Citations

659 Background: Regular physical activity (PA) is associated with reduced risk of recurrence and mortality in non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Its influence on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is largely unexplored. Methods: 1231 patients participating in CALGB 80405 (first-line phase III chemotherapy trial for mCRC) completed questionnaires that included self-report on PA at time of chemotherapy initiation and total metabolic equivalent task (MET)-hours/week were determined based on responses. The primary endpoint of the clinical trial and this companion study was overall survival (OS), with progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary endpoint. To minimize confounding by poor and rapidly declining health, we excluded patients who experienced progression or died within 60 days of activity assessment and adjusted for known prognostic factors, comorbid illness, and weight loss over the previous six months. Results: Compared with patients engaged in less than three MET-hours/week of PA, patients engaged in 18 or more MET-hours/week experienced an adjusted hazard ratio for OS of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.98, P for trend 0.03) and for PFS of 0.84 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.00, P for trend 0.03). Greater nonvigorous PA and walking duration were both associated with improved OS ( P for trend 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). Conclusions: In mCRC patients from CALGB 80405, greater total PA was associated with improved PFS and OS, while greater walking duration and non-vigorous PA were associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00265850 [Table: see text]

609 Background: Targeting MEK is of interest in the development of novel agents for treatment of many malignancies. However, better strategies are needed to overcome acquired resistance to MEK inhibitors. Preclinical studies have shown Wnt pathway overexpression in KRAS mutant cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, Selumetinib. The combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A (CsA), a non-canonical WnT pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. We are conducting an NCI CTEP-approved Phase I/IB trial (NCI # 9571/COMIRB # 13-2628) of selumetinib and CsA combination. Biomarkers of response to therapy are being co-developed. We hypothesize that this combination will be safe and potentially effective in patients with mCRC and that upregulation of FZD2 may predict for sensitivity. Methods: Phase I trial with initial dose escalation investigating the combination of selumetinib and CsA in patients with advanced solid tumors (n = 18) followed by an expansion cohort in patients with irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC (n = 20). The expansion cohort utilizes a selumetinib “run-in” to evaluate efficacy in RAS-WT and RAS-MT mCRC to identify those patients most likely to respond to the combination. Results: 18 patients were enrolled in the dose escalation phase and 10 patients have been enrolled in the dose expansion phase as of September 2016. Grade 1 or 2 nausea and rash were reported as the most common AEs. Most commonly reported Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hypertension, elevated liver enzymes and rash. Three DLTs were reported with Grade 3 hypertension noted at dose level 1 and 2 and grade 3 rash reported at dose level 2. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as Selumetinib 75 mg BID and CsA 2 mg/kg BID on a 28-day cycle. Two partial responses and sixteen stable disease responses have been observed. Six patients have exhibited progressive disease. Conclusions: Selumetinib in combination with cyclosporin A appears to be well-tolerated with evidence of activity in solid tumors. Expansion cohort will complete enrollment this month. Clinical trial information: NCT02188264.

603 Background: Oncogenic BRAFV600E mutations activate MAP kinase signaling and are associated with treatment resistance and poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In BRAFV600E mutant CRCs, treatment failure may be related to BRAFV600E-mediated apoptosis resistance that occurs by an as yet undefined mechanism. Methods: BRAF isogenic RKO CRC cells and RKO, HT29, WiDr cell lines were treated with cobimetinib ± the small molecule MCL-1 inhibitor, A-1210477. Apoptosis was measured by Annexin V staining and caspase cleavage. Gene knockdown or overexpression was achieved by lentivirus; ERK siRNA was utilized. Competitive RT-PCR was performed for MCL-1 mRNA expression. HT-29 cells with control or MCL-1 shRNA were xenografted into SCID mice, treated with cobimetinib or vehicle, and tumor volume was measured. Results: We found that BRAFV600E can upregulate anti-apoptotic MCL-1 in a gene dose-dependent manner using CRC cell lines isogenic for BRAF. BRAFV600E-induced MCL-1 upregulation was confirmed by ectopic BRAFV600E expression that activated MEK/ERK signaling to phosphorylate (MCL-1Thr163) and stabilize MCL-1. Upregulation of MCL-1 was mediated by MEK/ERK shown by ERK siRNA that suppressed MCL-1. Stabilization of MCL-1 by phosphorylation was shown by a phosphorylation-mimicking mutant and an unphosphorylated MCL-1 mutant that decreased or increased MCL-1 protein turnover, respectively.MEK /ERK inhibition by cobimetinib suppressed MCL-1 expression/phosphorylation and induced pro-apoptotic BIM to a greater extent than did vemurafenib in BRAFV600E cell lines. MCL-1 knockdown vs control shRNA significantly enhanced cobimetinib-induced apoptosis in vitro and in HT29 colon cancer xenografts. A-1210477 also enhanced cobimetinib-induced apoptosis in vitrothat was due to disruption of the interaction of MCL-1 with pro-apoptotic BAK and BIM. Knockdown of BIM attenuated BAX, but not BAK, activation by cobimetinib plus A-1210477. Conclusions: BRAFV600E-mediated MEK/ERK activation can upregulate MCL-1 by phosphorylation/stabilization to confer apoptosis resistance that can be reversed by MCL-1 antagonism.

593 Background: Cancer stem cells or stemness-high cancer cells are considered to be fundamentally important for resistance to therapy, recurrence and metastasis. Napabucasin, a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in clinical development, suppresses cancer stemness by targeting Stat3-driven gene transcription. Preclinical studies suggest that napabucasin sensitizes heterogeneous cancer cells to chemotherapeutics and targeted agents. Methods: This study was performed to assess signs of anti-tumor activity of napabucasin in combination with FOLFIRI +/- Bev in CRC pts. Napabucasin was administered at 240 mg BID. FOLFIRI (5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus with 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, and leucovorin 400 mg/m2 infusion) +/- Bev 5 mg/kg was administered biweekly until disease progression or other discontinuation criterion. pSTAT3 status of archival tumor tissue was assayed by immunohistochemistry using the H-score with pSTAT3highdefined as ≥ 5% pSTAT3+ cancer cells and tumor stroma staining at ≥ 2+ intensity. Results: 63 CRC pts with an average of >2 prior therapy lines were enrolled. No pharmacokinetic interactions or dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Most common adverse events (AEs) included grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. 25 pts had grade 3 AEs, including diarrhea (14), fatigue (4), dehydration (2), electrolyte imbalance (4), nausea (1) and weight loss (1) resolved with dose reduction and supportive care. Among 63 pts enrolled who received RECIST evaluation, disease control (CR+PR+SD) was observed in 49 pts (86%) with an overall response (CR+PR) of 28% with 1 pt achieving CR. Clinical trial information: NCT02024607. Conclusions: This phase Ib/II study suggests napabucasin may sensitize chemorefractory CRC to FOLFIRI +/- Bev. Encouraging signs of synergistic activity between napabucasin and FOLFIRI was observed in CRC pts regardless of pSTAT3 status.[Table: see text]

576 Background: Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is rare, accounting for 1% of gastrointestinal malignancies, but the incidence is rising. Risk factors for the development of ASCC in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) include immunotherapy, increased duration of disease, and chronic fistulizing perianal disease. We sought to understand management strategies for ASCC in the setting of CD. Methods: A retrospective review from 2001-2016 was conducted for ICD-9/10 codes pertaining to Crohn’s disease (CD) (555.9/ K50) and ASCC (154.3/C44.520). Adult patients with a diagnosis of CD at the time of ASCC diagnosis were included. Results: A total of 7 patients (5 female) were included with a median age of 50 years. The majority presented with perianal pain (4) and bleeding (3). The mean duration of CD was 20 years, and all patients had perianal disease for > 10 years. Five patients had perianal fistulizing disease at the time of ASCC presentation. Clinical stage at diagnosis of ASCC was stage 0 (n = 1), I (n = 1), II (n = 1), III (n = 2), IV (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1). All patients were treated with Nigro protocol which included radiation (50-55Gy), 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin; 1 patient received cisplatin due to concurrent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Three patients required fecal diversion during radiation due to significant perianal disease. Two patients experienced complications related to radiation including anal and vaginal stenosis and an anovaginal fistula. One additional patient required an APR with rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for uncontrolled CD after treatment. During follow-up, 3 of the 7 patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation developed residual or recurrent disease and required salvage APR. All patients were alive at last follow-up, 2 with metastatic disease. 5-year disease free survival was 56%. Conclusions: Patients with ASCC in the setting of CD may be managed with the standard Nigro protocol, but complications from radiation are common in this setting. Three of seven patients required salvage surgery for residual or recurrent disease, and an additional patient required APR for palliation of CD symptoms. Given the aggressive nature of ASCC in this population, surveillance guidelines are necessary.

452 Background: CC pts with biliary stents or catheters often present with fever and/or jaundice requiring urgent treatment for which there is no uniform guideline. We aimed to develop an expert panel consensus on this topic using the modified RAND/UCLA Delphi process to rate treatment appropriateness. Methods: We recruited 13 physician experts from relevant specialty, geography, and practice settings. Patient scenarios were developed based on a literature review, and therapies were rated by the experts before and after a face-to-face discussion. The appropriateness of various therapies was rated on a 1-9 scale and classified as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain. Scenarios with > 2 ratings of 1-3 (inappropriate) and > 2 ratings of 7-9 (appropriate) were considered to have disagreement and were not assigned an appropriateness rating. Results: Panelists were from all US regions (92%) and the UK (8%); had practiced for a mean 16.5 years (4-33 years) and reported seeing an average of 120 unique CC patients a year (0-900 pts). Panelists rated 288 clinical scenarios. Experts decided that ongoing treatment with chemotherapy did not influence decision-making. Disagreement decreased from 37.5% before the meeting to 10.4% after. Consensus statements are summarized in table 1. Conclusions: The Delphi process produced consensus guidelines to fill an unmet need in urgent management of ascending cholangitis in pts with CC. Studies of the impact of these guidelines on cost of care and pt outcomes are warranted. (Support: The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation)[Table: see text]

434 Background: Based on the ABC 02 trial, standard therapy for ABTC is CG for up to 8 cycles. However, a recent abstract (Doherty et al, ASCO 2016) confirmed that a cohort of pts does benefit from continued therapy. The weekly administration of G and C can add significant toxicities that may prohibit prolonged treatment (trmt). Previous studies have shown that a biweekly schedule (Ko AH et al JCO 2012) of fixed dose rate (FDR) G helps optimize the prescribed regimen with an improved toxicity profile and added convenience to pts while maintaining efficacy. Methods: Pts with ABTC treated with FDR G (1000mg/m2 at 10mg/m2/min) with C 20mg/m2(GC) on days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle were included for analysis. Pts received trmt until time of progression. Data was collected including demographics, clinico-pathologic features, toxicities and survival. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate the median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: The study included 109 evaluable pts with ABTC who received CG. Pts had disease that was locally advanced (16.5%) or metastatic (83.5%). Median age was 60 years (28-86). Sites of tumor included gallbladder (21.1%), ampullary (3.6%) and bile duct (75.2%). Median number of cycles was 6 (1-27). Median PFS was 8.34 (6.74, 9.23) months and median OS was 10.32 (9.10, 11.43) months. Most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included neutropenia (11%), fatigue (10%), thrombocytopenia (TCP) (6.4%), anemia (2.8%), and abnormal liver function tests (2.8%). Fifty-two percent of pts received second line therapy. Conclusions: Biweekly CG in ABTC is associated with a more favorable toxicity profile while maintaining efficacy similar to that observed in prior clinical trials. Minimal toxicities were observed despite a prolonged course for many. Further prospective exploration should consider evaluating the role of biweekly gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen in ABTC especially as a potentially more favorable platform to combine with novel agents. [Table: see text]

420 Background: Advanced biliary cancers respond poorly to chemotherapy and have a dismal survival. Currently gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) is the standard of care for patients with advanced disease. The efficacy of second line treatment options is not well-defined. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients undergoing second line treatment for advanced biliary cancers at Mayo Clinic. Methods: After obtaining approval from the institutional board review (IRB), we identified 42 patients with advanced and metastatic biliary cancers that progressed after first line (GC) and received second line treatment from 2007-2014. All patients had adequate follow up data. JMP software was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis, and multivariate cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the prognostic effect of pertinent clinical variables. All tests were two sided and a P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 61.5 (range 26-87). The most common regimens used for second line settings were 5-FU-based (69%) followed by gemcitabine-based regimens (19%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 9.1%, while the disease control rate (DCR; stable disease and partial response) was 33%. The median overall survival (mOS) for the entire cohort from first line was 16.8 months (95% CI 12.7-21.7) and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.16 months (95% CI 7.3-14.7). From second line start the mOS was 10.4 months (95%; CI 7.3-23.7), and PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.3-4.0). 73% of patients who received second line therapy were alive at 6 months and 50% at 12 months. 25 patients received third line treatment after progression. An univariate and multivariate analysis were performed including age, sex, stage at diagnosis, regimen used, CA19-9 and total body weight loss > 5%, but no significant prognostic factors were identified. Conclusions: Patients with biliary cancers who progress after first line treatment have poor prognosis, but may benefit from second line regimens. 5-FU based regimens were the most commonly used in the second line setting, and 73% of patients who received second line therapy were alive at 6 months.

401 Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare neoplasms comprising less than 2% of pancreatic tumors. Outcomes of PNETs vary by stage, grade, and clinical presentation. New therapies may have improved outcomes. We present an analysis of the epidemiology and prognosis of patients (pts) with PNETs evaluating a more recent period than previously reported. Methods: Using data from the SEER registry, we identified adults with PNETs between 2000 and 2013. Cases were identified using a combination of ICD-O-3 site and histology codes. The JMP and SEER*STAT 8.3.2 were used for statistical analysis. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. The prognostic effect of variables was studied using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results: We identified 5993 pts with PNETs. Over the study duration, there was an increase in the annual incidence from 0.3 to 1.2 per 100.000. This was largely explained by the increase in number of pts with localized disease. The OS for the entire cohort was 54 months (95%; CI 50-58) and 5-year OS rates in localized, locally advanced and metastatic disease were 81.7%, 62% and 26% respectively. New therapies were increasingly implemented after 2008 such as sunitinib, everolimus and capecitabine/temozolomide. OS was better for pts diagnosed after 2008 (HR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.79; P < 0.0001) and this remained significant after excluding pts with localized disease (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92; P = 0.0002). Factors found to favorably affect OS included younger age, female sex, early stage, low grade, and surgery. In metastatic disease, pts who had surgery had better OS and this was significant after adjusting for possible confounders (HR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.3-0.45). Conclusions: In this large population-based study, we saw an increase in the annual incidence of PNETs mainly due to an increased number of pts with localized disease. The OS has improved over the study duration likely due to both stage migration and new therapies used in advanced disease. Younger age, female gender, low histologic grade, early stage and surgery were found to be factors that favorably affected survival. Surgery was found to be a predictor of better outcomes in metastatic disease.

389 Background: The liver is one of the most radiosensitive organs, making radiation therapy (RT) for liver tumors extremely challenging. RT is appropriate only for a minority of liver patients with limited tumor burden; a reduction in the prescribed radiation dose may be needed to lower the probability of radiation-induced liver disease especially in the presence of cirrhosis. Proton beam therapy (PBT) delivers less dose to the liver than photon therapy and is expected to reduce toxicity while also permitting safe dose escalation for some patients with liver tumors. Methods: The Proton Collaborative Group REG001-09 trial (NCT01255748) prospectively collects data for PBT patients with a variety of cancer types. To better understand treatment details and outcomes associated with liver PBT, patients enrolled on the PCG registry trial from 5 institutions who received liver PBT for any cancer between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed. Results: A total of 43 liver cancer patients were included, most with hepatocellular carcinoma (48.8%) or cholangiocarcinoma (25.6%). The vast majority did not have surgery at any time (86%). Most were treatment naive prior to PBT; 2 previously had RT and 8 had prior chemotherapy (mostly cholangiocarcinoma patients). The median total prescribed PBT dose was 58.05 Gy(RBE) (range 21.7-67.5). The median number of prescribed fractions was 15 (range 12-37). PBT was delivered to only the liver in 90.7% of patients; inclusion of lymph nodes was rare. Uniform scanning was used in 26 (72.1%) and pencil beam scanning in 2 patients (4.7%); the delivery technique used for the remaining patients was unknown (23.2%). With median follow up of 4.4 months (range 1.3-17.9), 3 patients (7%) had an intrahepatic recurrence, 2 patients (4.6%) developed distant metastasis, and 10 patients (23.3%) died. No grade 3 or higher toxicity was reported although 17 patients (39.5%) had grade 2 toxicity predominantly fatigue, anorexia, nausea, or vomiting. Conclusions: Although longer follow up is needed to assess late toxicities as well as disease control, early outcomes from the PCG registry trial for liver cancer patients shows that predominantly hypofractionated PBT has a very favorable acute toxicity profile.