CRi or non-CR/CRi groups but 2 deaths occurred in the latter group (p=0.44). One patient developed Richter transformation and died at 15 months and a second patient who had achieved PR died from autoimmune hemolytic anemia and fungal infection at 27 months. Two out of five patients who achieved CR or CRi had bone marrow MRD negative status at the final response evaluation. Conclusions: The Akt inhibitor MK-2206 administered at 90 mg once weekly in combination with BR is tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL and compares favorably to BR alone (59% ORR and 9% CR, Fischer, JCO, 2011). An ORR of 92% was observed with a 38% of patients achieving CR or CRi. The trial was terminated prematurely due to withdrawal of sponsor support, however further testing of Akt inhibition is needed given the promising results. Citation Format: Jeremy T. Larsen, Tait D. Shanafelt, Jose F. Leis, Betsy R. LaPlant, Timothy G. Call, Clive S. Zent, Curtis A. Hanson, Charles Erlichman, Thomas M. Habermann, Craig B. Reeder, Deborah A. Bowen, Michael Conte, Justin C. Boysen, Charla R. Secreto, Connie E. Lesnick, Renee C. Tschumper, Diane F. Jelinek, Neil E. Kay, Wei Ding. The Akt inhibitor MK-2206 in combination with rituximab and bendamustine demonstrates efficacy in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Updated results from the NCCTG N1087 Alliance study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Targeting the PI3K-mTOR Network in Cancer; Sep 14-17, 2014; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B02.

Abstract Purpose: Low breast cancer screening participation and adherence to guidelines is problematic. Our prior work found that on average 18% of women from four tribes adhered to Indian Health Service (IHS) mammographic screening guidelines over five years (study funded by Native American Research Centers for Health (NARCH IV). We sought to identify how adherent (persistent) and non-adherent (sporadic) screeners may differ by demographic and theoretical mediators that have successfully guided interventions in other health disparities populations. As part of planning interventions to increase AI/AN women's persistent screening, we characterized differences in persistent and sporadic screeners' responses to Social Norms and Health Beliefs in the context of social networks. Methods: From 2013-2014, we interviewed 55 recruited women (41 sporadic screeners and 14 persistent screeners) who had been randomly assigned unique identifiers. Data from interviews included demographic characteristics, assessments of health literacy, and social relationships from theoretical perspectives of: Theory of Planned Behavior, Social Support, Social Norms, Health Beliefs, and Social Networks. In this study, we examined areas that distinguished persistent from sporadic screeners—social norms and health beliefs--and we conceptualized the make-up of screeners' social networks to consider members by their generational status relative to the screener. We coded and categorized data; Fisher's Exact Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test were applied as appropriate. Results: We identified three mediators with four significant differences. 1. Social Norms: (A) Persistent screeners were significantly more likely to believe reservation women favored getting an annual mammogram while sporadic screeners were more likely to believe women were against getting annual mammograms (P = 0.03). Responses are consistent with Social Norms theory, but screeners' beliefs about friends' screening participation appear less consistent with the theory. (B) Persistent screeners by a large proportion believed friends obtained fewer mammograms than themselves while sporadic screeners had no prevailing view (P = 0.02). 2. Health Beliefs (susceptibility to breast cancer): (C) While sporadic screeners expressed considerable uncertainty about their susceptibility, persistent screeners expressed no uncertainty (P = 0.02). 3. Social Networks: (D) Examination of the generational membership of screeners' Social Networks showed that sporadic screeners' networks had significantly more members from generations younger than themselves compared to persistent screeners' networks ( P = 0.01). Conclusions: Screeners with younger social networks may in part be influenced to be sporadic screeners because they do not benefit from exposure to more mature and experienced individuals in their social networks. The excess of younger generation members in sporadic screeners' networks may expose them generally to people who do not screen (or have limited screening experience) due to age. This exposure would confirm for them that reservation women generally do not favor screening and would explain their mixed view of friends' screening behavior. The younger membership of sporadic screeners' networks also may explain why this group would express substantial uncertainty about their own susceptibility to breast cancer relative to other women. If the network is not of an age where breast cancer and screening are pertinent topics, screeners may not have a knowledgebase (accurate or not) from which to build their views. We anticipate further testing to ascertain the role of social networks in the views and behaviors of sporadic and persistent screeners before considering any interventions. Citation Format: Corinna Sabaque, Ann M. Nicometo, Robert Vierkant, Wesley O. Petersen. Do generational cohort differences in social networks influence persistent and sporadic screeners' perceptions of breast cancer screening? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Seventh AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 9-12, 2014; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B73.

Abstract Prior to PanIN formation, acinar cells harboring oncogenic Kras gradually lose their acinar character and take on a ductal phenotype in a process known as acinar-to-ductal metaplasia. Rather than mimicking a normal pancreatic duct, metaplastic ducts take on a proliferative biliary progenitor phenotype, marked by the expression of SOX17 and PDX1 and the presence of numerous tuft cells, recently identified as a PanIN initiating cells. Manipulation of SOX17 and PDX1 in vivo reveal them to be a transdifferentiation promoter and suppressor, respectively, both greatly affecting tuft cell genesis and tumor formation. These opposing roles of developmental transcription factors during tumorigenesis implicate the usurpation of a differentiation program that significantly contributes to cellular heterogeneity within early pre-cancerous lesions of the pancreas. Citation Format: Kenneth K. Takeuchi, Kathleen E. Delgiorno, Christopher J. Halbrook, Howard C. Crawford. Acinar cell transdifferentiation sets the stage for early tumor heterogeneity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Innovations in Research and Treatment; May 18-21, 2014; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(13 Suppl):Abstract nr IA13.

Abstract Hyperactive K-RAS signaling is a major menace that drives aggressive cancer cell dissemination, tumor progression and metastasis in human pancreatic cancer. Currently, there are no effective therapies to control human pancreatic cancers that have oncogenic K-RAS mutations that confer drug resistance, aggressive tumor growth, systemic metastasis and poor clinical outcome. Therefore, finding novel approaches and new drug targets to inhibit oncogenic K-RAS activation is an urgent goal and major challenge in targeted therapy development in pancreatic cancer. Instead of targeting an upstream signaling module such as EGFR/K-RAS/B-RAF/MEK/MAPK/ERK/AKT/mTOR, we targeted the most downstream signaling module in the K-RAS signaling pathway called the SIAH-dependent proteolytic machinery. SIAHs are the human homologs of Seven-In-Absentia (SINA), an evolutionarily conserved RING E3 ligase, an essential downstream signaling module and a critical “gatekeeper” required for proper K-RAS signal transduction. Guided by the insights and principles learned from Drosophila RAS signaling pathway, we have conducted preclinical studies to dissect SIAH function in the context of K-RAS-mediated tumorigenesis and metastasis in human pancreatic cancer cells and tumor specimens. We found that inhibiting SIAH function is highly effective to abolish well-established and late-stage pancreatic tumor growth and metastasis in our pre-clinical studies. These findings demonstrate that SIAH is indeed an attractive, logical and potent anti-K-RAS therapeutic target for us to develop new and effective anticancer strategy against human pancreatic cancer. Through our work, SIAH has emerged as a new and effective drug target against oncogenic K-RAS hyperactivation in human pancreatic cancer. As one of the most evolutionarily conserved E3 ligases, SIAH is ideally and logically positioned to become a next-generation anti-K-RAS drug target in human cancer. Our preclinical studies have demonstrated that “SIAH-dependent proteolysis” is indeed an Achilles’ heel for human pancreatic cancer cells. Hence, anti-SIAH-based small molecule inhibitors may aid in expanding our arsenal of novel anticancer therapies in pancreatic cancer. By attacking the most downstream “gatekeeper” critical for the proper oncogenic ERBB/K-RAS signaling transmission, we may be in a position to halt the genesis, progression and metastasis of the most aggressive and the deadliest forms of human pancreatic cancer in the future. Citation Format: Vasilena Zheleva, Minglei Bian, Xiaofei Gao, Justin J. Odanga, Monicah M. Njogu, Zena M. Urban, Bruce E. Knudsen, Richard A. Hoefer, Roger R. Perry, Amy H. Tang. Developing a new and potent anti-K-RAS strategy by inhibiting SIAH E3 ligase, the most downstream “gatekeeper” in the oncogenic K-RAS signal pathway, to block well-established pancreatic tumor growth. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Innovations in Research and Treatment; May 18-21, 2014; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(13 Suppl):Abstract nr B70.

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), as with all cancer, is driven by dysregulation of genetic programs due to accumulation of somatic mutations, epigenetic modifications and changes in the micro-environment. Holistic views of perturbations in gene expression networks could illuminate key regulators and pathways for this highly lethal cancer. Toward this end, we performed massively-parallel mRNA-sequencing in normal (n = 10) and tumor (n = 8) derived pancreatic tissue samples as well as pancreatic cancer cell lines (n = 9), and determined differential gene expression (DE) patterns. Sub-network enrichment analyses of all expressed genes based on magnitude of DE identified HNF1A as the regulator of the most significantly and consistently dysregulated expression sub-network in our pancreatic tumor samples (median P = 7.56 x 10-7, median rank = 1, range = 1-25). To explore the effect of HNF1A expression in pancreatic tumor-derived cells we generated stable HNF1A-inducible clones in two pancreatic cancer cell lines. Induction of HNF1A overexpression caused severe growth inhibition (5.3-fold, P = 4.5x10-5 for MIA PaCa-2 clones; 7.2-fold, P = 2.2x10-5 for PANC-1 clones), and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest. This was accompanied by down-regulation of 49 out of 84 assayed cell cycle genes, while only 1 displayed increased expression. These data, combined with HNF1A’s direct regulation of pancreatic development and homeostasis genes (i.e. PDX1, PTF1A and NR5A2), suggest it may be an important tumor suppressor in pancreatic cells. Citation Format: Jason W. Hoskins, Marta Flandez, Jinping Jia, Hemang Parikh, Irene Collins, Mickey Emmanuel, Abdisamad Ibrahim, Wenming Xiao, John Powell, Nuria Malats, Gloria M. Petersen, Fransisco X. Real, Laufey T. Amundadottir. Transcriptome analysis in pancreatic cancer reveals a tumor suppressor function for HNF1A. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer: Innovations in Research and Treatment; May 18-21, 2014; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(13 Suppl):Abstract nr B112.