Smith, Jamie

Substance use disorders (SUD) remain a significant source of morbidity and mortality in the United States, and access to treatment continues to be inadequate. Primary Care Clinicians (PCCs) are well-positioned to provide long-term SUD care for patients. However, multiple provider-level barriers exist. Collaborative Care Management (CoCM) has proven successful in supporting PCCs in treating psychiatric conditions, such as depression. Our group proposes an addiction-focused modified CoCM that leverages telemedicine and an electronic platform (Senyo) into primary care. This study assesses PCCs’ attitudes toward this proposed model and their likelihood (with support) of prescribing medications for alcohol and opioid use disorder. To achieve this, an anonymized and confidential electronic survey was deployed to all 489 of our institutions’ PCCs. Eighty-five completed the survey (17.4% response); the majority (94%) agreed that digital CoCM for SUD will be helpful for their practice, and 85% expressed agreement that such a model will increase their confidence and likelihood to prescribe anti-craving medications. Additionally, we found that PCCs’ comfort level in addressing SUD with patients is not associated with years in practice, clinician type (attending physicians, resident/fellow physicians, nurse practitioner or physician assistant), or their perception of currently available SUD treatment resources. Future work to evaluate practice changes, including rates of anti-craving medication prescribing and SUD-treatment outcomes after implementation of our digital CoCM will prove useful in determining the effectiveness of this model.

Background Heart failure self‐care can contribute to a high daily workload and treatment burden. The goal of this cohort study was to assess the characteristics and outcomes associated with burden of treatment (BoT). Methods Surveys comprising validated instruments to measure BoT and other constructs were mailed to patients with heart failure in Southeastern Minnesota. Participants were divided into tertiles by BoT scores. Associations of clinical variables with BoT were examined using multinomial logistic regression. Associations of BoT with mortality and hospitalizations were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression and Andersen–Gill models, respectively. Results A total of 609 participants (mean age 76.3 years, 60.3% men, 55.2% urban, 64.3% preserved ejection fraction) completed surveys. Higher BoT was associated with worse health status, more depressive symptoms, lower resilience, less social support, lower medication adherence, and worse health literacy. Mean±SD follow‐up was 14.4 (4.1) months. Estimated 1‐year mortality (8.3% [95% CI, 4.3%–12.1%], 11.0% [95% CI, 6.5%–15.2%], 16.0% [95% CI, 10.8%–21.0%]) and 1‐year mean cumulative hospitalizations (0.57 [95% CI, 0.45–0.72], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.66–1.05], 1.15 [95% CI, 0.93–1.42]) increased across patients reporting low, medium, and high BoT, respectively. Adjustment for health status eliminated any significant association of BoT with risks of death and hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.10 [95% CI, 0.58–2.07] and 1.09 [95% CI, 0.74–1.61], respectively, highest versus lowest BoT tertile). Conclusions BoT in heart failure varies by clinical and psychosocial factors. Higher BoT identifies patients at increased risk of adverse health outcomes due to their worse health status. These findings can serve as a foundation for interventions to minimize workload and improve quality of life.

Chronic pain is common with aging. Yet, little is known about the attitudes, beliefs, and experiences of older adults with chronic pain regarding opioids, particularly in regard to effects on daily functioning and cognition. This qualitative analysis employed semi-structured interviews in 25 community-dwelling older adults with chronic pain and current or recent prescription opioid use. Interviews focused on perceptions, beliefs, and experiences of living with chronic pain, use of prescription opioids, and the impact of opioids on pain control, cognition, and daily function. Older adults display adaptability and acceptance in living with chronic pain, desire person-centered pain care, approach the risks-benefits of opioids with regards to cognition differently, and perceive stigma as a barrier to effective partnership with clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Validly measuring disease-specific health status is critical in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) to quantify the benefit of different interventions. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) has been used to assess health status in patients with severe TR, but its content validity in this patient population is unknown, including whether additional questions are needed to supplement the KCCQ. METHODS: Twenty participants with symptomatic severe TR from 2 midwestern clinical sites were interviewed in 2023 using a semistructured guide. The interview guide addressed symptoms, physical and social functioning, and quality of life concepts of the KCCQ, as well as other potential TR symptoms not represented in the KCCQ. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive and deductive coding and content analysis, with additional participants recruited until thematic saturation occurred. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 80 (41–89), and 75% were female. Shortness of breath and fatigue were reported by virtually all participants (n=20 and n=19, respectively) and had a marked negative impact on their physical and social functioning and quality of life. Lower limb edema was also reported by 10 participants. Although these concepts are captured by the KCCQ, other symptoms were also reported, including appetite loss (n=8) and upper body edema (n=4), but did not seem to markedly affect participants’ function or quality of life. In addition, all participants who experienced these other symptoms reported symptoms that were already captured by the KCCQ. CONCLUSIONS: All participants experienced symptoms captured by the KCCQ, and these symptoms had a substantial impact on their physical and social functioning and quality of life. Although some participants reported additional symptoms not assessed by the KCCQ, their incorporation would only marginally improve content validity. Thus, the current KCCQ appears to be appropriate for capturing the disease-specific health status of patients with severe TR.

Objective Patients with heart failure (HF) perform a variety of self-care activities to control symptoms and minimise the risk of HF decompensations. The objective of this study was to understand how patients build capacity and manage the work of living with HF. Design A qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews. The interview guide was informed by the Cumulative Complexity Model, a conceptual framework that focuses on a patient’s workload and their capacity to manage that work. Interview transcripts were analysed using a mixed inductive and deductive coding approach with organisation into larger thematic categories. Setting Southeastern Minnesota USA (11 counties) with capture of data from local community healthcare providers under the auspices of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Participants Intentional sampling of local patients with HF (n=24, median age 69.5 years, 54% women, 63% rural, 54% preserved ejection fraction) who reported high treatment burden and/ or poor health status on a questionnaire. Results Three major themes emerged: using capacity to manage workload, disruptions resulting in workload exceeding capacity and regaining workload-capacity balance. Participants described routinising the daily tasks associated with living with HF to minimise the associated burden and identified disruptions to their routines, including hospitalisations, emergency room visits, worsening health status and changes in healthcare access. To accommodate disruptions and regain workload-capacity balance, participants decreased workload and/or transferred tasks to others to maximise capacity. Conclusions Participants with HF described managing patient workload in times of stable health, but they sometimes struggled to accommodate disruptions and worsening health status. These findings can inform the design of interventions to minimise workload, maximise capacity and improve quality of life for patients with HF.

Introduction: Psychological resilience is the ability to adapt to significant adversity. Higher resilience has been associated with better quality of life in HF, but its association with outcomes is not known. Herein, we characterize resilience and its association with outcomes in HF. Research Questions/Hypothesis: Greater resilience is associated with better health status and outcomes in high-risk HF. Methods: In a prospective study, adult residents of 11 counties in Southeastern Minnesota with HF who had been hospitalized with decompensated HF or ventricular arrhythmia (“high-risk HF”) in the preceding 1 year were mailed a survey that included questionnaires to assess resilience (Connor Davidson resilience scale, CD-RISC2), health status (KCCQ-12), and other psychosocial constructs in March 2022. Patients were divided into tertiles by resilience scores, and association with outcomes (survival and hospitalization) were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression and Andersen-Gill models, respectively. Results: Among 649 respondents (mean age 76 ± 11.5 years, 40% women, 64.3% HFpEF), patients with greater resilience were older ( p=0.015 ), had lower BMI ( p=0.003 ) and were more often retired or employed (vs disabled or unemployed, p<0.001 ). Greater resilience was moderately correlated with better health status (r=0.33), social support (r=0.27), and health literacy (r=-0.30); and lower treatment burden (r=-0.42), symptom burden (r=-0.41), and fewer depressive symptoms (r=-0.41) ( p<0.001 for all ). At 1-year follow up, patients with the lowest resilience (lowest tertile) were at a significantly increased risk for HF hospitalizations (adjusted HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.06-4.11) and CV mortality (adjusted HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.01-2.57) compared to those with highest resilience. There was no statistically significant association of resilience with risks of all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalizations after adjustment ( Figures 1A-D ). Conclusion: Higher resilience is associated with better health status and psychosocial profile. Patients with low resilience are at increased risk for HF hospitalizations and CV mortality. Impact of resilience on long term outcomes and response to interventions must be tested in future studies.

Background The epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) differ in women and men. Whether these differences extend to the subgroup of patients with advanced HF is not well defined. Methods and Results This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with advanced HF (European Society of Cardiology criteria) from 2007 to 2017. Differences in survival and hospitalization risks in women and men following advanced HF development were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression and Andersen‐Gill models, respectively. Of 936 individuals with advanced HF, 417 (44.6%) were women and 519 (55.4%) were men (self‐reported sex). Time from development of HF to advanced HF was similar in women and men (median 3.2 versus 3.6 years). Women were older at diagnosis (mean age 79 versus 75 years), less often had coronary disease and hyperlipidemia, but more often had hypertension and depression ( P <0.05 for each). Advanced HF with preserved ejection fraction was more prevalent in women than men (60% versus 30%, p<0.001). There were no differences in adjusted risks of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.77–1.03]), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.70–1.02]), all‐cause hospitalizations (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.90–1.20]), or HF hospitalizations (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.75–1.11]) between women and men. However, adjusted cardiovascular mortality was lower in women versus men with advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56–0.93]). Conclusions Women more often present with advanced HF with preserved ejection fraction and men with atherosclerotic disease and advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction. Despite these differences, survival and hospitalization risks are largely comparable in women and men with advanced HF.

Introduction: The epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) differs in women and men. However, it is not well defined whether these differences extend to the subgroup of patients that develop advanced HF or if they translate to differences in outcomes. Aim: To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of advanced HF in women and men. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota with advanced HF (as defined by European Society of Cardiology Criteria) from 2007-2017. Differences in survival and hospitalization risks following advanced HF development in women and men were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression and Andersen Gill models, respectively. Results: Of 936 individuals with advanced HF, 417 (44.6%) were women and 519 (55.4%) were men. Women were older (mean 79 vs 75 years) with a lower overall comorbidity burden (Charlson comorbidity index 4.7 vs 5.2), less often had coronary artery disease (60% vs 79%) and hyperlipidemia (69% vs 77%), but more often had hypertension (91% vs 87%) and depression (32% vs 24%), and more often had advanced HF with preserved ejection fraction (60% vs. 30%) compared with men ( p<0.05 for each). After adjustment for age, ejection fraction and comorbidities, there were no differences in risks of survival or hospitalizations ( Figure ) between women and men (p> 0.10 for each). Conclusion: While advanced HF can occur in both women and men, their phenotypes differ; women more often present with advanced HFpEF and men with more atherosclerotic disease and advanced HFrEF. Despite these differences, survival is similar in women and men with advanced HF.