Citations

391 Background: Prior economic analysis of a 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX), compared with patterns of care reported in the NCCN database of patients with stage II, T3, DNA mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) colon cancer, predicted that the assay would save medical costs and improve patient well-being (Hornberger et al., Value Health, 2012). This study assessed the validity of those findings with actual adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) recommendations. Methods: Outcomes and costs were estimated for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer using a Markov model. A study of 141 patients from 17 sites in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium collected data on aCT recommended before and after knowledge of the 12-gene assay results (Srivastava et al. abstract). Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and medical resource use after recurrence were computed using guideline-validated state-transition probability estimation methods. Risk of progression and incidence of adverse events with different aCT regimens were based on published literature. Drug and administration costs for aCT were obtained from 2012 Medicare fee schedules. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter influence on economic impact. Results: After receiving the 12-gene assay results, physician recommendations in favor of aCT decreased 22% (95% CI 11%-32%; McNemar test p<0.001) from 73 (52%) to 42 (30%) patients. Oxaliplatin aCT and 5-FU monotherapy recommendations each declined 11%. Average aCT costs decreased $5,738 for drugs, $668 for administration, and $3,268 for adverse events management. Overall, average total direct medical costs decreased $4,203. The net effect on average patient well-being was a gain of 0.083 QALYs. Total medical costs are most influenced by change in aCT recommendations, 5-FU monotherapy efficacy, and oxaliplatin drug acquisition cost. Savings are expected to persist even if the cost of oxaliplatin dropped by >75% due to generic substitution. Conclusions: The 12-gene assayhas been shown to alter aCT recommendations for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer. This study provides real-world confirmation that these changes in aCT reduce direct medical costs and improve patient well-being.

381 Background: In the CORRECT Ph3 trial, regorafenib demonstrated significant improvement in OS and PFS vs. placebo in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had progressed on standard therapies. An exploratory biomarker substudy was conducted on samples collected from subjects enrolled in CORRECT. Methods: DNA was isolated from archival tumor tissue and fresh baseline plasma samples that were available from 239 (31%) and 503 (66%) subjects enrolled in CORRECT, respectively. Mutations in KRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF were evaluated via BEAMing technology. Results: Mutations were readily detected in DNA isolated from both tumor and plasma samples: KRAS: 59/69%; PIK3CA: 12/17% and BRAF: 1.5/3.4%. The frequency of KRAS mutation detected in tumor samples via BEAMing (59%) was identical to the frequency determined from pre-existing “historical” KRAS mutation data that was available from 96% of the subjects enrolled in the study. Concordance among the mutations detected via BEAMing in tumor vs. plasma was 76% (KRAS), 88% (PIK3CA), and 97% (BRAF). A subset of CRC which was found to be KRAS-wildtype in DNA from archival tumor, but KRAS-mutant in DNA from fresh plasma was identified and may represent subjects whose KRAS mutational status had changed during prior therapy. Correlative subgroup analyses demonstrated that regorafenib mediated a trend for clinical benefit vs. placebo in both KRAS wildtype and mutant subgroups identified by plasma BEAMing (OS: KRAS WT, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41–1.08; KRAS mutant, HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.61–1.09; interaction p=0.561). Similar results were noted for PIK3CA WT/mutant subgroups (OS: WT, HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57–0.99; mutant, HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.47–1.50; interaction p=0.723). BRAF was not analysed due to the small number of BRAF-mutant samples. Conclusions: The mutational analysis of DNA isolated from fresh plasma is feasible and robust using the BEAMing platform and may better represent the mutational status of the tumor(s) that a mCRC patient harbors at the time of enrollment than does the mutational analysis of archival primary tumor tissue. Regorafenib was associated with clinical benefit (vs. placebo) in all mutational subgroups evaluated. Clinical trial information: NCT01103323.

341 Background: Precursors to 1/3 of colorectal cancer (CRC), serrated polyps have historically been underdetected by screening due to their inconspicuous, nonhemorrhagic, and proximal nature. New generation sDNA-MT show high sensitivity for both CRC and advanced adenomas (Gastroenterology 2012;142:248), but screen detection of serrated polyps by this approach requires further validation. Aim: To assess and compare noninvasive detection of sessile serrated polyps >1cm (SSP) by sDNA-MT and a commercial quantitative FIT. Methods: In a blinded prospective study, a single stool sample used for both tests was collected from 456 asymptomatic adults prior to screening or surveillance colonoscopy (criterion standard). All 29 patients with SSP were included as cases and all 232 with no neoplastic findings as controls. Buffered stool samples were processed and frozen on receipt; Exact Sciences performed sDNA-MT in batches using optimized analytical methods (Gastroenterology 2012;142:S770). The sDNA-MT panel targets methylated BMP3 (mBMP3) and NDRG4, mutant KRAS, β-actin, and hemoglobin. FIT (Polymedco OC-FIT Check) was performed in separate lab <2 days post defecation and evaluated at cutoffs of 50 (FIT-50) and 100 ng/ml (FIT-100). Results: Age/sex distributions were similar in cases and controls: 40% vs 45% > 65 years and 51% vs 59% women, p=NS respectively. SSP median size was 1.2cm (range 1-3cm), 93% were proximal, and 64% had synchronous diminutive polyps. Among sDNA-MT markers, mBMP3 proved highly discriminant for SSP detection (AUC=0.87, p<0.00001); other DNA markers were less informative and provided no incremental sensitivity. Hemoglobin alone showed no discrimination (AUC=0.50, p=NS). At matched specificities, SSP detection by stool mBMP3 was significantly greater than by either FIT-50 or FIT-100 (Table). Conclusions: From a screening and surveillance setting, SSP can be detected noninvasively by stool assay of exfoliated DNA markers, especially mBMP3. FIT appears to have no value in SSP detection. [Table: see text]

325 Background: TH-302 is a hypoxia-targeted drug with a hypoxia-triggered 2-nitroimidazole component designed to release the DNA alkylator, bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (Br-IPM), when reduced in severe hypoxia. A randomized Phase 2B study (NCT01144455) was conducted to assess the benefit of G+T to standard dose G as first-line therapy of PAC. Methods: An open-label multi-center study of two dose levels of TH-302 (240 mg/m2 or 340 mg/m2) in combination with G versus G alone (randomized 1:1:1). G (1,000 mg/m2) and T were administered IV over 30-60 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients on the G could crossover after progression and be randomized to a G+T arm. The primary efficacy endpoint was a comparison of PFS between the combination arms and G alone (80% power to detect 50% improvement in PFS with one-sided alpha of 10%). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results: 214 pts were treated; 163 (76%) Stage IV and 51 (24%) Stage IIIB. Median age 65 (range 29-86); 126 M/88 F; 38% ECOG 0/62% ECOG 1. Receiving 6 or more cycles: 32% G; 45% G+T240; 55% G+T340. Median PFS was 3.6 mo in G vs 5.6 mo in G+T240 (p=0.06) and 6.0 mo in G+T340 (p=0.01). Median OS was 6.9 mo in G vs 8.7 in G+T240 (p=0.83) vs 9.2 mo in G+T340 (p=0.80). 6-mo OS was 57% in G vs 69% in G+T240 (p=0.12) and 73% in G+340 (p=0.04); 12-mo OS was 26% in G vs 37% in G+T240 (p=0.18) and 38% in G+340 (p=0.13). RECIST best response was 10% in G vs 17% in G+T240 and 26% in G+T340. 14 and 12 pts in G crossed over to T240 and T340, respectively. Median post crossover PFS was 1.8 mo in T240 vs 2.9 mo in T340 (p=0.13). Median post crossover OS was 2.6 mo in T240 vs 13.4 mo in T340 (p=0.01). AEs leading to discontinuation were: 16% G, 17% G+T240 and 12% G+T340. Rash (47% in G+T340) and stomatitis (42% in G+T340) were greater in combination, 3 pts Grd 3 rash. Grd 3/4 thrombocytopenia were 11% G, 39% G+T240 and 63% G+T340 and Grd 3/4 neutropenia were 31% G, 56% G+T240 and 60% G+T340. Conclusions: The combination of G plus TH-302 improved the PFS of G. Skin and mucosal toxicity and myelosuppression were the most common TH-302 related AEs with no increase in treatment discontinuation. A phase 3 study of TH-302 (340 mg/m2) in combination with G is planned with OS as the primary efficacy endpoint. Clinical trial information: NCT01144455.

284 Background: ODSH, a low anticoagulant heparin derivative, interferes with several important pancreatic cancer cell survival pathways. A randomized phase II trial was initiated to determine if ODSH improves the activity of G/A, a promising pancreatic cancer investigational therapy. Preliminary data are presented here for the first 10 patients administered ODSH as part of an initial run-in phase prior to patient randomization. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with G (1,000 mg/m2) and A (125 mg/m2) plus ODSH (4 mg/kg bolus followed by a 48 hr. continuous IV infusion at a dose of 0.375 mg/kg/hr) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were required to have ECOG ≤ 1 and appropriate blood and liver function levels. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 10 patients (median age, 66 years) were administered up to 5 cycles of G/A plus ODSH. Per RECIST criteria, a partial response (PR) was achieved in 5 patients (50%) and the median PFS will exceed 6 months. Disease control (PR or stable disease for > 16 weeks) occurred in all 10 patients. Of 9 patients with baseline elevated CA 19-9 levels, 8 had > 60% reduction. ODSH was well tolerated and unexpectedly appeared to preserve marrow function as no patients had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia or grade 4 neutropenia during any of the cycles. Conclusions: Although G/A and FOLFIRINOX are important advances, additional progress is necessary for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. ODSH may interfere with pancreatic cancer invasion, metastasis, and chemo-resistance by inhibiting P- and L-selectins, heparanase, and the HMGB1-RAGE axis, respectively, suggesting that ODSH may enhance chemotherapy activity. This preliminary analysis in a small number of patients is encouraging and consistent with a previous report for this regimen (Von Hoff, J Clin Oncol, 2011). ODSH has also been very well tolerated and early data suggests that it may preserve platelet and neutrophil levels. Further follow-up of the ongoing randomized phase II trial is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01461915.

245 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy for PDA has modest activity. 17-N-Allylamino-17-demthoxygeldanamycin (Tanespimycin/17AAG), is an HSP90 inhibitor, which results in degradation of a number of client proteins such as RAF and Akt. Arlander et al (J Biol Chem. 2003 278:52572-7) have demonstrated that 17AAG targeting of HSP90 leads to Chk1 degradation. Chk1 is upregulated with GEM treatment which affects cell survival (Karnitz et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2005 68:1636-44). In vitro, the combination demonstrated in vitro synergy. Thus the potential clinical activity in pancreatic cancer of the combination was explored. Methods: A phase II multicenter prospective study was performed using GEM 750 mg/m2 d1,8 and 17AAG 154 mg/m2 d2,9 on a 21 day cycle, as defined in a previous phase I trial. Patients with stage IV PDA, with adequate liver, kidney function and counts, ECOG 0-2 and no prior therapy for metastatic disease were eligible. The primary endpoint of 60% overall survival at 6 months was considered of clinical interest. Sixty-six patients were planned for accrual, and an interim analysis was planned after 25 evaluable patients. Informed, written consent was obtained from all pts. Results: Due to lack of drug availability and failure to achieve the planned endpoint, accrual was halted at 21 pts, enrolled from 5/08 to 9/10, of which 20 were evaluable (1 cancelled prior to treatment). Median age was 61.5 yrs., 55% were male, PS 0 (50%), 1 (45%), 2 (5%); 95% were non-Hispanic white, 1 was African American. Two had received adjuvant therapy for PDA. Tolerability was moderate, with 13 pts (65%) having > grade 3 adverse event (AE), with 15% gr 4 AEs and 0% gr 5. Nausea (20%), vomiting (20%), constipation (15%), dehydration (15%), and anorexia (10%), were the most common non-heme AEs. Lymphopenia (15%), leukopenia (10%) and neutropenia (10%) were common grade 3 hematologic AEs. No complete or partial responses were seen. 40% of patients were alive at 6 months, with a median OS of 5.4 months. Conclusions: HSP 90 inhibitor 17AAG in combination with GEM does not show activity for treatment of PDA. Further trials should not be pursued with this combination. Supported by N01-CM-62205. Clinical trial information: NCT00577889.

238 Background: To compare post-transplant recurrence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and differences in percent tumor necrosis in patients with pre-operative superselective chemoembolization (CE) vs. non-superselective CE. Methods: Retrospective review of 147 patients with liver transplant (LT) for HCC treated with pre-operative CE. Those transplanted less than 24 hours after CE and those who had other concomitant treatments were excluded. The angiographic studies and written reports were reviewed to categorize patients into superselective and non-superselective groups. CE was done with an emulsion of lipiodol, cisplatin, doxorubicin, mitomycin C, and contrast, with or without embolization particles. Superselective CE was defined as treatment directly into the vessel(s) feeding the tumor. Treatment from more proximal vessels was considered non-superselective. Data gathered included age, gender, date of CE, date of LT, tumor size and number, tumor stage, MELD score, Child-Pugh class, alpha fetoprotein, percent tumor necrosis at explant, date of recurrence, date and cause of death, and date of last follow-up. Patient and disease characteristics and percent tumor necrosis were analyzed with a Wilcoxon rank sum test or Fisher’s exact test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative incidences of death due to recurrent disease after LT. Results: 99 patients were included, 53 had superselective CE and 46 non-superselective. HCC recurrence rates at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were all significantly less for superselective CE compared to non-superselective CE (p = 0.039 single, p = 0.011 multivariable). Using multivariable analysis, superselective CE had a lower risk of death due to recurrent HCC at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years (p = 0.046). There was a trend toward more percent tumor necrosis after superselective CE, but it did not reach significance (p = 0.057). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that HCC recurrence after LT and death due to recurrent HCC is lower after pre-LT superselective CE versus non-superselective CE. The strong trend for greater percent tumor necrosis with superselective CE may explain the differences in recurrence rate.

228 Background: Even though gemcitabine monotherapy is commonly used as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer, many novel treatment approaches have focused on combination chemotherapy. FOLFIRINOX, a combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, has recently been shown to improve survival compared to gemcitabine. However, it is unclear whether survival benefits are counterbalanced by a poor quality of life due to the adverse effects. The aim of this study was to review emerging strategies that enhance treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Two authors independently conducted a comprehensive search of the Cochrane library PUBMED, and published proceedings from major oncologic and gastrointestinal cancer meetings from January 1980 to July 2012. Only published randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. Our primary outcome measures were: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and serious adverse events (grade 3 or 4). Results: Thirty-one studies involving 7,957 patients were included in the analysis. There was an overall statistically significant increase in OS (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.30) and PFS (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.46) for the gemcitabine-based combination therapy group versus the gemcitabine monotherapy group. Subgroup analysis showed that only patients with fluoropyrimidine and platinum containing regimens showed prolonged survival: RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.04-1.76 and RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08-1.76, respectively. The most common severe adverse event (neutropenia) was found in 45% of patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: Overall, gemcitabine in combination with fluoropyrimidine or platinum containing regimens can improve overall survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer compared to gemcitabine alone. Even though, FOLFIRINOX therapy is associated with better survival outcomes than gemcitabine, the prolonged survival comes at the cost of poorer quality of life due to a higher incidence of adverse events. More data is needed from studies involving novel combination therapy such as hedgehog pathway inhibitors and radio-immunotherapy.

224 Background: In the phase 3 RADIANT-3 trial, everolimus (EVE) demonstrated significantly improved median progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo (PBO) (11.0 vs 4.6 months; HR=0.35, p < 0.0001) in patients (pts) with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) (Yao et al, NEJM, 2011). Here we present a planned exploratory analysis by prior chemotherapy (chemo) use. Methods: Pts with progressive low- or intermediate-grade pNET were prospectively stratified by prior chemo use and randomized (1:1) to EVE 10 mg/d (n = 207) or PBO (n = 203) plus best supportive care. Results: Of the 410 pts, 206 (50%) had received prior chemo and 204 (50%) were chemo naive. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, race, tumor type, histologic grade) and baseline tumor biomarker levels were similar for pts with/without prior chemo. More chemo-naive pts were newly diagnosed (time since initial diagnosis ≤ 6 mo: 50 [25%] vs. 7 [3%] pts with prior chemo). A lower proportion of chemo-naive pts received prior somatostatin therapy (45% vs. 54% prior chemo). EVE significantly prolonged median PFS regardless of prior chemo use (with prior chemo: 11.0 vs. 3.2 months; HR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.25-0.49, p < 0.001; chemo naive: 11.4 vs. 5.4 months; HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.29-0.60; p < 0.001). Stable disease was the best overall response in 73% of EVE-treated pts irrespective of prior chemo use. The benefit from EVE irrespective of prior chemo was further demonstrated by disease stabilization or minor tumor shrinkage and in the lower incidence of progressive disease in waterfall plots. Safety of EVE was consistent regardless of prior chemo use. The most common drug-related adverse events (chemo vs chemo naive) included rash (53% vs. 52%), stomatitis (52% vs. 56%), diarrhea (41% vs. 52%), and fatigue (37% vs. 51%). Conclusions: This planned subgroup analysis demonstrated the beneficial effects of EVE in pts with pNET regardless of prior chemo use. These findings support the possible first-line use of EVE for pts with pNET.

2 Background: Testing for HER2 in EAC has become routine given its ability to predict benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. HER2 protein analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is more rapid and generally less expensive than assessment of gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, the accuracy of IHC for predicting HER2 amplification has not been examined in a large EAC cohort. Methods: Surgical EAC specimens were examined from 675 patients who underwent curative resection at a single institution without preoperative therapy. Tumors were located in the esophagus (47%) or gastroesophageal junction (53%); most were node-positive (73%). Every tumor was evaluated by IHC in parallel with FISH in a blinded manner using FDA-approved assays. A consensus IHC score was determined by 2 pathologists using tumor-specific criteria (negative, 0 or 1+; equivocal, 2+; positive, 3+). Gene amplification by FISH was defined as a HER2/CEP17ratio ≥ 2. Results: HER2 amplification was detected in 89% of IHC 3+ cases, 13% of IHC 2+ cases, and 4% of IHC 0-1+ cases (Table). Accordingly, using FISH as the reference standard, the positive predictive value (PPV) of a positive IHC test (3+) was 89% (79/89 [95% CI 82%-95%]), and the negative predictive value of a negative IHC test (0-1+) was 96% (401/417 [94%-98%]). Importantly, the PPV of an equivocal IHC score (2+) for detecting HER2 amplification was 13% (22/169 [8%-18%]). Conclusions: In the largest study to date comparing HER2 testing methods in EAC, a negative IHC result (0 or 1+) nearly excludes the presence of gene amplification by FISH. Whereas a positive IHC result (3+) strongly predicts for the presence of amplification, an equivocal IHC result (2+) is a weak predictor. These findings in EAC support a HER2 testing algorithm where IHC is used for initial screening and FISH testing is restricted to cases with equivocal IHC results. [Table: see text]