Citations

Abstract Objective To test the effectiveness of a surgical web‐based decision aid (DA) in improving knowledge. Summary of Background Data DAs support decision making by providing information about the options. Methods A stepped wedge trial was conducted in 10 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program clinics (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology). Clinics were randomized to time of transition from usual care (UC) to delivery of a web‐based DA. Patients with stage 0 through 3 breast cancer being considered for surgery were enrolled. Knowledge (primary outcome) was measured using the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument and patients were asked, “How informed do you feel?” Intervention effects were tested with linear mixed‐effects models, accounting for surgeon and clinic‐level clustering, time, and enrollment after COVID. Additional models controlled for demographics. Results A total of 44% of DA arm patients reviewed the DA and 58% in UC arm reported reviewing “any information.” Being in the DA arm versus UC was not associated with knowledge. However, “review of information” was associated with higher knowledge. In addition, non‐White race and lower education were associated with lower knowledge. The DA arm was associated with higher perceptions of feeling informed (parameter estimate 1.36; 95% CI, 0.18–2.55; p = .02); this persisted even when controlling for review of information or demographics. Conclusion Improved knowledge was not demonstrate with a web‐based DA versus UC. Interestingly, the DA was associated with a higher likelihood of feeling informed. Future research will explore the discrepancy between patients feeling informed but having low knowledge, especially for disadvantaged patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0376600

Abstract Rationale Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are characterised by significant challenges in communication, social interaction, and adaptive function, often impacting quality of life. Previous studies support genetic influences on the communication abilities of individuals with NDD, but were either limited to single genetic conditions or to small cohorts with a limited selection of communication measures. Methods We analysed caregiver-reported communication abilities in 79,518 individuals with NDD from the Simons Searchlight and SPARK registries: 4,439 with a CNV-based or monogenic NDD and 75,079 with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) without a known genetic cause (idiopathic ASD) as controls. For analysis, we a priori selected 10 communication-related measures based on their availability in the study cohorts, coverage of distinct communication aspects, and their frequent use in neurodevelopmental phenotyping, yielding 177,328 data points across all study cohorts. The individuals in the Searchlight registry were divided into a Discovery cohort (the 15 most prevalent genetic NDD conditions) and a Confirmation cohort (all other genetic NDD conditions). A second Confirmation cohort was generated using all individuals with genetic ASD forms from the SPARK registry. We then tested each of the three case cohorts and each genetic condition represented in the Discovery cohort against the ASD control cohort. Developmental trajectories were assessed through testing of participants grouped by age at evaluation. Results Measure-level analyses demonstrated significant associations between genetic status and communication abilities, differences in communication abilities between classes of genetic variants (monogenic vs. CNV-based NDDs), and variability between specific genetic NDD conditions. CNV-based NDDs showed milder communication impairment, outperforming idiopathic ASD controls in 9/10 communication measures, whereas monogenic NDD conditions had more pervasive impairments, especially in verbal communication. Although impaired in verbal communication, five monogenic NDD conditions showed at least suggestive strengths in nonverbal and social communication relative to idiopathic ASD controls ( CSNK2A1 , CTNNB1 , SETBP1 , MED13L , and PPP2R5D ), specifically in using gestures. Developmental trajectory analyses revealed STXBP1 as the gene group at highest risk of developmental stagnation in communication abilities. Conclusions These findings underscore the potential of precision speech-language pathology (SLP) approaches tailored to the specific verbal and nonverbal communication strengths and weaknesses of genetic groups. We also provide evidence for measurable improvements and declines in communication abilities with age at the group level, highlighting the need for developmentally informed care. By integrating genetic insights into clinical practice, precision SLP approaches may enhance communication outcomes and developmental progress and improve quality of life for individuals with genetic NDDs.

Abstract Objective Dravet syndrome (DS) is the prototypic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by drug‐resistant seizures, developmental slowing, and many other morbidities. Detailed characterization of behavioral phenotypes and social–emotional skill development are limited. Methods We prospectively assessed behavioral and social–emotional problems in the ENVISION natural history study (NCT04537832) of children with DS associated with SCN1A pathogenic variants ( SCN1A + DS) enrolled at <5 years of age. Assessments every 3 months for up to 2 years included the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Brief Infant‐Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd Edition (VABS‐3). Results Fifty‐eight children with DS enrolled at 16 sites worldwide. Problematic behaviors—inattention, aggressive or oppositional behaviors, and withdrawn and autistic behaviors—began before age 3 years, became more evident with age, and were clinically significant in many children by age 3–4 years. CBCL Total, Externalizing, and Internalizing Problems T‐scores rose by approximately 3 points per year, and BITSEA Problem scale scores increased by 2.3 points annually ( p = .002). SDQ Hyperactivity scores worsened over time ( p = .013), whereas emotional difficulties remained stable. VABS‐3 Socialization domain scores, which were already more than 1 SD below the normative mean at baseline, decreased further, particularly in younger participants. Correlation analyses showed that poorer communication abilities were associated with increased problematic behaviors ( R = −.55 for CBCL Total Problems and VABS‐3 Communication scores). Mixed‐effects modeling identified age as the strongest predictor of worsening behavioral outcomes. Significance We found that behavioral and social–emotional problems are inherent components of DS that present in toddlerhood and worsen throughout early childhood. This highlights the need to diagnose and manage these issues early. Targeted therapy may alleviate the wide‐ranging morbidities that are intrinsic to DS, including the social–emotional and behavior problems that frequently emerge.

Abstract Objectives Discuss the current status of advanced practice providers (APPs) onboarding to headache medicine (HM) practices in the United States and present recommendations of the American Headache Society (AHS) APP Work Group to improve the onboarding process. Background A high demand for care, national shortage of specialists, and multiple advancements in HM have led to an increasing interest and presence of APPs of various backgrounds in the field, currently without a unifying onboarding process. Efforts to standardize and optimize the onboarding process for APPs in HM practices are necessary, to ensure high standards in quality of care. Methods The APP Work Group of the AHS Practice Management Committee developed comprehensive recommendations through literature review, survey of AHS members, and expert consensus. A modified Delphi protocol was used to establish key onboarding goals, definitions, and best practice recommendations. Results Recommendations are made regarding duration of onboarding, appropriate supervision, formal education and procedural skills, scope of practice, grading and documentation of competence, and reciprocal feedback. Conclusion Currently, there are no standard onboarding and training guidelines for APPs in the field of HM. We provide recommendations for a more systematic approach to help develop qualified providers and enhance their retention in HM practices.

Abstract Systemic amyloidosis is a rare, multisystem disorder that is often challenging to diagnose due to vague and nonspecific symptoms that frequently overlap with other disorders. By the time patients are diagnosed, irreversible organ impairment from amyloid deposition occurrs, contributing to substantial morbidity and mortality. Although developing the American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines on systemic amyloidosis, we identified a critical knowledge gap in the recognition of the clinical presentation of its most common subtypes. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of 117 studies following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines to identify clinical “red flags” for light chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR; wild-type [ATTRwt] and hereditary [ATTRv]) amyloidosis. Studies were identified from the comprehensive systematic review through the ASH amyloidosis diagnosis guideline panel, data mining, and gray literature review. Data were extracted and synthesized by systems to characterize the earliest and most frequently overlooked clinical red flags for the different types of amyloidosis. Shortness of breath and fatigue, the earliest symptoms of AL amyloidosis, contrast with the carpal tunnel syndrome occurring years before ATTRwt cardiac amyloidosis is diagnosed. Weight loss, unexplained abdominal pain, and early satiety were overlooked red flags for AL amyloidosis, compared to the preceding arrhythmias often missed in evaluation for ATTRwt amyloidosis. Sensory loss was the predominant neuropathic presentation for AL amyloidosis compared to the painful length-dependent neuropathy of ATTRv amyloidosis. Awareness of the early symptoms and distinct patterns across subtypes can enhance cross-specialty awareness and support earlier diagnosis and intervention of AL and ATTR amyloidosis.

Background Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by the misfolding of immunoglobulin light chains produced by a plasma cell dyscrasia. Patients can present with involvement of many organs, including the heart, kidneys, liver, nerves, and other sites, resulting in a high symptom burden. Timely and accurate diagnosis is important to prevent organ failure and improve patient survival. Objective These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients and clinicians in the timely and effective diagnosis of AL amyloidosis. Methods ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 22 individuals representing various medical specialties (academic and community hematology, nephrology, neurology, cardiology, internal medicine, and pathology) as well as 1 patient representative. The group was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The University of Kansas Medical Center supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews (up to 6 March 2023). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE evidence-to-decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. Results The panel agreed on 12 recommendations. Conclusions The use of serum immunofixation, urine immunofixation, and serum free light chains enhances the clinical suspicion of AL amyloidosis. The diagnosis of AL amyloidosis can be made effectively through surrogate biopsies, which require both a bone marrow biopsy and fat-pad sampling; however, target organ biopsies may be favored in certain clinical situations.

Abstract Objective Despite being safe and effective, surgery for pediatric epilepsy is underutilized. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are important to consider when examining this treatment gap. This study examined the potential systemic inequities at three different stages in the journey toward epilepsy surgery across the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC). Methods Any youth in the PERC prospective surgery database (≤18 years) was eligible and included if sociodemographic factors were also available. We examined if there were differences in disparity factors in: (1) referral to Phase I evaluation, (2) offering of surgery, and (3) completion of surgery. Results Of 1309 patients, the majority were male (53%, p = .04), White (82.2%, p < .001), not Hispanic or Latino (84.3%, p < .001), and privately insured (56.3%, p < .001). Of the youth who were offered surgical treatment ( n = 1103, 84.3%), there were no significant differences in race/ethnicity or sex. Those with a structural lesion were more likely to be offered surgery, and historically marginalized youth were more likely to have a lesion. Of patients who completed surgery ( n = 927, 84.0%), White patients were 1.88 times (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14–3.04) more likely than Black patients to complete surgery ( p = .01). Significance Youth who began surgery evaluation are not representative of the demographics of those with epilepsy in the United States, with greater representation of White, non‐Hispanic male individuals. In addition, youth who began surgery evaluation disproportionally have private insurance. At the next stage of offering surgery, there were no differences based on SDoH. However, there is evidence that underrepresented youth that were magnetic resonance negative were less likely to be referred for surgical workup and that Black youth were less likely to undergo surgery. Therefore, efforts to provide equitable opportunity for all youth with refractory epilepsy should be concentrated at the referral for surgery evaluation point of care; however, additional efforts are also needed at later stages.

Abstract Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment has become central to risk-adapted treatment strategies in multiple myeloma, yet the prognostic value of MRD negativity following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) across individual high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) remains unclear. We analyzed 351 newly diagnosed patients who achieved MRD negativity (sensitivity 2.4×10 − 6 ) at Day 100 following ASCT and had baseline cytogenetic data available. Median follow-up was 50.4 months. Standard-risk cytogenetics were present in 46% (n = 162), while 34% (n = 118) had one HRCA and 20% (n = 71) had ≥ 2 HRCAs. Despite uniform MRD negativity, several HRCAs continued to confer inferior progression-free survival (PFS). Compared with the standard-risk group (4-year PFS 84%), patients with del(17p), 1q21+, t(4;14), or MAF translocations [t(14;16)/t(14;20)] had significantly lower 4-year PFS rates: 56% (HR 2.89; p = 0.0001), 60% (HR 2.46; p = 0.0001), 43% (HR 3.50; p = 0.0001), and 58% (HR 2.51; p = 0.01), respectively. Isolated del(17p) and 1q21 + also conferred inferior PFS. The 4-year PFS was 65% for patients with one HRCA (HR 2.31; p = 0.0004) and 55% for those with ≥ 2 HRCAs (HR 2.75; p = 0.0001). In this large MRD-negative post-ASCT cohort, several HRCAs, including isolated HRCAs, remained clinically meaningful drivers of inferior PFS, highlighting that early MRD negativity does not uniformly mitigate the impact of high-risk biology.

Abstract Motivation: Epilepsy is a diverse group of neurological disorders affecting over 50 million people worldwide. While common epilepsy types are well studied, rare epilepsies—often severe and genetically complex—pose significant challenges in diagnosis, research, and treatment. Accurate and interoperable etiology and disease classifications are critical for improving data sharing, supporting clinical decision-making, and advancing rare disease research. Results: To enhance the accuracy of epilepsy-related disease concept representation within the Mondo Disease Ontology (Mondo), we conducted a series of expert-driven workshops in collaboration with the team from the Rare Disease Cures Accelerator-Data and Analytics Platform (RDCA-DAP). Specialists in epileptology, genetics, neurodevelopment, biomedical ontology, and patient community advocates systematically reviewed and revised the epilepsy hierarchy in Mondo, aligning it with the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification system. These updates include reclassification of epilepsy subtypes, including syndromes, age-related epilepsies, and developmental epileptic encephalopathies, resulting in a more granular, standardized, and clinically relevant structure. Mondo now offers an enhanced framework for integrating epilepsy data across resources, enabling improved interoperability and facilitating rare disease research and data curation, with continued efforts underway to further refine and expand this integration.