Citations

653 Background: Next-generation sequencing often reveals potentially actionable molecular alterations; however, data on approved targeted therapies in non-indicated tumors are limited. MyPathway (NCT02091141) evaluates agents targeting the HER2, EGFR, BRAF, or Hedgehog (Hh) pathways in tumors for which these therapies are not currently indicated. Here, we present early response data for patients with GI tumors. Methods: Eligible patients had metastatic tumors with potentially actionable genomic alterations, identified by a CLIA-certified lab, and progression on standard therapy. Based on the identified alteration, patients received standard doses of trastuzumab + pertuzumab (HER2), erlotinib (EGFR), vemurafenib (BRAF), or vismodegib (Hh). Response was evaluated by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. Results: As of Aug 21, 2015, 96 patients had enrolled, 36 of whom (38%) had GI tumors with the following alterations: HER2 (n=28 [22 amplifications, 5 activating mutations, 1 both]), BRAF (n=4), Hh (n=2 [2 PTCH-1 mutations]), and EGFR (n=2). Patients had a median of 4 (range, 1–8) prior lines of therapy. Tumor types and interim best response data are shown below. Among all evaluable patients with GI tumors (n=26), 5 have had a PR to targeted therapy (duration 3–10+ months). Conclusions: Targetable molecular alterations were found in a variety of GI tumors, resulting in clinical benefit from targeted treatments that would not have otherwise been realized. These early results support this molecular testing strategy. Accrual to the trial continues; based on activity observed, the HER2-positive colorectal cancer cohort will be expanded to ≥30 patients. Additional data will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02091141. [Table: see text]

569 Background: BBI-608 is an oral first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that blocks STAT3-mediated transcription of cancer stemness genes. Potent anti-CSC activity was observed in vitro and in vivo,in mono and combination therapy. In phase I studies, BBI-608 was generally well tolerated with encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity. Methods: A phase Ib open label, multi-center study in pts with advanced CRC was undertaken to confirm the RP2D of BBI-608 in combination with FOLFIRI with or without BEV. BBI-608 was administered at 240 mg BID in combination with FOLFIRI (5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus with 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, and leucovorin 400 mg/m2infusion) with or without BEV 5 mg/kg, administered bi-weekly until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criterion was met. Results: 18 heavily pretreated pts with an average of > 3 prior lines of therapy of which 10 pts (56%) previously progressed on FOLFIRI were enrolled. Of the 17 pts evaluable for response, 8 pts received FOLFIRI and 9 pts received FOLFIRI with BEV in combination with BBI-608. Most common adverse events included grade 1 and 2 diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. No dose limiting toxicity or new adverse events were seen, and the safety profile was similar to that of each regimen as monotherapy. Grade 3 events related to protocol therapy included diarrhea occurring in 3 pts, fatigue in 2 pts and dehydration in 1 pt. All events resolved after dose reduction and/or start of anti-diarrheal medications. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Disease control (PR+SD) was observed in 16 of 17 evaluable pts (94%) with 2 PR (per RECIST 1.1 criteria: 44% and 33% regression) and 14 SD (of which 13 (93%) had tumor regression < 25%). In the evaluable pts, median progression free survival was 5.54 months. Of 17 pts, 7 (41%) had prolonged SD of > 6 months. Conclusions: This phase Ib study confirmed that BBI-608 at 240 mg bid can be safely combined with FOLFIRI with and without BEV, and shows encouraging anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated CRC pts, even in pts with prior progression on FOLFIRI-based therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02024607.

524 Background: Psychosocial distress during radiotherapy (RT) for gastrointestinal tumors is poorly characterized. Since 2012, patients receiving RT in our clinic have been prospectively screened for causes of distress. The results of our screening were reviewed in order to elucidate concerns of GI cancer patients and to delineate patterns within patient reported distress (PRD). Methods: Patients treated with RT at our institution receive a 30 question PRD survey that also includes a linear analog measure of overall distress at the start and during RT. The PRD survey asks patients to rate forms of distress on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 being the most distressed). The survey also asks patients to rate overall distress according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer on a scale 0 to 10. The reported results were retrospectively reviewed in patients receiving definitive RT for GI cancers from 04/02/2012 to 08/05/2015. Results: PRD surveys were completed by 113 patients, 55 (48.7%) male and 58 (51.3%) female. Median age was 65 years (range 28 to 93). The most common tumor histology was adenocarcinoma, 67 (59.3%). 105 patients (93.0%) received chemotherapy and 66 (58.4%) underwent surgery. Overall, NCCN distress thermometer results ranged from 0 to 10, with a median of 4.3. The mean distress scores for the top five complaints ranged from 1.27 to 2.63. Top distresses were “How will I feel during treatment” (2.63), “Fatigue” (2.45), “Pain that affects daily functioning” (2.35), “Out of pocket medical costs” (2.31), and “Sleep difficulties” (2.31). The least concerning complaints were “Housing during treatment” (1.27), “A loved one relying on me for their physical care” (1.30), “Spirituality” (1.33),“Family communication about my illness”(1.37), and “Transportation” (1.38). Conclusions: Patients’ major concerns were aligned with daily quality of life, such as fatigue, pain and insomnia. Highest reported distress was linked with the process of RT and side effects associated with treatment. Medical expenses were also perceived as a burden. Medical providers should identify psychosocial stressors during RT in order to effectively communicate and provide resources to improve quality of life.

497 Background: As activating RAS mutations have been shown to predict lack of benefit from anti-EGFR therapies in advanced CRC, NCCN guidelines recommend testing for KRAS exon 2 and non-exon 2 mutations; however, these alterations are thought to explain only a subset of de novo resistance to targeted therapy. In a large set of CRC assayed with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the course of clinical care, we assessed the frequency of less common KRAS short insertions that may predict failure of anti-EGFR therapy. Methods: 4,422 CRC cases were assayed with CGP performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation based libraries to a mean coverage depth of > 650X for at least 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. All classes of genomic alterations (GA) were identified, including base pair substitutions, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations, and rearrangements. Pertinent available prior molecular testing results and clinical history was reviewed for selected cases. Results: Out of 4,422 CRC cases analyzed, KRAS short variants were identified in 50.9% of cases. A majority of cases contained a KRAS alteration at either codon G12 (35.5%) or G13 (9.1%), while alterations at codons Q61 or A146 were identified in 2.2% and 3.1% of cases, respectively. KRAS insertions were identified in 8 ( < 0.5%) cases. All KRAS insertions identified fell within codons 9-13, and 6/8 cases harbored V9_G10 insertions. Out of 6 patients with prior KRAS testing results available, 5 (83%) were negative by previous testing. Conclusions: CGP identifies KRAS insertions within or adjacent to hotspot regions in CRC cases which have previously tested negative for KRAS mutations. Given the importance of KRAS alterations in predicting lack of response to anti-EGFR therapies in CRC, accurate detection of these alterations in the course of clinical care is essential for effective treatment. CGP offers the possibility of identifying KRAS insertions that may impact efficacy of anti-EGFR targeted therapy and should be considered when previous focused testing for KRAS mutations is negative.

457 Background: Curative therapy for PDAC is currently achievable through resection only, but ≤ 15% of patients are candidates for surgery. FG-3019, a recombinant human mAb to connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), plus gemcitabine (G) significantly reduced tumor growth, increased apoptosis and improved survival vs G alone in the KPC mouse model. Higher FG-3019 exposure and lower baseline (BL) CTGF were independently and significantly associated with improved overall median and 1-year survival (OS) in a Ph2a trial with G and erlotinib in stage 3 or 4 PDAC. Neoadjuvant treatment of LAPC with FG-3019 combined with multidrug therapy may change the fibrotic character of LAPC and thus may make it amenable to surgical resection and potentially improve OS. Methods: Patients with unresectable LAPC (confirmed by laparoscopy) are randomized to G/NP ±FG-3019 for 6-cycle/24-week treatment. Safety, efficacy, PK and changes in CT, PET, & CA19.9 from BL through end of treatment (EOT) are assessed. Up to 4 endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided core biopsies are collected at BL. Protein microarrays of pre- and post-treatment biopsies are prepared from tumor and stromal cells isolated by laser capture microdissection. Surgical exploration is performed in subjects who achieved the protocol-defined criteria for possible resection. Results: To date, 11 subjects were enrolled with 5 randomized to +FG-3019 arm. There were no complications from laparoscopy or EUS core biopsies that were clinically significant or delayed dosing. Per investigator assessment, no FG-3019-related SAEs were reported, nor any identified toxicity suspected from combination of FG-3019 with chemotherapy. Overall, CA19.9 mean change from BL was −62.7% at Week 8 (n = 8), and target lesions were reduced by 20.6% (n = 6) at Week 16. Three out of 4 subjects had PET SUVmax reductions of ≥ 30% at EOT. Additional data from protein microarrays will be presented. Conclusions: Based on the limited data collected so far, this trial design is feasible and the G/NP +FG-3019 combination is well-tolerated and appears to be active. Summary results on surgical exploration of subjects will be provided later. Clinical trial information: NCT02210559.

335 Background: CCA is a hepatobiliary malignancy with poor prognosis and few treatment options following cytotoxic therapy in the first-line metastatic setting. The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) axis may promote CCA tumorigenesis. FGFR2 fusions (in up to 17% of intrahepatic CCAs) may predict FGFR inhibitor sensitivity. A prior phase 1 trial of the selective pan-FGFR inhibitor BGJ398 showed antitumor activity in a pt with CCA harboring an FGFR2 fusion. Methods: This ongoing phase 2, open-label study is evaluating oral BGJ398 125 mg once daily on a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule (28-day cycle) in pts with advanced or metastatic CCA with FGFR2 fusions (n ≈ 40) or other FGFR genetic alterations (n ≤ 15) who progressed after cisplatin/gemcitabine or are cisplatin intolerant (NCT02150967). The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, best overall response (BOR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results: As of 10 July 2015, 26 pts with CCA harboring FGFR2 fusions (n = 22) or other FGFR alterations (n = 4), pretreated with 1 to ≥ 4 prior regimens, were enrolled. Common adverse events (AEs; ≥ 20% of pts), were hyperphosphatemia (50%), fatigue (42%), constipation (38%), cough (23%), and nausea (23%). Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in ≥ 2 pts were hyper/hypophosphatemia, lipase increase, and hyponatremia. AEs were manageable, reversible, and rarely led to treatment discontinuation. Among 22 pts evaluable for BOR, 3 achieved partial response and 15 had stable disease, including 10 with tumor reductions (-41%, n = 1; -2% to -29%, n = 9). Overall DCR was 82%. As of the cutoff date, 18 pts remained on therapy, of which 13 were on for > 120 days. Kaplan-Meier estimated lower limit (95% CI) of median time on study was 143 days. Conclusions: BGJ398 shows impressive anti-tumor activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with advanced FGFR-altered CCA, an indication of high unmet medical need. Updated data including additional responses post data cutoff will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02150967.

291 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy with poor survival. The only curative therapy is resection and the role of adjuvant therapy is not well defined. Despite the unproven benefit, adjuvant therapy is used in resected CCA. The aim of this study is to analyze our institution’s outcomes for peri-operative treatment of resected intrahepatic and extrahepatic CCA. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 intrahepatic (iCCA) and 109 extrahepatic (eCCA) CCA patients who underwent resection at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester. The majority of treated patients received adjuvant chemotherapy; however neo-adjuvant and radiation were also included. Results: In stage 1-2 iCCA patients, the HR indicated worse outcomes for time to recurrence and death. For stage 3-4 or node positive disease, outcomes were not significantly different. Those with node unknown/negative disease had significantly worse time to recurrence but not OS. There was a significant difference in stage and treatment modality between these groups (see table). Among eCCA, for any stage and node positive disease, outcomes were not different. In the node unknown/negative group, neither time to recurrence nor OS differed significantly. In controlling for different features in multi-variable analyses, no significant differences were observed (see table). Conclusions: This retrospective study does not show a significant difference in recurrence free or OS for treated patients. The apparent lack of benefit most likely reflects selection bias among treatment groups. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to make sound recommendations in adjuvant treatment for CCA. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

289 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are all devastating malignancies. Limited data exists about PD-1 and PDL1 expression in these cancers. We assessed expression of PD1/PDL1 in a large cohort of patients with hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) cancers and explored the existence of accompanying genomic mutations associated with expression of PD-1/PD-L1. Methods: 524 patients with HPB cancers (354 PDAC, 58 HCC, 54 intrahepatic (ICC), 18 extrahepatic (ECC), and 40 gallbladder (GBC)) were included in the study and tumors tested centrally at a CLIA lab (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Tests included one or more of the following: gene sequencing (next generation sequencing, Illumina TruSeq), protein expression (immunohistochemistry [IHC]) and gene amplification). PD-1 (SP142 antibody) and PD-L1 (MRQ-22 antibody) status was tested in all samples. Two-tailed Fisher's exact test was performed to test where proportions of positive results were different by subgroup (p²0.05). Results: Among those with PDAC, HCC, ICC, ECC, and GBC, rates of PD1 expression on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD-L1 expression on tumor cells is detailed in the Table. In PD-1+, compared with PD-1- HPB cancers, mutations in the following were more prevalent, though not statistically significant: BRCA2, ATM, CTNNB1, and PIK3CA. Among all theranostic biomarkers tested, TOP2A expression (IHC) was significantly increased in PD-L1+ versus PD-L1- tumors (82% vs 60%; p=0.0083). Conclusions: HPB tumors express PD-L1 at a frequency of 4-18%, and PD-1 at a frequency of 29-45%. A statistically significant association of mutations with PD-1+ or PD-L1+ tumors was not identified in this group of tumors. PD-L1 expression associates with TOP2a expression, a marker of proliferation and also anthracycline sensitivity. Further evaluation of this correlation and PDL1/PD-1 + anthracycline combination therapy may be warranted. [Table: see text]

288 Background: Programmed-death 1 (PD-1) receptor and its corresponding ligand, PD-L1, have been found to be clinically relevant in maintaining immune tolerance to malignant cells in an increasing number of tumor types. We have previously shown that nearly half of 48 randomly selected, resected small bowel adenocarcinomas at any stage exhibit positive PD-L1 expression. Furthermore, a larger quantity of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within the tumor stroma or microsatellite instability (MSI-H) have been associated with improved likelihood of response to PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. We have descriptively characterized the stromal components of small bowel adenocarcinomas to determine if similar tumor/stromal features to drug-responsive tumors can be seen. Methods: 30 tumors were immunohistochemically stained for CD8 (T-lymphocytes), CD68 (macrophages), and e-cadherin. They were morphologically screened for MSI-H status with light microscopy. PD-L1 staining was previously performed and reported. Results: Of the 30 tumors, there was no correlation between the density of macrophages and T-lymphocytes, nor was there a correlation with the burden of immune cells with e-cadherin expression. 14/30 (47%) tumors had 3+/4+ expression of CD8+ lymphocytes. 7/14 (50%) of these tumors were morphologically MSI-H. No tumors with low CD8+ cells (1+/2+) were MSI-H. PD-L1 expression colocalized exclusively with macrophages and not with lymphocytes. Conclusions: There appears to be no association between the proportions of immune cells and basement membrane integrity. MSI-H tumors are more likely to have a greater quantity of CD8+ lymphocytes in the stroma; however, PD-L1 stromal expression appears to colocalize with macrophages. Further pathologic characterization is needed in patients treated with PD-1 and other immune checkpoint inhibitors to determine the clinical significance of these observations.

248 Background: Improved understanding of TME in CCA may allow for development of novel therapeutics targeting stromal components. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a polysaccharide that has been found in the TME of a number of solid tumors characterized by desmoplastic stroma, such as pancreatic cancer. Elevated HA levels were prognostic in these malignancies. HA prevalence and association with clinic-pathological features in CCA is unknown. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using clinically annotated formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue from resected intrahepatic CCA samples. Specimens were analyzed for HA, scored using a positive pixel count algorithm (Aperio Imagescope) and positivity was calculated as % of total pixel count. Clinical variables were examined by chi-square or ANOVA F-test. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared via log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: 142 patient samples were stained for HA. HA was identified in all samples (100%), with a range of HA positivity of 32.8 – 91.8%. Median HA value was 67.1% and 95% of patients had HA positivity ≥ 45%. Factors associated with higher than median HA ( > 67%) included perineural invasion (PNI) (40% vs. 21%, p = 0.011), necrosis (67% vs. 41%, p = 0.003), lymph node positivity (32% vs. 14%, p = 0.027), and small tumor size ( < 6.8 cm vs. > 8.4cm, p = 0.014). Stratification of HA staining by median positivity value was not an independent predictor of survival based on multivariate analysis. OS for patients with HA > 67% was 40.1 months (mo) vs 48.5 mo with HA ≤ 67%, p = 0.537. PFS for patients with HA > 67% was 14.4 mo vs. 25.7 mo with HA ≤ 67%, p = 0.177. Conclusions: Prevalence of HA staining in resected CCA is higher than seen in many solid tumors and is ubiquitous in our study. Absence of statistically significant association with OS and PFS might be attributable to ubiquitous prevalence, narrow signal range, and association with known negative prognostic factors. Further pre-clinical and clinical evaluation would be warranted.