Citations

Background: Collaborative methods are necessary to meet patient palliative care (PC) needs because of the inadequate supply of PC specialists. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a needs assessment and determine primary care, emergency, and hospital physicians’ general attitudes about primary PCs, confidence in managing common PC scenarios, and preferences for interaction with specialty PCs. Design: A sequential mixed-methods study design was used, whereby individual qualitative interviews informed the content of a quantitative survey. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted by a member of the study team with expertise in qualitative research methods. Setting/Subjects: The quantitative survey, delivered to primary care, emergency, and hospital physicians across four distinct geographic locations of a large health system, solicited impressions on common clinical PC scenarios that might pose challenges. Measurements: Survey data included demographic information, clinician confidence levels, preferences for support in managing PC scenarios, and likelihood to refer to PC. Results: The quantitative survey was completed by 126 physicians (response rate, 13.9%). Overall mean (standard deviation) confidence levels were lowest for a scenario about handling pain (5.57 [2.35] out of 10) and highest for goals-of-care conversations with the patient (7.80 [2.02]). Spearman correlations between mean confidence and likelihood to refer to PC demonstrated weak to moderate inverse correlations. Respondents with previous training in PC had higher mean confidence in managing symptoms and goals-of-care conversations. Conclusions: Continuing efforts are needed to help improve physicians’ confidence in primary PC skills and develop innovative methods to provide collaborative support of specialty PCs across various specialties and PC needs.

Background: Traditional Medicare (TM) claims data are widely used by researchers and registries to report survivorship following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the mass exodus of patients from TM to Medicare Advantage (MA) has compromised the fidelity of TM data. Methods: We identified 11,717 Medicare-eligible patients (15,282 knees) who had undergone primary TKA from 2000 to 2020 at a single institution. Insurance type was analyzed, and 84% of TKAs were covered by TM. The rates of survivorship free from revision or reoperation were calculated for patients with TM coverage. The same survivorship end points were recalculated after censoring of patients who transitioned to MA after primary TKA, thereby modeling the impact of losing patients from the TM dataset. Differences in survivorship were compared. The mean duration of follow-up was 10 years. Results: From 2000 to 2020, there was a decrease in TM insurance (from 94% to 68%) and a corresponding increase in MA insurance (from 0% to 19%) among patients undergoing TKA. Following TKA, 25% of patients with TM coverage switched to MA. For patients with TM at the time of surgery, the 15-year rates of survivorship free from any reoperation or revision were 90% and 96%, respectively. When patients were censored upon transition from TM to MA, the 15-year rates of survivorship free from any reoperation (92% versus 90%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.2; p = 0.001) or any revision (97% versus 96%; HR = 1.3; p = 0.002) were significantly higher. Conclusions: One in 4 patients left TM for MA after primary TKA, effectively making them lost to follow-up within TM datasets. The mass exodus of patients out of TM resulted in falsely elevated estimates of survivorship free from reoperation and from revision, with increasing divergence in survivorship over time, when MA data were excluded. As MA continues to grow, efforts to incorporate these data will become increasingly important. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intraoperative exoskeleton that supports surgeons’ heads, necks, and backs to reduce neck discomfort. Background: Surgeons are at a considerable risk of developing neck pain and related injuries. Passive exoskeletons are a potential intervention to support surgeons’ body parts and alleviate strain and discomfort. Methods: The NekSpine (a passive neck exoskeleton) was trialed on 12 surgeons (7 males and 5 females) across 6 specialties. Each surgeon performed 4 surgical procedures, 2 with the NekSpine (exoskeleton) and 2 without (baseline). Exoskeleton and baseline surgeries were paired primarily by surgical procedure and secondarily by duration. Surgeons completed surveys that included the NASA-TLX and usability questions before and after surgical procedures to evaluate body part discomfort, overall fatigue, workload, and potential disruptions to the surgical workflow. Surgeons also wore inertial measurement units to objectively record their upper arms, neck, and torso postures. Results: Use of the exoskeleton yielded significant decreases in discomfort in the neck, left shoulder, right shoulder, and left arm. Reductions in percent surgical duration in risk 4 (extreme risk postures) coupled with increases spent in risk 2 (moderate risk postures) for the neck and torso were noted. Surgeons reported overall favorable usability results with the exoskeleton not interfering with the surgical workflow, and most stated that they would use the exoskeleton again. Conclusions: The NekSpine is a promising intervention to alleviate surgeons’ neck discomfort and improve their neck and torso postures.

Abstract Introduction Case reports and series are critical to guide initial decision-making in a pandemic, but may have lower rigor because of the need to publish them quickly. This meta-epidemiologic study compares the methodological quality of case series that described the acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020 versus those that described long-haul cases. Methods We conducted a systematic review in multiple databases for long-haul case series and reports. We identified early cases of acute COVID-19 synthesized in published systematic reviews. We evaluated the methodological quality by pairs of independent reviewers using a tool dedicated for appraising case series. Results We included 239 original case series (81 published in the first year of the pandemic and 158 published later describing long-haul COVID). The methodological quality of both groups of case series was very good (80–100% of series satisfying quality items) except for two items, the selection approach of cases included in the series and ruling out other causes that can explain the main finding described in the series. The appraisal tool demonstrated high agreement and reliability between reviewers. Conclusion The methodological quality of modern case series is high, except for two quality items that represent an area for potential for improvement for authors of case series describing future pandemics.

Chronic pain is common with aging. Yet, little is known about the attitudes, beliefs, and experiences of older adults with chronic pain regarding opioids, particularly in regard to effects on daily functioning and cognition. This qualitative analysis employed semi-structured interviews in 25 community-dwelling older adults with chronic pain and current or recent prescription opioid use. Interviews focused on perceptions, beliefs, and experiences of living with chronic pain, use of prescription opioids, and the impact of opioids on pain control, cognition, and daily function. Older adults display adaptability and acceptance in living with chronic pain, desire person-centered pain care, approach the risks-benefits of opioids with regards to cognition differently, and perceive stigma as a barrier to effective partnership with clinicians.

Objective: To characterize the relationship between surgeon-staff familiarity and the time required to perform an operation. Summary Background Data: The clinical and operational efficiency of operating rooms is a driver of hospital finances and patient outcomes. Surgeon-staff familiarity is an important focus for quality improvement and process optimization. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed analyzing operations performed at 4 academic hospitals between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023. Exclusion criteria (urgent operations, 2-specialty cases, low surgeon/specialty volume in data set, scheduled length > 8 hours) were applied to limit heterogeneity. The exposure of interest was familiarity between the surgeon and the allied health staff (scrub technicians and circulating nurses) present during an operation (represented as the median staff experience with the index surgeon in the previous 180 d). The primary outcome was whether the actual case length was (vs. was not) 10% shorter than the scheduled case length (“shorter case length”). A secondary outcome was the quantification of the difference between the observed and expected case length and whether the surgical time (cut-close) was shorter. Results: A total of 257,645 operations performed by 25 different specialties comprised the analyzed cohort. Higher levels of surgeon-staff familiarity were associated with a higher likelihood of a shorter case length (observed:expected ratio = 1.16 [1.14–1.18] for high/high levels of familiarity, compared with 0.90 [0.88–0.91] for low/low levels of familiarity). Greater familiarity was also associated with case lengths that were shorter relative to scheduled case length (high/high levels of familiarity 8.7% shorter than low/low levels, P < 0.001). Within the 4 most common types of cases, those operations performed by teams with higher levels of familiarity had shorter surgical times (cut-to-close). Conclusions: This study found that operations were more efficiently performed when the scrub technician and circulating nurse staff had a greater recent experience with the primary surgeon. Surgical team familiarity should be considered a focus of operational and clinical excellence.

The optimal patient panel size (PPS) in primary care and the factors determining it remain unclear. We conducted a meta-narrative review of the literature to evaluate factors influencing PPS and assess its association with patient outcomes. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed from inception through December 2023, focusing on original studies reporting factors used to determine PPS and related outcomes (eg, clinical outcomes, process measures, and resource utilization). A total of 48 studies were included, identifying 7 key factors influencing PPS. Smaller panels were associated with improved patient satisfaction, continuity of care, and health promotion, while clinical outcomes, utilization, and costs showed minimal impact by PPS. Panel size was primarily associated with patient age, sex, comorbidities, and practice type and structure. Community-based centers typically managed smaller panels, often staffed by female clinicians and serving socioeconomically disadvantaged populations with greater health needs than hospital-based practices. Female clinicians were also independently associated with managing smaller panels, higher quality care indicators, fewer emergency department visits, and improved patient satisfaction. Determining the ideal PPS is a multifaceted process influenced by practice setting, patient demographics, and clinician characteristics. While practice-related factors showed limited association with PPS, patient-reported outcomes were more closely linked to it. Primary care practices should tailor panel sizes to their patient populations, emphasizing a patient-centered approach and ensuring adequate infrastructure support to optimize care delivery.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal bloating is a difficult symptom to treat. Hypnotherapy and diaphragmatic intervention have separately shown benefit on bloating in prior work but have not been united into a single intervention. We aimed to obtain data on the potential therapeutic impact of a novel audio-recorded bloating treatment for bloating integrating hypnosis and diaphragmatic breathing, with proposed synergistic effect. METHODS: Patients with nonorganic bowel disorders with predominant bloating symptoms completed a digitally delivered 7-session audio-recorded hypnotherapy program without clinician involvement. The intervention combined bloating-targeted hypnotic suggestions and guided diaphragmatic breathing delivered under hypnosis, and was supplemented with interval self-guided breathing exercises. Participants completed online REDCap assessments at baseline, midtreatment, at end of treatment, and 3-month follow-up, evaluating symptom severity, gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety, overall anxiety/depression, and quality of life. Outcomes were assessed in an intention-to-treat manner with repeated measures analysis of variances (ANOVAs) with Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise post hoc tests. RESULTS: Of 23 patients who started treatment, 22 (95.6%) completed follow-up. Bloating severity on Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Symptom Severity Scale and Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index showed reduction in bloating with large effect sizes (Cohen d of ∼0.8) at the end of treatment, as did Visceral Sensitivity Index bloating-related anxiety. At the end of treatment, 16 patients (69.6%) were Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Symptom Severity Scale treatment responders (≥30% symptom reduction) on bloating and 17 (73.9%) on overall bowel symptom severity. Anxiety, depression, and quality-of-life scores were unchanged. Outcome measures were fully maintained at the 3-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Results suggest the therapeutic utility of a new cost-effective self-administered bloating intervention. A randomized controlled trial is planned to confirm these therapeutic effects.

BACKGROUND: Validly measuring disease-specific health status is critical in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) to quantify the benefit of different interventions. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) has been used to assess health status in patients with severe TR, but its content validity in this patient population is unknown, including whether additional questions are needed to supplement the KCCQ. METHODS: Twenty participants with symptomatic severe TR from 2 midwestern clinical sites were interviewed in 2023 using a semistructured guide. The interview guide addressed symptoms, physical and social functioning, and quality of life concepts of the KCCQ, as well as other potential TR symptoms not represented in the KCCQ. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive and deductive coding and content analysis, with additional participants recruited until thematic saturation occurred. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 80 (41–89), and 75% were female. Shortness of breath and fatigue were reported by virtually all participants (n=20 and n=19, respectively) and had a marked negative impact on their physical and social functioning and quality of life. Lower limb edema was also reported by 10 participants. Although these concepts are captured by the KCCQ, other symptoms were also reported, including appetite loss (n=8) and upper body edema (n=4), but did not seem to markedly affect participants’ function or quality of life. In addition, all participants who experienced these other symptoms reported symptoms that were already captured by the KCCQ. CONCLUSIONS: All participants experienced symptoms captured by the KCCQ, and these symptoms had a substantial impact on their physical and social functioning and quality of life. Although some participants reported additional symptoms not assessed by the KCCQ, their incorporation would only marginally improve content validity. Thus, the current KCCQ appears to be appropriate for capturing the disease-specific health status of patients with severe TR.