Citations

Abstract Background Global data demonstrate an inverse relationship between hospital ileoanal pouch volume and adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for quality metrics for this technically demanding procedure.1-4 Currently, there are no standardised quality indicators to define high-quality pouch surgery. This study aimed to establish international consensus on key performance indicators (KPIs) in pouch surgery. Methods A modified Delphi process was conducted among an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts. Participants were identified through professional networks, literature review, and direct email invitation; additional participants recruited via a snowball sampling approach over one month. Candidate KPIs were generated from literature review and expert input across 5 domains. Each item was rated on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = not important, 9 = critically important); consensus was predefined as ≥ 80% of respondents rating an item 7–9. Items not reaching consensus were re-rated in a second round following anonymized group feedback. Results Round 1 included 312 participants from 37 countries. Demographics (Table 1): 53% were age 45 years, 35.2% were female, and included surgeons (68.6%) and gastroenterologists (31.1%). Most (76.6%) practice at academic or university hospitals, with a median of 11 (5–17) years in practise; 78.9% perform >1 pouchoscopy per month, and 39.5% of surgeons perform 5 pouches/year. Respondents’ regions included North America (51%), Europe (26%), Oceania (9%), Asia (6%), Latin America (4%), and the Middle East/Africa (4%). Seven (18%) countries (Denmark, Lithuania, Malaysia, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Sweden, and Switzerland) reported pouch surgery is already centralised, while 70.6% agreed pouch centralisation should be implemented. Cost/logistics and professional autonomy were the most important barriers to centralisation, whereas capacity and training exposure were least important. Overall, 37/59 (62.7%) candidate KPIs reached consensus after Round 1. The Round 2 response rate was 61%, and 2 additional KPIs reached consensus (preop ileitis and long-term risk of pouchitis). Additionally, 14 of 25 (56%) informed consent items reached consensus, and 64% of respondents felt informed consent for pouch surgery requires 2 or more office visits. Consensus items were used to populate a KPIPS Checklist (Figure 1). Conclusion Through an international Delphi process, the KPIPS study identified a consensus-derived set of key performance indicators to measure quality in pouch surgery. These quality metrics provide a foundation for benchmarking outcomes and represent a critical step towards centralization and the development of designated pouch centres of excellence to improve global standards of care for pouch patients. References: 1. Worley GHT, Fearnhead NS, Brown SR, et al. Review of current practice and outcomes following ileoanal pouch surgery: Lessons learned from the ileoanal pouch registry and the 2017 ileoanal pouch report. Colorectal Dis 2018;20:913–22. 2. Giddings HL, Yang PF, Steffens D, Solomon MJ, Ng KS. Influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on the outcomes after ileo-anal pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: Systematic review. Br J Surg 2024;111. 3. Hoang CM, Maykel JA, Davids JS, et al. Distribution of elective ileal pouch-anal anastomosis cases for ulcerative colitis: A study utilizing the university health system consortium database. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:2613–9. 4. Moojen TB, Visser E, Reijntjes MA, et al. One-year stoma-free survival of ileoanal pouches for uc in european centers: The miracle project. Ann Surg Open 2025;6:e596. Conflict of interest: Prof. Holubar, Stefan: No conflict of interest Soop, Mattias: No conflict of interest Poskus, Tomas: No conflict of interest Neary, Peter: No conflict of interest Uchino, Tairin: No conflict of interest Yang, Song-soo: No conflict of interest Adamina, Michel: No conflict of interest Avellaneda, Nicolas Luis: No conflict of interest Barnes, Edward: No conflict of interest Brouquet, Antoine: No conflict of interest Brown, Steven Ross: No conflict of interest De Buck Van Overstraeten, Anthony: No conflict of interest Buskens, Christianne J.: No conflict of interest Chiorean, Michael: No conflict of interest Clark, David: No conflict of interest Cohen, Benjamin: No conflict of interest El Ouali, Sara: No conflict of interest Faiz, Omar Darius: No conflict of interest Fichera, Alessandro: No conflict of interest Hahnloser, Dieter: No conflict of interest Hancock, Laura: No conflict of interest Herfarth, Hans: No conflict of interest Johnston, Michael: No conflict of interest Kayal, Maia: No conflict of interest Laharie, David: No conflict of interest Liberman, Sender: No conflict of interest Loftus, Jr, Edward: No conflict of interest Moeslein, Gabriela: No conflict of interest Myrelid, Pär: No conflict of interest Poylin, Vitaliy: No conflict of interest Qazi, Taha: No conflict of interest Raffals, Laura: No conflict of interest Rubin, David T.: No conflict of interest Spinelli, Antonino: No conflict of interest Steinhagen, Emily: No conflict of interest Tozer, Philip: No conflict of interest Verstockt, Bram: No conflict of interest Warusavitarne, Janindra: No conflict of interest Wexner, Steven: No conflict of interest Winter, Desmond: No conflict of interest

Abstract Background We aimed to describe the real-world durability of clinical and endoscopic outcomes of upadacitinib (UPA) in ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods We retrospectively analyzed an ongoing multi-center cohort of UC patients(pts) in the United States who were started on UPA for active disease. Primary outcome was clinical remission at 1yr assessed by partial Mayo score(pMS)(resolution of all UC related symptoms and physician global assessment). Secondary outcomes assessed at various timepoints, including after re-escalation, included clinical response(>50%reduction in symptoms utilizing the pMS), endoscopic response (Mayo endoscopic score≤1or absence of erosions/ulcerations) and histological remission(defined as normal or chronic inactive). Durable secondary outcomes achieved at both 6months and at 1yr and beyond were also assessed. Descriptive statistics were performed. Adverse events(AEs) investigated included cardiovascular events and herpes zoster (HZ). Results 416pts were included(Table 1) with median values for age at initiation of36.00yrs(range27-48), disease duration7.00yrs(range3-14)and follow-up 993days(IQR,672-1103), with206(49.52%)with follow-up at 1yr or beyond. Of these, 66.1%had extensive colitis. Induction duration was8wks in 86.5%and16wks in 4.8 %(20/416). Most received an induction dose of45mg(97.1%)and maintenance dose of30mg(85.8%). Among the evaluable population at1yr and beyond, 62.5%(45/80)were in clinical remission, 75.9%(22/29)in endoscopic response with58.6%(17/29) in remission and66.6%(20/30)in histological remission. At 6months, clinical remission was51.6%(42/93), endoscopic response was 75%(24/32) of which43.75%(14/32)were in remission and histologic remission was seen in 40.8%(20/49).Durable secondary outcomes of clinical remission were seen in 71.4%(30/42), endoscopic improvement in 45.8%(11/24), and histologic remission in35%(7/20). Re-escalation to 45mg occurred in 35pts, of which48.6%(17/35)were re-escalated due to incomplete induction clinical response with all achieving response(11 in remission). The rest(18/35)were re-escalated for clinical relapse after initial remission where72.2%(13/18)were able to recapture remission. After re-escalation,54.3%(19/35)continued on 45mg daily. AEs were reported in12.7%with HZ in 7pts(2.1%). One pt aged53yrs had an episode of TIA after 1yr on UPA at 15mg, without pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors and UPA use is ongoing at the same dose. There were no reported episodes of worsening of pre-existing cardiovascular disease or DVT/PE. Conclusion UPA is durably effective and safe in a real-world clinical setting with re-escalation to 45mg capturing response in a majority of the pts. Ongoing recruitment will provide further evidence on long term effectiveness and safety. Conflict of interest: Ms. Huang, Katherine: No conflict of interest Chandnani, Arun: No conflict of interest Samaan, Sami: None Tan, Tingyi: I have no conflict of interests to declare. Ramesh, Prajith Raj: None Conlon, Caroline: No conflict of interest Klein, Jeremy: None Reddy, Nikhil: No conflict of interest Ayoub, Malek: None Cervantes Limon, Gabriela: none Myers, Melissa: None Bucaram, Martha: No conflict of interest Lieto, Stephen: No conflict of interest Scalzo, Nicholas: No conflict of interest Cohen, Benjamin: Abbvie - consulting and speaking ALPCO - consulting J & J Innovative Medicine - consulting Takeda - consulting and speaking Emmes Biopharma Services LLC - DSMB Pfizer - consulting Mohamed, Islam: nothing to declare Ciorba, Matthew: Advisory Board: Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Geneoscopy Consulting: Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Geneoscopy Grant contracts: Janssen, Pfizer, Incyte Shukla, Richa: Speakers bureau - Abbvie and Lilly Wright, Michael: None Xu, An Tao: No conflict of interest Chowla, Navreet: No conflict of interest Ogholikhan, Sina: Abbvie Medical Director Kujawski, Michelle: Abbvie Scientific Director Dulaney, David: Speaker bureau - Regeneron Speaker bureau - Sanofi Speaker bureau - Takeda Speaker bureau - Eli Lilly Fenster, Marc: none Benson, Caroline: No conflict of interest Alhobayb, Tamara: No conflict of interest Berinstein, Jeffrey: No conflict of interest Shivashankar, Raina: Abbvie and BMS - speaker bureau Janssen and Celltrion - grant for IBD fellowship funding Pfizer - consultant Bishu, Shrinivas: None Patel, Anish: speaker: abbvie, J & J, Lilly, BMS, Pfizer, Phathom, Takeda consultant: abbvie Ungaro, Ryan: Personal Fees: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Takeda Johnson, Amanda: Research grant: Abbvie, Spyre Therapeutics Pekow, Joel R.: CVS Health - Consulting Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson - Stocks Yarur, Andres: Personal Fees: Consultant for Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Merck, Abbvie, Eli Lilly. Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Johnson and Johnson. Deepak, Parakkal: Parakkal Deepak has received research support under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the abstract from AbbVie, Johnson and Johnson, Sanofi, Merck, Teva, Direct Biologics, Tr1x, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche Genentech, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Spyre and Agomab, has received consulting fees from Johnson and Johnson, Abbvie, Merck, Sobi, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Sandoz and CorEvitas, LLC and has served on the board of the Srategic Alliance for Intercultural Advocacy in GI.

Abstract Background Colonic strictures in Crohn’s disease (CD) present a complex and relatively underexplored clinical issue. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intestinal ultrasound (IUS), have established criteria for evaluating small bowel CD strictures. However, radiologic definitions of benign colonic strictures and their diagnostic accuracy are not well-developed. Endoscopic definitions of colonic strictures are the most well-described. We conducted a systematic review to summarize definitions, diagnosis, and identification of inflammation and fibrosis of colonic strictures on endoscopy, CT, MR, and IUS. Methods A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, from inception to October 6, 2024, was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases to identify literature on diagnostic imaging of patients with colonic CD strictures. Only studies with comparison to endoscopy or imaging to a full-thickness histologic gold standard to differentiate fibrosis from inflammation were included. Two stage screening was completed in duplicate, and risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Results 46 studies were eligible for inclusion of 4623 abstracts screened. Definitions of colonic strictures on CT, MR, and IUS were highly variable with combinations of bowel wall thickness, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation. Endoscopic definitions of colonic strictures were the most consistently reported as lack of passage of a colonoscope through a narrowed lumen. Diagnostic imaging definitions used various combinations of increased bowel wall thickness, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation with no clear cutoffs. Few studies directly compared imaging features with histologic or endoscopic gold standards, limiting evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Meta-analyses were not conducted due to methodological heterogeneity of grading fibrosis across studies. In addition, statistical heterogeneity of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of colonic stricture diagnoses was limited by pooling with small bowel strictures in the studies. Conclusion This systematic review highlighted the absence of standardized definitions for diagnosing colonic Crohn’s disease strictures, particularly on diagnostic imaging, and the limited data distinguishing inflammatory from fibrotic components. Bowel wall thickening, luminal narrowing, and pre-stenotic dilation are key features of small bowel strictures, but their relevance to the colon requires further assessment. Establishing standardized definitions for colonic strictures that incorporate both endoscopic and imaging modalities is essential to advancing the field. Conflict of interest: Dr. Lu, Cathy: Advisory board - Abbvie, Johnson and Johnson, Takeda, Ferring, Merck, Celltrion, Lilly, Pfizer, Pendopharm, Agomab. Research Funding - Abbvie, Helmsley Charitable Trust, Alberta Innovates Dhaliwal, Ravdip: No conflict of interest Kellar, Amelia: No conflict of interest Rowan, Catherine: No conflict of interest St-Pierre, Joelle: Consultant for Pfizer, Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Pendopharm, and speaker for Takeda. Ernest-Suárez, Kenneth: Consulting/Advisory Board fees: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Ferring, Sandoz, SatisfAI, Takeda O’Brien, Maureen: No conflict of interest Rosentreter, Ryan: No conflict of interest Gulhati, Vishrut: No conflict of interest Baker, Mark: No conflict of interest Bettenworth, Dominik: DB is on the advisory board or consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Atheneum, BNG Service GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, CED-Service GmbH, Celltrion, Doctorflix, DGVS, Diaplan, Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation, Falk Foundation, Galapagos, Guidepoint, Impulze, Ferring, Janssen Cilag, Lilly, Medical Tribune, MedTriX, MSD, Mylan, Onkowissen, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, Tetrameros, Thieme, Tillotts Pharma, UCB Biopiharma, Viatris and Vifor Pharma. Bruining, David: Advisory board fees from Janssen Bari, Dane: Grant from Helmsley Charitable Trust speaker honorarium from Siemens Healthineers support for attending meetings or travel from Siemens Healthineers member of the Olympus advisory board co-chair Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disease Focused Panel (IBD DFP) and SAR Photon-Counting Detector CT Emerging Technology Commission and chair of the Society for Advanced Body Imaging Scientific Committee. Dillman, Jonathan: Grants from Philips Healthcare, GE HealthCare, Motilent, Perspectum, Guerbet, and Bracco. El Ouali, Sara: Speaker and/or consulting fees from Takeda, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Abbvie. Fletcher, John: Grant supports from Siemens Healthineers Gordon, Ilyssa: Grants to institution from Morphic Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Pliant Therapeutics, and UCB patent pending with Case Western Reserve University on radiomics signatures Jairath, Vipul: Consulting Fees: Abbvie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Anaptys Bio, Asahi Kasei, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Attovia, Blackbird Labs, BMS, Boehringer Ingleheim, Biomebank, Caldera, Calluna, Catalytic Health, Celltrion, Ensho, Enthera, Exeliome Biosciences, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Granite Bio, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mountainfield, MRM Health, Nxera, Organon, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pendopharm, Pioneering Medicine, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, SCOPE, Shattuck Labs, Sorriso, Spyre, Synedgen, Takeda, Teva, Tillotts, Union Therapeutics, Ventus, Ventyx, Vividion, Xencor, Zealand Pharma. Feagan, Brian Gordon: Consulting Fees: AbbVie, Abivax, Adaxion, Adiso, AgomAB Therapeutics, Akros, Alira Health, Ally Bridge Group, Apini Therapeutics, Argenx, Attovia Tx, Avoro Capital Advisors, Belmore Law, Biora Therapeutics, Blackbird Laboratories, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Boxer Capital, Celgene/BMS, Clarivate, Connect Biopharm, EcoR1, Eli Lilly, Ensho Therapeutics, Equillium, Evida, Enveda, Evommune Inc. Faes Farma, First Wave, Forbion, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, General Atlantic, Genesis Therapeutics, Gerson Lehrman Group, Gilead, Guidepoint, Imhotex, ImiDomics, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen, Japan Tobacco Inc., LifeMine Therapeutics, Mage Biologics, Merck, Mirador Therapeutics, Mobius Care, Monte Rosa Tx, Morphic Therapeutics, Nimbus Therapeutics, Novartis, Nxera, OncoC3, Palisade Bio, Pendopharm, Pfizer,Q32 Bio, REDX, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, Sorriso, Spyre Therapeutics, Sun Pharma, Surrozen Inc., Synedgen, Takeda, Tegus Inc., Teva, Tillotts, Trex Bio, TR1X Inc. TVM Lifesciences, Ventyx Biosciences, Versant Ventures, Vida Ventures, Ysios Capital, Zagbio Stock Shareholder: Connect Biopharm, EnGene, Evida, SRT, Imidomics, Enveda Rieder, Florian: Personal Fees: Adiso, Adnovate, Agomab, Allergan, AbbVie, Arena, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene/BMS, Celltrion, CDISC, Celsius, Cowen, Ferring, Galapagos, Galmed, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer, Granite, Guidepoint, Helmsley, Horizon Therapeutics, Image Analysis Limited, Index Pharma, Landos, Jannsen, Koutif, Mestag, Metacrine, Mopac, Morphic, Organovo, Origo, Palisade, Pfizer, Pliant, Prometheus Biosciences, Receptos, RedX, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, Surmodics, Surrozen, Takeda, Techlab, Teva, Theravance, Thetis, UCB, Ysios, 89Bio

Abstract Background The STOMP2 trial sought to determine whether the implantable autologous cell therapy AVB-114 is an effective add-on therapy for patients with persistent Crohn’s perianal fistulas. The trial design incorporated wait-list controlled (WLC) elements, allowing eligible control group subjects who completed the 9 mo primary endpoint visit in Part 1 to request AVB-114 treatment in Part 2 and strengthen the evaluation of AVB-114’s safety and effectiveness. Methods Eligible patients had a single perianal fistula tract and had failed prior treatment or had documented medication intolerance to biologic or conventional Crohn’s disease therapy. Subjects at 14 U.S. sites were randomized 1:1 to either standard of care (SoC; fistula optimization including seton placement) or AVB-114 implantation. The primary endpoint was combined fistula remission at 9 mo, defined as no collections >2cm on MRI, visual closure of the external opening, and no drainage of fluid despite gentle finger compression. A logistic regression time from exposure model through 9 mo utilized complete Part 1 data and all available Part 2 data to estimate combined AVB-114 effectiveness. Results Part 1 combined remission (using Non-Responder Imputation) was 8.3% (2/24) for SoC and 45.8% (11/24) for AVB-114 (38% difference, 95% CI 11 – 60%, post-hoc p-value of 0.0078). Twenty SoC subjects were treated with AVB-114 in Part 2. Four of the 9 Part 2 subjects with 9 mo combined remission data available were in combined fistula remission (44.4%). No subjects failed 9 mo radiological remission (first component of the primary endpoint), thus clinical remission (composite of the latter two components) was equivalent to combined remission. AVB-114 clinical remission in Part 1 and Part 2 to-date were similar, and when combined provided narrower estimates with the same coverage (Figure 1). Mean (SD) 9 mo perianal disease activity index (PDAI) scores for SoC, Part 1 AVB-114, and Part 2 AVB-114 were 5.0 (2.6), 4.1 (2.9), and 3.8 (3.5), respectively. Lower 9 mo scores and decreases from baseline were independently associated with an increased probability of clinical remission. Two serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; pseudopolyposis and proctalgia) occurred, with the latter attributed to AVB-114. Non-serious product related TEAE were predominantly related to postoperative perianal pain. Two grade 2 (moderate) AEs of cellulitis and abdominal wall abscess were attributed to adipose tissue collection. Conclusion Both the randomized and combined (all-treated) analyses demonstrated substantial AVB-114 effectiveness through 9 mo in this challenging patient population. AEs were anticipated, and generally mild and infrequent. Conflict of interest: Schwartz, David: 1) Abbvie: consultant 2) Janssen: Consultant 3) Takeda: Consultant 4) Avbios- consultant 5) Olympus- consultant Dozois, Eric: TBD Ehman, Eric: TBD Faubion, William: TBD Hudesman, David: Consultant: Avalo, Abbvie, Abivax, Biocon, BMS, CorEvitas, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Prometheus, Sanofi, Takeda, Fresenius Kabi Research Support: Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson Espen, Benjamin: employee of Avobis Bio LLC Pabla, Baldeep: Astellas, J & J - Advisory Board Prometheus - Speaker Eli Lilly - Speaker Papadakis, Konstantinos: TBD

Abstract Background Icotrokinra is the first targeted oral peptide that selectively blocks the IL-23 receptor (IL-23R) and precisely inhibits the IL-23 pathway. In ANTHEM-UC—a Phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, dose-ranging study in adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC)—all doses of icotrokinra achieved the primary endpoint of clinical response and delivered clinically meaningful improvements across key secondary endpoints at Week (W)12,1 which were maintained or improved at W28.2 Here we report the impact of icotrokinra on systemic and tissue biomarkers of inflammatory burden in UC. Methods Participants were randomised (1:1:1:1) to receive once-daily icotrokinra 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, or PBO. Clinical inflammatory biomarkers, C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP), along with serum IL-23 pathway biomarkers (IL-22, IL-17A, and IL-17F) were used to determine the impact of icotrokinra on systemic inflammation. Gene expression changes in colonic biopsies were used to confirm tissue IL-23 pathway engagement and dampening of tissue inflammation with icotrokinra. Results At the W12 primary timepoint, all doses of icotrokinra attenuated levels of serum CRP and FCP (Figure 1). All doses of icotrokinra, but not PBO, markedly reduced serum levels of IL-22, IL-17A, and IL-17F at W12 relative to baseline. Greater reductions in these serum biomarkers of IL-23 pathway activation were observed with the 200 mg and 400 mg doses relative to the 100 mg dose (Figure 1, nominal p < 0.05). All doses of icotrokinra, but not PBO, markedly reduced expression of gene sets associated with the IL-23–driven inflammation in tissue at W12 relative to baseline (Figure 2, nominal p < 0.0001). With icotrokinra treatment, the tissue transcriptome more closely resembled that of healthy individuals, with decreased expression of gene sets associated with UC-relevant inflammatory cell types and increased expression of genes characteristic of healthy epithelial cells. Importantly, dampening of systemic and tissue inflammation with icotrokinra was sustained at W28 (Figures 1 & 2). Conclusion We show for the first time that blocking the IL-23R can inhibit IL-23-mediated inflammatory signaling in UC patients. Icotrokinra treatment induced a sustained (W28) reduction in systemic and tissue biomarkers of inflammatory burden in UC. Furthermore, icotrokinra induced transcriptional changes that are consistent with dampening of IL-23–driven inflammation and normalization of the tissue transcriptome. While all once-daily doses of icotrokinra attenuated systemic and tissue inflammation, greater reduction of systemic inflammatory burden was observed with the 200 mg and 400 mg doses of icotrokinra. References: 1. Abreu MT, et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 10;13(suppl 8):172-3. 2. Jairath V, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 120;10(suppl 2):S312. Conflict of interest: Louis, Edouard: Education and Research Grants for my department: Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Fresenius-Kabi, Celltrion, EG pharma, Sandoz, Falk Personal Fees for conferences, advisory boards and consultancy: Abbvie, Takeda, Ferring, Pfizer, Janssen, Lilly, Galapagos, Celltrion, Arena, BMS, Falk, Biokuris, Fresenius-Kabi, Thabor Jairath, Vipul: Consulting fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Amgen, Anaptys Bio, Asahi Kasei, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Attovia, Blackbird Labs, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingleheim, Biomebank, Caldera, Calluna, Catalytic Health, Celltrion, Ensho, Enthera, Exeliome Biosciences, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Granite Bio, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Merck, Mountainfield, MRM Health, Nxera, Organon, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pendopharm, Pioneering Medicine, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, SCOPE, Shattuck Labs, Sorriso, Spyre, Synedgen, Takeda, Teva, Tillotts, Union Therapeutics, Ventus, Ventyx, Vividion, Xencor, Zealand Pharma. Siegmund, Britta: Consultant for AbbVie, Abivax, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dr. Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly, Endpoint Health, Galapagos, Johnson & Johnson, Materia Prima, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, Wedbush Securities speaker for AbbVie, AlfaSigma, Bristol Myers Squibb, CED Service GmbH, Dr. Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Johnson & Johnson, MD Education, MSD, Pfizer, Tr1xBio grant from Pfizer. Kannan, Arun K: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Zeeman, Martha: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Hart, Amy: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Strawn, David: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Venkat, Swati: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Tomsho, Lynn: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Mcrae, Bradford: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Ruane, Darren: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Surace, Lindsey: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Erondu, Ngozi: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Zhan, Joyce: Employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson Chen, Minhu: I have received speaker honoraria from Takeda China, Xian Janssen, and AbbVie China, as well as research funding from Takeda (China). Chachu, Karen: Advisory board for Johnson & Johnson consultant for OptumRx Matsuoka, Katsuyoshi: Grant: Abbvie Inc., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., ZERIA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., JIMRO Co., Ltd. Personal Fees: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Abbvie Inc., EA Pharma Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., ZERIA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Gilead Sciences, Celltrion Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb Limdi, Jimmy: Speaker/consultancy fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Arena, BioHit, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda research support from Galapagos, Takeda Rydzewska, Grazyna: Speaker and consultant fees from AbbVie, AlfaSigma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biocodex, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ferring, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, PRO.MED.Pl, Recordati, Sanprobi, SOBI, Takeda travel/accommodation meeting expenses from AbbVie, Ferring, Takeda Abreu, Maria Teresa: Grant/Research Support: Janssen, Prometheus Bioscience, Takeda Consultant: Janssen, Prometheus Bioscience, Takeda Gilead, Eli Lilly, AbbVie Inc., Bristol Myers, Imedex, Loftus Jr, Edward V: Consultant/advisory board member for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB.

Ameloblastomas are locally aggressive odontogenic tumors that most commonly arise in the mandible and maxilla and often harbor BRAF V600E mutations. While rare extragnathic ameloblastomas have been reported, primary pulmonary cases have not been documented. We identified 3 pulmonary neoplasms with features of ameloblastoma that were submitted for consultation between 2022 and 2025 at 3 academic institutions and performed detailed clinicopathologic and molecular analysis. The tumors presented as 5.4 to 7.3 cm peribronchial solitary lung masses. All resected tumors exhibited a predominant stellate reticulum-like component composed of loosely arranged p40-reactive bland squamoid-to-spindled cells with long intercellular bridges, and streaming and swirling architecture, surrounded by palisaded columnar cells with focal reverse nuclear polarity at the interface with myxoid stroma. All tumors were immunoreactive for BRAF V600E IHC, and BRAF V600E mutations were confirmed by molecular assays, including broad next-generation sequencing on 2 cases. Florid hyperplasia of entrapped pneumocytes initially suggested a biphasic neoplasm, but the absence of BRAF V600E IHC labeling confirmed pneumocyte entrapment. Occult gnathic primary tumors were excluded by subsequent clinical examination, including negative panoramic dental x-rays. No recurrences or metastases have been observed to date. This first series of primary pulmonary ameloblastomas highlights a distinctive tumor with histologic and molecular features identical to gnathic counterparts. We discuss the potential histogenesis of these unusual tumors.

Background. Acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains a major cause of morbidity after heart transplantation despite advances in immunosuppression. Whole genome transcriptomic profiling offers a systems-based, unbiased approach to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying ACR. However, noninvasive, longitudinal biomarker assessments capable of capturing the temporal dynamics of rejection biology remain scarce. Methods. RNA sequencing of peripheral blood from heart transplant recipients before, during, and after ACR was compared with nonrejection controls. Pathway analysis was conducted using differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and a machine learning approach was applied to assess gene-based prediction of ACR. Results. A total of 235 rejection-specific significant DEGs and 863 postrejection DEGs (false discovery rate < 0.05) were identified. During ACR, DEGs were enriched for T-cell activation/differentiation, apoptosis, and B-cell receptor signaling pathways. By combining the 2 sets of DEGs, a panel of 71 common genes was identified that reflected the significant, longitudinal transcriptomic dynamics of ACR. In an elastic net machine learning–based classifier, DYNLL1 and SERF2 were identified as ACR predictive genes, and achieved a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.63. Conclusions. Peripheral blood transcriptomics identify dynamic temporal responses in ACR including T- and B-cell pathways with potential ACR predictive genes that warrant further investigation.

Abstract Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment has become central to risk-adapted treatment strategies in multiple myeloma, yet the prognostic value of MRD negativity following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) across individual high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) remains unclear. We analyzed 351 newly diagnosed patients who achieved MRD negativity (sensitivity 2.4×10 − 6 ) at Day 100 following ASCT and had baseline cytogenetic data available. Median follow-up was 50.4 months. Standard-risk cytogenetics were present in 46% (n = 162), while 34% (n = 118) had one HRCA and 20% (n = 71) had ≥ 2 HRCAs. Despite uniform MRD negativity, several HRCAs continued to confer inferior progression-free survival (PFS). Compared with the standard-risk group (4-year PFS 84%), patients with del(17p), 1q21+, t(4;14), or MAF translocations [t(14;16)/t(14;20)] had significantly lower 4-year PFS rates: 56% (HR 2.89; p = 0.0001), 60% (HR 2.46; p = 0.0001), 43% (HR 3.50; p = 0.0001), and 58% (HR 2.51; p = 0.01), respectively. Isolated del(17p) and 1q21 + also conferred inferior PFS. The 4-year PFS was 65% for patients with one HRCA (HR 2.31; p = 0.0004) and 55% for those with ≥ 2 HRCAs (HR 2.75; p = 0.0001). In this large MRD-negative post-ASCT cohort, several HRCAs, including isolated HRCAs, remained clinically meaningful drivers of inferior PFS, highlighting that early MRD negativity does not uniformly mitigate the impact of high-risk biology.

Abstract Introduction Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is an effective treatment for basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke in select patients. While there is a growing body of literature suggesting that advanced imaging modalities such as computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and magnetic resonance (MR) may not be necessary for selecting anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke patients for EVT, whether advanced imaging may be superior to conventional imaging (non-contrast CT and CT angiography) in identifying good treatment candidates among BAO patients is less clear. Patients and methods This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of BAO EVT patients treated from 2013 to 2022 in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry. Patients selected for EVT by advanced imaging (CTP or MR) were matched with those selected by conventional imaging using propensity score matching (PSM) accounting for possible confounders. Primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days. Other outcomes include bedridden state or death at 90-days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Results 268 patients were included. 150 patients were selected for BAO EVT by conventional imaging, 86 by CTP, and 32 by MR. Patients selected by advanced imaging were significantly older than those selected by conventional imaging (median age 71 vs 64 years, p = 0.001); patient characteristics were otherwise similar between cohorts. After PSM, 90-day outcomes were similar between the two cohorts (p = 0.56), with similar rates of functional independence (39.4% vs 35.1%, p = 0.65), bedridden state or death (40.4% vs 44.7%, p = 0.66), and sICH (3.3% vs 5.7%, p = 0.49) for conventional and advanced imaging groups, respectively. Results were similar across treatment time windows (all p &gt; 0.05). Conclusions Selecting patients for basilar EVT using conventional versus advanced imaging did not result in different clinical outcomes, regardless of treatment time windows. Conventional imaging appears sufficient as a first-line tool for selecting basilar EVT patients in routine clinical practice.

Abstract Background Recent trials have furthered uncertainty regarding the endovascular benefit for medium vessel occlusions (MeVO). Stent retrievers (SR) were employed in the first attempt in most interventional arm participants. We sought to compare outcomes in acute MCA M2 occlusions between frontline aspiration and SR, and to delineate procedural and anatomical covariates associated with differential treatment effect. Methods Retrospective analysis of a multicenter stroke thrombectomy cohort identified cases of MT for M2 occlusions. Unmatched and propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts were generated comparing frontline aspiration to standalone and combined SR. The primary outcome was functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 90 days. Recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and the effect of M2 laterality, division occlusion and procedure time were assessed. Results About 1734 patients with M2 occlusions underwent either frontline aspiration (n = 711) or SR/combined (n = 958) thrombectomy between 2013 and 2024. PSM analysis favored aspiration for functional independence (49.9% vs 44.0%, OR 1.27 (1.03–1.57)), complete recanalization (61.2% vs 48.7%, OR 1.66 (1.34–2.05)), complete first pass effect (35.0% vs 27.6%, OR 1.42 (1.13–1.78)), and sICH (3.5% vs 6.2%, OR 0.55 (0.33–0.91)), with no difference in mortality. Frontline aspiration had significantly shorter procedural times (median 28 [IQR 15–49.5] vs 51 [IQR 35–78] minutes; p &lt; 0.001). For every minute increase in procedure time, the probability of functional independence decreased significantly (p &lt; 0.001) less with frontline aspiration (0.35%) compared to SR/combined (1.61%). Conclusion Frontline aspiration for M2 occlusions resulted in better clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to SRs. Future trials for MeVO with a focus on contact aspiration thrombectomy may succeed where recent trials have failed.