Citations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It remains unclear whether decompressive craniectomy (DC) is beneficial in patients who suffer symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We sought to study the effect of DC on functional outcomes in patients with sICH after AIS who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT). METHODS: Patients with AIS from anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent MT and subsequently developed sICH were identified from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry database. The primary outcome was acceptable 90-day functional neurological outcome, defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-3. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity-score matching were used to identify and quantify risk factors. RESULTS: Of 464 patients identified with sICH after AIS after MT, 97 patients (20.9%) underwent DC. Patients who underwent DC were more likely to be female ( P < .001), younger ( P < .001), have a measured medical comorbidity, have higher baseline mRS ( P = .02), and have higher-grade hemorrhages ( P = .01). At 90 days, 14% of patients had the primary outcome of mRS 0-3 and 56% had died. The primary outcome was observed in 11 patients who underwent DC (11%) and 55 (15%) of those without DC (odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.4, P = .40). DC did not affect mRS shift at 90 days ( P = .10) but was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8, P = .01). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that DC decreased the odds of primary outcome (adjusted OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02-0.9, P = .045), but did not affect mortality ( P = .94), mRS shift ( P = .50), or length of stay ( P = .90). Propensity-matched analysis similarly demonstrated that non-DC patients were more likely to achieve the primary outcome (24% vs 8%, P = .045). CONCLUSION: In patients with sICH after AIS after MT, those selected for DC had less favorable outcomes and similar rates of mortality at 90 days.

Background: Despite mounting clinical evidence for the utility of orthobiologics in nonoperative management of orthopaedic pathology, the market for orthobiologic therapies remains largely unregulated by the Food and Drug Administration, giving rise to a wide range of pricing for these therapeutics by different provider types. Purpose: To determine the availability and pricing for platelet-rich plasma (PRP), amniotic or adipose “stem cell,” and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMC) injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis among orthopaedic sports medicine and alternative providers (eg, chiropractic clinics and stand-alone “regenerative medicine” clinics) in a major metropolitan city. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Orthopaedic sports medicine providers in the Chicagoland area were identified through the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) and Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) surgeon databases. Alternative clinics offering orthobiologic injections were systematically compiled using Yelp! and Google search listings and reviews. Clinics were contacted using a standardized telephone script. Data were collected for each site on the types of injections offered, whether price was disclosed over the telephone, the price of injections offered, and the source of stem cell injections if they were provided. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the mean price between practices. F tests for equality of variances were used to compare the variability in prices between practice types. Results: A total of 25 unique orthopaedic sports medicine practices (comprising 80 AOSSM/AANA surgeons) and 40 alternative clinics offered PRP, stem cell, and/or BMC injections, as indicated over the telephone. There was no difference in likelihood of offering PRP ( P = .698) or BMC injections ( P = .340). However, alternative clinics were significantly more likely to offer stem cell injections ( P < .001). There was no difference in the willingness to disclose the price for PRP ( P = .269), stem cell injections ( P = .302), and BMC ( P = .528) or the source of what each clinic advertised as stem cell injections ( P = .630). The mean price for a single PRP injection was significantly higher ( P = .011) and significantly more variable ( F statistic = .139; P < .001) at alternative clinics. Similarly, the mean price for a single stem cell injection was significantly higher ( P < .001) and significantly more variable ( F statistic = 0.080; P = .025) at alternative clinics. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that orthobiologic knee injections are highly prevalent for in-clinic use within the Chicago metropolitan area, with PRP being the most commonly used therapeutic. When compared with orthopaedic sports medicine providers, alternative clinics were more likely to offer stem cell injections and charge a significantly greater and more variable amount per PRP and stem cell treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used as a primary treatment modality for intracranial meningiomas. We aim to describe clinical outcomes after single-fraction SRS for sporadic intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with sporadic meningiomas who underwent SRS (Gamma Knife) as primary treatment modality from April 1997 to February 2022. Primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Six hundred sixteen patients (653 tumors) underwent SRS with median follow-up of 6.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.1-10.5 years). The median tumor volume was 4.5 cm 3 (IQR 2.0-8.0 cm 3 ). The median margin dose was 15.0 Gy (IQR 14.0-16.0). In-field progression was noted in 7 tumors (1.1%) and marginal progression in 2 tumors (0.3%) for a raw failure rate of 1.4%. PFS estimates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 99.8%, 99.0%, and 93.2%, respectively. Factors associated with reduced PFS on univariable analysis included older age (hazards ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% CI, 1.05-1.22, P < .001), male sex (HR 5.44, 95% CI, 1.45-20.4, P = .010), increasing tumor volume (HR 1.06, 95% CI, 0.99-1.13, P = .028), and lower tumor margin dose (HR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.43-0.97, P = .006). Treatment-related complications were noted in 56 patients (9.1%), of which 45 (7.3%) were temporary, 5 (0.8%) were minor, and 6 (1.0%) were permanent and/or required intervention. Radiosurgical parameters associated with treatment-related complications included increased number of isocenters (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04-1.14, P < .001), higher 12-Gy volume (OR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.03-1.09, P < .001), larger tumor volume (OR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.02-1.10, P < .001), and lower maximal dose (OR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.82-0.98, P = .11). CONCLUSION: SRS is effective as a primary treatment modality for sporadic, small-volume to medium-volume intracranial meningiomas. Pre-emptive SRS should be discussed as a safe management strategy compared with observation alone for incidentally discovered meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention remains an important option in the management of vestibular schwannoma (VSs). Development of a systematic approach to choose the most appropriate route for this intervention, based on existing published evidence, is an important goal. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature published since the 2018 Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guideline on surgical intervention for patients with sporadic VSs and use this information to update that set of recommendations. METHODS: The literature in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases from January 2015 through May 20, 2022, was searched for manuscripts pertaining to surgical intervention for VSs. Those manuscripts meeting inclusion criteria were then analyzed for creation of recommendations in response to a set of updated questions. RESULTS: The resultant findings included a considerable amount of data that did not alter the recommendations form the 2018 publication on this topic. Thus, recommendations stating hearing preservation surgery through the middle fossa or retrosigmoid approach may be considered in individuals with good preoperative hearing as an alternative to simple observation remain. In addition, if microsurgical resection is necessary after stereotactic radiosurgery, it is recommended that patients be counseled that there is an increased likelihood of a subtotal resection and decreased facial nerve function. In some questions, insufficient data were present to create an answer and that is stated. CONCLUSION: This guideline demonstrates surgical intervention for VSs and represents a range of options, and the choice of the intervention depends on the specific aspects of the lesion and the individual that harbors them. Objective refinement of those choices will require thoughtful research design by investigations that wish to address those items for which we still have insufficient information. The full guideline can be seen online at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/treatment-adults-vestibular-schwannoma/7-surgical-resection-treatment-of-patients-with-ve-2

BACKGROUND: Imaging is a critical aspect of vestibular schwannoma (VS) management, influencing essentially every aspect of care including diagnosis, surveillance, treatment decision making, and follow-up after either resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. Despite this, treatment protocols are heterogeneous, and frequently based on historical practices, or low-quality evidence. OBJECTIVE: To update evidence-based guidelines for the use of imaging in the clinical management of patients with VS published by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons in 2018. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature published from 1/1/2015 to 5/20/2022 regarding imaging protocols for VS management. Salient questions were identified by a writing group of diverse individuals with topic-specific expertise. Questions were validated by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines Committee. Following systematic review, literature tables and summary statements pertinent to the study questions were generated by the writing group, which underwent subsequent evaluation and revision by the task force before formalization. RESULTS: Seven questions were formulated; adequate literature was identified to formulate updated recommendations for 6 of these. Search strategy identified 1143 unique records, of which 109 underwent full-text review, and 57 were included in this study. Most studies provided level III evidence, with rare level II studies noted, yielding level III recommendations. CONCLUSION: The current evidence base for imaging protocols in VS clinical management is broad, diverse, low certainty, and low quality. This in part reflects a heterogeneous disease, although variability in treatment philosophies may also influence local decision making. Key areas for future study include the clinical utility of advanced imaging techniques and head-to-head comparisons of imaging protocols for patients in common initial VS management pathways (eg, observation, resection, or stereotactic radiosurgery). The full guideline can be seen online at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/treatment-adults-vestibular-schwannoma/5-role-of-imaging-in-management-of-patients-with-v

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major global health problem with no disease-modifying therapies. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a critical cytokine associated with the pathophysiology of OA and can be inhibited by IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra). Here, we tested the delivery of a gene therapeutic encoding the human IL-1Ra to the knee in a phase 1, open-label clinical trial that enrolled nine patients with radiographic knee OA. The IL-1Ra gene was delivered by a self-complementary (sc)–recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) serotype 2.5 (sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra) by intra-articular injection into an index knee at one of three doses: low [1 × 10 11 viral genomes (vg)], mid (1 × 10 12 vg), or high (1 × 10 13 vg). The primary outcome was safety. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) related to sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra. Two AEs occurred that were possibly related to the vector. Both were effusions with increased pain and resolved with conservative treatment. sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra did not cause changes in vital signs, physical findings, or clinical laboratory measures. Less than 1% of the injected dose of sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra vg was detected in circulation after 1 day and was cleared within a week. Titers of neutralizing antibodies to AAV2.5 rose in serum and synovial fluid. In all cases, IL-1Ra concentration increased in the synovial fluid, and IL-1Ra concentrations remained elevated after 1 year. Baseline pain and function scores improved during the study. Therefore, we found that intra-articular gene therapy with sc-rAAV2.5IL-1Ra was safe. The sustained increase in local IL-1Ra in human knee joints supports the further clinical examination of this therapy to provide therapeutic benefit in OA.

BACKGROUND: Small, randomized trials of patients with cervical artery dissection showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with cervical artery dissection treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included patients with cervical artery dissection without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets), and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an as-treated crossover approach and only included outcomes occurring with the above treatments. RESULTS: The study included 3636 patients (402 [11.1%] received exclusively anticoagulation and 2453 [67.5%] received exclusively antiplatelets). By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45–1.12]; P =0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.28–2.24]; P =0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.35–5.45]; P =0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR, 5.56 [95% CI, 1.53–20.13]; P =0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18–0.88]; P interaction =0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not rule out the benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

LBA1 Background: Standard adjuvant chemotherapy of stage III colon cancer consists of a fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin. In patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR), the benefit of an immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with adjuvant chemotherapy is unknown. The phase III ATOMIC trial (NCT02912559) was conducted to determine whether atezolizumab (atezo), an anti-PD-L1 antibody, can improve pt outcomes when added to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) in pts with stage III dMMR tumors. Methods: We conducted an NCI-sponsored, multicenter and randomized phase III trial in pts with surgically resected stage III dMMR colon adenocarcinoma (any T, N 1,2 M 0 ). Pts, age > 12 years (yr), were accrued at NCTN sites and the German AIO. Tumor dMMR was determined by local immunohistochemistry and centrally verified. Pts were randomized 1:1 to mFOLFOX6 plus atezo (840 mg IV q2 weeks) for 12 cycles (6 months)[mo] followed by atezo monotherapy for 13 cycles (12 mo total) versus mFOLFOX6 alone for 12 cycles. Randomization stratification factors were N-stage (N 1 /N 1c vs N 2 ), T-stage (T 1 -T 3 vs T 4 ) and site (proximal vs distal). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival and adverse event (AE) profile (CTCAE, PRO-CTCAE). Primary efficacy analysis was done in the intent-to-treat population; DFS was compared by arm (stratified log-rank test). Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a stratified Cox model; 3-yr DFS was determined by Kaplan-Meier method. Among 700 pts., 165 DFS events with two interim analyses (50% , 75% of events) yielded 90% power to detect HR 0.6 (3-yr DFS 75% vs. 84.2%) assuming exponential survival and 1-sided alpha (0.025). Results: From 9/2017 to 1/2023, 712 pts were randomized (1 pediatric) to either atezo plus mFOLFOX6 (n= 355; atezo arm) or mFOLFOX6 (n= 357). Median pt age was 64 yr. 55.1% were female. Among tumors, 83.8% were proximal, 46.1% were clinical low risk (T 1-3 N 1 ) and 53.9% high risk (T 4 and/or N 2 ). At the second interim analysis, median pt follow-up was 37.2 mo (interquartile range, 24.2 to 55.5) and 124 DFS events were observed. Three-year DFS was 86.4 % (95% CI, 81.8 to 89.9) in the atezo arm and 76.6 % (95% CI, 71.3 to 81.0) in the mFOLFOX6 arm (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.72). Stratified log-rank p-value was <0.0001, crossing the pre-specified efficacy boundary of 0.009. Efficacy for the atezo arm was consistent across subgroups, including pts >70 yr and low- and high-risk groups. Treatment-related > grade 3 AEs occurred in 71.7 % of pts in the atezo arm vs 62.1 % in the mFOLFOX6 arm. Conclusion: The addition of atezolizumab to mFOLFOX6 significantly improved DFS and should be considered the new adjuvant standard of care for patients with dMMR stage III colon cancer. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; Genentech, a member of the Roche group; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical trial information: NCT02912559 .