Citations

AbstractVon Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric glycoprotein with essential roles in primary hemostasis. Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD), due to quantitative and/or qualitative defects of VWF usually experience mucocutaneous bleeding. Based on the laboratory results of VWF antigen, various VWF activities, factor VIII activity, and VWF multimer patterns, VWD can be categorized as type 1, 2, and 3 VWD. VWF multimer analysis by either manual or semi-automated electrophoresis and immunoblotting is a critical part of the laboratory testing to differentiate type 1, type 2 VWD, and subtypes of type 1 or 2 VWD. The multimer distribution patterns can also help to understand the underlying molecular mechanism of VWF synthesis, multimerization, and clearance defects in VWD. This review will cover VWF synthesis, multimerization, secretion, VWF multimer analysis, and VWF multimer interpretation of various types and subtypes of VWD.

AbstractVon Willebrand factor (VWF) level and/or function is altered in von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common heritable bleeding disorder worldwide. Laboratory assessment of VWF is continually evolving. Historically, the primary method for the assessment of VWF platelet-binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). Contemporary alternative measures of VWF platelet-binding activity include VWF:GPIbR (recombinant; using ristocetin), VWF:GPIbM (recombinant; gain-of-function mutant), and monoclonal antibody. Recently, the American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Federation of Hemophilia collaboration issued guidelines recommending the use of newer assays of VWF platelet-binding activity (VWF: GPIbM, VWF: GPIbR) over VWF:RCo, given known limitations of the VWF:RCo assay. Despite this recommendation, the newer VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR assays are not United States Food and Drug Administration cleared, limiting their availability in the United States. We sought to assess assay utilization trends, agreement of VWF testing methods, and imprecision of VWF testing (based on assigned sample type) from the College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Surveys. The analysis confirms that, while VWF antigen testing has low imprecision, the various VWF activity assays have significant interassay variability, with VWF:RCo showing greater imprecision than the newer GPIb-binding assays. The overall trends in assay utilization reflect the barriers to complete compliance with modern VWD diagnostic guidelines in North America.

AbstractVon Willebrand factor (VWF) level and/or function is altered in von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common heritable bleeding disorder worldwide. Laboratory assessment of VWF is continually evolving. Historically, the primary method for the assessment of VWF platelet-binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). Contemporary alternative measures of VWF platelet-binding activity include VWF:GPIbR (recombinant; using ristocetin), VWF:GPIbM (recombinant; gain-of-function mutant), and monoclonal antibody. Recently, the American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Federation of Hemophilia collaboration issued guidelines recommending the use of newer assays of VWF platelet-binding activity (VWF: GPIbM, VWF: GPIbR) over VWF:RCo, given known limitations of the VWF:RCo assay. Despite this recommendation, the newer VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR assays are not United States Food and Drug Administration cleared, limiting their availability in the United States. We sought to assess assay utilization trends, agreement of VWF testing methods, and imprecision of VWF testing (based on assigned sample type) from the College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing Surveys. The analysis confirms that, while VWF antigen testing has low imprecision, the various VWF activity assays have significant interassay variability, with VWF:RCo showing greater imprecision than the newer GPIb-binding assays. The overall trends in assay utilization reflect the barriers to complete compliance with modern VWD diagnostic guidelines in North America.

AbstractHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is suspected much more often than it is confirmed. Technically simple platelet factor 4 (PF4)-polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are sensitive but nonspecific. In contrast, accurate functional tests such as the serotonin release assay, heparin-induced platelet activation assay, and PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay require fresh platelets and have complex assay end points, limiting their availability to specialized reference laboratories. To enable broad deployment of functional testing, we sought to extend platelet viability significantly by optimizing storage conditions and developed a simple functional assay end point by measuring the release of a platelet α-granule protein, thrombospondin-1 (TSP1), in an ELISA format. Platelet cryopreservation conditions were optimized by freezing platelets at controlled cooling rates that preserve activatability. Several-month-old cryopreserved platelets were treated with PF4 or heparin and were evaluated for their ability to be activated by HIT and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) antibodies in the TSP1 release assay (TRA). HIT and spontaneous HIT patient samples induced significantly higher TSP1 release using both PF4-treated (PF4-TRA) and heparin-treated cryopreserved platelets relative to samples from patients suspected of HIT who lacked platelet-activating antibodies. This latter group included several patients that tested strongly positive in PF4-polyanion ELISA but were not platelet-activating. Four VITT patient samples tested in the TRA activated PF4-treated, but not heparin-treated, cryopreserved platelets, consistent with recent data suggesting the requirement for PF4-treated platelets for VITT antibody detection. These findings have the potential to transform the testing paradigm in HIT and VITT, making decentralized, technically simple functional testing available for rapid and accurate in-hospital diagnosis.

AbstractThe current study was approached with the assumption that response to induction chemotherapy, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), overshadows pre‐treatment risk variables in predicting survival and therefore be used as an anchor for a simplified risk model. We considered 759 intensively‐treated patients with AML, not promyelocytic: median age 60 years; primary 66%, secondary 25%, and therapy‐related 9%; European LeukemiaNet cytogenetic risk category favorable 8%, intermediate 61%, and adverse 31%. Complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery was achieved in 608 (80%) patients. After a median follow‐up of 22 months, 503 deaths, 272 relapses, and 257 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (AHSCTs) were recorded. Multivariable analysis identified failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 3.8, 95% CI 3.1–4.8), adverse karyotype (2.2, 1.8–2.8), and age >55 years (2.1, 1.6–2.7) as main risk factors for survival. HR‐weighted scoring resulted in four‐tiered risk stratification: low (0 points; N = 183), intermediate‐1 (1 point; N = 331), intermediate‐2 (2 points; N = 117), and high (≥3 points; N = 128), with respective median survival (5‐year rate) not reached (68%), 34 (37%), 13 (20%), and 5 (5%) months (p < .001). FLT3‐ITD mutation was associated with inferior survival in intermediate‐1 (p = .004) and TP53 in intermediate‐2 (p = .06) and high (p = .02) risk disease; the latter was fully accounted for by the close association between TP53 mutation and complex/monosomal karyotype while the observations regarding FLT3‐ITD were not affected by treatment with midostaurin. AHSCT had a favorable impact on survival, most apparent in intermediate‐1 (p < .001), intermediate‐2 (p = .03), and high (p = .01) risk disease. The proposed 3‐factor survival model offers a novel prototype that is amenable to further enhancement by molecular information and was validated in an external cohort of 1032 intensively‐treated AML patients.

Abstract Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CKD4/6i) have demonstrated clinical utility extending progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for advanced hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer patients. The efficacy in early-stage breast cancer (eBC) is unclear, with conflicting results from adjuvant CDK4/6i trials on invasive disease-free survival. Thus, there is a critical need to identify biomarkers of response (BoR) to determine which, if any, eBC patients could benefit from this treatment. This BoR could also stratify advanced BC patients for likelihood to respond to CDK4/6i. Metabolism is influenced by both genome and environment, and changes in the metabolome can be correlated with drug responsiveness. Thus, metabolite BoRs may serve to identify eBC patients for which CDK4/6i would offer a therapeutic benefit.Methods: Plasma and serum samples from 50 early-stage ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients, treated with neoadjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (palbo) and aromatase inhibitor (AI) anastrozole on NeoPalAna trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01723774), were collected from treatment-naïve patients (BL) and 3 consecutive time points: anastrozole,1 mg daily for 4 weeks (C1D1), anastrozole plus palbo,125 mg daily, for 15 days (C1D15), and for 4-5 months before surgery (SURG). Metabolites were extracted from all samples via methanol and chloroform precipitation and quantified using an unbiased, non-destructive, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based profiling platform (Olaris®, Inc., Waltham, MA). Statistical analysis and machine learning was used to identify differential metabolites and generate predictive models. A separate validation set of samples was collected from a subset of patients (N=6) who received an additional cycle of palbo treatment prior to surgery to assess model accuracy. Results: Non-parametric differential expression analysis of BL/C1D1, BL/C1D15, and C1D1/C1D15 identified 53 ,97, and 90 differential NMR resonances in plasma (p&lt;0.05) and 36, 34, and 25 differential NMR resonances in serum (p&lt;0.05), respectively. Based on the proliferative marker Ki67 levels at C1D15, 37 patients were classified as responders (Ki67≤2.7%) and 6 patients as non-responders (Ki67&gt;2.7%). Analysis of the responder (R) and non-responder (NR) groups identified that 13 plasma and 14 serum resonances (21 unique resonances and 6 overlapping) were differentially expressed (p&lt;0.05) at C1D1. Many of the differential resonances could be mapped back to amino acid metabolites including several branched chain amino acids such as leucine, valine, and isoleucine, and positively charged amino acids such as lysine. A Olaris® BoR score was generated using 5 differential resonances that had an AUC of 0.931 (training set) and 100% accuracy when predicting palbo-response in a blinded test set (N=6).Conclusion: The differential metabolites identified from matching plasma and serum samples suggest that, compared to serum, plasma has a better representation of the metabolic changes associated with palbo treatment-response. While comparing samples from R and NR patients, amino acids were found to be consistently altered in both serum and plasma before palbo treatment. In addition, a BoR model based on select metabolites could precisely stratify palbo-response in a blinded dataset. A larger independent validation cohort is ongoing. Citation Format: Chen Dong, Shana Thomas, Chandrashekhar Honrao, Leonardo O. Rodrigues, Nathalie Tessier, Bo Zhang, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Brenda J. Ernst, Karen S. Anderson, Mateusz Opyrchal, Foluso Ademuyiwa, Lindsay L. Peterson, Matthew P. Goetz, Donald Northfelt, Elizabeth O'Day, Cynthia Ma. Identifying a metabolite signature that correlates with tumor proliferation in early-stage breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors from matched plasma and serum samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-20.

AbstractHospitalized patients with COVID‐19 infection frequently have coagulopathy resembling disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). An elevation of D‐dimer level is associated with a poor prognosis; however, the role of other fibrin degradation products, such as soluble fibrin monomers (SFMC), is not known.The objective of the study was to investigate the frequency and prognostic role of elevated SFMC in patients with COVID‐19. In this retrospective cohort study, patients hospitalized between April 1, 2020 and December 14, 2020 at Mayo Clinic with COVID‐19 infection who underwent DIC panel testing were identified. Results of laboratory tests and outcomes (thrombosis and death) within 40 days of testing were obtained via medical record review.Of 108 patients, D‐dimer was elevated in 82 (75.9%) patients. Of those with elevated D‐dimer, SFMC was elevated in 19/82 (23%) patients. There were 16 thrombotic events and 16 deaths during the 40‐day follow‐up. The incidence of overt‐DIC was 4.6%. In univariate analysis, D‐dimer ≥5 x highest upper limit normal (ULN) and elevated SFMC were each associated with higher 40‐day mortality. However, when used in combination with D‐dimer ≥5 x highest ULN, an elevated SFMC provided no further mortality predictive value.Compared to 75.9% of patients with elevated D‐dimers, of those tested, only 23% had elevated SFMC. These results support the hypothesis that elevated D‐dimer in COVID‐19 infection is a direct consequence of endothelial damage and not overt‐DIC.