Citations

ABSTRACT Diagnosis The diagnosis of multiple myeloma requires ≥ 10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE): CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions) attributable to the plasma cell disorder, bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥ 60%, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥ 100 (provided involved FLC is ≥ 100 mg/L and urine monoclonal protein is ≥ 200 mg/24 h), or > 1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging. Risk Stratification High‐risk multiple myeloma is defined by the presence of del(17p), p53 mutation, or bi‐allelic del(1p); t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20) in combination with gain(1q) or del(1p); or gain(1q) plus del(1p). Initial Therapy Initial therapy consists of a quadruplet regimen consisting of anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody (daratumumab or isatuximab) plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in eligible patients. Selected standard risk patients can delay transplant until first relapse. Frail patients who are not candidates for transplant are treated with a triplet regimen, either anti‐CD 38 antibody plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, or VRd. Maintenance Therapy Standard maintenance is lenalidomide in combination with daratumumab or isatuximab. Lenalidomide is discontinued after 2 years in standard‐risk patients. Bortezomib plus lenalidomide is an alternative option for high‐risk myeloma. Management of Relapsed Disease Major options are chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, various triplet regimens, and belantamab mafadotin. Management of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Daratumumab for 3 years should be considered in high‐risk smoldering multiple myeloma.

IMPORTANCE: Phenobarbital use in ICU alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) may reflect severe or refractory withdrawal and treatment escalation, making multicenter data important to understand its use within ICU practice and its relationship with clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate phenobarbital use in real-world ICU AWS as a marker of severe or refractory withdrawal and treatment escalation. We also examined its association with time-to-discharge and safety outcomes compared with nonphenobarbital regimens. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study using multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Adults with AWS, defined as Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, revised (CIWA-Ar) score greater than or equal to 10, were included if they received a phenobarbital-based or nonphenobarbital-based regimen in ICUs across a large academic health system from June 30, 2017, to July 1, 2024. Postoperative ICU admissions were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were time to ICU and hospital discharge alive from treatment initiation. Safety outcomes were hypotension, new intubation, and aspiration within 48 hours. RESULTS: Of 1216 patients, 345 (28.4%) received phenobarbital. Before matching, phenobarbital-treated patients had higher CIWA-Ar, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and pre-ICU benzodiazepine exposure, consistent with more severe or refractory withdrawal. In adjusted time-to-discharge models, phenobarbital use was not significantly associated with time to hospital discharge alive (discharge rate ratio [DRR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74–1.12; p = 0.370) or ICU discharge alive (DRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59–1.01; p = 0.057). Hypotension and intubation were similar, and aspiration was less frequent with phenobarbital. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary ICU cohort, phenobarbital use reflected treatment escalation in patients with more severe or refractory AWS. After adjustment, time to ICU and hospital discharge alive did not differ significantly, hypotension and intubation were similar, and aspiration was less frequent with phenobarbital. Future studies should define optimal timing, dosing, and patient selection.

Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer, yet the optimal target definition, dose, and toxicity profile for rib metastases remain uncertain. Objectives We assessed local control (LC), toxicity, and the risk of radiation-induced rib fracture (RF) after SBRT for rib metastases. Design Retrospective multicenter cohort study. Methods We analyzed prostate cancer patients with radiologically diagnosed rib metastases treated with SBRT and >=12 months of follow-up. Outcomes were descriptively compared between gross tumor volume (GTV)-only and GTV plus an intraosseous clinical target volume (CTV) margin. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, cumulative incidence functions, and exploratory univariable Cox and logistic regression; no formal equivalence testing or multivariable validation was attempted because event numbers were very low. Results We included 102 patients with a median follow-up of 20 months. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 97.9% and 96.3%, respectively. At 3 years, local progression was 2.1% in the GTV-only group, absent in patients treated with >=10 mm margins, and numerically highest with 3-5 mm CTV margins (13.5%, p=0.022). Among 13 symptomatic patients, pain control was excellent, with complete or partial response in all patients within 6 months. No grade >=3 toxicities occurred. RFs were rare (n=3, 2.9%), comprising one symptomatic Grade 2 event (0.9%) and two asymptomatic Grade 1 events (2.0%). Baseline symptoms and extraosseous infiltration were associated with RF in exploratory univariable analysis, but confidence intervals were wide. Higher PTV dose exposure, particularly PTV D50% (36.9 vs. 31.1 Gy, p=0.041), was also observed among RF cases. Conclusions SBRT for rib metastases from prostate cancer was associated with high LC, pain relief, and low observed toxicity in this retrospective real-world cohort. GTV-only contouring may be feasible in carefully selected patients staged and planned with PSMA-PET/CT, but the non-randomized design, baseline imbalances, short follow-up, and very low event count preclude drawing conclusions about equivalence or independent validation. RF predictor analyses should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) entails prolonged recovery, serious complications, functional limitations, psychological distress, and extended isolation to prevent infection. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, treatment disruptions, restricted caregiver access, and intensified isolation compounded these transplant-specific burdens. The longer-term influence of the pandemic experience on HCT recovery and survivorship remains poorly understood. Methods In this qualitative descriptive study, adults with AML who underwent allogeneic HCT from March through September 2020 participated in virtual semi-structured interviews from July 2022 through April 2023, approximately two years post-transplant. Participants were identified through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. Zoom or phone interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis to describe survivorship experiences and opportunities to improve supportive care. Results A total of 25 AML survivors (ages 24-78, 56% male) were interviewed approximately two years post-transplant. Three themes were found: (1) Transplant is an arduous journey; (2) The COVID-19 pandemic shaped the transplant experience in complex and far-reaching ways; (3) Transplant demands sustained personal and relational investment throughout the transplant journey. Conclusions This study enhances our understanding of the stressors associated with transplantation during periods of heightened adversity, while also identifying opportunities to strengthen healthcare systems and supportive care services for this population. Situating these experiences within the context of a global health emergency offers a rare lens into how external stressors can exacerbate the already demanding nature of HCT survivorship. By understanding survivors’ experiences, healthcare systems can better anticipate and address the evolving needs of transplant survivors.

ABSTRACT Introduction Sustaining interventions implemented as part of pragmatic clinical trials requires proactive planning, but how to approach this process remains understudied. The Non‐pharmacological Options in Hospital‐based and Rehabilitation pain Management stepped‐wedge cluster‐randomized pragmatic trial tested an electronic health record‐based educational bundle (known as the Healing After Surgery [HAS] initiative) that encouraged the incorporation of non‐pharmacological pain care in perioperative pain management. The HAS initiative was implemented in multiple surgical practices and hospital sites. One year prior to trial completion, a sustainment committee was established to support the transition of intervention components to clinical ownership and to support posttrial sustainment of the HAS initiative. Methods We reviewed meeting minutes from biweekly sustainment committee meetings and conducted debriefing sessions with committee members (informed by the Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool) to identify sustainment strategies and challenges, which were then organized into meaningful themes. Results The following six themes emerged from meeting minutes and debriefings: (1) automation of low‐touch components, (2) reliance on internal champions, (3) intentional handoff communication, (4) institutional attention, (5) relaxed fidelity, and (6) continuous evaluation. Together, they highlight the importance of early, structured planning and adaptable implementation strategies. Conclusions Sustainment of the HAS initiative required extensive communication, adaptation, and stakeholder engagement across diverse institutional contexts. Proactive sustainment planning during trial design may help ensure interventions are successfully integrated into routine clinical practice posttrial.

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship offer guidance for health care providers who care for survivors of adult-onset cancer. These guidelines include screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for common physical and psychosocial problems resulting from cancer and its treatment and provide a framework for care coordination. They also present guidance for helping cancer survivors to enhance their wellness and maintain a healthy lifestyle. This article summarizes the panel’s current recommendations and recent updates regarding anxiety, depression, distress, and trauma in cancer survivors.

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that originates from the mesothelial surfaces of certain sites within the body. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and represents approximately 85% of mesotheliomas. The NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural provide recommendations for evaluation and treatment in patients with pleural mesothelioma. The NCCN Guidelines will continue to be updated annually based on available clinical evidence and panel consensus.