Citations

Abstract Background Use of software to “de‐face” research brain images has grown as advances in automated face recognition have made it increasingly possible to re‐identify participants. Imaging studies of Alzheimer’s Disease and related diseases have included more participants from historically underrepresented groups, but de‐facing software have primarily been validated using images from mostly non‐Hispanic White participants, and its performance has not been directly compared across ethnoracial groups. Method From The Health and Aging Brain Study: Health Disparities (HABS‐HD) study, we constructed a sample of 305 T1‐weighted MRI from HABS‐HD baseline visits, matched across three ethnoracial groups (non‐Hispanic White (NHW, n = 104), non‐Hispanic African American (AA, n = 104), Mexican American (MA, n = 97)) according to age‐decade, sex, cognitive status (impaired/unimpaired), and MRI scanner model. We ran mri_reface 0.3.5 on each image, and we ran FreeSurfer 7.4.1 on each unmodified image and on each de‐faced output. We then compared regional gray matter (GM) volume and cortical thickness measurements by subtracting each de‐faced image measurement from the corresponding unmodified image measurement. We compared these differences between de‐faced and unmodified images across the three matched groups using GLM analyses adjusted for age, sex, and cognitive status, and Bonferroni corrected. Result When aggregating across all brain regions, differences in cortical thickness measures due to de‐facing were significantly different between the NHW and MA groups, and between AA and MA, but not between NHW and AA (Figure 1). Differences between these group means were <0.005mm. For GM volume, differences were significant between AA and MA (magnitude < 0.2%), but not between NHW and AA or NHW and MA (Figure 2). Examining each region individually (Figure 3), cortical thickness differences were significant for only 4 regions (all with magnitudes <0.03mm), and GM volume differences were significant for only 6 regions (all with magnitudes <2%). Conclusion Effects of mri_reface on FreeSurfer brain measurements were significantly different across ethnoracial groups. Our future work will optimize mri_reface to eliminate these differences. However, the magnitudes of these differences are sufficiently small that they are unlikely to have a practical effect on analyses of data using current versions.

Abstract Background Diffusion MRI (dMRI) measures are increasingly being used as biomarkers for aging and dementia in multi‐center studies. Measurements in longitudinal studies are often acquired on different systems, which can result in systematic differences of machine origin (e.g. vendor, hardware, algorithms). This may warrant harmonization prior to pooling multi‐site data. However, harmonization algorithms may introduce a risk of removing valuable information content and reducing sensitivity to physiological factors (e.g. sex, age, disease). Here, we tested the hypothesis that protocol standardization may minimize machine‐origin differences, obviating a need for post‐acquisition harmonization in a two‐site (Mississippi‐MS and Minnesota‐MN) cohort of the longitudinal Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA). Methods Two data sets were analyzed: first, a crossover dataset with 80 participants (scanned within 2 days) bridging two different protocols on GE and Siemens scanners; second, participants scanned using standardized protocols from the ongoing MCSA ( N MN‐MCSA =204; N MS‐MCSA =52). Parameters are listed in Figure 1. For crossover data, analyses were repeated with GE data resampled to 2‐mm isotropic resolution, and discarding Siemens‐only b‐shells to artificially reduce protocol disparities. Analysis encompassed visualization of overlain subjectwise histogram‐derived densities obtained from whole‐brain masks for dMRI measures; and median dMRI measures from within the genu of the corpus callosum (GCC) with nonparametric statistical testing. When available, both DTI and NODDI measures were compared. Results Pronounced visual distributional differences seen between MD and FA in crossover data were reduced with resampling of GE data and including only b‐shells shared across acquisitions. For the resampled/reshelled data, significant differences remained for all GCC‐FA comparisons, but not all GCC‐MD (Figure 2). For the ongoing MCSA data from two sites, MD and FA whole‐brain densities were more closely aligned, with GCC‐FA and GCC‐MD showing no significant differences (Figure 3). NODDI measures showed more discordant densities than DTI measures, including shifts in most probable values and differences in distributional arrangement. Conclusions Our work provides further evidence supporting protocol and processing standardization for minimizing machine‐origin differences prior to considering harmonization. Differences in dMRI metrics seen when comparing across unstandardized protocols were reduced when protocols were standardized. NODDI metrics had more apparent sensitivity to site than DTI measures.

Abstract Background Most existing biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) inform on core AD pathologies in the central nervous system, namely amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration (ATN). However, molecular disease mechanisms underlying AD are complex and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers that reflect brain molecular changes in AD beyond ATN. Method Using peripheral blood transcriptome data from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging(MCSA) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we identified genes associated with AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, cognitive, and harmonized neuroimaging measures in two cohorts, followed by meta‐analysis. We identified consensus gene co‐expression modules in MCSA and ADNI using WGCNA and assessed the association between module eigengenes and aforementioned measures. Using seven bulk brain RNAseq cohorts, we confirmed the preservation of coexpression modules across blood and brain. Enrichment analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) terms and cell‐types were performed using significant and/or hub genes. The MCSA transcriptome was further deconvoluted to obtain cell‐type proportions and cell‐type specific expression. Result Blood transcriptome modules M5 and M8 are upregulated in AD/MCI and associate with worse cognition, whereas M1, M10, M13, M16, and M21 are downregulated in AD/MCI and associate with better cognition. M17 associates with more microhemorrhages. Cell‐type enrichment analysis revealed that M5 is enriched in basophils, monocytes, and neutrophils; M8 in monocytes and neutrophils; M13 in natural kills cells; M17 in megakaryocytes; M21 in B cells. GO analysis shows broad consistency with the cell‐type enrichment analysis. M1, 5, and 8 are preserved in the brain network modules. From these modules, we prioritized transcripts significantly associated with at least one AD‐related phenotype in both blood and brain. Cell‐type deconvolution analysis shows that prioritized transcripts in M1 associate with better cognition and higher metabolic activity in B cells. Conclusion We identified blood transcripts and modules associated with AD/MCI, cognition, or neuroimaging, with three preserved in brain networks. These three modules represent centrally linked peripheral molecular signatures that can reveal perturbed brain pathways and cell level transcriptional changes in AD/MCI. We aim to further investigate the prioritized transcripts in additional datasets to establish them as potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Abstract Background Plasma neurofilament light chains (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are blood‐based biomarkers of axonal injury and astrocytic activation, respectively, that are elevated in those with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) relative to cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) is a multishell diffusion MRI method capable of evaluating tissue microstructure at the axonal and dendritic level. We evaluated associations between temporal cortex orientation dispersion index (ODI), neurite density index (NDI) and isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF) and plasma NfL and GFAP concentrations. Method We included Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) participants (ages 60‐95 years) with diagnoses or CU ( n = 356) or MCI ( n = 60), and Alzheimer’s Dementia Research Center (ADRC) participants with dementia ( n = 51). NODDI imaging was obtained on a 3T Siemens Prisma scanner with 2 mm isotropic resolution. NfL and GFAP were measured using the Simoa® Neurology 4‐Plex E Advantage kit. We fit separate linear regression models within each MCALT_ADIR122 cortical ROI with regional NODDI as the primary predictor and log‐transformed plasma concentration as the outcome. Models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, cortical thickness (or hippocampal & amygdalar volume) and total intracranial volume. Result The Table displays demographic data. Figures 1 & 2 show the relationship of NDI and ISOVF measures to plasma NfL concentrations across participants in individual ROIs (similar findings were noted with GFAP). A significant inverse relationship between NfL concentrations and NDI was observed in hippocampus, amygdala, entorhinal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus as well as all temporal neocortical regions except the superior temporal gyrus ( p <0.001) (Figure 1), whereas higher NfL concentrations were associated with higher ISOVF in all regions ( p <0.001) (Figure 2). Fewer significant associations were also seen with ODI. After adjusting for age, cortical thickness/volume and other confounds, significant associations with NDI remain, particularly in hippocampal and amygdalar regions. Conclusion NODDI‐derived measures (NDI and ISOVF) within the temporal lobe cortical regions demonstrate significant associations with plasma biomarkers of axonal and astrocytic dysfunction that are elevated during cognitive decline. This association provides preliminary validation of the utility of NODDI in assessing cortical microstructural changes associated with cognitive decline.

Abstract Background The Joint Propagation Model (JPM)‐based CenTauR scale was recently introduced to harmonize tau‐PET quantification across different radiotracers. This study examined how CenTauR harmonization enhances the comparability of tau‐PET quantification across matched cohorts using different tracers. The evaluation focused on three key aspects: (1) comparing tau‐PET positivity rates as defined by CenTauR, (2) evaluating its diagnostic accuracy for symptomatic AD, and (3) analyzing longitudinal changes in tau‐PET rates over time. Method The JPM, developed by the CPAD‐led Tau PET Harmonization Working Group (Leuzy et al., Alzheimers Dement. 2024; Figure 1A), models relationships between anchor point subjects and head‐to‐head tau‐PET SUVR data onto the CenTauR scale, providing conversion equations for multiple tracers. JPM equations were applied to [¹⁸F]flortaucipir SUVR (Meta‐temporal ROI) data from 561 cognitively impaired participants in the ADNI and OASIS‐3 studies. Using ROC analysis, we determined the CenTauR cut‐off for positivity (T+) that maximized the Youden index for discriminating between FDA‐approved positive/negative visual reads. Three separate cohorts, scanned using [¹⁸F]flortaucipir (ADNI), [¹⁸F]MK‐6240 (CPAS), and [¹⁸F]RO‐948 (BioFINDER‐2), were matched 1:1 by age, MMSE, amyloid‐β, and clinical diagnosis. CenTauR‐based metrics were compared across these cohorts. Result A cut‐off of 18 CenTauRs was found to optimally classify [ 18 F]flortaucipir PET visual reads (Figure 1B). The matching procedure identified 1089 participants (363 per cohort). The frequency of T+ using the 18 CenTauRs cut‐off for the Meta‐Temporal ROI was highly comparable across tracers across groups, except for the Aβ‐positive cognitively unimpaired group, where variability was more pronounced due to a smaller sample size (Figure 2A). Similarly, tau‐PET discriminative accuracy for symptomatic AD vs controls remained similar across [ 18 F]flortaucipir and [ 18 F]MK‐6240 (Figure 2B). In a separate sample of 212 matched participants from ADNI ([¹⁸F]flortaucipir) and AIBL ([¹⁸F]MK‐6240) with baseline and 1‐year follow‐up tau‐PET scans, 1‐year change in CenTauRs was comparable (Figure 2C). An exploratory voxelwise transformation, utilizing the Meta‐Temporal conversion equation in a representative case scanned with both [¹⁸F]flortaucipir and [¹⁸F]MK‐6240, demonstrates the potential for voxelwise CenTauR harmonization (Figure 3). Conclusion These analyses suggest that CenTauR harmonization increases the comparability of tau‐PET data acquired with different tracers. Additional validation analyses with larger cohorts including other radiotracers ([¹⁸F]PI‐2620) are underway.

ABSTRACT Background Previous studies on the relationship between prediabetes, HbA1c and cognitive trajectories show mixed results. Therefore, we investigated the association of prediabetes, diabetes and HbA1c with change in global and domain‐specific cognitive scores in cognitively unimpaired (CU) adults, as well as the potential effect modification by sex or age. Methods This longitudinal study included 4236 CU persons aged ≥ 50 years from the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. We ran linear mixed‐effect models with baseline prediabetes, diabetes and HbA1c predicting longitudinal global and domain‐specific (i.e., memory, language, attention/executive function, and visuospatial skills) cognitive z‐scores and raw scores. Models were adjusted for age, sex, education, medical comorbidity, repeated cognitive testing, and ApoEɛ4. We additionally ran models with sex and age interactions. Results Compared to normoglycemic individuals, individuals with prediabetes and diabetes showed poorer performance on cognitive tests, i.e., TMT‐B, category fluency, and block design subtest over time. Additionally, the presence of prediabetes, diabetes, longer diabetes duration and higher HbA1c were associated with faster global and domain‐specific cognitive decline over a median follow‐up of 6.4 years (range 1–19). Three‐way interactions showed that the effect of diabetes on decline in global cognition, attention and visuospatial domains was more pronounced in women than in men. Age did not modify the effect of diabetes or higher HbA1c on cognition. Conclusions The results suggest that prediabetes and diabetes significantly shorten the timeframe before a potentially clinically noticeable change in global and domain‐specific cognition is reached. Thus, lifestyle modification to reverse prediabetes and prevent diabetes could potentially reduce the rate of cognitive decline in aging populations. The findings differed by sex (i.e., the effect of diabetes on decline in global cognition, attention and visuospatial domains was more pronounced in women than men).

Abstract BACKGROUND Understanding long-term sequelae of cancer care is critical. Cognitive impairment is a common and disabling survivorship issue. Because sex influences tumor biology, therapy exposure, and dementia risk, we examined whether cancer care for a prior malignancy alters late-life cognitive outcomes differently in males and females. METHODS We assessed adults ≥50 years, cognitively normal at study entry, from a longitudinal, population-based cohort (Mayo Clinic Study of Aging). Participants were linked to our institutional cancer registry (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers). Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia were adjudicated by consensus. We fitted multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models to estimate how prevalent cancer diagnosis influenced the risk of developing MCI/dementia. Sex-specific effects were determined by incorporating a cancer×sex interaction term and by generating separate hazard ratios. Analyses were controlled for age, APOE4 status, education, and presence of vascular/metabolic conditions. RESULTS 5793 MCSA participants (female: 49.4%, APOE4 positive: 27.5%) were included in the study, with a mean age of 73 years at study entry. Incident MCI was recorded in 866 participants, and 737 were diagnosed with incident dementia. About 20% (n=1176) of the cohort had a cancer diagnosis, most commonly prostate (n=423) and breast (n=277). There was no independent relationship between history of cancer and risk for MCI or dementia. We found that males with cancer had an increased risk for MCI (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04-1.57, p=0.003) and dementia (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.6, p=0.053). Conversely, females with cancer had a lower risk for MCI (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.01, p=0.063), although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggests male cancer survivors may be more susceptible to cognitive impairment, independent of age, APOE4 status, education, and vascular/metabolic burden. Elucidating the hormonal, treatment-related, and systemic pathways driving this should be a priority for future mechanistic studies.