Citations

Case: A 43-year-old man with a history of well-controlled HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infection presented with sacroiliac joint destruction from a Mycobacterium gordonae infection. A sacroiliac joint arthrodesis was performed using a minimally invasive technique utilizing both biologic fusion (allograft bone with rhBMP-2 [recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2]) and fixation with titanium ingrowth rods. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of infectious sacroiliitis from a nontubercular mycobacterium (M. gordonae) treated with a combination of joint debridement, biologic fusion with bone graft, and nonbiologic functional fusion using titanium ingrowth rods, all performed in a minimally invasive fashion. This strategy effectively alleviated pain and preserved function at 2 years of follow-up.

Background.Sarcoma is a rare malignancy, and more recent management algorithms emphasize a multidisciplinary approach and limb salvage, which has resulted in an increase in overall survival and limb preservation. However, limb salvage has resulted in a higher rate of wound complications.Objective.To compare the complications between immediate and delayed (>three weeks) reconstruction in the multidisciplinary limb salvage sarcoma patient population.Methods.A ten-year retrospective review of patients who underwent sarcoma resection was performed. The outcome of interest was wound complication in the postoperative period based on timing of reconstruction. We defined infection as any infection requiring intravenous antibiotics, partial flap failure as any flap requiring a debridement or revision, hematoma/seroma as any hematoma/seroma requiring drainage, and wound dehiscence as a wound that was not completely intact by three weeks postoperatively.Results.70 (17 delayed, 53 immediate) patients who underwent sarcoma resection and reconstruction met the inclusion criteria. Delayed reconstruction significantly increased the incidence of postoperative wound infection and wound dehiscence. There was no difference in partial or total flap loss, hematoma, or seroma between the two groups.Discussion and Conclusion.Immediate reconstruction results in decreased wound complications may reduce the morbidity associated with multidisciplinary treatment in the limb salvage sarcoma patient.

BACKGROUNDWe compared three instruments for double red blood cell (DRBC) collection to efficiently optimize our RBC inventory.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSInstruments compared were the TerumoBCT Trima Accel (Trima), the Fenwal Alyx (Alyx), and the Haemonetics MCS+ 8150 (MCS+). Forty consecutive collections (80 products) per instrument were evaluated for hemoglobin (Hb) content, leukoreduction, collection time, instrument efficiency, donor acceptance, and reactions. The total number of whole blood donors who could be eligible for DRBC collection was analyzed. All collections were as per the manufacturer recommendations with target volume of 360 or 400mL. Leukoreduction was integral to the collection procedure for the Alyx and Trima, while it was a separate process for the MCS+.RESULTSThe total numbers of whole blood donors who could be eligible for DRBC collection were 10,116 for the MCS+, 9378 for the Alyx, and 8573 for the Trima. All units collected had more than 42.5 g of Hb. Mean Hb levels were as follows: Trima, 59.2 g; Alyx, 56.8 g; and MCS+, 51.5 g. Donor times for the Trima, Alyx, and MCS+ were 52, 45, and 52 minutes, respectively. Technician times for the Trima, Alyx, and MCS+ (without filtration) were 87, 73, and 64 minutes. All collected products had fewer than 5 × 106 white blood cells.CONCLUSIONSAll three instruments would be capable of collecting an acceptable leukoreduced DRBC product. The Alyx was most portable, with the shortest donor time and total technician time (considering filtration time) and highest collection efficiency and would collect from more donors than the Trima. We thus chose the Alyx as it best fits the specific needs of our center.

Objectives To evaluate the prognostic significance of germline variation in candidate genes in patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods Germline DNA was extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with CRPC enrolled in a clinically annotated registry. Fourteen candidate genes implicated in either initiation or progression of prostate cancer were tagged using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from HapMap with a minor allele frequency of >5%. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), defined as time from development of CRPC to death. Principal component analysis was used for gene levels tests of significance. For SNP‐level results the per allele hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) under the additive allele model were estimated using Cox regression, adjusted for age at CRPC and Gleason score (GS). Results A total of 240 patients with CRPC were genotyped (14 genes; 84 SNPs). The median (range) age of the cohort was 69 (43–93) years. The GS distribution was 55% with GS ≥8, 32% with GS = 7 and 13% with GS <7 or unknown. The median (interquartile range) time from castration resistance to death for the cohort was 2.67 (1.6–4.07) years (144 deaths). At the gene level, a single gene, JAK2 was associated with OS ( P < 0.01), and 11 of 18 JAK2 SNPs were individually associated with OS after adjustment for age and GS. A multivariate model consisting of age, GS, rs2149556 (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.38–1.18) and rs4372063 (HR 2.17; 95% CI 1.25–3.76) was constructed to predict survival in patients with CRPC (concordance of 0.69, P < 3.2 × 10 −9 ). Conclusions Germline variation in the JAK2 gene was associated with survival in patients with CRPC and warrants further validation as a potential prognostic biomarker.

AbstractMany clinical trials have been conducted on the treatment of pityriasis rosea (PR). Our aim was to establish a position statement for the management of adults withPRbased on the best available evidence. We searchedPubMedfor all reports on randomized controlled trials for the treatment ofPRpublished in the past 30 years. We retrieved 14 articles reporting randomized controlled trials, and found five which met our quality requirements for in‐depth analyses. Erythromycin was found in a well‐conducted triple‐blind study to cast significant impacts on clinical outcomes. However, adverse gastrointestinal effects were fairly common. Another well‐conducted study on azithromycin reported no significant benefit. It was reported in three well‐conducted studies on oral acyclovir in low dose (400 mg three times daily for 7 days or 400 mg five times daily for 7 days) and high dose (800 mg five times daily for 7 days), that acyclovir is effective in attaining rash regression and lessening the pruritus. When compared against each other, the high‐dose regimen demonstrated no benefit over the low‐dose regimens. Our statement comprises the follows: (i) The diagnosis ofPRshould be ascertained; (ii) The patients should be assessed for rash severity and impacts on quality of life; (iii)PRis a self‐limiting disease, and most patients do not necessitate any treatment; (iv) For patients necessitating active treatment, oral acyclovir as 400 mg three times daily for 7 days can be considered; (v) Attention should be given to adverse effects and contraindications of acyclovir; (vi) WhenPRoccurs in early pregnancy, oral antiviral therapy could be considered after consulting experienced clinicians; (vii) Inadequate information exists in the use of acyclovir to treatmentPRin children and breastfeeding women; and (viii) TreatingPRis an off‐label use of acyclovir, and this has to be discussed with experienced colleagues and the patients.