Citations

Showing 10 of 108073 citations.

Prevalence and Surgical Implications of Dural Enhancement at the Porus Acusticus in Vestibular Schwannomas
Patel, Neil , Abel, Kathryn M. Van , Link, Michael J. , Driscoll, Colin L. W., Neff, Brian A., Lane, John I. , Carlson, Matthew L. , Van Abel, Kathryn M, Van Gompel, Jamie J, Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Van Abel, Kathryn M

Mayo Clinic

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | October 4, 2016 | Volume: 155 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1021-1027

10.1177/0194599816670144 | PMID 27703093 Get It

ObjectiveDemonstrate the association of radiographic dural enhancement with increased tumor adherence at the porus acusticus, which may influence completeness of resection and facial nerve outcome.Study DesignCase series with chart review.SettingAcademic referral center.Subjects and MethodsA total of 205 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed vestibular schwannoma (VS) were evaluated. Patients with tumors exhibiting dural enhancement on postgadolinium T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging were identified and compared with matched controls. Completeness of resection, intraoperative details, and facial nerve outcomes were analyzed.ResultsExcluding strictly intracanalicular tumors (n = 32, 16%) and those with NF2 (n = 10, 4.9%), the presence of dural enhancement was radiographically confirmed in 16 (9.8%) cases. Paired analysis did not reveal significant baseline differences between cases and controls. Subtotal resection was performed in 5 (31%) of the 16 patients with tumors exhibiting dural enhancement, in contrast to 1 (3%) of the matched controls (P =. 01). Four (25%) demonstrated increased tumor adherence at the porus acusticus intraoperatively, compared with 1 control (3%, P =. 04). Long‐term facial nerve function was similar between cases and controls (81% vs 84% House‐Brackmann I‐II function, P = 1.00).ConclusionDural enhancement is present in approximately 10% of extracanalicular VS. Dural enhancement at the porus acusticus may represent hypervascularity, dural reaction, or infiltration, and portends increased tumor adherence and greater likelihood of subtotal resection to preserve facial nerve function. To our knowledge, this is the first series that reports the prevalence of this phenomenon in VS and the potential surgical implications. Recognition preoperatively may be valuable toward patient counseling.
Arterial wall perfusion measured with photon counting spectral x-ray CT
Jorgensen, Steven M., Korinek, Mark J., Vercnocke, Andrew J. , Anderson, Jill , Halaweish, Ahmed F., Ritman, Erik L., Anderson, Jill L, Korinek, Mark, Leng, Shuai , McCollough, Cynthia H.

Mayo Clinic

SPIE Proceedings | October 4, 2016 | Volume: 9967 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 99670B

10.1117/12.2238817 | PMID 27807391 Get It

Prosthesis Design and Stress Profile after Hip Resurfacing: A Finite Element Analysis
Heijink, Andras, Zobitz, M. E., Nuyts, Rudy M. M. A., Morrey, BF, An, K-N, Morrey, BF, An, K-N.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery | October 4, 2016 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 326-332

10.1177/230949900801600312 | PMID 19126900 Get It

Purpose. To evaluate the effect of prosthesis design on stress profile in the proximal femur after hip resurfacing. Methods. The von Mises stress profile of the native femur was simulated and compared with that of resurfaced femurs using various prosthetic materials (titanium, cobalt-chrome, ceramic), stem lengths (normal, half, short, and no stem), and femoral head coverage (shell size) [260°, 220°, 180°, and 140°]. Results. Hip resurfacing altered the stress profile of the cancellous (but not cortical) bone of the femoral neck. Maximal cortical stresses were observed at the posterior half of the medial femoral neck. The stress profile of the native femur was most similar to that of the resurfaced femur made of titanium, with a short or no stem and 260 degrees of femoral head coverage (shell size). Conclusion. Optimising prosthesis design by minimising biomechanical alterations seems a valid approach to achieving favourable long-term outcomes. Cadaveric and in vivo studies are needed to confirm the clinical relevance and feasibility.
Review Article: The Rationale for Posterior Cruciate Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty
Scuderi, Giles R. , Pagnano, Mark W.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery | October 4, 2016 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 81-88

10.1177/230949900100900217 | PMID 12118138 Get It

Epigenetic Control of the Tumor Microenvironment
Marks, David L. , Olson, Rachel LO, Fernández-Zapico, Martín E. , Olson, Rachel , Olson, Rachel LO

Mayo Clinic

Epigenomics | October 4, 2016 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1671-1687

10.2217/epi-2016-0110 | PMID 27700179 Get It

Increased Use Of Care With Retail Clinics
Furst, Joseph W. , Klavetter, Eric, Myers, Jane E., Myers, Jane

Mayo Clinic

Health Affairs | October 4, 2016 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1935-1935

10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0936 | PMID 27702972 Get It

State Regulation Of Freestanding Emergency Departments Varies Widely, Affecting Location, Growth, And Services Provided
Gutierrez, Catherine , Lindor, Rachel A. , Baker, Olesya , Cutler, David , Schuur, Jeremiah D. , Lindor, Rachel A

Mayo Clinic

Health Affairs | October 4, 2016 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1857-1866

10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0412 | PMID 27702960 Get It

Rate of rise in diastolic blood pressure influences vascular sympathetic response to mental stress
Sayed, Khadigeh El, Macefield, Vaughan G. , Joyner, Michael J. , Taylor, Chloe E. , Hissen, Sarah L. , Joyner, Michael J , Macefield, Vaughan G

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Physiology | October 4, 2016 | Volume: 594 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 7465-7482

10.1113/jp272963 | PMID 27690366 Get It

Key pointsResearch indicates that individuals may experience a rise (positive responders) or fall (negative responders) in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during mental stress.In this study, we examined the early blood pressure responses (including the peak, time of peak and rate of rise in blood pressure) to mental stress in positive and negative responders.Negative MSNA responders to mental stress exhibit a more rapid rise in diastolic pressure at the onset of the stressor, suggesting a baroreflex‐mediated suppression of MSNA. In positive responders there is a more sluggish rise in blood pressure during mental stress, which appears to be MSNA‐driven.This study suggests that whether MSNA has a role in the pressor response is dependent upon the reactivity of blood pressure early in the task.AbstractResearch indicates that individuals may experience a rise (positive responders) or fall (negative responders) in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during mental stress. The aim was to examine the early blood pressure response to stress in positive and negative responders and thus its influence on the direction of change in MSNA. Blood pressure and MSNA were recorded continuously in 21 healthy young males during 2 min mental stressors (mental arithmetic, Stroop test) and physical stressors (cold pressor, handgrip exercise, post‐exercise ischaemia). Participants were classified as negative or positive responders according to the direction of the mean change in MSNA during the stressor tasks. The peak changes, time of peak and rate of changes in blood pressure were compared between groups. During mental arithmetic negative responders experienced a significantly greater rate of rise in diastolic blood pressure in the first minute of the task (1.3 ± 0.5 mmHg s−1) compared with positive responders (0.4 ± 0.1 mmHg s−1;P = 0.03). Similar results were found for the Stroop test. Physical tasks elicited robust parallel increases in blood pressure and MSNA across participants. It is concluded that negative MSNA responders to mental stress exhibit a more rapid rise in diastolic pressure at the onset of the stressor, suggesting a baroreflex‐mediated suppression of MSNA. In positive responders there is a more sluggish rise in blood pressure during mental stress, which appears to be MSNA‐driven. This study suggests that whether MSNA has a role in the pressor response is dependent upon the reactivity of blood pressure early in the task.
What Factors Influence the Outcome of Surgically Treated Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Hand and Wrist?
Wilke, Benjamin K. , Rose, Peter S. , Walczak, Brian E, Houdek, Matthew T. , Walczak, Brian E. , Kakar, Sanjeev , Shin, Alexander Y. , Wilke, B K

Mayo Clinic

HAND | October 3, 2016 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 493-500

10.1177/1558944716672197 | PMID 28832212 Get It

Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the hand are exceedingly rare. The aim of this study was to review our institution’s experience with STS of the hand to identify factors affecting outcomes and survivorship. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 46 hand STS treated with definitive surgery at our institution between 1992 and 2013. Pertinent demographics as well as information regarding the surgical procedure, and disease status at latest follow-up were reviewed. Mean age at diagnosis was 38 years with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Results: The most common tumor subtypes were epithelioid (n = 10) and synovial sarcoma (n = 8). Sixty-one percent were superficial in location. Thirty-three patients had had a nononcologic resection prior to definitive surgical treatment at our institution. Ultimately, negative margins were obtained in all cases. Local recurrence was observed in 5 patients and distant metastases in 14 patients. Tumor sizes ≥2 cm, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) grade, and depth of the tumor were found to adversely affect the outcome in terms of disease-free and overall survival. Reexcision of an inadvertently excised tumor at an outside institution did not adversely affect the outcome. The 10-year overall and disease-free survival was 72% and 63%. Conclusions: Local recurrence after a wide excision was observed infrequently; however, distant disease was relatively common. Tumors with a size ≥2 cm were associated with a worse disease-free and overall survival, highlighting the aggressive nature of these tumors.
The OncoArray Consortium: A Network for Understanding the Genetic Architecture of Common Cancers
Wang, Zhaoming , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Gayther, Simon A. , Casey, Graham , Sellers, Thomas A. , Gruber, Stephen B., Dunning, Alison M. , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Fachal, Laura , Doheny, Kimberly F. , Li, Yafang , Xiao, Xiangjun , Romm, Jane, Pugh, Elizabeth, Coetzee, Gerhard A. , Hazelett, Dennis J. , Bojesen, Stig E. , Caga-Anan, Charlisse , Haiman, Christopher A. , Kamal, Ahsan , Luccarini, Craig , Tessier, Daniel C., Vincent, Daniel , Bacot, François, Berg, David Van Den , Nelson, Stefanie A. , Demetriades, Stephen, Goldgar, David E., Forman, Judith L., Conti, David V. , Bickeböller, Heike , Risch, Angela , Waldenberger, Mélanie , Brüske‐Hohlfeld, Irene, Hicks, Belynda , McGuffog, Lesley, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline , Soucy, Penny, Manz, Judith, Cunningham, Julie M. , Butterbach, Katja, Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Kraft, Peter , Lindström, Sara , Adams, Marcia, McKay, James , Phelan, Catherine M., Benlloch, Sara, Kelemen, Linda E., Brennan, Paul , Riggan, Marjorie J. , O’Mara, Tracy A. , Shen, Hongbing , Shi, Yongyong , Thompson, Deborah J. , Goodman, Marc T. , Nielsen, Sune F. , LaBoissière, Sylvie, Schmit, Stephanie L. , Shelford, Tameka, Edlund, Christopher K., Taylor, Jack A. , Field, John K. , Park, Sue K. , Offit, Kenneth , Thomassen, Mads , Schmutzler, Rita K., Ottini, Laura , Hung, Rayjean J., Olama, Ali Amin Al , Peters, Ulrike , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Seldin, Michael F., Gillanders, Elizabeth M. , Seminara, Daniela, Antoniou, Antonis C. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Simard, Jacques , Easton, Douglas F. , Durocher, Francine , Hung, Rayjean J. , Amos, Christopher I. , Dennis, Joe , Byun, Jinyoung , Hunter, David J. , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Couch, Fergus J. , Giles, Graham G. , Ling, Hua , Lee, Andrew , FitzGerald, Liesel M. , Berchuck, Andrew , Marchini, Jonathan , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Hazelett, Dennis J , Eeles, Rosalind A , Van Den Berg, David J , Hung, Rayjean J , Wang, Zhaoming , O'Mara, Tracy A , Field, John K , Dunning, Alison M , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Taylor, Jack A , Kraft, Peter , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Ottini, Laura , Conti, David V , Bojesen, Stig E , Risch, Angela , Bickeböller, Heike , Shen, Hongbing , Goodman, Marc T , Fachal, Laura

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | October 3, 2016 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 126-135

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0106 | PMID 27697780 Get It

Abstract Background: Common cancers develop through a multistep process often including inherited susceptibility. Collaboration among multiple institutions, and funding from multiple sources, has allowed the development of an inexpensive genotyping microarray, the OncoArray. The array includes a genome-wide backbone, comprising 230,000 SNPs tagging most common genetic variants, together with dense mapping of known susceptibility regions, rare variants from sequencing experiments, pharmacogenetic markers, and cancer-related traits. Methods: The OncoArray can be genotyped using a novel technology developed by Illumina to facilitate efficient genotyping. The consortium developed standard approaches for selecting SNPs for study, for quality control of markers, and for ancestry analysis. The array was genotyped at selected sites and with prespecified replicate samples to permit evaluation of genotyping accuracy among centers and by ethnic background. Results: The OncoArray consortium genotyped 447,705 samples. A total of 494,763 SNPs passed quality control steps with a sample success rate of 97% of the samples. Participating sites performed ancestry analysis using a common set of markers and a scoring algorithm based on principal components analysis. Conclusions: Results from these analyses will enable researchers to identify new susceptibility loci, perform fine-mapping of new or known loci associated with either single or multiple cancers, assess the degree of overlap in cancer causation and pleiotropic effects of loci that have been identified for disease-specific risk, and jointly model genetic, environmental, and lifestyle-related exposures. Impact: Ongoing analyses will shed light on etiology and risk assessment for many types of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 126–35. ©2016 AACR.