Mahajan, Anita

Abstract Embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) are rare, highly aggressive tumors of infancy with extremely poor outcomes and no established standard of care therapy. ETMRs were recognized as a distinct molecular entity in 2016, however, the absence of prospective, biology-driven clinical trials has limited translation of these insights into standardized, risk-adapted treatment approaches for this vulnerable population. To address this gap, the Collaborative Network for Neuro-oncology Clinical Trials (CONNECT) developed CURE(Clinical trial advancing Understanding of Rare Embryonal Brain Tumors), an international, multi-institutional, molecularly guided umbrella trial. All patients enroll through the centralized CURE-Screening protocol, which provides rapid comprehensive molecular profiling with real-time central pathology, molecular, and radiographic review to confirm diagnosis, define molecular subtype, and determine eligibility and assignment to disease-specific treatment arms. CURE-ETMR represents the first disease-specific arm to open within this platform. Following centralized screening, children with newly diagnosed ETMR are assigned to clinically defined risk strata using integrated molecular, radiographic, and clinical criteria. Patients will be treated using a risk-adapted multimodal approach in which we prioritize maximal safe surgical resection with consideration of second-look surgery based on centralized imaging review; administer induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell rescue or dose-intensified chemotherapy, selectively incorporate radiation sparing approach or early focal radiotherapy for patients with unresectable residual disease or brainstem involvement; deliver intrathecal chemotherapy for leptomeningeal prophylaxis; and include biologically informed maintenance therapy. In parallel, protocol-required longitudinal collection of tumor tissue, cerebrospinal fluid, blood, and advanced neuroimaging supports integrated molecular, liquid biopsy, and imaging biomarker analyses to identify predictors of treatment response, resistance, and relapse. Primary objectives include evaluation of feasibility, safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with molecularly annotated historical cohorts. This centralized screening to assignment framework establishes a scalable model for prospective, biology-driven trials in rare embryonal brain tumors.

Abstract Background Children’s Oncology Group ACNS0333 treated atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) with surgery, chemotherapy (induction and consolidation) and radiation therapy (RT). M0 had focal RT and M+ had physician-selected focal RT or craniospinal (CSI). Methods Forty patients (29 M0, 11 M+) received RT. Pre-RT chemotherapy response was complete, partial, or stable disease. RT timing (age/stage-based) was pre-consolidation (RT-first) or post-consolidation (consolidation-first). Event-free survival (RT-EFS), overall survival (RT-OS), and cumulative incidence of local relapse (CILR) or distant relapse (RT-CIDR) were calculated. Analyses included log-rank tests and relative hazard rates with 95% confidence intervals to estimate proportional hazards regression. Results Four-year RT-EFS was 56.8% and 4-year RT-OS was 58.8% focal RT: 34 patients, CSI: 6 patients). A trend for superior RT-EFS for M+ compared to M0 (P = .0625, RHR 0.26; 95% CI 0.06-1.18) was shown. RT-EFS was improved for consolidation-first compared to RT-first timing (P = .037, RHR 0.43; 95% CI 0.13-1.37). Pre-RT chemotherapy response was associated with improved RT-EFS (P = .031) and RT-OS (P = .0069). Four-year RT-CILR was 7.84%; no differences in RT-CILR were shown for higher primary RT dose (≥5400 cGy, P = .38) or gross total resection (P = .80). 4-year RT-CIDR was 27.8% for M0 and 9.1% for M+ patients (P = .22). M+ had CSI (n = 6) or focal RT (n = 5). Fatal necrosis potentially-attributable to RT occurred in 3 RT-first patients (occuring either 1.6, 4.6, or 16.2 months post-treatment). Conclusions RT with intensive systemic therapy showed promising survival outcomes and effective primary disease control in ATRT. Sequencing RT prior to myeloblative chemotherapy, rather than post-consolidation, may be associated with increased risk of fatal radionecrosis.

ABSTRACT Background Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers dosimetric advantages in pediatric radiotherapy by reducing radiation exposure to healthy tissues. However, broad implementation raises important ethical, logistical, and equity considerations, especially in settings with limited access to advanced technologies. Procedure This position paper by the Paediatric Radiation Oncology Society (PROS) reviews the clinical rationale for selecting radiotherapy modalities in children, with a specific focus on ethical utilization of PBT. The document synthesizes evidence on the benefits and limitations of modern photon and proton therapies, explores disparities in access, outlines the role of local pediatric radiation oncologists, and addresses the impact of industry‐driven messaging on family decision‐making. Results While PBT offers clinical benefit in selecting pediatric cancers, high‐quality photon‐based treatments such as IMRT and VMAT remain effective and widely accessible alternatives. The referral and evaluation process for PBT is complex and may introduce treatment delays. Travel and financial burdens can exacerbate disparities. PROS underscores the critical role of local pediatric radiation oncologists in counseling families, and calls for balanced, evidence‐based communication from providers and industry stakeholders. Conclusions PROS advocates for an ethical, equitable, and evidence‐informed approach to radiotherapy modality selection in children, reflecting holistic considerations beyond dosimetry. Proton therapy should be pursued when clinically indicated and accessible without compromising timely care. Investment in a comprehensive radiation therapy infrastructure, including professional education, collaborative research, and responsible public messaging, is essential to optimize pediatric cancer outcomes globally.

Abstract Brain metastases significantly impact neurocognitive function and overall survival. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a cornerstone of treatment for patients with limited metastases and expected survival beyond three months. Despite current guidelines, up to 20% of patients with brain metastases undergoing SRS have been reported to die within 90 days. This study retrospectively evaluates prognostic factors associated with 90-day survival after SRS, aiming to improve patient selection. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1,546 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases at our institution between 2015 and 2023. One hundred seventy patients who survived fewer than 90 days post-SRS were identified and case-matched to 170 patients who survived over 90 days. Measured variables included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment history, functional status, and control of the primary cancer. We modeled post-SRS 90-day survival using binomial and multivariate logistic regression. Multivariate analysis highlighted Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 70 (OR: 17.4, p < 0.001), prior whole brain radiation (OR: 6, p = 0.004), and focal neurological deficits (OR: 3.02, p = 0.003) as significant predictors of early deaths, while CNS progression before SRS (OR: 0.22, p < 0.001) and control of systemic cancer (OR: 0.556, p = 0.002) were associated with a less than 90-day survival. The predictive model demonstrated acceptable performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 71%. Key predictors of 90-day survival following SRS for brain metastases include functional status (KPS), control of systemic cancer, CNS progression status, and focal neurologic deficits. These findings are complementary factors that can assist in making decisions and SRS patient selection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly used as a primary treatment modality for intracranial meningiomas. We aim to describe clinical outcomes after single-fraction SRS for sporadic intracranial meningiomas. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with sporadic meningiomas who underwent SRS (Gamma Knife) as primary treatment modality from April 1997 to February 2022. Primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: Six hundred sixteen patients (653 tumors) underwent SRS with median follow-up of 6.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.1-10.5 years). The median tumor volume was 4.5 cm 3 (IQR 2.0-8.0 cm 3 ). The median margin dose was 15.0 Gy (IQR 14.0-16.0). In-field progression was noted in 7 tumors (1.1%) and marginal progression in 2 tumors (0.3%) for a raw failure rate of 1.4%. PFS estimates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 99.8%, 99.0%, and 93.2%, respectively. Factors associated with reduced PFS on univariable analysis included older age (hazards ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% CI, 1.05-1.22, P < .001), male sex (HR 5.44, 95% CI, 1.45-20.4, P = .010), increasing tumor volume (HR 1.06, 95% CI, 0.99-1.13, P = .028), and lower tumor margin dose (HR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.43-0.97, P = .006). Treatment-related complications were noted in 56 patients (9.1%), of which 45 (7.3%) were temporary, 5 (0.8%) were minor, and 6 (1.0%) were permanent and/or required intervention. Radiosurgical parameters associated with treatment-related complications included increased number of isocenters (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04-1.14, P < .001), higher 12-Gy volume (OR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.03-1.09, P < .001), larger tumor volume (OR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.02-1.10, P < .001), and lower maximal dose (OR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.82-0.98, P = .11). CONCLUSION: SRS is effective as a primary treatment modality for sporadic, small-volume to medium-volume intracranial meningiomas. Pre-emptive SRS should be discussed as a safe management strategy compared with observation alone for incidentally discovered meningiomas.

TPS2092 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. GBM is universally recurrent and associated with dismal outcomes. Re-irradiation (reRT) is ideal for evaluating combination therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM) due to its multifactorial mechanism of action, including downstream immunomodulatory activity. RT (especially multi-fraction) increases immunogenicity in preclinical models by promoting immune activation, immune migration, and antigen uptake. Additionally, a recent study demonstrated enhanced PD-L1 expression in the glioma tumor microenvironment (TME) following RT, and combining stereotactic RT with a PD-1 inhibitor improved survival in murine models. Retifanlimab is a humanized monoclonal anti-PD1 IgG4 antibody that received FDA approval for adults with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, is a treatment for radiation necrosis/cerebral edema with less immune suppression than corticosteroids. In a previous Phase 2 study, hypofractionated RT (HFRT), retifanlimab, and bevacizumab was associated with a 9-month overall survival (OS) rate of 71.4%. To demonstrate the efficacy of this regimen compared to HFRT and bevacizumab, we have designed a new randomized controlled Phase 2 trial. We hypothesize that combination reRT with retifanlimab will produce a more robust anti-tumor immune response and improve OS compared to reRT without retifanlimab. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled Phase 2 study of retifanlimab, bevacizumab, and HFRT for adult patients with rGBM. Patients are randomized 1:1 to the experimental (bevacizumab + retifanlimab + HFRT) or control cohort (bevacizumab + HFRT). Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60, ≥ 4 months since administration of any prior bevacizumab, and dexamethasone dose ≤ 4 mg at the time of randomization. The primary endpoint is 9-month OS. Secondary endpoints include OS, progression-free survival, objective response rate, neurologic assessment by NANO criteria, and adverse events profile. Protocol treatment will continue up to two years, or until progression or intolerable toxicity. Survival follow up will continue every two months, up to four years. Seven of the planned 94 patients have been enrolled as of submission on 1/28/25. Clinical trial #: NCT06160206. Funding provided by Incyte. Clinical trial information: NCT06160206 .

Abstract To propose a novel entity of possible intraosseous pseudoprogression in clival chordoma following proton radiation therapy (PRT). A total of 38 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection followed by PRT for clival chordoma between January 2015 and December 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggesting recurrence or progression was evaluated for validity. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and tumor-to-brainstem signal intensity ratio on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (Rce) were assessed. Pseudoprogression was defined as (1) MRI signs of recurrence or progression with no pathological confirmation despite obtaining a specimen, or (2) MRI signs of recurrence or regression with spontaneous resolution/regression. Of the 11 patients with MRI findings suggestive of recurrence or progression, 3 were diagnosed with recurrence, 5 with progression, and 3 with pseudoprogression. Patients with pseudoprogression were significantly younger than those with progression (p = 0.04), and all were female. The median time to recurrence, progression, and pseudoprogression was 31, 29, and 21 months, respectively. The three pseudoprogression cases were managed with gross-total resection followed by stereotactic radiosurgery, extensive biopsy, and observation, respectively. Although statistical significance was not reached, ADC (p = 0.33) and Rce (p = 0.13) tended to be higher in pseudoprogression cases. After PRT for clival chordoma, intraosseous pseudoprogression should be considered in the differential diagnosis, particularly in relatively young female patients, although the role of ADC and Rce on MRI remains inconclusive. Multidisciplinary teams managing chordomas should take this into account when determining the aggressiveness of treatment in such cases.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pineocytoma is a rare pineal parenchymal WHO grade 1 tumor, typically well-managed with surgical resection alone. With gross total resection (GTR), 91% 1-year and 84% 5-year survival rates have been reported. Recurrent pineocytoma is rare and optimal management in that setting is unknown, in part owing to the rarity of the condition. METHODS We report an atypical course of pineocytoma in a 58-year-old male involving metastatic disease. RESULTS A pineal mass was identified upon MRI of the brain obtained for vision changes. Patient underwent GTR, pathology was consistent with pineocytoma, WHO grade 1. Ki-67 labeling index was low at 1-2%. Despite low-grade pathology, two years later, surveillance imaging demonstrated recurrence in the pineal region and a second lesion in the right thalamus. The patient underwent gamma knife surgery (GKRS) to both lesions. Three years later, he developed three new lesions in the right cerebellum and again underwent GKRS. Subsequent surveillance imaging identified new lesions in the right cerebellum and along ventricular walls, treated with further GKRS. Nine years after initial diagnosis, focal nodular leptomeningeal metastases were discovered, along with progression at the primary tumor site. Patient was treated with GKRS to the nodular deposits followed by pembrolizumab. Further disease progression as noted despite immunotherapy. Patient was treated with 6 cycles of temozolomide chemotherapy and at further progression 3 cycles of lomustine. Upon additional progression, further radiation therapy was administered with bevacizumab to reduce risk of radiation necrosis. Patient remains on surveillance 13 years after initial diagnosis with visual changes and mild headache representing only clinical issues. CONCLUSIONS Although exceedingly rare, pineocytoma is capable of metastasizing to brain parenchyma and the leptomeninges, as demonstrated in our patient. However, our case demonstrates prolonged survival is possible even in the setting of relentlessly progressive metastatic disease with utilization of multimodality treatment.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Lymphopenia attributed to postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can accelerate tumor recurrence and contribute to poor prognosis in GBM. We hypothesize that short course (1-2 weeks) CRT can mitigate lymphopenia compared to standard course and may provide immune benefits for future combination therapy. METHODS GBM patients were randomized on a multi-site phase II study comparing short course (35Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/10Fx depending on target volume) (Arm A) versus standard dose fractionation (60Gy/30Fx or 40Gy/15Fx, Arm B). All patients received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). This unplanned interim analysis evaluates changes of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), CD4 and CD8 prospectively at 3-timepoints: baseline (prior to CRT), end of CRT, and 1-month post-CRT. RESULTS To date, 72 patients enrolled (34 Arm A, 38 Arm B). Median age 66 (35-86), ECOG 0-2. Patients characteristics as followed in Arm A vs. Arm B, respectively: female 47% vs. 42%, MGMT promotor methylated 31% vs. 34%, steroid use 46% vs. 45%, ALC 1310 cells/mm3 (330 –9730) vs. 1480 (750 –7750), CD4 531 cells/mm3 (86 –1368) vs. 662 (318 –1671), and CD8 151 cells/mm3 (56 –940) vs. 272 (68 –875). Lymphocytes data were collected in 49 patients (21 Arm A, 28 Arm B). There were signficantly fewer reductions of ALC, CD4 and CD8 in Arm A. Median ALC changes were 95% and 99% of baseline (Arm A) vs 52% and 61% of baseline (Arm B) at the end of CRT and 1-month post-CRT, respectively (p&lt;0.01). Median CD4 changes 93% and 96% of baseline (Arm A) vs 51% and 49% (Arm B), and median CD8 changes 97% and 98% of baseline (Arm A) vs 57% and 71% (Arm B) at the end of CRT and 1-month post-CRT, respectively (p&lt;0.05). CONCLUSIONS This interim analysis suggests that short course RT could reduce treatment-related lymphopenia and immune suppression compared to standard RT, thus could be potentially beneficial to combine with immunotherapy.